Source of Consciousness.

6 views
Skip to first unread message

sadovnik socratus

unread,
Dec 14, 2011, 11:40:33 PM12/14/11
to Epistemology
Source of Consciousness.
Will Physics explain Consciousness?
=.
Does evolution begin on big bang level?
Does evolution begin on the quarks level?
In our earthly world there is only one fundamental
particle - electron
Does evolution begin on the electron’s level?
Can an electron evolve?
Does an electron have consciousness ?
At first glance this seems to be a rather senseless questions.
But . . . . .
Energy is electromagnetic waves (em).
In 1904 Lorentz proved: there isn’t em waves without Electron
It means the source of these em waves must be an Electron
The electron and the em waves they are physical reality
Can evolution of life begin on electron’s level?
We say: Molecular biology & molecular evolution,
Cosmology & cosmic evolution.
If Universe evolve can electron evolve too ?
Does evolution of life begin on electron level ?
Origin of life is a result of physical laws that govern Universe
Electron takes important part in this work
Question:
Why does the simplest particle - electron have six ( 6 ) formulas:
E=h*f, e = +ah*c, e = -ah*c, +E=Mc^2, -E=Mc^2, E= ∞ ?
Nobody knows
Question:
Why does electron obey five ( 5) Laws ?
a) Law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass
b) Maxwell’s equations
c) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / Law
d) Pauli Exclusion Principle/ Law
e) Fermi-Dirac statistics
Nobody knows.
====.
Quote by Heinrich Hertz on Maxwell's equations:

"One cannot escape the feeling that these mathematical formulae
have an independent existence and an intelligence of their own,
that they are wiser than we are, wiser even than their discoverers,
that we get more out of them than was originally put into them."
====.
Ladies and Gentlemen !
Friends !
Electron is not as simple as we think and, maybe, he is wiser than we
are.
==========.
Once again: Brain and Electron.
Human brain works on two levels:
consciousness and subconsciousness. The neurons of brain
create these two levels. So, that it means consciousness and
subconsciousness from physical point of view ( interaction
between billions and billions neurons ). It can only mean
that the state of neurons in these two situations is different.
How can we understand these different states of neurons?
How does the brain generate consciousness?
We can understand this situation only on the quantum level,
only using Quantum theory. But there isn’t QT without
Quantum of Light and Electron. So, what is interaction between
Quantum of Light, Electron and brain ? Nobody knows.
Therefore I say:
we must understand not only the brain but electron too.
And when we understand the Electron
we will know the Ultimate Nature of Reality.
=================.
According to Pauli Exclusion Principle
only one single electron can be in the atom.
If the atom contains more than one electron
(for example - two), this atom represents " Siamese twins".
Save us, the Great God, of having such atoms, such cells.
And therefore the human brain has only one Electron.
Each of us has an Electron, but we do not know it.
As the ‘Bhagavad Gita’ says:
Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form.
They do not know My transcendental nature and
My supreme dominion over all that be.
/ Chapter 9. Text 11./
#
Where is the root of consciousness?
At what step does consciousness begin?
The consciousness begins on electron’s level.
An electron (quantum of light) has its own initial consciousness.
This consciousness is not rigid, but can develop.
The development of consciousness goes
“from vague wish up to a clear thought” / Veda./
================== .
Best wishes
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
==================.

sadovnik socratus

unread,
Dec 15, 2011, 7:23:43 AM12/15/11
to Epistemology
Could hackers develop a 'computer virus' to infect the human mind?

Synthetic biology is 'out-accelerating evolution' - expert
Bio-crime today is 'like computer crime in the Eighties'
Viruses could be used to influence behaviour - and we
may have to 'learn how to counterattack'
'One of the most powerful technologies in the world'

By Rob Waugh
Last updated at 9:26 AM on 14th December 2011

The field of 'synthetic biology' is in its infancy.
We can 'tweak' the genetics of life forms - but billionaire
entrepreneur Craig Venter only created 'artificial life' for the
first time last year, christening his life form 'Synthia'.
But experts working within the field believe that our expertise
is out-accelerating natural evolution by a factor of millions
of years - and some warn that synthetic biology could spin out of
control.
It could lead, says Andrew Hessel of Singularity University,
on Nasa's research campus, to a world where hackers could engineer
viruses or bacteria to control human minds.
Hessel believes that genetic engineering is the next frontier of
computing.
'This is one of the most powerful technologies in the world,'
says Hessel 'Synthetic biology - the writing of life.'
'I advocate that cells are living computers and DNA is a
programming language.'
'I want to see life programmed and used to solve global challenges
so that humanity can achieve a sustainable relationship within
the biosphere,' he says.It's growing fast. It will grow faster than
computer technologies.'
He predicts a world where we can 'print' DNA, and even 'decode' it.
But he warned, in a speech at technology conference TXM,
that viruses and bacteria send chemicals into human brains – and
could be used to influence, or even 'control' their host.

A literal virus - injected into a 'host' in the guise of a vaccine,
say - could be used to control behaviour.
Hessel warns that we 'may have to learn how to counterattack'
against such weapons.

