Building Ice Cream Sandwich for the Motorola Xoom

[Thomas Bennett]

I successfully built Ice Cream Sandwich for the Motorola Xoom (stingray), but ran into an issue with flashing the device. It seems like the baseband is not what's expected.

bash-3.2$ fastboot flashall
--------------------------------------------
Bootloader Version...: 1050
Baseband Version.....: N_02.0F.00R
Serial Number........: XXXXXXXXXXX
--------------------------------------------
checking product...
OKAY [ 0.830s]
checking version-bootloader...
OKAY [ 0.841s]
checking version-baseband...
FAILED

Device version-baseband is 'N_02.0F.00R'.
Update requires 'CDMA_N_03.1A.5CPS'.

finished. total time: 5.416s
Any idea how I can update the baseband to what's expected, or how to work around the issue?

[Jean-Baptiste Queru]

You can delete the relevant line in
device/moto/stingray/board-info.txt (and re-run make). That'll bypass
the version check.

JBQ

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Android Building" mailing list.
> To post to this group, send email to android-...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> android-buildi...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/android-building?hl=en

--
Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
Software Engineer, Android Open-Source Project, Google.

Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
warning.

[Thomas Bennett]

Seems to have worked! Thanks!

[andria]

Hi,

I just read your post and I would like to know the differences between stingray and wingray because on source.android.com only wingray is mentionned.

Thanks

[Jean-Baptiste Queru]

stingray is the version for Verizon Wireless (both versions in fact,
the 3G-only one, and the 3G/4G one). wingray is the wifi-only US
version. stingray isn't supported in AOSP, wingray is (though with
limited functionality)

JBQ

[Geofuzzy]

When you say limited functionality are you referring to the camera drivers missing?

[Jean-Baptiste Queru]

Mostly the camera, yes, but there might be some other more subtle ones
as well (sensors come to mind).

JBQ

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Geofuzzy <goga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When you say limited functionality are you referring to the camera drivers missing?
>