Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

pronounciation of Vi

20 views
Skip to first unread message

Jules Alberts

unread,
Sep 7, 2000, 4:03:31 AM9/7/00
to
how is Vi normally pronounced[0]? i mostly say something like "vee
aay", but a friend allways says "vee". so what's the standard
("vaay"?)? anybody? thanks.

[0] no flamebait intended, just curious

--
Jules Alberts
jul...@arbodienst-limburg.nl

Phil Reynolds

unread,
Sep 7, 2000, 5:42:30 AM9/7/00
to
Jules Alberts wrote:
> how is Vi normally pronounced[0]?

Well, it's normally pronounced in lots of ways :-), but the CORRECT way
is "vee eye". That's what it's author says and he should know.

--
Phil Reynolds http://users.computerweekly.net/fluffer/
Remove "spamaway." if replying by mail

Ben Allen

unread,
Sep 7, 2000, 1:24:20 PM9/7/00
to

Since the topic's sort of been raised, I'd like to make sure that I
haven't been making a fool of myself in a different, but related way.
Just making sure, but "vim" is pronounced "vim" and not "vee aye em",
since it's Vi IMproved and not VI iMproved, right?

--
Ben Allen

Charles Gilley

unread,
Sep 7, 2000, 2:31:34 PM9/7/00
to
I thought it was pronounced "six"?
Credit to the Vi Lover's Page

Phil Reynolds <flu...@spamaway.computerweekly.net> wrote in message
news:8p7nu6$8d0$2...@newsfeed.pit.comms.marconi.com...

Othniel Graichen

unread,
Sep 7, 2000, 9:35:54 PM9/7/00
to
The correct pronunciation of VI is "six" !

Please don't flame as I wouldn't care anyhow. :)
Rightly or wrongly I have been saying "vai" as "vee eye"
has gotten tedious for us Texans.

Ralf Arens

unread,
Sep 7, 2000, 12:46:55 PM9/7/00
to
Jules Alberts <jul...@arbodienst-limburg.nl> wrote:

> how is Vi normally pronounced[0]? i mostly say something like "vee
> aay", but a friend allways says "vee". so what's the standard
> ("vaay"?)? anybody? thanks.

> [0] no flamebait intended, just curious

E.g. see the Jargon File:

vi /V-I/, not /vi:/ and never /siks/ n.

So the pronunciation of your friend is wrong.


Ciao,
Ralf

--
The usual comp.editors signature:

Please add the name of the editor in question to your subject line.
This makes sure everybody know what you're talking about.

Phil Reynolds

unread,
Sep 8, 2000, 4:42:10 AM9/8/00
to
Ben Allen wrote:
>
> Since the topic's sort of been raised, I'd like to make sure that I
> haven't been making a fool of myself in a different, but related way.
> Just making sure, but "vim" is pronounced "vim" and not "vee aye em",
> since it's Vi IMproved and not VI iMproved, right?

Right. Otherwise the Tigger poetry in Sven Guckes' signature wouldn't
work (see http://www.vim.org).

You may still, of course, be making a fool of yourself in all sorts of
ways, but this isn't one of them. :-)

Ralf Arens

unread,
Sep 8, 2000, 4:38:47 AM9/8/00
to
Ben Allen <hi...@news.speakeasy.org> wrote:

[ pronunciation problems ]

> Since the topic's sort of been raised, I'd like to make sure that I
> haven't been making a fool of myself in a different, but related way.
> Just making sure, but "vim" is pronounced "vim" and not "vee aye em",
> since it's Vi IMproved and not VI iMproved, right?

Maybe it should be pronounced /V-Im/, since it's /V-I/. Or maybe
deducing these things doesn't always lead to the correct (read common)
pronunciation, because PC should then be pronounced /P-K/ (personal
computer).

Problems over problems and Bram is on holidays... ;-)


Ciao,
Ralf

PS: I have to admit I say "vee eye em", but most people I know say
"vim".

Joachim Hofmann

unread,
Sep 9, 2000, 2:46:29 PM9/9/00
to

Phil Reynolds schrieb:

*The* autor? Very interesting.. who is/are/were the author(s) of original
vi? why he/they are not so much famous than Kernighan/Ritchy ... and so on?
:-)

Achim

Alisdair McDiarmid

unread,
Sep 9, 2000, 3:10:13 PM9/9/00
to
In article <39BA8584...@fhtw-berlin.de>, Joachim Hofmann wrote:
>
>
> Phil Reynolds schrieb:
>
> > Jules Alberts wrote:
> > > how is Vi normally pronounced[0]?
> >
> > Well, it's normally pronounced in lots of ways :-), but the CORRECT way
> > is "vee eye". That's what it's author says and he should know.
>
> *The* autor? Very interesting.. who is/are/were the author(s) of original
> vi?

