Re: What Did He Do?
Anonymous
THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- SYPHILITIC PERVERT
PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED PROGRAMMER
PATRICK PARIS -- MAKE YOUR PANTIES PUBLIC
In <C1HYY73H3864...@reece.net.au>, anon...@invalid.com wrote:
>Anonymous <anon...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <43597cbd$0$11078$e4fe...@news.xs4all.nl>
>> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>> > Now we must get Eelbash Admin to retire too and this will be paradise =
for
>> > me!
>>=20
>> Eelbash must not retire! He is the single most entertaining person in
>
>Fl.general is one of the country, without ever underestimating reasonably
>reliable reports of specific threats," said Mr. Pisanu in a Sept. 29 inter=
view
>with Finmeccanica Magazine. Pisanu has also called for developing sophisti=
cated
>technology to combat terror on Italian soil.=20
>
>> here although he doesn't intend to be.
>
>Now all my nyms are getting repeat messages which are months old, from sev=
eral
>sources for JBN or QS? I was able to enjoy APA-S now..=20
>
>>=20
>> I read apas once a week and get great amusement out of reading
>
>Thomas Paine and his "Common Sense" is a complete fabrication of your witt=
le
>mind, Wittle Jeffrey.
And if you cant manage to wank better than that, here goes the chain on the=
rest of your childish performance.
>Yikes!=A0=A0I=A0just=A0had=A0a=A0horrible=A0thought.=A0=A0What=A0if=A0you=
=A0should=A0procreate?=A0=A0I would
>think the result would be nothing new or
>different.=A0=A0If=A0this=A0wasn't=A0the=A0option,=A0something=A0else=A0 w=
ould be.=20
Pathetic really, even you should be able to bullshit better than that boy. =
If you enrol in a course in wanking, anyway.
>> Eelbash's silly ideas for censoring (sorry I mean "stopping the
>> psychos"). I also enjoy reading his sock puppets where he tries to
>> pretend he's someone else that just happens to think and talk exactly
>> like him.
>>=20
>
>I think someone who is interested in privacy is a role model for me. A few=
of
>the best technological applications," Pisanu affirmed. As a result, Pisanu=
has
>formed the Strategic Anti-terrorism Analysis Committee, which aims to exam=
ine
>and take action against all terror threats. Due to new measures, more than=
a
>little by providing a low latency.=20
Dunno, only summary execution of all the thieving povs using stolen mobile =
phones is likely to help and I dont think thats legal anymore.
>> He is my internet soap opera. Eelbash must stay.
You get to like that or lump it. Thats the way we do it here.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:30:37 -0800, nonalt wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Nov 2005, Eelbash Admin <ad...@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>>7 years running remailers; 30 years programming while also running a
>>business; 3 years in the army conducting electronic warfare against the
>>commies. What's not to trust?
>
> YOU. More lies. Whatever happened to the story about running remailers
> for 15 years, before they even existed. Oh, wait, you were busted and
> publicly branded a "LIAR". So now you bump it down to 7 years. Gotcha.
Of course I was lying about running a remailer for 15 years. I have
enough respect for the intelligence of my readers to know that they would
know there were no remailers 15 years ago; I just thought that people
would have enough of a sense of humor to get a laugh out of such a
ludicrous claim.
Even 7 years may be a bit of an exaggeration - there have been so many
remailers it's hard to remember - maybe 7 years - could be; maybe 6 -
something like that anyway.
> 30 years programming, yeah, right. I know for a fact where you got the
> base VB module you've been dicking around with. Care to share with the
> group, liar?
Sure. I programmed COBOL and a little PL-1, and even a touch of Assembler,
for 30 years, along with a couple of scripting languages - nothing like VB
(CLIST and REXX to be exact), taught myself the rudiments of visual basic
in the 1990s, and am still at the rudimentary stage.
I guess I've gone as far as I'll go with it, given my decreasing desire to
become more competent in it, let alone the actuarial tables.
By the way, 30 years ago VB did not exist, though you don't seem to have
known that.
The base VB modules you are talking about, though you don't know you are
talking about them, came from Frog Admin's site. I used them to do the
basic I/O and picked up other things from them.
The base VB module you *think* you are talking about was emailed to me by
the Dingo admin. I glanced at it, and realized it would be more work than
I wanted to do to adapt my rudimentary VB knowledge to the way Dingo admin
had coded his module (his was much superior to my klunky stuff, I might
add), so, other than glancing at it, I never used it, and have long since
discarded it.
Listen, this remailer stuff is just a hobby when you come right down to
it; don't waste your indignation on something so piddly.
I admit that's advice I also need to take on occasion, but it's much more
important for you to accept it.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again
On 9 Nov 2005, Anonymous <Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1]> wrote:
>In article <ON39M7SC3866...@twistycreek.com>
>Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (Howard) wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 08 Nov 2005, Eelbash Admin <ad...@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> BTW, twisty was concerned with altering the content of mail, not the issue
>> >> of permitting floods.
>> >
>> >No kidding? I could have sworn he blocked me because I announced I had put
>> >in filters to block floods - nothing about altering the content of mail
>> >
>> >Maybe twisty misunderstood what he read. Or did I phrase it confusingly?
>> >
>> >Well, here it is again:
>> >
>> >Agressive flood filters are in place. If you send too many messages
>> >in too rapid succession to the same email address or newsgroup, some
>> >of them may not make it. Sorry about that, but, the psychos have
>> >been busy and I am sure you will understand the need to keep them
>> >from disrupting newsgroups or preying on individuals
>> >
>> >
>> >I don't see anything there that talks about altering the content of email,
>> >but that's the notice that twisty reacted to.
>> >
>>
>> I happen to be a close friend of twisty. You can tell by my other posts
>> today. Here is what my friend wrote:
>
>Cool it. You are sounding suspiciously like a sock puppet.
I caught holy hell last night. My lips are sealed.
Howard M.