i have a new computer with xp home sp2 installed.
it has 1 gig ram
200 gig hdd only just under 9 gig of hdd is currently used.
every download i try to install takes many attempts with a new fresh
download each time until eventually if i am lucky xp allows it to
install.
i have xp pro on my old machine and have had win 95 & 98 and never
have i had any problems getting downloads and installing them.
currently i am trying to download and install windows live messenger,
i have deleted and fetched new downloads and tried to install
immidiately app' 10 times now. and xp says it failed possibly due to
'lack of memory, lack of disc space to allow file transfer or a
corrupt cabinet file'. this has been the same reason on each attempt.
i check the download file size against what has been downloaded and
they match, so what the problem is? is beyond me, even tried a free
download manager and that didn't help.
my only conclusion is it has something to do with xp home sp2 somehow.
tia
len
With peace and brightest of blessings,
len
--
"Be Content With What You Have And
May You Find Serenity and Tranquillity In
A World That You May Not Understand."
> i have a new computer with xp home sp2 installed.
> it has 1 gig ram
> 200 gig hdd only just under 9 gig of hdd is currently used.
> every download i try to install takes many attempts with a new fresh
> download each time until eventually if i am lucky xp allows it to install.
What exactly happens with the attempts to install that fail ?
Presumably you do a fresh download because it complains about a bad file ?
If so, you've got a problem with your downloads.
> i have xp pro on my old machine and have had win 95 & 98 and never
> have i had any problems getting downloads and installing them.
Yeah, it isnt common to get that effect.
> currently i am trying to download and install windows live messenger,
> i have deleted and fetched new downloads and tried to install
> immidiately app' 10 times now. and xp says it failed possibly due
> to 'lack of memory, lack of disc space to allow file transfer or a
> corrupt cabinet file'. this has been the same reason on each attempt.
Most likely the file is corrupt.
> i check the download file size against what has been
> downloaded and they match, so what the problem is?
Most likely the file is corrupt. Try comparing one that
works with one that doesnt, using a binary compare.
> is beyond me, even tried a free download manager and that didn't help.
Yeah, it wont if the file is getting corrupted in transit.
> my only conclusion is it has something to do with xp home sp2 somehow.
I certainly dont get that effect with mine and I dont recall
any reports of others getting that effect with SP2.
Try downloading something thats in zip or rar format and
see if you can verify it. Bet they will mostly be corrupted.
Are you trying to download the updates via the Windows Update site?
If so then go to the Windows Update site and note down the KB numbers
of the updates you want to install, then go to
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=fh;EN-US;KBHOWTO type
the KB number of the update you are after into the "For" box and click
search down load the update that is for your machine, often there are
several versions of the same update for different Windows operating
systems.
If this works then burn the files you download to a CD for future use.
this problem is unique to the new machine only.
where i go fo downloads is where that particular site directs me. so i
don't know what form they are in except they generally are all zipped.
so my question is still then why is it only this version of xp having
the problems?
this is a m$ program i am trying to download and install.
it agve me almost as hard a time on the following downloads which
eventually it installed:
avg
peer guardian
ad-aware
spy bot
spyware blaster
that i can recall
snipped
it is not a windows up date it is a new version of ms messenger called
'windows live messenger'
this has uniquely on this new machine with xp home sp2 happened to
other downloads as well.
On 12 Jul 2006 18:04:31 -0700, "GreenieLeBrun"
> this problem is unique to the new machine only.
Yeah, that was clear.
> where i go fo downloads is where that particular site directs me. so i
> don't know what form they are in except they generally are all zipped.
> so my question is still then why is it only
> this version of xp having the problems?
Best to confirm that plain zip files do get corrupted during
downloading first. Because the problem may be different to that.
> this is a m$ program i am trying to download and install.
> it agve me almost as hard a time on the following
> downloads which eventually it installed:
> avg
> peer guardian
> ad-aware
> spy bot
> spyware blaster
> that i can recall
Sure, but at this stage its important to decide whether the file is
getting corrupted during the download, or whether its something else.
