The best knot to use (in my opinion) for fastening two strings together
is a variation of the surgeons knot (basically a reef knot but passing
both loose ends through on the second time). I've used this for years
for mending broken strings on guitars, attaching kite lines, fishing
lines, hemp thread for leather work and pretty well anything that needs
joining one string to another and works with different thickness too.
It won't work on very thick stings (like cello) but it's a secure not
(the harder you pull, the tighter it gets and can be cut right up to the
knot and it doesn't snap the strings).
To tie:
Take the two lengths and do a right over left (like tying a shoelace)
then left over right (like tying a reef/granny knot) but also run the
other loose end through as well so you get a double twist. (The usual
surgeon's not has the double twist first). It doesn't slip and is a very
secure knot to use.
Colin Hill
On 25/04/2014 22:07, Arle Lommel wrote:
> Others have answered your question about string types, but to answer
> your other question about modifications there is an easy and absolutely
> non-invasive solution to your problem: you can always tie a short
> extension of a lighter string (or even fishing line) to the end of the
> string (really easy with a ball-end string if you have one) and then run
> that through the tailpiece. It needs to be short, but as long as you
> don’t have the silk overwound part of the string past the bridge, you’ll
> be fine.
>
> If you have a ball-end you simply feed the light string through ball and
> then feed /both/ ends of the lighter string through the hole in the tail
> piece and knot them as appropriate after they are through the hole. If
> that doesn’t make sense, let me know and I can make you a drawing (it’s
> super simple).
>
> The best knots to do this depend on the type of string end (and string
> material) you’re dealing with, but as long as you can securely grab the
> string with your lighter piece of string and run the extension through
> the tailpiece, you should be fine. I’ve done this a number of times with
> no problem.
>
> I’d also second the recommendations for octave tuning. My own instrument
> has three chanterelles, and is tuned g g’ d’’. I don’t use the d’’ very
> much, but the combination of all three sounds fantastic for certain
> kinds of music. (I did an arrangement of Granados’ Spanish Dance No. 2
> where the three together is just fantastic). In my playing I tend to
> treat the different chanter strings the way an organist would treat
> different stops: by selecting them I have up to seven timbre
> combinations I can use for different things.
>
> Best,
>
> Arle
>
> On 2014 Apr 25, at 19:28 , Norm Sohl <
no...@sohl.com
> <mailto:
no...@sohl.com>> wrote:
>
>> I've always treasured this list in particular as a source of excellent
>> technical advice - so here is a technical question.
>> My instrument is currently tuned G/C with the two chanters tuned to
>> the typical g’. Since one of the chanters broke, I’ve been thinking
>> of replacing it with a string that would sound an octave below the g’
>> to get a richer sound.
>> so far the viola string I purchased is too large to fit in the
>> tailpiece, and I am reluctant to enlarge the hole without further
>> discussion of the topic - so, what do you all think? Is this a
>> reasonable modification, are there good strings I should be
>> considering, are there better ways to get a lower sound (like a
>> different tuning entirely)?
>> Sent from Windows Mail
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG -
www.avg.com <
http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 2012.0.2247 / Virus Database: 3722/6893 - Release Date: 04/25/14
> <mailto:
hurdygurdy+...@googlegroups.com>.
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG -
www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2247 / Virus Database: 3722/6893 - Release Date: 04/25/14