http://bit.ly/9qvkji
What I like about the chart thus far is 15 trading sessions with not
one of them seemingly in negative territory. If you can keep this up
it would indicate engineered trades as opposed to gambling. But we
don't know the history of the trades which is acceptable if you don't
want your method reverse engineered. There are large trading gaps
which probably means you kept losing positions having large equity
draw-downs for days on end. This would be a negative sign because the
longer a trade takes to become a winning trade , the more the "random
luck" factor increases.
We need a fair trade-off between preventing the reverse engineering of
a method and demonstrating engineered trades. Between 31 Aug and 10
Sept we have a large trading gap, which most likely indicates losing
trades, or winning trades that you allowed to rally with the trend.
Thus that trading gap must display the equity, we could compress those
ten days into a single day with a different color such as blue for
positive equity or red for negative equity.
You also need to show the balance and actual profit made if you want
to have PAMM investors. I would say an account should be at least
$2000 to reflect the psychological effect of making gains as well as
losses that are material. Making one penny on an Oanda sub-account of
$100 is good for testing a method but meaningless in the real-world
where you would have to deal with real people who's $5000, $2000 or
$10000 you would be trading.
Best of luck, I will be following your account with interest and think
of ways to provide us with more insight into the risk your trades
incur without having to reveal your method or history of actual
trades .