The best way to check for corrupted downloads is to download a zip
file, dont try to install it, just open it with WinZip etc and verify the archive.
That will tell you if its getting corrupted during the download.
i went to the old machine downloaded the program did and install on
the old machine in quick time no xp sp1 causing problems.
then copied downloaded file onto usb flash stick plugged it into new
machine and from the flash stik installed the program no worries at
all.
so my question still is why does xp home sp2 cause all these problems?
you help is appreciated
tia
snipped
i have an update reply post added hope it can explain how, why or what
i feel the problem is.
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:42:25 +1000, "Rod Speed" snipped
You need to trouble shoot the problem in a systematic way.
Perhaps if you post the complete details of your system hardware and
software it might be easier for people to offer solutions.
As an example of the possible causes of corrupt file downloads there are
people on this forum (linked below), that have had problems with network
cards, firewall software conflicts and a feature of some nVidia based boards
called Active Armor.
http://www.anetforums.com/posts.aspx?ThreadIndex=32700
ask and ye shall recieve here are the full stat's:
CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3200+ 2.0GHz 939-Pin
Motherboard: ASUS AN8E nForce 4 Ultra
RAM: 1GB Hynix (Hyundai) DDR400
HDD: Seagate 8M 200GB SATA
Graphics: 256MB MSI X1300 Pro
DVD BenQ DW1650
still looks like and xp sp2 problem to me.
> ok more on the topic,
> i went to the old machine downloaded the program did and install
> on the old machine in quick time no xp sp1 causing problems.
> then copied downloaded file onto usb flash stick plugged it into new
> machine and from the flash stik installed the program no worries at all.
OK, clearly the downloads are getting corrupted.
> so my question still is why does xp home sp2 cause all these problems?
Is there any difference in how those two machines are connected to the net ?
> you help is appreciated
Doesnt to me, because hardly anyone
gets download corruption with XP SP2.
Bet it would even with SP1.
A quick Google throws up some other people with that problem and that
particular board
Doing a Google search using keywords of "AN8-E download corruption"
http://www.anetforums.com/posts.aspx?ThreadIndex=32700
http://secure.ncix.com/forumpost/displaythread.php?threadid=1084070
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=4978&st=40
yup gree it may not happen to you as you say, but it is happening to
me. an it tech told me never to get sp2 but all advice on this forum
and others said i needed to get it and nothing would happen.
what is happenint to me is what the tech told me happens to some sets
not all but some and it is hard to figure why.
now it doesn't happen with xp sp1 as i just showed, i did the download
on xp sp1 installed it on that machine, then copied the download to
the flash stick and plugged that into the new xp sp2 machine and
installed from there and it all worked.
but it would not work using xp sp2 even after app' 10 times doing a
new downlaod each time just in case it was corrupted there but the
download would ahve been good it only became corrupted when i tried to
get xp sp2 to install the download.
the common factor is since i have had this new machine with xp sp2 i
have trouble installing downloads even when it is obvious the
doiwnload is not corrupted.
as i already know others have the problem i had hoped that someone
here may know of it and how to fix it?
i must repeat i have never in 15 years of computers with win 95, 98 &
xp sp1, i have never had problems in installing any download i wanted
to get.
thankfully i don't do much downloading and hopefully this is the last
one but the m$ problem should not be there or it should be fixable.
tia
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:03:00 +1000, "Rod Speed" snipped
>gardenlen <garde...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
>> snipped
>
>OK, clearly the downloads are getting corrupted.
>
i don't believe they are rod it corrupts at point of install
>> so my question still is why does xp home sp2 cause all these problems?
>
>Is there any difference in how those two machines are connected to the net ?
>
one machine use the usb port and the new machine uses the ethernet
port. i would think the ethernet port should be at least the same as
the usb or better, i ahve been told it should be the better connection
>> you help is appreciated
What's it got to do with Microsoft? Are you just going to ignore Fred?
