<http://2012.djangocon.eu/schedule/involving-women-in-the-community/> - and then I had a closer look at the names of this year's speakers.
There are *two* women out of the 24 or so speakers listed, and only one is doing a solo talk.
This is absolutely not a comment about or criticism of the organisers; apart from anything, I know that they're aware of and concerned about the issues. They can only select proposals they've been given, or have attendees who sign up.
At last year's DjangoCon Europe, there were few women attending. At PyCon UK last year, there was a similar dearth. Someone remarked to me then that a Microsoft event there would be a much more equal distribution.
So where are the women?
Does open source put women off? Is it something in the open source community, or the personalities you find in it? The nature of these conferences?
It's true that some open software communities, and the people in them, are pretty unwelcoming to newcomers, or seem to delight in expressing agressive and macho attitudes, but Python and Django are clearly not like that (quite the opposite in fact).
The conferences I've attended have been relaxed, warm and friendly. The worst you could say is that they are a little bit nerdy, which as a complaint would be like saying that medical conferences tend to be a little bit doctory.
The last thing I want is for a woman to read this (there won't be that many reading in any case, I suppose) and decide not to go because she doesn't like the thought of finding herself one person in ten; but from what I understand she's one in ten in the workplace and in the industry anyway.
I assume that most people agree this is a problem and worth addressing, but perhaps I'm wrong.
If women are not part of the community, or not coming forward to do things like give talks at - or even simply attend - its conferences, what if anything should be done about it?
Daniele
Daniele
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
I don't think this is particularly true. I've met many male developers
who can't handle open source at all.
We use primarily open source - mainly python - at $JOB. In our UK dev
department we have ~ 25 developers, and ~ 20% of them are women. In
our US department it is more like 10%.
This compares to when I was at university (~10 years ago), when ~10%
of my peers were female. I don't think compsci admissions will reach
gender equality any time soon, so you can expect to see this trend
continue.
All of my colleagues are excellent (which is why we hired them!),
regardless of gender :)
Cheers
Tom
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
More generally, I would have liked to go to EuroPythonCon both this
year and last year but from experience I don't deal with hot and humid
weather very well so it's out of the question.
More specifically, when the base percentage of programmers vs.
non-programmers being different in the two sexes (this is also depends
on class and culture) is multiplied with the base percentage of
open-source programmers vs. non-open source programmers you will end
up with four different groups generally in four different sizes (Bayes
theorem!). We know that male programmers outnumber female programmers.
If non-open-source programmers outnumber open source programmers then
the group "female open-source programmer" is likely to be the smallest
group.
You can then set up a new test with "female programmers" vs. "male
programmers" and "programmers that visit techie cons" vs. "programmers
not visiting techie cons". The group "female open-source programmer
that visit techie cons" will have fewer members than "female
open-source programmers".
You get the idea. It might be that running those numbers will explain
the low number of "female open-source programmer that visit techie
cons that also are of interest to you" all by itself, no conspiracy
required.
You get more women in by changing the weights in *any* of the tests:
more programmers, more female programmers, more open source
programmers, more programmers visiting techie cons etc. It adds up.
So: you have this wee group of potential "female open-source
programmer that visit techie cons that also are of interest to you".
Then, and only then can you start to look at con-specific or
language-specific tests that the community can directly do something
with: "bro"grammers, strip shows, excessive drinking and pressure to
drink (rumored to be a problem at Java Script venues), rock star
behavior (ruby?), specific idiots that should never have been left out
of the asylum and ruins it for everyone etc.
I haven't heard any rumors of stupid behavior among pythoneers or at
python cons though so it might just be that "female open-source
(python and django) programmer that visit techie cons that also are of
interest to you" is a very small group.
HM, member of "open source programmers that don't get a paid trip to
visit techie cons that often and can't function very well in hot
climates"