Holocaust Links
Joe Bruno
Bent Attorney Esq.
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/6000e28f4ecd22ba
you think no one else was a victim? just the chosen people? good
grief grow up man.
Topaz
Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany
went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just
a couple years later. If an incredible economic improvement can be
achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them
with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world
should give this a try.
Obviously the Jews don't want anyone else getting the idea of removing
them to create prosperity. The Jews control the mass media in most
Western countries. Most people don't know about the Balfour
Declaration. During World War One, Zionist Jews offered to use their
control of the press to bring America into World War One if Britain
would promise them Palestine. This offer was dubbed the Balfour
Declaration. If the Jews had enough media control and influence to
push America into World War One in 1917, what else have they done with
their power?
It was a huge embarrassment for the Jews to see Germany so prosperous
in the mid-1930s after removing them from power. They considered this
a dangerous precedent. To deal with this "problem" the Jewish World
Congress declared war on Germany in 1933. This declaration of war at
least encouraged a world-wide boycott against Germany and at worst
encouraged other nations of the world to become hostile toward
Germany. (The Jews curiously sanctioned the Germans before the Germans
passed any laws restricting the Jews.) More importantly the Jews
pushed vicious anti-German slander in all the Jewish-owned newspapers
in the West in the years leading up to World War Two. The Communist
mass murder of 30 million people in Russia and the Ukraine received
almost no publicity in the Jewish media. Most people in the West only
heard a serious mention of these Communist mass murders beginning in
the 1980s. Instead, the Jewish media focused all their hatred and
agitation against Germany and its allies.
After six years of relentless agitation, the Jews pushed England and
France into war with Germany. Only two years later, FDR and his cabal
of Jews provoked a war with Japan (and Germany).
Naturally, the Jews did not want future historians to say: "World War
Two was provoked by the Jewish media in retaliation for Germany
removing the Jews from power." The Jews needed a new reason for World
War Two. A reason that painted their enemies as unquestionably evil.
So they invented the Holocaust.
The Holocaust stood mostly unchallenged for decades after the war
because people feared being branded "Nazi-sympathizers" for
questioning its details. The truth always comes out in the long run.
Professor Arthur Butz published his famous work "The Hoax of the 20th
Century" in 1977 detailing a very solid argument against this war
propaganda. Dr. Butz pointed out that the world population of Jews
remained at about 16 million before and after the war. He also noted
that half a million Jews remained in Paris after four years of German
occupation. Both these facts strongly suggest the Holocaust is a
fraud, but the political power of the Jews has suppressed and punished
any public questioning of the Holocaust to this day. David Irving
joined the ranks of Revisionist historians several years ago and went
from a famous successful author to a pariah thanks to persecution by
the Jews.
The Institute for Historical Review has done great work exposing the
Holocaust as a great historical fraud. Anyone interested in looking
for historical truth should visit their website. It's a shock for many
people to see how much propaganda we've been force fed.
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
Joe Bruno
wrote:
Not at all. The Nizkor website is devoted to all the victims of
Naziism.
You don't pay attention, do you?
Joe Bruno
Pay attention, dimwit:
_Chronicle of Higher Education_, January 8, 1998. P A6
HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ISSUES STATEMENT DEPLORING EFFORTS TO DENY
HOLOCAUST
by Ellen K. Coughlin
Chicago
The governing council of the American Historical Association,
meeting at the group's annual conference here last week, unanimously
approved a statement condemning recent claims that the Nazi
extermination
of Jews in WWII is a myth.
"The AHA council strongly deplores the publicly reported
attempts to deny the Holocaust," the statement said. "No serious
historican questions that the Holocaust took place."
Over the past year, efforts by neo-Nazis and others to deny
the Holocaust--through such means as advertisements placed in student
newspapers--alarmed scholars. Last fall, however, the 13-member AHA
council declined to issue a statement explicitly asserting the truth
of the Holocaust, largely because of the strong feeling of some of
the
that the association should not be in the business of certifying
historical facts. Instead, the council called on historians to
"encourage the study of the significance of the Holocaust."
Some 300 Signatures Collected
The councils latest action, taken on the closing day of the
association's annual meeting, came in response to a groundswell of
support among historians at the conference for a more forceful
statement against the so-called "Holocaust revisionists."
Approximately
300 signatures were collected on a petition, circulated informally
at the conference, calling on the AHA council to take a public
position against attempts to deny the fact of the Holocaust.
"If we'd had the time and the personnel, I think we could
have gotten 3,000 signatures." said John W. Chambers, associate
professor of history at Rutgers University, who spearheaded the
petition effort.
Mr. Chambers said many who signed the petition were alarmed
at the presence of people at the presence of people at the enterance
of the convention hotel handing out pamphlets purporting to refute
historical claims about the Nazi concentration camps. Others at
the meeting expressed dismay at the AHA's council's earlier failure
to take a stronger stand against the revisionist position.
Bent Attorney Esq.
What about the victims of Americanism? You don't pay attention, do
you?
Topaz
By Patrick Grimm
All of history attests in one fulminating and tumultuous voice "Beware
the power of the Jew!" Men strewn throughout the annals of time, men
of every political persuasion, social standing, occupation, men
unconnected by country or origin or class or creed or religion attest
to one blaring and incontrovertible fact. They warn us, each in their
own individualistic way, of the dangers of Jewish primacy, Jewish
purse, Jewish power and Jewish prowess. They cannot afford to be
ignored, for we discard their words at our own peril and at the risk
of our own endangerment, indeed our own potential extinction. These
great men, great for so many different and antithetic reasons, all
knew one thing, and if they concurred or agreed on nothing else, they
agreed on this. They boomed in their writings, in their speeches, in
their orations, their words dripping with ominous and ill-boding truth
"Beware the power of the Jew!"
What are the chances, the odds that so many disconnected men,
scattered across an expansive globe, never having met each other,
living centuries, sometimes millennia apart, could all attest to the
same thing, and describe it often in terms, in phrases, in patterns
that seem so similar, so eerily familiar. Some commentators, fools
though they are, will try to describe this as simple "anti-Semitism"
and this might be believed if these observations about the Jews had
been noted in one, two or even merely three places. An anomaly,
perhaps, if it were so isolated. But no, the statistical odds of these
warnings occurring over and over and over, scattered like stones
across the history of mankind, throughout his rise and evolution upon
the globe, are billions to one. For all the warnings given were
first-hand observances of the treachery of the Jews, their scheming,
their unmitigated hatred for all of the Gentile world, their mighty
strength of their united front, allied against the "Other" fiscally
and often religiously, the vitriolic power of their Talmud or their
Torah egging them on.
No, my friends, we must not shut out the lessons our forebears tried
to teach. Before we take up our chains and call them jewelry, we must
comprehend the height, length and breadth of Jewish historical crimes.
But before we scan all the registers of history, we must glance about
us, somewhere closer to home at just a fraction of the deadly and
endless drop-down menu of their criminal iniquities.
We cannot silence the blood that cries from the ground, spilled by
Jewish commissars executing their brand of Talmudic Jewish Bolshevism
against 60 million Russian people, whose country they imprisoned with
gulag "justice." Soon, when their masterdom of the Gentile cattle is
unabridged, they will do the same to us, slaughtering Americans for
the crime of "anti-Semitism." Do you doubt it? Even now they are
passing 'hate' laws, allowing Jews to jail anyone who criticizes them
or challenges their superior reign over us.
We must not ignore the killing of US soldiers by the Israeli surprise
attack on the USS Liberty, orchestrated and ordered by the Israeli
government to instigate an American war with Egypt.
Our citizens, 3000 of them, were blown to bits by the callous and
calculated Israeli false flag of 9/11, blamed subsequently on Arabs
only to justify more carnage for the filthy Zionist state, the sex
slave capital of the world, where beautiful blonde-haired, blue-eyed
white women are sexually violated, raped and sodomized by sick Jews
stoked to hatred of the Goyim by their "holy books."
We must never forget that we fight and kill, and our precious American
soldiers are maimed and mutilated and murdered in the proxy war in
Iraq for the most nefarious and criminal nation on the face of God's
earth, that being the Jewish state of Israel.
And we must never forget that they have managed to cover up these
crimes, concealing them from most of the American people because of
their almost omniscient dominion over our government and media.
Cicero, Martin Luther, Ulysses Grant, Henry Ford, William Shakespeare,
Winston Churchill, Richard Wagner, Charles Lindbergh, Voltaire, Thomas
Aquinas, H.L. Mencken, Ezra Pound, Francis Bacon, Napoleon Bonaparte,
Henry Adams and so many more men of renown all tried to forewarn
humanity. They sounded the cry, they arose to divulge what they knew.
But alas, we would not listen.
This is a lesson that history has tried to tattoo, stamp upon our
minds, indelibly if we will so receive it. But we haven't. Even now
our minds have been dulled, our thoughts distracted and muddled, our
warning signals stymied and crossed by propaganda. Our taboo-meters
need to be shattered. The lesson just won't take. It doesn't register
as the cautionary monitorial scream it still sounds like as it
shrieks, begging us, for the sake of our countries, our children and
our future to heed its exhortations. It admonishes, it entreats us to
acknowledge the verisimilitude of its simplistic words, to guard
ourselves, to inculcate its reality and inseminate its truth like a
seed that will grow into a horror we must act upon. "Listen to me! I
have but one lone axiom for you!" all of accumulated human history and
human wisdom pleads. "Beware the power of the Jew!"
http://zionistwatch.blogspot.com/2007/07/beware-power-of-jew.html
Michael Ejercito
> Beware the Power of the Jew
> By Patrick Grimm
>
They WORK.
Nazis just wait for the welfare check to buy meth and kiddie porn.
You are a Nazi.
As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.
You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.
You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.
You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.
You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.
Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.
That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.
Michael
Topaz
"Internationalization today means only Judaisation. We in Germany have
come to this: that a sixty million people sees its destiny at the will
of a few dozen Jewish bankers."
Adolf Hitler, 28th July 1922
"I realized that the fight was not against enemy nations, but against
international capital."
"The fight against international finance and loan capital became the
most important point
in the program of the German nation's struggle for its economic
independence and freedom."
Adolf Hitler
Here is a quote from a very pro-Jewish book that was first
published in 1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis
Browne.
"The Jews had become the money lenders of Europe for quite
evident reasons. The Church sternly forbade all Christians to engage
in the pursuit...
"So the Jews became the money lenders of Europe. They developed
a great shrewdness and cunning in the one and only field of
opportunity left open to them. And with their shrewdness and cunning
they developed a certain cruelty and greed. That was natural. The
world was cruel to them, so when the chance was theirs, they were
cruel in return..."
The money system we have today is called the debt-money
system. It is evil and needs to be replaced. The only way money comes
into existence today is when it is borrowed. There is no freely
existing money supply, but only borrowed money that needs to be paid
back to bankers with interest. If all the money that was owed to
bankers was ever paid back there would be no money left in circulation
and this would be a great depression. What makes matters even worse is
that when money is created only the principle of the loan is created.
The money needed to pay the interest is never created. For this reason
it is impossible to pay back the principle plus the interest on all of
the loans that make up our money supply. The extra amount of money
needed to pay the interest was never created and does not exist.
The United States government borrows money from the Federal
Reserve Bank. This bank is not federal but owned by private
stockholders. It is in the business section of the phone book, not the
government section. Other banks also create the money in our money
supply. They are allowed to loan out much more money then they
actually have. Thus they create new money. No one else is allowed to
create money, only bankers have this privilege. All of our money is
debt-money and it is all owed back to bankers, plus the interest.
In the U.S.A. money is created by the Bureau of Engraving and
Printing which is a unit of the treasury, but the orders to print come
from the Federal Reserve Banks. The money is created for and owned by
the banks. And the Federal Reserve Banks are not Federal, in spite of
the name. Privately owned commercial banks own the stock of the
Federal Reserve Banks. The Federal Reserve Banks give the newly
created money to the government in exchange for government bonds. To
simplify: The United States does not make its own money. Bankers
create the money and loan it to the United States with an interest
charge.
The book War Cycles Peace Cycles puts it this way:
"If there is only $10 in existence, and you lend it to someone
under the condition that he repay $11, and if he agrees to this, he
has agreed to the impossible."
The book The Struggle for World Power put it this way:
"The Bank of England... was the first payment institution which
was legally empowered to issue state-authorized paper currency and ,
therefore, the Government itself became its debtor. Thus the State not
only renounced its monopoly on monetary emission, but also agreed to
borrow the privately-created money from the bankers...Not only the
thing being done, but even the very name was a deliberate fraud and
deception to conceal the essence of the deed. To create money out of
nothing is to make valid and effective claim on all goods and services
for no return, which is fraud and theft, made worse by the
circumstances that the money is lent out at interest...it follows that
those who have the power to 'create' out of nothing all the money in
each country and the whole world and lend it as stated, have total
power over all states, parties, firms, radio, press, individuals and
so on. Therefore the power of Parliament in general, and especially
with regard to money, is non-existent, and all the true sovereignty is
in the hands of those private individuals who issue all money"
Michael Ejercito
> "Internationalization today means only Judaisation. We in Germany have
> come to this: that a sixty million people sees its destiny at the will
> of a few dozen Jewish bankers."
>
Topaz
Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
We had no idea of the danger that threatened us then. I myself did not
yet know Marxism well enough to foresee the possible consequences. I
shrugged my shoulders as I read the dark prose of the red press and
awaited expectantly the decisive evening.
Around 8 p.m. we drove in an old rusty car from the city center to
Wedding. A cold gray mist hung under a starless sky. Our hearts were
bursting with impatience and expectation.
As we drove down M�llerstra�e it was already clear that the evening
did not bode well. Groups of dark figures stood on every street
corner. They apparently planned to teach our party members a bloody
lesson before they even got to the meeting.
Dark masses of people stood outside the Pharus Hall, expressing their
rage and hate with loud and impudent threats.
The leader of the protective forces cleared a way for us and reported
briefly that the hall had been packed since 7:15 p.m. and had been
closed by police. About two-thirds of the audience were Red Front
Fighters. That was what we wanted. There would be a decision. We were
ready to give it all we had.
Entering the hall, we encountered a warm, stiffling aroma of beer and
tobacco. The hall was hot. A lively roar of voices filled the hall.
People were packed in tightly. We reached the podium only with
difficulty.
No sooner was I recognized than hundreds of voices filled with rage
and revenge thundered in my ears: "Bloodhound! Murder of Workers!"
Those were the mildest words they shouted. But a welcoming group of
some party members and S.A. Men answered with passion. Excited battle
cries sounded from the platform. I saw immediately that we were a
minority, but a minority determined to fight, and therefore win.
It was still our custom then for an S.A. leader to chair all of the
party's public meetings. Here too. Tall as a tree he stood up front
and asked for silence with his upraised arm. That was easier said than
done. Mocking laughter was the answer. Insults flew toward the
platform from every corner of the room. People growled and screamed
and raged. There were world revolutionaries scattered about who
apparently had gained the courage they needed by drinking. It was
impossible to quiet the hall. The class-conscious proletariat had not
come to discuss but to fight, to break things up, to put an end to the
Fascist specter with callused workers' fists.
We were not uncertain, even for a moment. We also knew that if the
enemy did not succeed this time in what he had threatened, the future
success of the movement in Berlin was assured.
Fifteen or twenty S.A. and S.S. men stood before the platform in
uniforms and arm bands, an impudent and direct provocation to the Red
Front Fighters. Behind me was a select group of reliable people ready
at any moment to risk their lives to defend me from the onrushing red
mob with brutal force.
The Communists made an obvious mistake in their tactics. They had
scattered small groups throughout the hall, but clumped most of the
rest in the right rear of the hall. I recognized immediately that
there was the center of unrest, and if anything was to be done, we
first had to deal ruthlessly with them. Whenever the chair tried to
open the meeting, a dark chap stood up on a stool and shouted "Point
of Order!" Hundreds of others yelled the same after him.
If one takes from the mass their leader or also their seducer, they
are leaderless and easily controlled. Our tactic therefore was to
silence this cowardly troublemaker at any cost. He felt secure back
there, surrounded by his comrades. We tried to do this peacefully a
few times. The chair shouted over the uproar: "There will be
discussion afterward! But we determine the rules of order!"
That was an ineffective attempt at an unsuitable object. The screamer
wanted to throw the meeting into confusion by his endless shouts and
bring things to the boiling point. Then a general melee would result.
As our efforts to bring the meeting to order peacefully proved
unsuccessful, I took the head of the defensive forces to the side, and
immediately after groups of his men slipped through the thundering
Communist masses. Before the astonished and surprised Red Front troops
realized what was happening, our comrades had hauled the troublemaker
down from his stool and brought him through the raging crowd to the
podium. That was unexpected, but what followed was no surprise. A beer
glass flew through the air and crashed to the floor. That was the
signal for the first major meeting hall battle. Chairs were broken and
legs ripped from tables. Glasses and bottles suddenly appeared and all
hell broke loose. The battle raged for ten minutes. Glasses, bottles,
table and chair legs flew randomly through the air. A deafening roar
rose; the red beast was set free and wanted its victims.
At first it looked as if we were lost. The Communist attack was sudden
and explosive, completely unexpected. But soon the S.A. and S.S. men
distributed throughout the hall and in front of the platform recovered
from their surprise and counterattacked with bold courage. It quickly
became clear that although the Communist Party had masses behind it,
these masses became cowards when faced with a firmly disciplined and
determined opponent. They ran. In short order the red mob that had
come to break up our meeting had been driven from the hall. The order
that could not be secured by good will was gained by brute force.
Usually one is not aware of the stages of a meeting hall battle. Only
later does one recall them. I still remember a scene that I will never
forget; on the podium stood a young S.A. man whom I did not know. He
was hurling his missiles into the on-coming red mob. Suddenly a beer
glass thrown from the distance hit him on the head. A wide stream of
blood ran down his face. He sank with a cry. After a few seconds he
stood up again, grabbed water bottle from the table and threw it into
the hall, where it clattered against the head of an opponent.
The face of this young man is engraved in my memory. This
lightening-fast moment is unforgettable. This gravely-wounded S.A. man
would soon, and indeed for all times, become my most reliable and
loyal comrade.
Only after the red mob had been driven howling, growling and cursing
from the field could one tell how serious and costly the battle had
been. Ten lay in their blood on the platform, most with head injuries,
two with severe concussions. The table and stairs to the platform were
covered in blood. The whole hall resembled a field of ruins.
In the midst of this bloody and ruined wasteland, our tree-high S.A.
leader resumed his place and declared with iron calm: "The meeting
will continue. The speaker has the floor."
Never before or since have I spoken under such dramatic conditions.
Behind me, groaning in pain and bleeding, were seriously injured S.A.
comrades. Around me were broken chair legs, shattered beer glasses and
blood. The whole meeting was icily silent.
We lacked then a medical corps. Since we were in a proletarian
district, we had to have our seriously wounded carried out by
so-called worker volunteers. There were scenes outdoors of
unimaginable inhumanity. The bestial people who were supposedly
fighting for universal brotherhood insulted our poor and defenseless
injured with phases like: "Isn't that pig dead yet?"
Under such conditions it was impossible to give a coherent speech.
Scarcely had I begun to speak when another group of volunteers entered
the hall to carry off a seriously wounded S.A. man on a stretcher. One
of them, encountering the brutal apostles of humanity outside the door
and their unflattering and crude language, shouted for me in
desperation. His voice could be heard loudly and unmistakably on the
platform I interrupted my speech and went through the hall, where
there were still scattered Communist commando groups. Still surprised
by what had happened, they stood quietly and shyly to the side. I bade
farewell to the seriously wounded S.A. comrades.
Gord McFee
> Joseph Goebbels:
<begin quote>
Bez�glich der Judenfrage ist der F�hrer entschlossen, reinen Tisch zu
machen. Er hat den Juden prophezeit, da�, wenn sie noch einmal einen
Weltkrieg herbeif�hren w�rden, sie dabei ihre Vernichtung erleben
w�rden. Das ist keine Phrase gewesen. Der Weltkrieg ist da, die
Vernichtung des Judentums mu� die notwendige Folge sein.
In respect of the Jewish Question, the F�hrer has decided to make a
clean sweep. He prophesied to the Jews that if they again brought about
a world war, they would experience their annihilation in it. That
wasn't just a catch-word. The world war is here, and the annihilation
of Jewry must be the necessary consequence.
[Goebbels, Diary entry, December 12, 1941]
<end quote>
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
Joe Bruno
> On 8/15/2009 6:17 AM, Topaz wrote:
>
> > Joseph Goebbels:
>
> <begin quote>
>
> machen. Er hat den Juden prophezeit, daß, wenn sie noch einmal einen
> Weltkrieg herbeiführen würden, sie dabei ihre Vernichtung erleben
> würden. Das ist keine Phrase gewesen. Der Weltkrieg ist da, die
> Vernichtung des Judentums muß die notwendige Folge sein.
>
> In respect of the Jewish Question, the Führer has decided to make a
> clean sweep. He prophesied to the Jews that if they again brought about
> a world war, they would experience their annihilation in it. That
> wasn't just a catch-word. The world war is here, and the annihilation
> of Jewry must be the necessary consequence.
>
> [Goebbels, Diary entry, December 12, 1941]
>
> <end quote>
>
> --
> Gord McFee
> I'll write no line before its time
>
> Visit the Holocaust History Projecthttp://www.holocaust-history.org
That will be a worthy addition to my page of Holocaust links, Gord.
Thanks.
Gord McFee
> On Aug 16, 9:29 am, Gord McFee <gord.mc...@rogers.com> wrote:
>> On 8/15/2009 6:17 AM, Topaz wrote:
>>
>>> Joseph Goebbels:
>>
>> <begin quote>
>>
>> Bez�glich der Judenfrage ist der F�hrer entschlossen, reinen Tisch zu
>> machen. Er hat den Juden prophezeit, da�, wenn sie noch einmal einen
>> Weltkrieg herbeif�hren w�rden, sie dabei ihre Vernichtung erleben
>> w�rden. Das ist keine Phrase gewesen. Der Weltkrieg ist da, die
>> Vernichtung des Judentums mu� die notwendige Folge sein.
>>
>> In respect of the Jewish Question, the F�hrer has decided to make a
>> clean sweep. He prophesied to the Jews that if they again brought about
>> a world war, they would experience their annihilation in it. That
>> wasn't just a catch-word. The world war is here, and the annihilation
>> of Jewry must be the necessary consequence.
>>
>> [Goebbels, Diary entry, December 12, 1941]
>>
>> <end quote>
>>
>> --
>> Gord McFee
>> I'll write no line before its time
>>
>> Visit the Holocaust History Projecthttp://www.holocaust-history.org
>
> That will be a worthy addition to my page of Holocaust links, Gord.
> Thanks.
My pleasure.
Topaz
LIBERATOR
Perfection in revealing the true henious actions of the Jews.