Atheists SUICIDAL After Obama Dumps Them

[BroilJAB]

Obama at 2012 Dem Convention,
"I rejected the failed Atheist worldview. And I
directed that my platform embrace God. We
voted and the atheists are done, here."

Only the Church stood squarely across the
path of Hitler's campaign for suppressing truth.
The Holy Church alone has had the courage
and persistence to stand for intellectual truth.
-- Al Einstein

[Syd M.]

Oh, stop lying, idiot.

[Virgil]

In article
<35d42232-38dc-4749...@v15g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>,
BroilJAB <Design...@wmconnect.com> wrote:


Those who claim certainty of the truth of that for which they have
absolutely no objective physical evidence and equally claim certainty of
the falsehood of that for which science has ever growing mountains of
supporting objective physical evidence are arrogant fools and doom
themselves by their arrogance.



The "Big Tent" Creationist Charter

(established circa 1980)

1. Don't ask, don't tell what happened when (must cover up those
weaknesses and contradictions of those failed YEC and OEC
"theories"!).

2. Bait and switch between proximate and ultimate causes.

3. Promote doubt of evolution, and leave it to the audience to infer
what happened instead, when, and how.

4. Bait and switch between evolution and abiogenesis.

5. Bait and switch between abiogenesis, which had to occur at least
once by definition, and the yet-unknown proximate causes of how it
occurred.

6. Use the word "Darwinism" at every opportunity.

7. Quote mine like there�s no tomorrow.

8. Play favorites with the evidence, just like YECs and OECs, but
don�t infer anything other than that "Darwinism" is falsified � or
unfalsifiable � or dead, dying, etc., whatever the audience will buy.

9. If the "activist judges" rule in favor of the "Darwinists" ditch
the "creation" language, and use something like "design" instead.

10. If you need to do #9, claim that your "theory" is not
creationism; critics will take the bait and react with "is too
creationism!" Which lets you�

11. Exploit multiple definitions (especially of "theory"), and the
public misconceptions based on them.

12. If all else fails, whine about being "expelled" and play the
Hitler card.
--

[Virgil]

In article
<2ed14d2b-fde8-4c48...@u15g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
BroilJAB <Design...@wmconnect.com> wrote:




"Darwinists" make lots of speculations/claims about the processes of
evolution, but, in evolutionary science, as in other sciences, those
speculations/claims remain merely speculations/claims until confirmed by
objective physical evidence, and are immediately rejected when objective
physical evidence disproves them.

Creationists also make lots of 'speculations/claims', but they regularly
assert the truth of those speculations/claims with without any objective
physical evidence confirming them or assert the falsehood of these
'speculations/claims' without any objective physical evidence
contradicting them.

Scientists do not object to speculation.

What scientists DO object to is claiming the absolute correctness of
such speculations, as Creationists do, without the support of any
objective physical evidence and, equally, to claiming the absolute
falsehood of such speculations, as Creationists do, without any
objective physical evidence contradicting them.

Thus all sciences, including evolution, are guided by the available
objective physical evidence while all creationism regularly rejects any
implications of objective physical evidence which does not support their
IDiot Bibliolatry.
--