--
steam3801
ASCII a silly question, get a silly ANSI
If you had taken notice of fred you may have found this.
http://www.anetforums.com/posts.aspx?ThreadIndex=32700
start:Programs:NVIDIA Corporation:Network Access Manager:Web-based Interface
now go to ActiveArmor and disable it.
> yup gree it may not happen to you as you say, but it is happening
> to me. an it tech told me never to get sp2 but all advice on this
> forum and others said i needed to get it and nothing would happen.
> what is happenint to me is what the tech told me happens
> to some sets not all but some and it is hard to figure why.
> now it doesn't happen with xp sp1 as i just showed,
No you didnt with the hardware that you are getting corruption with.
> i did the download on xp sp1 installed it on that machine, then
> copied the download to the flash stick and plugged that into the
> new xp sp2 machine and installed from there and it all worked.
Yes, but unless you have just sp1 on that PC that has the
problem, it doesnt prove that its sp2 thats the problem.
> but it would not work using xp sp2 even after app' 10 times
> doing a new downlaod each time just in case it was corrupted
> there but the download would ahve been good it only became
> corrupted when i tried to get xp sp2 to install the download.
Yes, because you are getting corruption with downloads on that new PC.
Doesnt mean that its sp2 doing that.
> the common factor is since i have had this new machine
> with xp sp2 i have trouble installing downloads even
> when it is obvious the doiwnload is not corrupted.
You havent established that last, JUST that its the same size.
> as i already know others have the problem
Bet they dont exclusively with sp2.
> i had hoped that someone here may know of it and how to fix it?
> i must repeat i have never in 15 years of computers
> with win 95, 98 & xp sp1, i have never had problems
> in installing any download i wanted to get.
Others have seen file corruption with downloads with those.
> thankfully i don't do much downloading and hopefully this is the last
> one but the m$ problem should not be there or it should be fixable.
Corse it should.
You never did answer the question about whether
both PCs connect to the net the same way.
> i don't believe they are rod it corrupts at point of install
Bet they are. I told you how to test that, download a
zip and see if it verifys. Bet it wont with the new PC.
>
>>> so my question still is why does xp home sp2 cause all these
>>> problems?
>>
>> Is there any difference in how those two machines are connected to
>> the net ?
>>
> one machine use the usb port and the new machine uses the ethernet
> port. i would think the ethernet port should be at least the same as
> the usb or better, i ahve been told it should be the better connection
Try swapping the connection used.
Its more likely to be the motherboard tho as Fred listed.
nothing wroing with waht fred said i provided more info' along the
line he said i am yet to go to that site he listed, and it has lots ot
do with m$ xp sp2, i ahve never never had the problems with xp sp1 or
win95/98, if you read my other posts i have had problems from day one
trying to instal many downloads that i needed.
yes maybe lots of people out ther don't have problems maybe it depends
on what programs they want to run, but this si happening so i hope
someone out there may twigg to what the issue is with sp2.
i do appreciate all the imput and i suppose if i can't get my story
across i may have to live with it.
i first wrote the failure said i have either not enough ram, not
enough disc space free for file transfer or maybe it is a corrupt
cabinet file that is what m$ xp told me.
so i reiterate i have a 200gig hdd with only 9 gig in use that leaves
over 190 gig free space. and i have 1 gig ram.
my old machine is running 351 meg ram and a 6 gig hdd and it causes me
no problems with xp sp1
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:55:55 +1000, steam3801 snipped
i did answer that question re the pc connections
the new machine use an ethernet connection
the old one uses a usb connection
and if it isn't sp2 corrupting the install then i don't know what it
is?
these problems are new to me
>gardenlen <garde...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:01:27 +1000, "Rod Speed"
>> <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> gardenlen <garde...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> snipped
>>>
>>> OK, clearly the downloads are getting corrupted.
>
>> i don't believe they are rod it corrupts at point of install
>
>Bet they are. I told you how to test that, download a
>zip and see if it verifys. Bet it wont with the new PC.
not sure waht you mean here? as far as i know all files i downlaod are
zipped files, not sure how i see if what verifys what???
>>
>>>> so my question still is why does xp home sp2 cause all these
>>>> problems?
>>>
>>> Is there any difference in how those two machines are connected to
>>> the net ?
>>>
>> one machine use the usb port and the new machine uses the ethernet
>> port. i would think the ethernet port should be at least the same as
>> the usb or better, i ahve been told it should be the better connection
>
>Try swapping the connection used.
>
>Its more likely to be the motherboard tho as Fred listed.
>
so the brand of motherboard i have been sold is faulty??
all update downloads for xp and all spyware and anti-virus software
all load and install no trouble
it wasn't that i hadn't taken notice of fred i jsut hadn't gone to the
link he provided and now having gone there i don't realy understand
that jargon as i am no technical person with computers.
so is the answer in the following quote from one of the many posts in
that thread:
" ok i got my to work, i have downloaded like 5 things like 300mb and
they work.
what i did was go to your focreware network access how i got there is
start:Programs:NVIDIA Corporation:Network Access Manager:Web-based
Interface now go to ActiveArmor and disabled it. "
so is the above action what will fix my machine???
and if the motherboard is at fault is this covered under warranty and
how do i prove to the supplier that my motherboard is faulty???
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:53:14 GMT, "jollyrodgers"
<joll...@bogpound.cum> wrote:
snipped
From what I have read it may be more of a driver issue that only affects
some users.
I just visited a forum dedicated to the A8N range of motherboards and there
is a recent thread there mentioning new nVidia drivers that may solve the
problem.
The forum is at (registration required)
http://asustech.15.forumer.com/index.php?showtopic=1349
The relevant post follows.
"Nvidia has released a new driver package for the NF4 based mobo's. For a
AMD based mobo the file can be found @
http://www.nvidia.com/object/nforce_nf4_win2k_6.86.html
One of the things that has to be done is to uninstall your old networking
drivers at a minimum. I would recomend that users uninstall all the NF4
drivers just to be safe. According to Crisao23 the following needs to be
done if a user is brave enough to install the Nvidia Firewall:
Run the drivers installer and follow the install sequence til it asks you if
you want to install the NAM, say NO reboot then when back at desktop unpack
the drivers installer using WinRAR and run the firewall installer inside the
NAM folder. If this is not done you will see a error on some boards, due to
the fact that you were using old network drivers it'll say that NAM isn't
available. Thanks to Cris once again for the news on this one
i will be taking a good long look at the info you ahve given me, i am
a relative novice at computers so a lot of jargon goes over my head,
and i don't always know wher to start looking for some of the
processes mentioned, when things get that heavy in the past i have had
technical help close by so i can take the machine there and let them
do that stuff, i don't have that now.
for me changing drivers sounds way past my comfort zone, at the very
least i will go into nvidia firewall and disable that armourguard
whatever.
and hope i never have to download another needed program, while i have
the old machine still running i can do downloads there and transfer
them to the new machine using the flash stick.
sorry if it seemed i was disregarding you i wasn't just lots of info
coming my way leaving me lots of options to decide which way i should
go.
thank you and all the others for the help to date. i will post a final
wash up if iget some positive result.
ta
No, it's just the drivers supplied by NVidia have an incompatability
problem. Sounds a bit like double-talk for the same thing, but there
is a big difference in the IT world. It's not an uncommon thing across
the whole IT spectrum.
> not sure waht you mean here? as far as i know all files i downlaod
> are zipped files, not sure how i see if what verifys what???
With files that have a zip extension, its easier to use WinZip
to open them and to verify the zip file using the verify button.
>>>>> so my question still is why does xp home sp2 cause all these
>>>>> problems?
>>>>
>>>> Is there any difference in how those two machines are connected to
>>>> the net ?
>>>>
>>> one machine use the usb port and the new machine uses the ethernet
>>> port. i would think the ethernet port should be at least the same as
>>> the usb or better, i ahve been told it should be the better
>>> connection
>>
>> Try swapping the connection used.
>>
>> Its more likely to be the motherboard tho as Fred listed.
> so the brand of motherboard i have been sold is faulty??