/bin/vi was originally written by Bill Joy, of Ethernet fame. See
http://www.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/~joern/jargon/vi.HTML

> why he/they are not so much famous than Kernighan/Ritchy ... and so
> on? :-)

No comment :)
--
Alisdair McDiarmid alis...@jml.net
[http://wasters.org/pubkey.asc perl -i.mac -p -e 's/\r/\n/smg;']

Steve Kirkendall

unread,
Sep 11, 2000, 2:59:22 PM9/11/00
to

The primary author was Bill Joy, who is justly famous. He discussed the
the origins of vi (including many of the other programmers' names) in a
1984 interview, published in the the old Unix Review magazine. You can
read the interview at...

http://www.cs.pdx.edu/~kirkenda/joy84.html

It is really quite interesting.

Smylers

unread,
Sep 20, 2000, 3:00:00 AM9/20/00
to
Steve Kirkendall <skirk...@uswest.net> uttered something along the
lines of:

> The primary author was Bill Joy, who is justly famous. He discussed
> the the origins of vi (including many of the other programmers' names)

> in a 1984 interview ...
>
> http://www.cs.pdx.edu/~kirkenda/joy84.html

Cheers for posting that. Some of what Bill Joy said in 1984 is quite
interesting. I like:

One of the good things about EMACS, though, is its programmability
and the modelessness. Those are two ideas which never occurred to
me.

I find it hard to believe that `Vi''s modality was an accident rather
than a conscientious choice -- it's one of the things I like best about
it, and the author doesn't seem convinced it's a good idea!

He also seemed fairly convinced that `Vi' wouldn't be used for much
longer; he thought that after ten years it was time to get rid of it
then! (I hadn't even heard of it until another ten years after that.)

He thought programmability was the main thing lacking, but also
mentioned multiple windows, multi-level undo, mouse support, and
command-line history as features -- all things which assorted `Vi'
clones have implemented since then.

I wonder which editor he uses now.

He also comments:

I think the wonderful thing about vi is that it has such a good market
share because we gave it away.

If that's the case, then how come the original is no longer available?

Smylers


Paul Fox

unread,
Sep 20, 2000, 3:00:00 AM9/20/00
to
Smylers <Smylers...@stripey.com> wrote:
: I find it hard to believe that `Vi''s modality was an accident rather

: than a conscientious choice -- it's one of the things I like best about
: it, and the author doesn't seem convinced it's a good idea!

remember that he was working from an existing model -- he just preserved
and extended the modality of ed/ex.

:
: I wonder which editor he uses now.
Word, probably. :-)

paul
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf-...@foxharp.boston.ma.us

Brendan Macmillan

unread,
Nov 11, 2000, 3:00:00 AM11/11/00
to
Alisdair McDiarmid <alis...@jml.net> wrote:

: In article <39BA8584...@fhtw-berlin.de>, Joachim Hofmann wrote:
:> Phil Reynolds schrieb:
:> > is "vee eye". That's what it's author says and he should know.

:>
:> *The* autor? Very interesting.. who is/are/were the author(s) of original
:> vi?

: /bin/vi was originally written by Bill Joy, of Ethernet fame.

And thus the link from Vi to Java.

Ob: May Joy forgive me, but I always pronounce it as "vie".
Seems oddly appropriate to me, somehow *grin*

/vie/ <<vaI>> v.intr. (/vying/) (often foll. by "with") compete; strive for
superiority ("vied with each other for recognition").

prob. f. ME (as /envy/)


But I also pronounce "URL" as "earl".

Brendan Macmillan
--
e: br...@csse.monash.edu.au v: +61 (3) 9905 1502
Email is checked daily Phone is rarely attended

Phil Edwards

unread,
Nov 11, 2000, 3:00:00 AM11/11/00
to

Brendan Macmillan <br...@fangorn.csse.monash.edu.au> wrote:
+ Alisdair McDiarmid <alis...@jml.net> wrote:
+ : In article <39BA8584...@fhtw-berlin.de>, Joachim Hofmann wrote:
+ :> Phil Reynolds schrieb:
+ :> > is "vee eye". That's what it's author says and he should know.

Yes indeed. But oddly enough, I have problems pronouncing vim as "vee
eye em". For me, it's "vim" (as in vim and vigor) or "gee vim" if I'm
running the gui version.


+ But I also pronounce "URL" as "earl".

Somewhere there's a good "duke of URL" joke floating around, but most
people don't remember that song now.


--
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com | pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools. Fools are protected by more capable fools.


Sven Guckes

unread,
Nov 12, 2000, 7:44:03 PM11/12/00
to
* Brendan Macmillan <br...@fangorn.csse.monash.edu.au>:

> May Joy forgive me, but I always pronounce it as "vie".
> Seems oddly appropriate to me, somehow *grin*
> /vie/ <<vaI>> v.intr. (/vying/) (often foll. by "with")
> compete; strive for superiority ("vied with each other for
> recognition").

oui - c'est la vi!

> But I also pronounce "URL" as "earl".

Figures - with you people
everything is umop-ap!sdn ..

Sven [Kraut]

--
Dearest creature in creation
study vee-eye pronunciation.
I will teach you in my verse,
things like c-x c-c and worse.

0 new messages