Grupos
Fazer login
Grupos
comp.std.c++
Conversas
Sobre
Enviar feedback
Ajuda
info
Não é mais possível fazer postagens ou usar assinaturas novas da Usenet nos Grupos do Google. O conteúdo histórico continua disponível.
Dismiss
Saiba mais
comp.std.c++
Entrar em contato com proprietários e gerentes
1 a 30 de 12979
Marcar tudo como lido
Denunciar grupo
0 selecionadas
Ian Collins
, …
Keith Thompson
7
01/04/2016
Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support
Ian Collins <ian-...@this.is.invalid> writes: > Has there ever been a move to formally
não lida,
Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support
Ian Collins <ian-...@this.is.invalid> writes: > Has there ever been a move to formally
01/04/2016
WIJ
18/03/2016
Amend request (throwing error)
The concept and usage of error handling mechanism(throw,catch) should have now been more widely
não lida,
Amend request (throwing error)
The concept and usage of error handling mechanism(throw,catch) should have now been more widely
18/03/2016
Christoph Schulz
,
Christof Meerwald
3
16/03/2016
C++11: Template argument deduction, partial ordering, and trailing parameter packs
Hello! Christoph Schulz wrote: > Hello, > > I read §14.8.2.1, §14.8.2.4, and §14.8.2.5
não lida,
C++11: Template argument deduction, partial ordering, and trailing parameter packs
Hello! Christoph Schulz wrote: > Hello, > > I read §14.8.2.1, §14.8.2.4, and §14.8.2.5
16/03/2016
W Karas
16/03/2016
Proposal: a "Components" template with partial specializations implicitly defined for typical classes
A "primitive" template named "Components" with this interface: <pre>
não lida,
Proposal: a "Components" template with partial specializations implicitly defined for typical classes
A "primitive" template named "Components" with this interface: <pre>
16/03/2016
Edward Rosten
16/03/2016
Indexing a pointer to members of a standard layout type.
Hi, I've been trying to wrangle the standardese on a bit of code with no success. For further
não lida,
Indexing a pointer to members of a standard layout type.
Hi, I've been trying to wrangle the standardese on a bit of code with no success. For further
16/03/2016
Jonathan Jones
,
Bo Persson
2
13/09/2015
Template argument name resolution and compiler discrepancies
On 2015-09-12 19:24, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Look at the following
não lida,
Template argument name resolution and compiler discrepancies
On 2015-09-12 19:24, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Look at the following
13/09/2015
Johannes Gerd Becker
, …
Richard Smith
8
21/08/2015
Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly?
Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2015 08:20:08 UTC+2 schrieb Richard Smith: > On 27/07/15 18:22, Johannes
não lida,
Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly?
Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2015 08:20:08 UTC+2 schrieb Richard Smith: > On 27/07/15 18:22, Johannes
21/08/2015
stg
,
Jakob Bohm
2
14/08/2015
Unicode support in C++ 17
On 12/08/2015 21:00, stg wrote: > > > > I would really like to see improved unicode
não lida,
Unicode support in C++ 17
On 12/08/2015 21:00, stg wrote: > > > > I would really like to see improved unicode
14/08/2015
Joaquín M López Muñoz
,
vervae...@googlemail.com
2
30/07/2015
Pointer to member contravariance and template non-type arguments
This is acutallly a really good question. Too bad it didn't get the answer it deserved. Op
não lida,
Pointer to member contravariance and template non-type arguments
This is acutallly a really good question. Too bad it didn't get the answer it deserved. Op
30/07/2015
Anders Granlund
15/07/2015
Conflicting extern variable declarations
Hi, Consider the following program: int main() { extern int x; extern double x; } Trying to compile