Not that so much as some problems with the
nvidia firewall thats usually installed with it or drivers.
> all update downloads for xp and all spyware and anti-virus software
> all load and install no trouble
You said the exact opposite previously, that they all
fail to install when downloaded with the new PC.
> and if it isn't sp2 corrupting the install then i don't know what it is?
Like Fred said, others are getting that with that new motherboard.
You dont know that it has anything to do with sp2 until you run sp1
on that new system and dont get the download corruption anymore.
> i do appreciate all the imput and i suppose if i can't
> get my story across i may have to live with it.
> i first wrote the failure said i have either not enough ram, not
> enough disc space free for file transfer or maybe it is a corrupt
> cabinet file that is what m$ xp told me.
And its clearly a problem with a corrupt file when you can
move the file to the system using a usb key and it works fine.
> so i reiterate i have a 200gig hdd with only 9 gig in use
> that leaves over 190 gig free space. and i have 1 gig ram.
Yes, the problem is a corrupt cab file.
Its still not clear why the new machine is producing
corrupt cab files when you download to that new machine.
> and if the motherboard is at fault
Unlikely, it looks more like a driver/nvidia firewall issue.
> is this covered under warranty
Yes.
> and how do i prove to the supplier that my motherboard is faulty???
Dont worry about that until the updated driver and turning
that nvidia firewall off doesnt fix the download corruption.
Its unlikely to be bad hardware.
ok still no idea wher i should be or waht i should do? info is too
tech' for me.
so if you have trouble suggesting why cab files are being corrupted at
download then i got no hope at all.
anyhow i can't even get to where the following info' suggest i could
go:
start copy unedited:
"what i did was go to your focreware network access how i got there is
start:Programs:NVIDIA Corporation:Network Access Manager:Web-based
Interface now go to ActiveArmor and disabled it."
end copy.
currently firefox can't connect to any of the live links in nvidia
firewall.
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 06:22:29 +1000, "Rod Speed"
so si there a qik check that says this driver or that driver need
replacing upadting? and that the problem will then be fixed? i don't
feel i have the competancy to uninstall driver and install new ones.
tia
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 06:07:43 +1000, steam3801
<tryspam...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
snipped
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 06:22:20 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
snipped
>
>Not that so much as some problems with the
>nvidia firewall thats usually installed with it or drivers.
>
>> all update downloads for xp and all spyware and anti-virus software
>> all load and install no trouble
>
>You said the exact opposite previously, that they all
>fail to install when downloaded with the new PC.
>
no not quiet correct i ahve trouble trying to put into words that
those who read it can understand waht i am saying because i am not a
technical person around computers.
the only problems i have is with new downloads when i try to download
and install suing the new machine, i cannot reall saying anything
about updates, that is the confusing issue with as i see it the
machine will downlaod any up dates and install them for any updatable
programs no troubles at all.
but the only way i can download and install a new program onto the new
machine is by downloading it on the old machien and using the flash
stick to install it onto the new machine that works???? why i don't
know?
when a new downlaod coplmetes ther is no indication that that zipped
(as i know it) file is corrupt until i try to execute and install.
so from my simplistic novice view point if there are conflicts with
drivers etc., ? it must be (well) known in the industry so why aren't
there some for us novices fixes available?
tia
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 06:24:40 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>snipped
>
>> and how do i prove to the supplier that my motherboard is faulty???
>
>Dont worry about that until the updated driver and turning
>that nvidia firewall off doesnt fix the download corruption.
>
ok can you line by line direct me how to update drivers as indicated
above please tia
>Its unlikely to be bad hardware.
>
>
>> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:53:14 GMT, "jollyrodgers"
>> <joll...@bogpound.cum> wrote:
>>
>> snipped
>> With peace and brightest of blessings,
>>
>> len
>
With peace and brightest of blessings,
len
--
> ok still no idea wher i should be or waht i should do?
Not sure if that is a question to me or not.
If its is, I'd first try turning off the nvidia firewall as documented
in the first of Fred's threads and if that doesnt fix the problem,
try the updated driver thats mentioned later.
