Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

P2P application in 15 lines of Python posted on slashdot

80 views
Skip to first unread message

slonik AZ

unread,
Dec 15, 2004, 6:41:13 PM12/15/04
to
Hi Everybody,
slashdot published an article on someone's
15 lines long Peer-2-Peer application
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/15/1953227

Another person followed up with a 9 line equivalent Perl code.

I wonder what an equivalent Ruby program would look like?

I do not care whether it 15 or 25 lines. Python program is not very readable.
Can Ruby variant be concise, yet more clear?

--Leo--


Giovanni Intini

unread,
Dec 15, 2004, 6:53:49 PM12/15/04
to
I was going to post the same message :)
Good rubyists unite! (I'm not good :( ). Let's write a short more
understandable program!


Purple Meteor

unread,
Dec 15, 2004, 8:11:15 PM12/15/04
to
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:53:49 +0900, Giovanni Intini <int...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Let's write a short more understandable program!
Actually, someone answered with a web server written in only 3 lines of codes.
More info here: http://tinyurl.com/6lxpa


Michael DeHaan

unread,
Dec 15, 2004, 8:19:59 PM12/15/04
to
LOL. The Python example used quite a few core libraries, so I think
a one-line instantiation of WebBRICK would suffice for a web server
example :)

Seriously, these golf competitions don't do much for me. Show me
formatted code that applies some interesting algorithms instead.
That's how you spar with other languages!

gabriele renzi

unread,
Dec 16, 2004, 2:08:59 AM12/16/04
to
Michael DeHaan ha scritto:

> LOL. The Python example used quite a few core libraries, so I think
> a one-line instantiation of WebBRICK would suffice for a web server
> example :)

ruby -rwebrick -e 'WEBrick::HTTPServer.new(:DocumentRoot=>".").start'
but it is a oneliner in python too ;)

> Seriously, these golf competitions don't do much for me. Show me
> formatted code that applies some interesting algorithms instead.
> That's how you spar with other languages!


def qs(l)
return [] if (x,*xs=*l).empty?
less, more = xs.partition{|y| y < x}
qs(less) + [x] + qs(more)
end

algoritm suggestions are welcome :)

Nikolai Weibull

unread,
Dec 16, 2004, 4:51:38 AM12/16/04
to
* gabriele renzi <rff...@remove-yahoo.it> [Dec 16, 2004 10:30]:

> def qs(l)
> return [] if (x,*xs=*l).empty?
> less, more = xs.partition{|y| y < x}
> qs(less) + [x] + qs(more)
> end

> algoritm suggestions are welcome :)

How about

def qs(l)
l.sort!
end

;-),
nikolai

--
::: name: Nikolai Weibull :: aliases: pcp / lone-star / aka :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA :: loc atm: Gothenburg, Sweden :::
::: page: www.pcppopper.org :: fun atm: gf,lps,ruby,lisp,war3 :::
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}


Florian Gross

unread,
Dec 16, 2004, 6:39:14 AM12/16/04
to
slonik AZ wrote:

> slashdot published an article on someone's
> 15 lines long Peer-2-Peer application
> http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/15/1953227
>
> Another person followed up with a 9 line equivalent Perl code.
>
> I wonder what an equivalent Ruby program would look like?

I did this 9.5 hours ago. Compared to the python one it is not
vulnerable to File stealing attacks (a client can request a file
../foobar and ~/foobar from the python server and will get it back
AFAIK) and 6 lines long. It is however vulnerable to the DRb style
.instance_eval exploits. I will fix this shortly, but I might have to
use 7 lines then.

p2p.rb

Brian Schröder

unread,
Dec 16, 2004, 7:08:20 AM12/16/04
to
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:51:38 +0900
Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lis...@rawuncut.elitemail.org> wrote:

> * gabriele renzi <rff...@remove-yahoo.it> [Dec 16, 2004 10:30]:
> > def qs(l)
> > return [] if (x,*xs=*l).empty?
> > less, more = xs.partition{|y| y < x}
> > qs(less) + [x] + qs(more)
> > end
>
> > algoritm suggestions are welcome :)
>
> How about
>
> def qs(l)
> l.sort!
> end
>
> ;-),
> nikolai
>

I hope sort is not implemented as quicksort ;)

Regards,

Brian


--
Brian Schröder
http://www.brian-schroeder.de/

Nikolai Weibull

unread,
Dec 16, 2004, 8:16:48 AM12/16/04
to
* Brian Schröder <ru...@brian-schroeder.de> [Dec 16, 2004 13:10]:
> > How about

> > def qs(l)
> > l.sort!
> > end

> I hope sort is not implemented as quicksort ;)

array.c:

static VALUE
sort_internal(ary)
VALUE ary;
{
qsort(RARRAY(ary)->ptr, RARRAY(ary)->len, sizeof(VALUE),
rb_block_given_p()?sort_1:sort_2);
return ary;
}

rb_ary_sort_bang(ary)
VALUE ary;
{
rb_ary_modify(ary);
if (RARRAY(ary)->len > 1) {
FL_SET(ary, ARY_TMPLOCK); /* prohibit modification during sort */
rb_ensure(sort_internal, ary, sort_unlock, ary);
}
return ary;
}

