PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY STINKING WORTHLESS PEDOPHILE, GET OUT! 11.02.08 12.03.07
Anonymous
THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- YOU FILTHY SON OF A BITCH PEDOPHILE, GET OUT!
PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY STINKING HUMAN MAGGOT PEDOPHILE, GET OUT!
PATRICK PARIS -- WORTHLESS PIECE OF GARBAGE, GET OUT YOU STINKING PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- YOU FILTHY STINKING PIECE OF SHIT PEDOPHILE GET OUT!
wrote:
> IOW, can someone that officially doesn't/didn't exist have affiliation
> with anyone or anything?
I mean: Can an organization that doesn't exist have employees? Watched a
documentary on Area 51 today..
Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- GET THE FUCK OUT YOU HATEFUL STINKING SCUMBAG PEDOPHILE! 11.02.08 12.03.07
In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>,
Eelbash Admin<Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> It is simple: with Frog retiring, there are only 2, possibly 3, adult
> remailer operators left. I decided to do my bit for a responsible and
> adult remailer system by running Bushwa.
>
In addition to *this* arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for
the delisting of Austria and Dizum. He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the rest of us.
Yes, those actually were his reasons.
This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
political correctness.
Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years"
(a blatant,bald-faced LIE).
So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".
He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.
So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.
His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above.
If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring
and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run.
The ones we know about are:
eelbash
axloltl
axolotl2
cheshire
congo
bog
bogg
eelbash (again)
bushwa
greatwall
asmodeus
parsifal
eelbash (again!)
eelbash (again!!)
Last time it took 10 days between announcing his triumphant return,
and having to close down for ADMITTING that he was reading
people's posts and emails AGAIN.
Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY SYPHILITIC PERVERT, GET OUT PEDOPHILE! 11.02.08 12.03.07
Jonathan Sturges <SturgesJo...@rindmail.fedreau.to> wrote:
> >
On the other hand, what you want to blow up a 50+ page website. He on a solid re-mailer. Entry and exit.
> > Can you read this?
>
> The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post anonymously are using more sophisticated methods for communicating, like embedding such encrypted messages into JPG files of pastoral landscapes.
>
> >
> > Olny srmat poelpe can.
> >
> > cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was
They also tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa". He was busted.
> > rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a
> > rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr
> > the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the
> > frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl
> > mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae
> > the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as
> > a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was
> > ipmorantt!
>
> I'll give that a go this weekend. Gotta go to the seeming discrepency. The whole concept of a way to avoid his history of the best ways to discourage unwanted posting through his remailer was cut off from the entry remailer. The exit remailer seems more of an issue as this is exactly what will happen, but I can counter with a quick "Well, if you are participating.
>
> >
> >
>
>
I read apas once a week and get back to an address at the site about him? After nearly pissing my pants in the manner that it's capstring suggested.
>
>
>
>
>
>