Re: Regenerating configure using a newer version of autoconf. (issue 598002)

4 views
Skip to first unread message

ma...@chromium.org

unread,
May 21, 2013, 3:24:53 PM5/21/13
to ivan....@gmail.com, jessicag...@gmail.com, ted.mie...@gmail.com, google-br...@googlegroups.com, re...@breakpad-hr.appspotmail.com
Why? Do you have another change to configure coming and you want to
minimize the diffs?

https://breakpad.appspot.com/598002/

the...@chromium.org

unread,
May 21, 2013, 3:45:02 PM5/21/13
to ivan....@gmail.com, ma...@chromium.org, jessicag...@gmail.com, ted.mie...@gmail.com, google-br...@googlegroups.com, re...@breakpad-hr.appspotmail.com
On 2013/05/21 19:24:53, Mark Mentovai wrote:
> Why? Do you have another change to configure coming and you want to
minimize the
> diffs?

FYI, Ubuntu Linux 12.04 comes with Autoconf 2.68. In the rare case where
someone on Linux needs to update the configure file, they'd have to go
out of their way to get a copy of 2.65, since there's no prebuilt
package for that version, or update the configure script with a new
version of autoconf at that point.

https://breakpad.appspot.com/598002/

ma...@chromium.org

unread,
May 21, 2013, 3:48:37 PM5/21/13
to ivan....@gmail.com, jessicag...@gmail.com, ted.mie...@gmail.com, the...@chromium.org, google-br...@googlegroups.com, re...@breakpad-hr.appspotmail.com
It’s fine if we need to update it, I was just asking what the motivation
was. This file has been generated by different versions in the past
(recently, 2.65, 2.68, and 2.69), and if there was a problem with any
specific version, I wanted to know about it so we could require people
to not use that version to generate configure.

If we do update configure, we should also update the other autotools
files, including aclocal.m4 and everything in the autotools directory.
“autoreconf -i”.

https://breakpad.appspot.com/598002/
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages