Groups
Groups
Sign in
Groups
Groups
Bitcoin Development Mailing List
Conversations
About
Send feedback
Help
Bitcoin Development Mailing List
Contact owners and managers
1–30 of 291
Mark all as read
Report group
0 selected
Murch
, …
Tim Ruffing
9
Jan 14
Follow-up regarding Motion to Activate BIP 3
Hi everyone, After a number of people stated in the past few days here and in the Activation pull
unread,
Follow-up regarding Motion to Activate BIP 3
Hi everyone, After a number of people stated in the past few days here and in the Activation pull
Jan 14
Antoine Poinsot
, …
Murch
12
Jan 14
Addressing remaining points on BIP 54
Ah right, the Merkle root is calculated based on the stripped transaction, and therefore AJ's
unread,
Addressing remaining points on BIP 54
Ah right, the Merkle root is calculated based on the stripped transaction, and therefore AJ's
Jan 14
bnv
Jan 13
QRAMP addition: Alternative to legacy freeze: “quarantine-mode” legacy spends via two-phase destination commitment
Hi Everyone, I'd like feedback on a concept that I want to frame explicitly as an *alternative*
unread,
QRAMP addition: Alternative to legacy freeze: “quarantine-mode” legacy spends via two-phase destination commitment
Hi Everyone, I'd like feedback on a concept that I want to frame explicitly as an *alternative*
Jan 13
Lazy Fair
Jan 11
Safe Redaction: an early draft BIP
Hello list, I've prepared a draft BIP for community feedback, called Safe Redaction (https://
unread,
Safe Redaction: an early draft BIP
Hello list, I've prepared a draft BIP for community feedback, called Safe Redaction (https://
Jan 11
fanquake
Jan 10
Bitcoin Core v30.2 Released
Bitcoin Core version v30.2 is now available from: <https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-30.2/
unread,
Bitcoin Core v30.2 Released
Bitcoin Core version v30.2 is now available from: <https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-30.2/
Jan 10
fanquake
,
/dev /fd0
2
Jan 9
Bitcoin Core v30.2rc1 Released
The biggest contributions in this release (v30.2) comes from the user (jestory) who reported the bug
unread,
Bitcoin Core v30.2rc1 Released
The biggest contributions in this release (v30.2) comes from the user (jestory) who reported the bug
Jan 9
Matthew Husák
,
Murch
3
Jan 8
BIP Idea: incrementalrelayfee in feefilter?
Hi Murch! thanks for such quick response. I think that we've been one of the first wallets to
unread,
BIP Idea: incrementalrelayfee in feefilter?
Hi Murch! thanks for such quick response. I think that we've been one of the first wallets to
Jan 8
Ava Chow
Jan 5
Wallet Migration Failure May Delete Unrelated Wallet Files In Bitcoin Core 30.0 and 30.1
Hi all, We have become aware of a wallet migration bug introduced in Bitcoin Core 30.0 and 30.1.
unread,
Wallet Migration Failure May Delete Unrelated Wallet Files In Bitcoin Core 30.0 and 30.1
Hi all, We have become aware of a wallet migration bug introduced in Bitcoin Core 30.0 and 30.1.
Jan 5
Able One
,
Chris Stewart
2
Jan 3
Re: Funding model question — unpaid exploratory work at intake
Hi Able One, I think this is an interesting topic. Over the past few years, I've been working
unread,
Re: Funding model question — unpaid exploratory work at intake
Hi Able One, I think this is an interesting topic. Over the past few years, I've been working
Jan 3
fanquake
Jan 2
Bitcoin Core v30.1 Released
Bitcoin Core version v30.1 is now available from: <https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-30.1/
unread,
Bitcoin Core v30.1 Released
Bitcoin Core version v30.1 is now available from: <https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-30.1/
Jan 2
Oren
,
waxwing/ AdamISZ
4
Jan 1
BIP idea: Timelock-Recovery storage format
One more thing to mention - none of the hardware wallets that I've tested show the custom
unread,
BIP idea: Timelock-Recovery storage format
One more thing to mention - none of the hardware wallets that I've tested show the custom
Jan 1
Claire Ostrom
, …
Antoine Riard
21
12/30/25
The Cat, BIP draft discussion.
Hi list, > Which brings me to my disagreement, which I know is not shared by a number of
unread,
The Cat, BIP draft discussion.
