Re: If penalised, approach courts in personal capacity, HC tells PIOs
REJIMON C K
If penalised, approach courts in personal capacity, HC tells PIOs
Creating a precedent, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that if the public information officer (PIO) of a department has been penalised by a State Information Commission on account of withholding information, the officer cannot appeal against the order through the state. The court has held that the PIO will have to approach the court in personal capacity.
In one such instance, the High Court has directed the Punjab government to withdraw a petition filed by it on behalf of K B S Sidhu, the then PIO of health department who had challenged a penalty imposed on him by the Punjab State Information Commission. A fine of Rs 25,000 was slapped on Sidhu in 2007 for not supplying information.
Ludhiana-based social activist Kuldip Singh Khaira had sought information under the Right to Information (RTI) Act from the health department with regard to rules drafted by its electro-homoeopathy wing. For not supplying information within the stipulated period, the State Information Commission had slapped a penalty of Rs 25,000 on
Sidhu, who challenged it before the High Court. During the resumed hearing, a single bench of the High Court refused to entertain the petition since the appeal against the penalty was filed by the state.
During the hearing last week, Advocate A P S Shergill, counsel for Khaira, raised the issue that a PIO could not appeal against an order through the state and should rather come in personal capacity. Shergill said the state machinery could not be put to use by a PIO for a penalty or strictures passed against him on account of dereliction
of duty. Finding merit in the contention, the High Court asked the Punjab government to withdraw the petition. Sidhu has been given the liberty to file a fresh petition in personal capacity.
--
REJIMON C K.
Each year 50million trees and 75 billion water is used to create 7 million tonnes of mail, over 40% of which is thrown away unopened. source : National Geographic so the next time you receive paper, think again before you print. choose to receive emails instead .
Mahendra Kumar Gupta
sanjay baranwal
A majority of RTI applications do not get appropriate replies and hence deserve a reprimand/penalty by Information commissioners.
Regards
Sanjay
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 08:11:26 +0530 wrote
>this is certainly a good judgement and repurcussion. many cases could be rejected by Govt employees especially the DDA/MCD keep filing cases of thieir negligences in the courts. I dont know it applicable to outside RTI matter also?
Rejimon
If penalised, approach courts in personal capacity, HC tells PIOs
Creating a precedent, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that if the public information officer (PIO) of a department has been penalised by a State Information Commission on account of withholding information, the officer cannot appeal against the order through the state. The court has held that the PIO will have to approach the court in personal capacity.
In one such instance, the High Court has directed the Punjab government to withdraw a petition filed by it on behalf of K B S Sidhu, the then PIO of health department who had challenged a penalty imposed on him by the Punjab State Information Commission. A fine of Rs 25,000 was slapped on Sidhu in 2007 for not supplying information.
Ludhiana-based social activist Kuldip Singh Khaira had sought information under the Right to Information (RTI) Act from the health department with regard to rules drafted by its electro-homoeopathy wing. For not supplying information within the stipulated period, the State Information Commission had slapped a penalty of Rs 25,000 on
Sidhu, who challenged it before the High Court. During the resumed hearing, a single bench of the High Court refused to entertain the petition since the appeal against the penalty was filed by the state.
During the hearing last week, Advocate A P S Shergill, counsel for Khaira, raised the issue that a PIO could not appeal against an order through the state and should rather come in personal capacity. Shergill said the state machinery could not be put to use by a PIO for a penalty or strictures passed against him on account of dereliction
of duty. Finding merit in the contention, the High Court asked the Punjab government to withdraw the petition. Sidhu has been given the liberty to file a fresh petition in personal capacity.
--
REJIMON C K.
Each year 50million trees and 75 billion water is used to create 7 million tonnes of mail, over 40% of which is thrown away unopened. source : National Geographic so the next time you receive paper, think again before you print. choose to receive emails instead .
>
===========================================================
>
NOTE:-- Any message posted will be Sole "RESPONSIBILITY" of the "SENDER(Post-Author)". The Moderator and owner of this blog googlegroup have NO Responsibility.
>
===========================================================
>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DWARKA-FORUM" :-- Dwarka Ki Awaaz
>
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Dwarka-residents?hl=en
>
Posting Rules:
>
Visit at http://groups.google.com/group/Dwarka-residents/web/posting-rules
>
===========================================================
>
Police- 100 & 1090 Ambulance 102 & 1099, Fire 101, Traffic 1095/23010101, Dwarka PS: 28051584, ACP-28051587, DCP -28042984.
>
SDM-25017834, Child-1098, Women-1091, Sr. Citizen 1291, Postal 1914, AIIMS-26588700, Blood Bank, 23716441, ORBO 1060, Eye-1919, Disaster Management- 1070. LG Complaints 155355, CMO 155345, MCD-1266/25321235/23910419, DDA-24690431, DJB-1916, MTNL-198
>
 |