não lida,
Conflicting extern variable declarations
Hi, Consider the following program: int main() { extern int x; extern double x; } Trying to compile
15/07/2015
Bo Persson
,
Martin Bonner
2
29/06/2015
How is reverse_iterator::base "explicit"
On Sunday, 28 June 2015 21:20:05 UTC+1, Bo Persson wrote: > The reverse_iterator class template
não lida,
How is reverse_iterator::base "explicit"
On Sunday, 28 June 2015 21:20:05 UTC+1, Bo Persson wrote: > The reverse_iterator class template
29/06/2015
itaj sherman
,
via....@googlemail.com
3
26/06/2015
Refreshing cpu cache before atomic relaxed loads
On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 10:30:04 PM UTC+3, itaj sherman wrote: > My question turned up while
não lida,
Refreshing cpu cache before atomic relaxed loads
On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 10:30:04 PM UTC+3, itaj sherman wrote: > My question turned up while
26/06/2015
Arno Schoedl
,
Öö Tiib
2
21/05/2015
tertiary results of compiler-generated comparison operators
On Tuesday, 19 May 2015 10:00:05 UTC+3, Arno Schoedl wrote: > there as been some discussion
não lida,
tertiary results of compiler-generated comparison operators
On Tuesday, 19 May 2015 10:00:05 UTC+3, Arno Schoedl wrote: > there as been some discussion
21/05/2015
Edward Diener
, …
James Kuyper
13
04/04/2015
Macro replacement interpretation
On 04/03/2015 04:30 PM, Edward Diener wrote: > On 3/31/2015 5:38 PM, James Kuyper wrote: >>
não lida,
Macro replacement interpretation
On 04/03/2015 04:30 PM, Edward Diener wrote: > On 3/31/2015 5:38 PM, James Kuyper wrote: >>
04/04/2015
via....@googlemail.com
,
Jakob Bohm
3
30/03/2015
object and pointer-to-member closure: trivial intent, arcane implementation
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 6:10:07 PM UTC+1, Jakob Bohm wrote: [...] > A major issue is that
não lida,
object and pointer-to-member closure: trivial intent, arcane implementation
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 6:10:07 PM UTC+1, Jakob Bohm wrote: [...] > A major issue is that
30/03/2015
litb
, …
avi.k...@googlemail.com
3
04/02/2015
Moving local objects into lambda closure
On Sunday, April 26, 2009 at 1:11:33 AM UTC+3, daniel....@googlemail.com wrote: > > While your
não lida,
Moving local objects into lambda closure
On Sunday, April 26, 2009 at 1:11:33 AM UTC+3, daniel....@googlemail.com wrote: > > While your
04/02/2015
Noah Roberts
22/10/2014
constexpr parameters
Where there insurmountable technical reasons why C++ doesn't allow you to accept constexpr
não lida,
constexpr parameters
Where there insurmountable technical reasons why C++ doesn't allow you to accept constexpr
22/10/2014
tra...@gockelhut.com
,
Öö Tiib
2
15/10/2014
Destructive erase for associative containers
On Friday, 10 October 2014 23:00:03 UTC+3, tra...@gockelhut.com wrote: > There are a number of use
não lida,
Destructive erase for associative containers
On Friday, 10 October 2014 23:00:03 UTC+3, tra...@gockelhut.com wrote: > There are a number of use
15/10/2014
rick.c...@googlemail.com
, …
Martin Bonner
9
24/09/2014
N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 4:00:02 PM UTC-4, Martin Bonner wrote: > On Saturday, 20 September
não lida,
N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 4:00:02 PM UTC-4, Martin Bonner wrote: > On Saturday, 20 September
24/09/2014
Szabolcs Nagy
27/08/2014
alignment with ISO C11
it seems that C++14 only references C99 (C++14 1.2p1) (more precisely "ISO/IEC 9899:1999,
não lida,
alignment with ISO C11
it seems that C++14 only references C99 (C++14 1.2p1) (more precisely "ISO/IEC 9899:1999,
27/08/2014
Piotr Nycz
, …
Daniel Krügler
6
17/06/2014
Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for the last time a good proposal?
