Polonium is readily absorbed by the body, but has a relatively short
biological half-life of about 30 days because it is excreted. It
concentrates in the spleen, kidneys, and liver which are the principal
organs of concern for exposure.
The rapid onset of illness after the presumed time of poisoning on Nov. 1
indicates a very high dose (if it was indeed the action of the radioisotope
that led to his initial symptoms). Po-210 is manufactured in nuclear
reactors and is used commercially in static eliminators (though on a much
reduced scale from many years ago), but the commercial anti-static sources
are so weak that a deadly dose cannot be obtained from them. There are very
few places were deadly amounts of this radioisotope can be obtained - mostly
radioisotope laboratories. The very recent acquisition of this material
should make it easy to identify possible culprits - unless it was done via a
clandestine route, like an intelligence agency from a government laboratory.
Carey Sublette
November 24, 2006
Former Spy Blames Putin Before Dying
By SARAH LYALL and JOHN O'NEIL
LONDON, Nov. 24 - British health officials said today that a "major dose" of
a radioactive substance had been found in the body of a former Russian spy
who died Thursday night after accusing Russian President Vladimir V. Putin
of being behind a plot to poison him.
Mr. Litvinenko, 43, a prominent opponent of the Kremlin, was hospitalized
earlier this month. He said that he fell ill on Nov. 1 after meeting
separately with two Russians and an Italian contact who said he had
information about the October killing of Anna Politkovskaya, a journalist
who had made her name as a critic of the government's policies in Chechnya.
Prof. Roger Cox, a radiation specialist working for the Health Protection
Agency, said at a televised news conference today that urine samples showed
high levels of alpha radiation. He said they appeared to be the result of
the ingestion of a substance called polonium 210, which he described as a
substance that is not generally available, but is used in some industrial
processes to prevent static buildup.
"You certainly can't go and buy it straightforwardly," he said.
"I've been a radiation scientist for 30-odd years, and this is the first
incident" involving apparent polonium 210 poisoning that he had seen,
Professor Cox said.
...
Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company
Good work -- but I would qualify "very recent". Since (as I heard on
the radio) a lethal dose is in the microgram range, one could have stolen
a gram years ago and still had a lethal dose.
This would be something like the world's entire annual commercial
production, and would be putting out 140 watts of decay heat. This stuff
isn't produced or sold in gram lots.
I think that 50 millicuries is about the right dose for the observed effect
(there are 4490 curies/g for Po-210), this would be 11 micrograms. This
about 200 times the amount in a Staticmaster® Brushes:
http://www.2spi.com/catalog/photo/statmaster.shtml
A quantity, say, 100 times this amount (which would have decayed to 50
millicuries over the course of 2.5 years) would be equivalent to 20,000 of
these commercial units - a very large amount to buy or steal.
It is difficult to handle, but this is hardly an insurmountable problem.
They could buy 400 commerical sources for $4,000 and extract the polonium
and process it into a palatable concentrate, but some significant lab skill
would be required due to its toxiicity and volatility.
Fine, we all agree that it could not have been collected from Staticmaster
brushes. But you take my point -- if you needed 11 micrograms, you could
have purchased 22 micrograms 138 days ago, or 44 micrograms 276 days
ago, or 88 micrograms 414 days ago, or 176 micrograms 552 days ago.
This enters the realm of "somewhat recent" -- well over a year.
|> I think that 50 millicuries is about the right dose for the
|> observed effect (there are 4490 curies/g for Po-210), this would be
|> 11 micrograms. This about 200 times the amount in a Staticmaster®
|> Brushes: http://www.2spi.com/catalog/photo/statmaster.shtml A
|> quantity, say, 100 times this amount (which would have decayed to
|> 50 millicuries over the course of 2.5 years) would be equivalent to
|> 20,000 of these commercial units - a very large amount to buy or
|> steal.
|
|Fine, we all agree that it could not have been collected from
|Staticmaster brushes. But you take my point -- if you needed 11
|micrograms, you could have purchased 22 micrograms 138 days ago, or
|44 micrograms 276 days ago, or 88 micrograms 414 days ago, or 176
|micrograms 552 days ago. This enters the realm of "somewhat recent"
|-- well over a year.
well, perhaps, but the point is that there's generally a strong
incentive to arrange things so that you don't procure the substance
until shortly before you're going to use it. (in this case not just
to minimize procurement cost but also because the bulkiness of an
equivalently lethal amount of the degraded form might be bad for
clandestine purposes.)
--
That seems a separate point.
> (in this case not just
> to minimize procurement cost but also because the bulkiness of an
> equivalently lethal amount of the degraded form might be bad for
> clandestine purposes.)
How bulky could 176 micrograms be?
... and if the Russian government was involved, I doubt if procurement
cost would be an issue. Their reactors, their polonium...
The presence of polonium traces by the sushi bar and by the former
spy's home could also be the result of killers who did not know the
substance they had was weaponized radioactive polonium. If they
thought the material they had was just a powerful poison, they would
have thought gloves were enough protection when handling the stuff.
Just a thought.
Two points here:
1) Is it actually plausible that some killers-to-be decided well over a year
that on or about November 1, 2006 they were going to kill someone so that
they must lay in a large supply of Po-210 so that they would have enough on
that appointed day?
I think police detectives around the world would get the giggles if
presented with this theory of the case.
2) Yes, they could have bought 800 millicuries (this stuff is not sold by
weight) 552 days ago, but the math is actually working against the theory
that it was obtained from commerical sources.
50 millicuries is already alot for a commercial purchase (not to a regular
customer), and each doubling makes the purchase correspondingly more
conspicuous. 500 microcuries is the most you can buy in the U.S. without a
special license.
In the absence of any unusual purchases identifiable by commerical
suppliers, the theory that the source was clandestine (e.g. a government
lab) is strengthened.
> substance they had was weaponized radioactive polonium. If they
> thought the material they had was just a powerful poison, they would
> have thought gloves were enough protection when handling the stuff.
> Just a thought.
Gloves ARE enough to block an Alpha emission. Might be a bit slight on to
prevent you ingesting the stuff though.
Anyone here read `Wolves Eat Dogs'? ;)
--
Paul Repacholi 1 Crescent Rd.,
+61 (08) 9257-1001 Kalamunda.
West Australia 6076
comp.os.vms,- The Older, Grumpier Slashdot
Raw, Cooked or Well-done, it's all half baked.
EPIC, The Architecture of the future, always has been, always will be.
Not the first time the KGB used radioactive poison to eliminate a
defector
As related by John Barron, an editor at Readers Digest, in his book THE
KGB a defector
named Khokhlov was poisoned by radiaoactive thallium. He survived
(barely) do to
heroic treatments given by his German doctors. Looks like Putin
resuming some of
their old habits.
> It has been reported that Alexander Litvinenko, who died yesterday after
> being poisoned in London, was poisoned with the radioisotope polonium-210.
> This isotope has a half-life of only 138.38 days, so the material used for
> poisoning Litvinenko was recently obtained.
>
> Po-210 is manufactured in nuclear
> reactors and is used commercially in static eliminators (though on a much
> reduced scale from many years ago), but the commercial anti-static sources
> are so weak that a deadly dose cannot be obtained from them. There are very
> few places were deadly amounts of this radioisotope can be obtained - mostly
> radioisotope laboratories. The very recent acquisition of this material
> should make it easy to identify possible culprits - unless it was done via a
> clandestine route, like an intelligence agency from a government laboratory.
Po-210 was used in early atomic bombs as part of the neutron intiator - the
"urchin" - is it still used at all in that role?
I doubt that advanced modern bombs use it, but perhaps some crude weapons
might? How hard would it be for eg a terrorist or wannabe nuclear state to
make a non-Po neutron initiator?
--
Peter Fairbrother
They do tend to lose stuff.
Jim E
>Carey Sublette wrote:
Much easier than it would be for them to make a Po-210 neutron initiator.
Deuterium and tritium are both commercially available in the necessary
quantities, gas discharge tubes are commonplace, as are the pulsed-power
electronics to drive them. The chemistry and materials issues would be
almost trivial compared to trying to build a Polonium initiator.
It is a common mistake to assume that nuclear weapons development by
contemporary emerging nuclear powers, will precisely recapitulate the
process of nuclear weapons development in the 1940s and 1950s. Much
of what was done then, is now widely understood to be a technological
dead end best avoided entirely. Po-210 neutron initiators are one
example of this.
--
*John Schilling * "Anything worth doing, *
*Member:AIAA,NRA,ACLU,SAS,LP * is worth doing for money" *
*Chief Scientist & General Partner * -13th Rule of Acquisition *
*White Elephant Research, LLC * "There is no substitute *
*schi...@spock.usc.edu * for success" *
*661-718-0955 or 661-275-6795 * -58th Rule of Acquisition *
beat me to the same question.
can neutron initiators be THAT available?
i can't wait til the Boy Scouts go nuclear - for real.
> It has been reported that Alexander Litvinenko, who died yesterday after
> being poisoned in London, was poisoned with the radioisotope polonium-210.
> This isotope has a half-life of only 138.38 days, so the material used for
> poisoning Litvinenko was recently obtained.
(snip for brevity)
Po-210 is a by product of LBE (lead-bismuth eutectic) reactors, 209Bi + N
= 210Po. AFAIK the Russian Navy is the only organization using such
reactors in any sort of wholesale fashion; from what I understand they've
had difficulties as the Po likes to vaporize and "plate out" on the inside
surfaces of the subs in the event of the tiniest leak.
--
Mike Harris
Austin TX
Interesting question
mk5000
"The only time the governor was
directly asked ... if he'd ever been
arrested for drinking, and he
replied, 'I do not have a perfect
record, Throughout
this campaign he has been very
forthcoming with the American people
that he made mistakes as a youth,
that he did things as a youth
that he
is not proud of, and he has been
very open about that."--Hughes, Bush's spokesman
If I wanted to obtain or buy it - where would I go to do that? Who
makes it?
Just a guess, government labs.
Jim E
>
> If I wanted to obtain or buy it - where would I go to do that? Who
> makes it?
>
>
> Just a guess, government labs.
>
>
> Jim E
Of course any dialing up a supplier and inquiring about buying Polonium
would unless
the buyer is known to seller and has a legitimate reason to possess
polonium (research,
industrial use (aka Staticmaster)) would probably be getting the third
degree from your
local FBI/DHS .
Is this very last statement an automated signature (like the
one my computer adds under my signature automatically), or
is it intended as an answer to restey9690's post?
And was John Kerry's past not discussed widely (as when he
assembled a mob of Sterno-drinkers to tour the country lying
about war crimes that in some cases they hadn't even been in
Vietnam to commit) because he was working for the side that
our press wanted to win in Vietnam (the Communists)?
--
Vance P. Frickey
remove "safety" from listed Email address to send mail
"When under attack, no country is obligated to collect
permission slips from allies to strike back."
- Charles Krauthammer
Although to be scrupulous, it's worth noting that Litvinenko
was a Muslim (one assumes a convert).
The closest thing we have to a profile on suicide bombers
and similar Islamic terrorists shows that they are often
late-in-life converts to Islam and highly-skilled, often
with advanced college degrees or similar education and
experience.
Significance? A committed, Koolaid-guzzling convert to
Islam in Litvinenko's shoes might have considered it his
religious duty to simulate an assassination by means that
implicate Putin and/or others in the Russian government very
publicly and convincingly - even if it's not true.
What I've heard about Soviet suitcase bomb technology
doesn't exclude the possibility of polonium-210 being part
of their design - some of what I've seen indicates that they
have to be serviced at regular intervals to remain usable,
and that they aren't healthy to be around for more than
short periods of time. (Of course, it's more plausible that
this is owing to the presence of tritium in the weapons).
But assume that either because Litvinenko had access to
suitcase nukes in his government job or connections in the
Russian nuclear industry, /he/ was the source of the
polonium-210 - the potential for mischief would be huge.
Isolating Putin and Russia from everyone else in Eurasia
politically might create more instability - and dissension
among what we call "the West" - on Earth than anything ObL
could manage on his own.
A new "caliphate" could simply move in and pick up the
pieces after a nasty internecine fight between Russia and
everyone else west of the Ural mountains started because of
nasty suspicions about assassinations which devolve into
another Sarajevo-type crisis - which kicks off another
political chain reaction like the one that led to World War
One. It could just be a very, very well-thought out
provocation.
--
Vance P. Frickey
remove "safety" from listed Email address to send mail
"If there is a God, atheism must seem
to Him as less of an insult than
religion." - Edmond and Jules de Goncourt