Hi list, > Which brings me to my disagreement, which I know is not shared by a number of
12/30/25
Karin Eunji
12/26/25
QRMVL: Modular Verification Layer for Post-Quantum Hash-Based Signatures
Hi all, Regarding the recent discussion on commit-based approaches: I agree with the general
unread,
QRMVL: Modular Verification Layer for Post-Quantum Hash-Based Signatures
Hi all, Regarding the recent discussion on commit-based approaches: I agree with the general
12/26/25
Antoine Poinsot
, …
Saint Wenhao
34
12/26/25
Unbreaking testnet4
> The given rationale for a difficulty reset was to let developers occasionally mine blocks on
unread,
Unbreaking testnet4
> The given rationale for a difficulty reset was to let developers occasionally mine blocks on
12/26/25
Mikhail Kudinov
, …
david torrealba
16
12/26/25
Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future
Hi everyone, I've been following the discussion regarding the trade-offs of Post-Quantum
unread,
Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future
Hi everyone, I've been following the discussion regarding the trade-offs of Post-Quantum
12/26/25
Hunter Beast
,
Erik Aronesty
2
12/23/25
Major BIP 360 Update
This is amazing! I have always been concerned about the exposure of public keys (mostly because of
unread,
Major BIP 360 Update
This is amazing! I have always been concerned about the exposure of public keys (mostly because of
12/23/25
Craig Raw
, …
Sebastian Falbesoner
8
12/22/25
[BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352
Hi Craig, a few comments about the cost of label scanning, as this topic comes up repeatedly: >
unread,
[BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352
Hi Craig, a few comments about the cost of label scanning, as this topic comes up repeatedly: >
12/22/25
defenwycke
, …
Murch
7
12/22/25
Draft BIP: DustSweep – policy-only UTXO dust compaction
Hi Defenwycke, You replied to every line of my email, except the most relevant one. Murch wrote: >
unread,
Draft BIP: DustSweep – policy-only UTXO dust compaction
Hi Defenwycke, You replied to every line of my email, except the most relevant one. Murch wrote: >
12/22/25
/dev /fd0
12/19/25
CTV activation meeting #1 Notes
Hi everyone, We organized an IRC [meeting][0] in #ctv-csfs-activation channel on 18 December 2025 to
unread,
CTV activation meeting #1 Notes
Hi everyone, We organized an IRC [meeting][0] in #ctv-csfs-activation channel on 18 December 2025 to
12/19/25
/dev /fd0
12/19/25
Secondary mailing list for moderated emails
Hi everyone, The old bitcoin-dev mailing list had a secondary mailing list for moderated emails:
unread,
Secondary mailing list for moderated emails
Hi everyone, The old bitcoin-dev mailing list had a secondary mailing list for moderated emails:
12/19/25
Erik Aronesty
, …
moonsettler
5
12/19/25
op_ctv still has no technical objections
Hi All, Just a small remark > lnhance is more comprehensive. but also it's so much harder to
unread,
op_ctv still has no technical objections
Hi All, Just a small remark > lnhance is more comprehensive. but also it's so much harder to
12/19/25
Anthony Towns
12/19/25
[BIP Proposal] Peer Feature Negotiation
Hello world, I've been thinking recently about a few ideas that would benefit from new p2p
unread,
[BIP Proposal] Peer Feature Negotiation
Hello world, I've been thinking recently about a few ideas that would benefit from new p2p
12/19/25
Josh Doman
, …
Antoine Poinsot
8
12/18/25
Does GCC preclude a soft fork to handle timestamp overflow?
Hi Josh, Interesting observation! I am of the opinion that the header timestamp overflow is one of
unread,
Does GCC preclude a soft fork to handle timestamp overflow?
Hi Josh, Interesting observation! I am of the opinion that the header timestamp overflow is one of
12/18/25
Erik Aronesty
2
12/18/25
Re: Perhaps the simplest possible quantum-security upgrade
Was thinking about this and I realized that a quantum-resistance scheme doesn't technically need
unread,
Re: Perhaps the simplest possible quantum-security upgrade
Was thinking about this and I realized that a quantum-resistance scheme doesn't technically need
12/18/25
Murch
, …
Melvin Carvalho
33
12/15/25
Motion to Activate BIP 3
Hi everyone, the pull request implementing the feedback from this thread was merged today. The PR
unread,
Motion to Activate BIP 3
Hi everyone, the pull request implementing the feedback from this thread was merged today. The PR
12/15/25
אושר חיים גליק
, …
Henry Romp
7
12/15/25
[Discussion] Year 2106 Timestamp Overflow - Proposal for uint64 Migration
Ah, I see you're right—once MTP reaches 2^32 - 1, no valid timestamp can exceed it, making the
unread,
[Discussion] Year 2106 Timestamp Overflow - Proposal for uint64 Migration
Ah, I see you're right—once MTP reaches 2^32 - 1, no valid timestamp can exceed it, making the
12/15/25
nymius
12/15/25
[BIP Proposal] Add PSBT_IN_SP_TWEAK field
Hi all, I'm working on the implementation of silent payments in BDK. BDK's transaction
unread,
[BIP Proposal] Add PSBT_IN_SP_TWEAK field
Hi all, I'm working on the implementation of silent payments in BDK. BDK's transaction
12/15/25
Antoine Riard
,
defenwycke
3
12/14/25
Splitting more block, addr and tx classes of network traffic
Hi Defenwycke, I'm already working on a native multi-process architecture where the traffic
unread,
Splitting more block, addr and tx classes of network traffic
Hi Defenwycke, I'm already working on a native multi-process architecture where the traffic
12/14/25
victor perez
,
Antoine Poinsot
5
12/14/25
Feedback on a simple 2-path vault design (2-of-2 + CLTV recovery) and use of pruned nodes for UTXO retrieval
Hi Antoine, Thank you very much for your detailed reply—it's extremely helpful. Following your
unread,
Feedback on a simple 2-path vault design (2-of-2 + CLTV recovery) and use of pruned nodes for UTXO retrieval
Hi Antoine, Thank you very much for your detailed reply—it's extremely helpful. Following your
12/14/25
uuowwpevskfcordh
, …
Eric Voskuil
5
12/13/25
Reducing RAM requirements with dynamic dust
Thanks both Eric and Erik for the replies. I can't answer whether RAM requirements due to UTXO
unread,
Reducing RAM requirements with dynamic dust
Thanks both Eric and Erik for the replies. I can't answer whether RAM requirements due to UTXO
12/13/25