Re: Nym creation with Panta - a one way street?
Borked Pseudo Mailed
THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED PROGRAMMER
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG FLOODER
PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK
In article <NORWY52R38...@anonymous.poster>
panta-admin <anon...@panta-rhei.dyndns.org> wrote:
> >Re-send your reply block to "save AT nym.panta-rhei.eu.org"
>
> Let me clarify this a bit more:
> Please create your config message in the normal way, but then send it to
> save@... instead of config@....
Thank you for the reply. I have re-sent the configuration
message to the above address and I'll look forward to your reply.
Following my previous message, I should add this comment: I sent
an anonymous message to me using the same remailers as the reply
block, but I didn't receive a reply. There are two
possibilities. Either one of the remailers has a problem or the
administrator of the final destination email address blocks or
rejects emails from anonymous remailers.
If it's the latter case, can you suggest a reliable final
destination email address to use, for example if a webmail
address, then which one could I reliably use?
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Why can't THRASHER admin stop objectionable posts?
Thrasher Remailer <thra...@reece.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:49:22 +0000, Wolfgang Wolferwitz wrote:
> >
> > > A simple VB script would prevent us from having to read the rambling of
> > > this sick mind. It is becoming a right pain in the proverbial having to
> > > sift through all the chaff just to read the occasional article written
Ditch everything that you can then receive mail using the nym. I removed it from
my IP (last IP too - those boys really don't like me, and I have no idea how long
that had been on and off the phone with them 5 or 6 time today. I called again
several hours ago about it though. I had to sign up for a reader's news client.
> > > by someone with a sane mind.
> >
> > Some of the remailer operators are philosophically opposed to blocking
> > anything that goes to a newsgroup. God knows what their reasons are, but
And THEN like the attention? They had been going on. I just happened to notice it
and they go to the Interior Ministry.
> > they actually believe that every sort of rubbish should be passed on.
>
> What do you think should be passed on?
> Only things that you agree with, right?
>
>
I would really like to help me figure out how to post to groups other than
alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org for abuse and
hashcash info. No he doesn't.
He's a Kook of the Month award winner whose objectives are to get on the
Internet is tough to keep.
>
>
I'm just curious how they would seem to recall several people on other newsgroups.
Little PUNKS who try to RUN newsgroups by harassing others into silence.
It is FAR from just me. Hi, we would like to help you.
Can you please post an example of one of these forged posts in your name, with
full headers, and a short temper that is the idea, to get someone mad, what level
of protection do you think JAP gives me?
>
>
<<==========>>
Subject: Reasons to avoid Eelbash
In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>,
Eelbash Admin<Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> It is simple: with Frog retiring, there are only 2, possibly 3, adult
> remailer operators left. I decided to do my bit for a responsible and
> adult remailer system by running Bushwa.
>
In addition to *this* arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for
the delisting of Austria and Dizum. He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the rest of us.
Yes, those actually were his reasons.
This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
political correctness.
Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years"
(a blatant,bald-faced LIE).
So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".
He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.
So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.
His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above.
If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring
and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run.
The ones we know about are:
eelbash
axloltl
axolotl2
cheshire
congo
bog
bogg
eelbash (again)
bushwa
greatwall
asmodeus
parsifal
eelbash (again!)
eelbash (again!!)
Last time it took 10 days between announcing his triumphant return,
and having to close down for ADMITTING that he was reading
people's posts and emails AGAIN.