--
Kartik
Variable duty cycle makes things a little more tricky. While designing
your filter, do not design for a cut off of 1kHz. It should be able to
let pass the small "peaks" of the signal when the duty cycle is very
low. So if the minimum duty cycle you wish to pass through the filter
is 10% then you should have a filter cut off frequency suiting a
square wave of period 2*(10% of 1/1kHz). This is vaguely what I
remember as a thumb rule from an elaborate calculation I did before
(and also posted in this forum, if you search through the archives).
--
Siraj
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Sanyam Mulay <sanyam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I checked out (experimentally) simple RC low pass filters.
>>
>> Any better ideas ?
>>
>> Spec. PWM - 1kHz; variable duty cycle; 3.6V peak to peak
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Kartik
>
--
Siraj
--
Siraj
Yeah, even I am curious to know why they are supposed to work better. I have seen colleagues use it on boards for rectification purposes. That's why I suggested him to try "experimentally". Awaiting formal corroboration.
-- Siraj
On Dec 5, 2010 1:14 AM, "Mehul Tikekar" <mehult...@gmail.com> wrote:
Why LR? I thought RC is easier to get.
Mehul
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Siraj Issani <siraj....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> And as the undo ...