Just hope your systems qsort() is any good,

ts

unread,
Dec 16, 2004, 8:29:07 AM12/16/04
to
>>>>> "N" == Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lis...@rawuncut.elitemail.org> writes:

N> Just hope your systems qsort() is any good,

uln% grep qsort util.h
void ruby_qsort _((void*, const int, const int, int (*)(), void*));
#define qsort(b,n,s,c,d) ruby_qsort(b,n,s,c,d)
uln%


Guy Decoux


Florian Gross

unread,
Dec 16, 2004, 8:32:32 AM12/16/04
to
Florian Gross wrote:

Here we go. Thanks to Mauricio Fernández for helping out with cutting
off a few important characters!

p2p.rb

Nikolai Weibull

unread,
Dec 16, 2004, 9:09:43 AM12/16/04
to
* ts <dec...@moulon.inra.fr> [Dec 16, 2004 14:30]:

> > Just hope your systems qsort() is any good,

> uln% grep qsort util.h void ruby_qsort _((void*, const int, const int,
> int (*)(), void*)); #define qsort(b,n,s,c,d) ruby_qsort(b,n,s,c,d)

Then hope Ruby's implementation of qsort is any good ;-),

Brian Schröder

unread,
Dec 16, 2004, 10:28:48 AM12/16/04
to
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 23:09:43 +0900
Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lis...@rawuncut.elitemail.org> wrote:

> * ts <dec...@moulon.inra.fr> [Dec 16, 2004 14:30]:
> > > Just hope your systems qsort() is any good,
>
> > uln% grep qsort util.h void ruby_qsort _((void*, const int, const int,
> > int (*)(), void*)); #define qsort(b,n,s,c,d) ruby_qsort(b,n,s,c,d)
>
> Then hope Ruby's implementation of qsort is any good ;-),
> nikolai
>

So just out of interest, what kind of sort is ruby using?
(I could dig the sources, but I hope it will be an easy question for someone to
answer without spending too much time.)

why the lucky stiff

unread,
Dec 16, 2004, 11:26:14 AM12/16/04
to
slonik AZ wrote:

>Hi Everybody,
>slashdot published an article on someone's
>15 lines long Peer-2-Peer application
>http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/15/1953227
>

I am saddened that they failed to mention ducks. Ducks, or, more
particularly, images of ducks, are the only legitimate payload in
peer-to-peer networks these days. And, notice how I summarized this
point in less than 15 lines of text. Christmas miracles abound, folks.

_why


Nikolai Weibull

unread,
Dec 16, 2004, 11:35:31 AM12/16/04
to
* Brian Schröder <ru...@brian-schroeder.de> [Dec 16, 2004 16:30]:

> So just out of interest, what kind of sort is ruby using? (I could
> dig the sources, but I hope it will be an easy question for someone to
> answer without spending too much time.)

Seems to be your standard memory-swap optimized quicksort, using its own
stack (i.e. no recursion), much like the one in glibc,

David G. Andersen

unread,
Dec 16, 2004, 2:57:22 PM12/16/04
to
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 10:37:13PM +0900, Florian Gross scribed:

> >
> >I did this 9.5 hours ago. Compared to the python one it is not
> >vulnerable to File stealing attacks (a client can request a file
> >../foobar and ~/foobar from the python server and will get it back
> >AFAIK) and 6 lines long. It is however vulnerable to the DRb style
> >.instance_eval exploits. I will fix this shortly, but I might have to
> >use 7 lines then.
>
> Here we go. Thanks to Mauricio Fern?ndez for helping out with cutting
> off a few important characters!

Nice use of drb.

I wonder how long the same program would be in ruby if it implemented
the "tinyp2p" protocol instead of using drb. ;)

-dave

--
work: d...@lcs.mit.edu me: d...@pobox.com
MIT Laboratory for Computer Science http://www.angio.net/


Kaspar Schiess

unread,
Dec 17, 2004, 7:27:40 AM12/17/04
to
> _why

No matter how much you might be off topic, I always enjoy reading your
posts. Another miracle lurking in the dark, there.

yours,
kaspar

Florian Gross

unread,
Dec 17, 2004, 4:53:19 PM12/17/04
to
Florian Gross wrote:

> Here we go. Thanks to Mauricio Fernández for helping out with cutting
> off a few important characters!

Another new version, binary files can be transfered to and from Win32,
you can run servers from behind Routers and you can list all the files
on the specified network sorted by node and file name before downloading
them. Still six lines.

p2p.rb

thanhv...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 10, 2012, 4:19:23 AM9/10/12
to
0 new messages