> info is too tech' for me.
> so if you have trouble suggesting why cab files are
> being corrupted at download then i got no hope at all.
I just meant that until you try the alternatives listed in those
threads that Fred listed, it isnt possible to way which one is
the problem with the corrupted downloads.
> anyhow i can't even get to where the following info' suggest i could go:
> start copy unedited:
> "what i did was go to your focreware network access how i got there is
> start:Programs:NVIDIA Corporation:Network Access Manager:Web-based
> Interface now go to ActiveArmor and disabled it."
> end copy.
> currently firefox can't connect to any of the live links in nvidia firewall.
That one is telling you to use the start menu entry, nothing to do with firefox.
> i think i have said in apost somewehre if it is the motehrboard how do
> get the supplier of the machine to look at it under warranty and replace?
And I said that you need to try turning the nvidia firewall off first,
and if that doesnt fix the problem, try the updated driver next.
> there is still a fair grey area that indicates we can't say for sure it is the m/b?
Yeah, I just meant that the problem has come with the new
motherboard, not that its the physical motherboard that is faulty.
> and wouldn't i be having other problems as well if it where?
Not necessarily, some motherboard problems can be quite specific in the
effect of the problem. But at this stage it looks like the motherboard is fine
since many have found that just turning the nvidia firewall off fixes the problem.
> so si there a qik check that says this driver or that driver need
> replacing upadting? and that the problem will then be fixed? i don't
> feel i have the competancy to uninstall driver and install new ones.
Try turning the nvidia firewall off first. If that doesnt fix the problem, I'll give
you detailled instructions on how to update the driver. Its very easy to do.
Because when you download using the new PC, the file gets corrupted.
When you download it with the old PC, the file isnt corrupted.
> when a new downlaod coplmetes ther is no indication that that
> zipped (as i know it) file is corrupt until i try to execute and install.
Yes, but like I said, just because the file length is the same
doesnt mean that all the bytes in that file are correct.
> so from my simplistic novice view point if there are conflicts
> with drivers etc., ? it must be (well) known in the industry
> so why aren't there some for us novices fixes available?
Presumably it cant be that commonly seen yet for some reason.
In other words the corruption is only commonly seen
with a particular hardware config or something.
Presumably Asus will document it properly when its
clear just when the download corruption is seen and
when it isnt with that particular motherboard.
Try turning the nvidia firewall off first.
I said in another post how to do that.
>gardenlen <garde...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
>>snipped
>try the updated driver thats mentioned later.
>
ok is there any place specifically that i should go to disable the
firewall?
>>snipped
>> end copy.
>
>> currently firefox can't connect to any of the live links in nvidia firewall.
>
>That one is telling you to use the start menu entry, nothing to do with firefox.
>
that was after accessing nvidia folder from the sart menu, none of the
folders in nvidia will open?
need instruction on how to disable the firewall please? as i can't
access anything in start menu\nvidia\folder
tia
Interesting thread here Rod:
http://forums.nvidia.com/lofiversion/index.php?t8171.html
> that was after accessing nvidia folder from the
> sart menu, none of the folders in nvidia will open?
OK, dont have it here, so I cant try that myself.
got the link saved but all beyond my comprehension maybe rod or
someone else might work it out and share the info?
tia
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:44:42 +1000, "Swampfox" <gro...@pochta.ru>
snipped
With peace and brightest of blessings,
len
--
>>> so si there a qik check that says this driver or that driver need
>>> replacing upadting? and that the problem will then be fixed? i don't
>>> feel i have the competancy to uninstall driver and install new ones.
>> Try turning the nvidia firewall off first. If that doesnt fix the
>> problem, I'll give you detailled instructions on how to update the
>> driver. Its very easy to do.
> need instruction on how to disable the firewall please?
> as i can't access anything in start menu\nvidia\folder
Click on the Nvidia Firewall icon in the systray, where the clock is.
In the top entry, Current Firewall Profile, select the off entry.
Thats in the manual, P 3-20 if I didnt say it clearly enough.
