I think David has said it well. I don't think Alcor is about to change
his mind but I wish he would consider selling the code base or opening
it fully to allow others to take this to the next level. The supported
alternatives (like launchbar) just don't cut it. While they feel like
an app, QS feels like your operating system.
My current setup on B5X from
http://lipidity.com/apple/quicksilver-b5x-download/
is the most stable and most responsive I've had yet but the lack of
proxy objects in Leopard is killing me. To bring all of the features
back, I too wish I could have a paid-for development of QS. It is the
app I rely on most. Nearly every keystroke depends on QS. It is an
extension of my brain. Don't let my brain wither away and die.
> > Compensation is not a driver for me, and while I would like to
> > encourage other developers to contribute, I don't want money to be the
> > motivation. I would like any proceeds to go to charity and I may set
> > up a foundation to facilitate this.
>
> Thanks a lot for replying here Alcor. Your interaction really helps to
> understand QS's progress.
>
> However, I hope you aren't taking the offers for compensation the
> wrong way, or as some kind of "bribe."
>
> I think it's fair to say that the people making these offers,
> including myself, assume that you have some kind of a job (apart from
> your studies) in which you can't develop Quicksilver. The idea behind
> offering compensation is that, if we could give you enough, help get
> the word out, and get Quicksilver to start bringing in a steady stream
> of money, you (or perhaps another developer or team) could afford to
> cut back on the day job (or quit it), and work on Quicksilver in a
> more steady fashion.
>
> Quicksilver is an incredibly significant, powerful, and influential
> application that a great many of us depend on. Our offers for
> compensation really are just attempts to give Quicksilver's developers
> the time to polish it into the serious application it deserves to be.