Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

How to split a string containing nested commas-separated substrings

308 views
Skip to first unread message

Robert Dodier

unread,
Jun 18, 2008, 1:19:57 PM6/18/08
to
Hello,

I'd like to split a string by commas, but only at the "top level" so
to speak. An element can be a comma-less substring, or a
quoted string, or a substring which looks like a function call.
If some element contains commas, I don't want to split it.

Examples:

'foo, bar, baz' => 'foo' 'bar' 'baz'
'foo, "bar, baz", blurf' => 'foo' 'bar, baz' 'blurf'
'foo, bar(baz, blurf), mumble' => 'foo' 'bar(baz, blurf)' 'mumble'

Can someone suggest a suitable regular expression or other
method to split such strings?

Thank you very much for your help.

Robert

Matimus

unread,
Jun 18, 2008, 1:54:29 PM6/18/08
to

You might look at the shlex module. It doesn't get you 100%, but its
close:

>>> shlex.split('foo, bar, baz')
['foo,', 'bar,', 'baz']
>>> shlex.split( 'foo, "bar, baz", blurf')
['foo,', 'bar, baz,', 'blurf']
>>> shlex.split('foo, bar(baz, blurf), mumble')
['foo,', 'bar(baz,', 'blurf),', 'mumble']

Using a RE will be tricky, especially if it is possible to have
recursive nesting (which by definition REs can't handle). For a real
general purpose solution you will need to create a custom parser.
There are a couple modules out there that can help you with that.

pyparsing is one: http://pyparsing.wikispaces.com/

Matt

Cédric Lucantis

unread,
Jun 18, 2008, 2:12:33 PM6/18/08
to pytho...@python.org
Hi,

I'd do something like this (note that it doesn't check for quote/parenthesis
mismatch and removes _all_ the quotes) :

def mysplit (string) :
pardepth = 0
quote = False
ret = ['']

for car in string :

if car == '(' : pardepth += 1
elif car == ')' : pardepth -= 1
elif car in ('"', "'") :
quote = not quote
car = '' # just if you don't want to keep the quotes

if car in ', ' and not (pardepth or quote) :
if ret[-1] != '' : ret.append('')
else :
ret[-1] += car

return ret

# test
for s in ('foo, bar, baz',
'foo, "bar, baz", blurf',
'foo, bar(baz, blurf), mumble') :
print "'%s' => '%s'" % (s, mysplit(s))

# result
'foo, bar, baz' => '['foo', 'bar', 'baz']'
'foo, "bar, baz", blurf' => '['foo', 'bar, baz', 'blurf']'
'foo, bar(baz, blurf), mumble' => '['foo', 'bar(baz, blurf)', 'mumble']'


--
Cédric Lucantis

Paul McGuire

unread,
Jun 18, 2008, 3:05:42 PM6/18/08
to

tests = """\
foo, bar, baz


foo, "bar, baz", blurf

foo, bar(baz, blurf), mumble""".splitlines()


from pyparsing import Word, alphas, alphanums, Optional, \
Group, delimitedList, quotedString

ident = Word(alphas+"_",alphanums+"_")
func_call = Group(ident + "(" + Optional(Group(delimitedList(ident)))
+ ")")

listItem = func_call | ident | quotedString

for t in tests:
print delimitedList(listItem).parseString(t).asList()


Prints:

['foo', 'bar', 'baz']

['foo', '"bar, baz"', 'blurf']

['foo', ['bar', '(', ['baz', 'blurf'], ')'], 'mumble']


-- Paul

Matimus

unread,
Jun 18, 2008, 4:55:07 PM6/18/08
to

Following up to my own post, Here is a working example that uses the
built-in _ast module. I posted something similar the other day. This
uses pythons own internal parser to do it for you. It works in this
case because, at least from what you have posted, your syntax doesn't
violate python syntax.

[code]
import _ast

def eval_tuple(text):
""" Evaluate a string representing a tuple of strings, names and
calls,
returns a tuple of strings.
"""

ast = compile(text, "<string>", 'eval', _ast.PyCF_ONLY_AST)
return _traverse(ast.body)

def _traverse(ast):
""" Traverse the AST returning string representations of tuples
strings
names and calls.
"""
if isinstance(ast, _ast.Tuple):
return tuple(_traverse(el) for el in ast.elts)
elif isinstance(ast, _ast.Str):
return ast.s
elif isinstance(ast, _ast.Name):
return ast.id
elif isinstance(ast, _ast.Call):
name = ast.func.id
args = [_traverse(x) for x in ast.args]
return "%s(%s)"%(name, ", ".join(args))
raise SyntaxError()

examples = [
('foo, bar, baz', ('foo', 'bar', 'baz')),
('foo, "bar, baz", blurf', ('foo', 'bar, baz', 'blurf')),
('foo, bar(baz, blurf), mumble', ('foo', 'bar(baz, blurf)',
'mumble')),
]

def test():
for text, expected in examples:
print "trying %r => %r"%(text, expected)
result = eval_tuple(text)
if result == expected:
print "PASS"
else:
print "FAIL, GOT: %r"%result

if __name__ == "__main__":
test()
[/code]

Matt

mario

unread,
Jun 25, 2008, 2:30:56 AM6/25/08
to
I have actually highlighted a small neat recipe for doing such
unpacking, that I use for parsing arbitrary parameters in Evoque
Templating. I never needed to handle "callable" parameters though, as
you do in your 3rd string example, so the little "unpack_symbol"
recipe I have publiched earlier does not handle it... anyhow, what I
referring to are:

Evoque Templating: http://evoque.gizmojo.org/
Code highlight: http://gizmojo.org/code/unpack_symbol/

However, a little variation of the aboverecipe can do what you are
looking for, in a rather cute way. The difference is to make the
original recipe handle "callable strings", and I achieve this by
modifying the recipe like so:


class callable_str(str):
def __call__(s, *args):
return s+str(args)

class _UnpackGlobals(dict):
def __getitem__(self, name):
return callable_str(name)

def unpack_symbol(symbol, globals=_UnpackGlobals()):
""" If compound symbol (list, tuple, nested) unpack to atomic
symbols """
return eval(symbol, globals, None)


Now, calling unpack_symbol() on each sample string gives the following
tuple of strings:

>>> unpack_symbol('foo, bar, baz')


('foo', 'bar', 'baz')

>>> unpack_symbol('foo, "bar, baz", blurf')


('foo', 'bar, baz', 'blurf')

>>> unpack_symbol('foo, bar(baz, blurf), mumble')
('foo', "bar('baz', 'blurf')", 'mumble')
>>>


Mario Ruggier

0 new messages