> To write a proposal, please read > > https://isocpp.org/std/submit-a-proposal > >
não lida,
Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for the last time a good proposal?
> To write a proposal, please read > > https://isocpp.org/std/submit-a-proposal > >
17/06/2014
jere...@googlemail.com
15/06/2014
Reinterpret casting to array types
Does the standard allow/consider to be defined behavior the following? T arr[100]; using T_part = T[
não lida,
Reinterpret casting to array types
Does the standard allow/consider to be defined behavior the following? T arr[100]; using T_part = T[
15/06/2014
john....@googlemail.com
30/05/2014
can generate_canonical return 1.0 exactly?
The text in 26.5.7.2 [rand.util.canonical] says that 0 <= tj < 1. But it seems to me that if
não lida,
can generate_canonical return 1.0 exactly?
The text in 26.5.7.2 [rand.util.canonical] says that 0 <= tj < 1. But it seems to me that if
30/05/2014
Piet
,
Daniel Krügler
2
14/05/2014
Compile-time integer sequences C++14
Am 13.05.2014 21:52, schrieb Piet: > > 20.5.1 of the C++14 draft reads > > example: >
não lida,
Compile-time integer sequences C++14
Am 13.05.2014 21:52, schrieb Piet: > > 20.5.1 of the C++14 draft reads > > example: >
14/05/2014
Roman Perepelitsa
,
Daniel Krügler
2
21/03/2014
Semantics of std::function's constructors
Am 20.03.2014 07:13, schrieb Roman Perepelitsa: > > Both C++11 and the C++14 draft seem to be
não lida,
Semantics of std::function's constructors
Am 20.03.2014 07:13, schrieb Roman Perepelitsa: > > Both C++11 and the C++14 draft seem to be
21/03/2014
Peter
,
enoquick
2
14/03/2014
Static member of class not found if class name == name of namespace it's defined in
Il 12/03/2014 15:30, Peter ha scritto: > > Some time ago I started a topic on comp.lang.c++
não lida,
Static member of class not found if class name == name of namespace it's defined in
Il 12/03/2014 15:30, Peter ha scritto: > > Some time ago I started a topic on comp.lang.c++
14/03/2014
mjb...@googlemail.com
,
Daniel Krügler
2
12/03/2014
Repeated headers in Table 14 [headers]
Am 11.03.2014 16:17, schrieb mjb...@googlemail.com: > > In Table 14, in [headers] (section
não lida,
Repeated headers in Table 14 [headers]
Am 11.03.2014 16:17, schrieb mjb...@googlemail.com: > > In Table 14, in [headers] (section
12/03/2014
goodb...@googlemail.com
,
James Kuyper
2
11/03/2014
Which one(s) of the following std::vector's member functions has the possibility/authority to reduce the vector's capacity?
The Subject: header of a message should contain a summary of the message, it shouldn't be the
não lida,
Which one(s) of the following std::vector's member functions has the possibility/authority to reduce the vector's capacity?
The Subject: header of a message should contain a summary of the message, it shouldn't be the
11/03/2014
Sebastian Karlsson
, …
James Kuyper
5
19/02/2014
The behavior of streambuf::seekoff
On 02/18/2014 05:36 PM, Daniel Krügler wrote: > Am 14.02.2014 19:41, schrieb Nach: >> >
não lida,
The behavior of streambuf::seekoff
On 02/18/2014 05:36 PM, Daniel Krügler wrote: > Am 14.02.2014 19:41, schrieb Nach: >> >
19/02/2014
Krzysztof Żelechowski
,
Bart van Ingen Schenau
3
06/01/2014
overload resolution failed
Bart van Ingen Schenau wrote: > > On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:20:32 -0600, Krzysztof Żelechowski
não lida,
overload resolution failed
Bart van Ingen Schenau wrote: > > On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:20:32 -0600, Krzysztof Żelechowski
06/01/2014