Greetings Jennifer (and all my other friends in the world of Fiber!)
I live in Juneau, AK, and I work for the University here in town. When
the Google RFI came around I volunteered to be on our city and
borough's committee to inform the public of what exactly Gigabit fiber
really means on a person to person basis. Pretty much I went to all
the meetings, asked good questions, and sat at a booth to make certain
that someone who knows how to talk tech and just plain talk would be
present. You know how it goes when you have varied interests and high
hopes, right?
I'm one of those "idea guys" that likes to come up with ideas and
share them whenever possible. I hope that you don't mind hearing from
another IT guy. I don't have much Fiber experience, but my friends
back home released a fiber product a few years back, and it's really
nice. I tired out my mother-in-laws fiber connection when I visited
Las Vegas and the house I was staying at had it. For a nerd and a
gamer there's nothing better than fiber.
Yet I know that data compression mechanics are advancing by leaps and
bounds. I just googled up this article:
http://broadcastengineering.com/digital_handbook/broadcasting_hdtv_data_multiplexing_5/
and noticed this tidbit:
"By using 64-QAM and 256-QAM digital modulation, cable system
operators can choose from maximum data rates of 27.7Mb/s or 38.8Mb/s,
respectively. With some judicious bit-rate compression, it is possible
to put 10 standard-definition HD programs, each with 2.7Mb/s data
rates, in a single 64-QAM channel. Pull out the ol' calculator, and
you'll see that two off-air HD broadcasts and a pair of SDTV programs
can be packed into a 38.8Mb/s 256-QAM payload."
That says to me that all the TV and TV-like data I would ever need
will be able to be pushed in under 100MB. That's the limit of my
Ethernet card anyway. I guess need to come up with 900Mb/s of more
cooliness, if we're implying that homes themselves will be fit with
gigabit direct connections to the next choke point. What I'm really
saying is that with common technology the everyday person may be less
inclined to notice that they are on fiber instead of cable or DSL. My
buddy (who was on dial-up) complains about the new faster data service
for connectivity and other issues that he never had on his 56k
connection (that is this year, btw). Things like still being able to
be on the internet when the cable goes out, but I digress.
So when I talk to everyday people, I find that they are almost
exclusively interested in how the existing service could be improved.
Under that idea they often only speak on the matter of cost of
service, and things that would affect the day to day when I sat at the
booth. Yet my mind and heart really listened to the more or less
simple ideas that came before me as I discussed with people how they
use data.
If we're trying to be really creative here, then we can start talking
about what needs could be met as an idle concern, I mean... faster is
cool for us gamers, but I don't think gaming is the dominant use for
the rest of the members of the community. All the little things that
could simply be done away with in an environment where fiber is run
everywhere, would also be really interesting. I can't really say what
we would entirely do away with, but the magnitude of the use of copper
may be changed, the amount of electricity should be substantially
decreased, and perhaps the cost of adding new lines may change. Heck,
I would like to see data caps go away, or become substantially larger.
Think about groups of terminals, like we find in any library, publicly
available with limited access, a timeout, and a mechanism for allowing
people to "use the internet, right quick." Wyse terminals that are
like the old telephone booths.
If we have something like terminal booths, we might as well put a
"public wifi" point right on top of it. If I'm really reaching it
could be common for people to have public wifi points in there homes,
now that they don't need to be concerned with the amount of data going
to the home.
I try not to focus on the big parts of the data throughput, because if
we're sending CT scans and the like out of town, it won't be in the
town that benefits. Though local doctor's offices could get more
immediate results from CT scans, Sonagrams, or any other digital
videography that is found to be useful produced at our towns only
hospital. I would like to see "small-time" applications, like having
an HD video call going out of your home to your local doctor 30 to 60
minutes away. I think of my elderly friends that would rather not
spend an hour round-trip driving, sit in the waiting room and patient
room, waiting for the doctor to be available, just to fulfill a
regular checkup. Of course if something needs physically to be
inspected, then definitely go on in, but if you're just going in to
talk to the doctor over a follow-up, then why not video chat from home
and have your prescriptions automatically ordered at the end of the
call?
I like local businesses. It's always great when they prosper, but in
the internet age it's always easy to find someone who is underselling
the locals. Here in Juneau we have a pretty large shipping cost to
contend with as well. Local businesses need simple things that will
allow patrons to feel as though they are getting what they pay for
when they pay more for local, other than supporting another local
individual. Imagine if it were common to set up a list of purchases
that you want to make from home, and it was delivered directly to a
local provider. In larger cities people can do this no big deal, order
pizza online, buy products from Macy's online, contact big companies
that have stores in the big city, and have little to no trouble. If
big data is common, then every ma and pa shop could just pay for a
local service that processes remote requests, because interfacing with
the internet is what is becoming the common behavior. Maybe such a
practice would spawn other small delivery companies that help save gas
in a community (a concern anywhere that has to ship in fuel and other
resources.)
I know this is barely worth mentioning, but having fiber to the home
would presumably make it easier to make use of monitorable devices.
Things like smart homes where the lights (and other electronically
monitored objects) are able to be controlled remotely. Though the
bandwidth required is small if there were 10,000 homes in a city
equipped with smart tech the whole city itself will save on power by
simply making informed decisions based on the data from your home and
guidance from the local electric company.
I believe that the fiber industry will allow us to inch towards
community data storage centers. Instead of sending data all over the
world, why not simply send your data to the local community data
center, and allow the companies to create products that benefit from
such a design. Traditionally there are 2 data centers to promote
redundancy, but perhaps as a society we will start storing a flikr
cache at our 'home' datacenter, and flikr will duplicate the data
during non-peak hours using their own personal data storage
procedures.
Community Data Centers very quickly leads into cloud computing, cloud
storage, and the idea of terminal use becomes more palatable. If we
have a cloud computing design supported by a fiber network we could
easily see people using the box that supplies service as a simple
terminal. Say you were able to check your email on your TV through
your cable box. Or say you are browsing the internet, and want to
switch over to Video On Demand through your DSL provider using such a
terminal. Either seems possible if fiber is the carrier. Only service
matters if "all wires are equal."
Did I mention that I volunteer with a middle school technology club? I
schedule 45 minutes just to drive out there (round trip), and then
another 1:15 minutes for Tech Club. I would love to see such an idea
expanded to where I could go to multiple schools through the week, and
a local video conference between multiple schools and the tech club
would be great. I could go personally to 5 schools for the after
school program, and the students would have a resource available in
person, and among each other! Technology is pretty hands on, and
sometimes we need to tear things apart (for the fun of learning), but
if I could show one school, "refresh" the next school, and work my way
through the schools, then by the end of the week they would feel like
they had 5 days of tech club, and the sick kids that would miss out
wouldn't have to miss much. Especially if each session were recorded
at each school, or in a cloud with at least one backup!
To me, the idea isn't about how we can reach the outside world faster
and better, but how we can reach each other better. In a time when
we're moving towards a truly global community, people sometimes feel
alienated and anonymous. If our entire 'net' culture were reminded
that we are all still people with common needs, and focus on meeting
those common needs, then our Technology may have the opportunity to
reflect that everywhere.
Hey, I really appreciate the time to get all this off my chest. I
really like to talk about where we could go with Fiber, and I love
hearing new ideas. Keep up the great work!
-jjj
Jeremy Johnson
Nerdly Volunteer Idea Guy