>>> it wasn't that i hadn't taken notice of fred i jsut hadn't gone to
>>> the link he provided and now having gone there i don't realy
>>> understand that jargon as i am no technical person with computers.
>>> so is the answer in the following quote from one of the many posts
>>> in that thread:
>>> " ok i got my to work, i have downloaded like 5 things like 300mb
>>> and they work.
>>> what i did was go to your focreware network access how i got there
>>> is start:Programs:NVIDIA Corporation:Network Access
>>> Manager:Web-based Interface now go to ActiveArmor and disabled it. "
>>> so is the above action what will fix my machine???
>>> and if the motherboard is at fault
>> Unlikely, it looks more like a driver/nvidia firewall issue.
>>> is this covered under warranty
>> Yes.
>>> and how do i prove to the supplier that my motherboard is faulty???
>> Dont worry about that until the updated driver and turning
>> that nvidia firewall off doesnt fix the download corruption.
>> Its unlikely to be bad hardware.
> Interesting thread here Rod:
> http://forums.nvidia.com/lofiversion/index.php?t8171.html
Urk, it is indeed.
I wouldnt worry about it for now until you get the download problem resolved.
The other one with file copying locally appears to be only seen
with hard drives you dont have and I'll tell you how to check that
you arent seeing the problem with yours once the download
problem has been resolved.
snipped
>
ok done that, so does that now mean i hae no firewall protection at
all?
or should i reinstate zone alarm?
> ok done that, so does that now mean i hae no firewall protection at all?
No, you said you had a hardware firewall in your router from memory
and you likely have the XP one still turned on too if you didnt turn it off.
> or should i reinstate zone alarm?
I wouldnt myself, even if you dont have a firewall in your router/adsl modem.
The XP firewall is quite adequate unless you want to be able to
see what stuff on your system is connecting to on the net etc.
What happened with the downloads or are you
asking before you connect to the net and try that ?
ta
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:29:15 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
snipped
> i'll hae to let you know later about the downloads,
> need to find on i need so i can try it out.
Just get one from tucows etc and just verify
the zip file, no need to actually install it.
how do i verify the zip file, i had a look at the files i have in my
download folder and it just calls them application files.
the problems are growing rod, i have been all day trying to get an
update into avg even tried a whole new download uninstalled the older
copy all the same version, that all failed and now it won't install
avast and i have nvidia turned off.
> how do i verify the zip file,
Right click on the zip file and select the Open with WinZip entry in the popup menu.
> i had a look at the files i have in my download
> folder and it just calls them application files.
See if that Open with WinZip appears in the popup menu with
any of them, it will with the ones that are self extracting zip files.
> the problems are growing rod, i have been all day trying to get an
> update into avg even tried a whole new download uninstalled the older
> copy all the same version, that all failed and now it won't install
> avast and i have nvidia turned off.
Yeah, it looks rather like you are still getting corrupted downloads.
See what that uninstall in add/remove does.
>>>>> i'll hae to let you know later about the downloads,
>>>>> need to find on i need so i can try it out.
>>>> Just get one from tucows etc and just verify
>>>> the zip file, no need to actually install it.
>>> how do i verify the zip file,
>> Right click on the zip file and select the Open with WinZip entry in the popup menu.
>>> i had a look at the files i have in my download
>>> folder and it just calls them application files.
>> See if that Open with WinZip appears in the popup menu with
>> any of them, it will with the ones that are self extracting zip files.
> i don't think this version of xp uses winzip,
Correct, it doesnt. You have to install winzip to get those popups.
> it ash the files listed as a '.exe' file when i right button it just shows the open and
> nothing about winzip oir any program
See above.
>>> the problems are growing rod, i have been all day trying to get an
>>> update into avg even tried a whole new download uninstalled the older
>>> copy all the same version, that all failed and now it won't install
>>> avast and i have nvidia turned off.
>> Yeah, it looks rather like you are still getting corrupted downloads.
>> See what that uninstall in add/remove does.
Yes, you uninstall the one that mentions the network access manager.