Thanks Borland for bringing us TOP QUALITY stuff, AGAIN!
> Yesterday I had the great displeasure of playing with D2006 beta, OR
> AT LEAST TRYING TO.
Are you on the private beta or are you a journalist who received an
advance copy? If you're on the private beta, I'd guess posting this
would be a violation of any agreement you signed.
> First the damn thing fails to recognize my HD
> free space, then the installation starts to drop a gazillion
> megabytes and fills up my whole HD, then the rollback fails and
> leaves my .NET installation completely screwed up. I can no longer
> run VS.NET 2005 and whenever I try to reinstall the .NET Framework it
> says something about corrupted assemblies. Worse, I can't run the
> .NET application that I use for my day-to-day work (I work as a
> writer for a literary magazine). Needless to say that this nasty
> incident is affecting my poetry. I HOPE I DON'T LOSE MY WORK.
>
> Thanks Borland for bringing us TOP QUALITY stuff, AGAIN!
Yikes... that's not a good sign. I'm still upbeat about D2006, but
maybe I'll hold off till a demo is available before throwing money at
it...
Will
--
Want native support in Delphi for AMD64/EM64T? Vote here--
... Maybe he was being sarcastic, and referring to Delphi 2005 ???
--
Arthur Hoornweg
(In order to reply per e-mail, please just remove the ".net"
from my e-mail address. Leave the rest of the address intact
including the "antispam" part. I had to take this measure to
counteract unsollicited mail.)
> ... Maybe he was being sarcastic, and referring to Delphi 2005 ???
Oooh, that's a possibility. I'd just be really surprised to see someone
break their NDA and post about the beta.
> Are you on the private beta or are you a journalist who received an
> advance copy?
Or a bootleg copy...
--
Andy Syms
Technosoft Systems Ltd
www.technosoft.co.uk
ICQ 136991871
> Or a bootleg copy...
LOL, I'd hope nobody would be sharing it out. Or at least, if someone
did, Borland would have a way to track the leak.
I thought that was the whole point of Beta's - to test things like
installs. I'm sure the OP had suitable disk backups etc - it would be
foolhardy to install a Beta without a good backup first given they are so
cheap and easy.
/Matthew Jones/
> I thought that was the whole point of Beta's - to test things like
> installs. I'm sure the OP had suitable disk backups etc - it would be
> foolhardy to install a Beta without a good backup first given they
> are so cheap and easy.
me too. I thought the fact that every beta Ive ever seen says "do not
use on a production box" and is well known generally that beta's as a
whole crash, make a mess, and arent right..:) there are exceptions, but
they are few.. thats why its a beta :)
--
Liz the Brit