Security expert Marc Goodman said, 'Synthetic biology will lead
to new forms of bioterrorism,' and said, 'Bio-crime today is akin
to computer crime in the early Eighties, Few initially recognised
the problem - but it grew exponentially.'
When billionaire entrepreneur Craig Venter 'created life' last year
by adding synthetic DNA to a bacteria cell, Professor
Julian Savulescu, an Oxford University ethicist, said:
'Venter is creaking open the most profound door in humanity's
history, potentially peeking into its destiny.This could be used
in the future to make the most powerful bioweapons imaginable.
The challenge is to eat the fruit without the worm.'
Hessel, however, is generally optimistic about the future of synthetic
biology. The scientist - who had a vasectomy because he
'never trusted the process' of natural reproduction, says,
'We are going to make synthetic genomes - human genomes.
It will make cloning look organic. It will make human reproduction
look quaint.'
Computer World blogger Darlene Storm says, 'I know people who
can't even keep their computers protected, updated and patched –
I wonder if they would be more security minded when the
hacking could be lethal?'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2073936/Could-hackers-develop-virus-infect-human-mind.html

Comments (20)
#
Isn't man fantastic, is their no end to man's creation and
manipulation
of the universe. Has he succeeded in becoming like God,
in both creation of the universe from the humble beginnings
of eating the forbidden fruit to this, the ultimate pinnacle
of man's control over the cells, virus and programming of DNA,
isn't it just amazing, we have become like the gods.
- Man, World, 14/12/2011 20:26
#
. . .


awori achoka

unread,
Dec 15, 2011, 7:39:06 AM12/15/11
to episte...@googlegroups.com

Wouldn't be the first time for such experimentation with fate..it usually hits back so fast, we have to scramble for an antidote. The first such human will kill the experimental hacker. I like the idea though.





Strategic visioning and futures.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to episte...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.

sadovnik socratus

unread,
Dec 16, 2011, 3:29:10 AM12/16/11
to Epistemology
Henry Stapp on how Consciousness affects Quantum Mechanics.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZzHgQ4CCW0&feature=youtu.be

sadovnik socratus

unread,
Dec 17, 2011, 1:17:50 AM12/17/11
to Epistemology

Try using QM to explain the "conscious *of* " feature.
I say it's doomed from the start, since consciousness
will always lie outside or beyond its object.
/ Kalkidas /
QM and consciousness may have some deep connection, but it
would take some truly funky mathematics to capture the relation.
/ Craig Franck /
=.
1
We have brushes, paints, canvas - they are tools.
The picture is not created by the paint and brush.
It is result of idea, information, consciousness.
The idea of painting is lie outside or beyond its object.
2
We have atoms, complex atoms.
From them were created everything.
The idea (consciousness) of creating cell, molecules
of DNA, body must lie outside or beyond its object too.
3
Where in the Universe we can find the world which
lie outside or beyond the visual material world?
The Universe as whole is Two - Measured World:
one Reference Frame is the Matter World
and another Reference Frame is the Vacuum World.
But today physicists know the Matter world and refuse to think
and understand the Vacuum world because the Vacuum is
Infinite and Eternal continuum.
Why do physicists refuse to take vacuum as a fundament of Universe?
Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ by Steven Weinberg. Page 138.
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /
4.
We are surrounded by Double Universe.
Quantum Theory says about wave–particle duality.
Our brain works on dualistic basis:
(as a logical consciousness and as an illogical (?) unconsciousness)
There are another kinds of dualities: matter and field,
matter and energy / force, body and mind / consciousness .
We are surrounded by the duality.
=.
Socratus.

sadovnik socratus

unread,
Dec 17, 2011, 10:27:56 AM12/17/11
to Epistemology

Roger Penrose wrote that
‘ the nature of consciousness suggests a quantum process’.
Many biophysicists try to understand the brain’s work using
Quantum theory.
And I ask:
Is it possible to understand brain’s work without electron?
=.
Book ‘The quantum self ’by Danah Zohar.
#
Physicist and photon are involved in a creative dialogue . . .
/ page 29/
‘. . . there is a vital link between thought processes and
quantum processes, between ourselves and electrons’.
/ page 59/
‘. . . the philosophical and psychological consequences
of such a close bond between the dinamics of the self
and those of the electron’
/ page 60/
Oxford’s Roger Penrose: ‘ Quantum physics . . . quantum
correlations could be playing an operative role over large
regions of the brain’.
/ page 61 /
‘ . . biophysicists . . . discovered that nerve cells in the
human brain are sufficiently sensitive to register the
absorption of a single photon . . .’
/ page 61 /
‘ It was clear in our discussion of the possibility that
electrons might be conscious.
/ page 78 /
‘ . . if electrons are conscious, we then have to say that they
have a mind/ body problem’.
/ page 79 /
‘ Even when disclaimers like ‘very primitive, ‘elementary’
or ‘ proto-‘ are used to discuss the consciousness of
electrons . . . .’.
/ page 79 /
‘ . . . the idea that consciousness itself arises out of a
coherent ordering of virtual photon relationships in the
brain’s quantum system.’
/ page 80 /

‘ Our human consciousness, therefore, is not different
in kind from that associated with more elementary life
forms or with elementary matter, but is different in degree
and complexity.’
/ page 86 /
BTW,
‘ . . . when we speak of consciousness we speak of
‘ property’ . .. . . .at least to some degree. . . ..’
‘ . . .many states and degrees of consciousness. ‘
/ page 37 /

/ Book ‘The quantum self ’ by Danah Zohar. /
==========..

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages