Barbara Schwarz
PART 1: BARBARA SCHWARZ VS. THE DESTRUCTIVE WIKIPEDIA (WIKIPIGGI) CULT
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/4acb4ad9404612ea?hl=de&
PART 2: BARBARA SCHWARZ VS. THE DESTRUCTIVE WIKIPEDIA (WIKIPIGGI) CULT
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/c1e6c9afe2995878?hl=de&
PART 3: BARBARA SCHWARZ VS. THE DESTRUCTIVE WIKIPEDIA (WIKIPIGGI) CULT
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/65043527af6828a5?hl=de&
PART 4: BARBARA SCHWARZ VS. THE DESTRUCTIVE WIKIPEDIA (WIKIPIGGI) CULT
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/2221227bd9449b44
PART 5: BARBARA SCHWARZ VS. THE DESTRUCTIVE WIKIPEDIA (WIKIPIGGI) CULT
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/0478f3858372733f
PART 6: BARBARA SCHWARZ VS. THE DESTRUCTIVE WIKIPEDIA (WIKIPIGGI) CULT
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/c83d655cb521ecba
PART 7: BARBARA SCHWARZ VS. THE DESTRUCTIVE WIKIPEDIA (WIKIPIGGI) CULT
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/f1ebe773364abb57
PART 8: BARBARA SCHWARZ VS. THE DESTRUCTIVE WIKIPEDIA (WIKIPIGGI) CULT
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/3c02e2d2acfafcc5?hl=de&
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/fd1176b12c9f2f47?hl=en&
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/fd1176b12c9f2f47
Well, I guess it's you who will write the first "tell all" book.
The only question will be, which section of the bookstore will we find
it in? Comedy? Humor? Loonytoon psychopaths with computer access?
--
"I'm for the separation of church and hate."
Barb
Chaplain, ARSCC(wdne)
xenu...@netscape.net
> The truth about Wikipiggi will shock the world!
It didn't in you last identical posting on this topic - why should it now?
--
"Der einzige Weg, Leute zu kontrollieren ist sie anzulügen" - L. Ron "Ich
kann kein Science-Fiction schreiben" Hubbard; Lügner, Betrüger, Fixer und
Wohltäter zu niemandem
I don't think so, I have more important projects than Wikipedia to take
care of.
> The only question will be, which section of the bookstore will we find
> it in? Comedy? Humor? Loonytoon psychopaths with computer access?
If you wouldn't lie so much, Barbzzzz Babbles Graham, you could write
it. But as you can't stick to the truth, you should not enter
non-fiction. Stick to your usually anti-religious horror.
-- Barbara Schwarz
http://www.thunderstar.net/~schwarz/lrh/fbidocs.html
The generosity of L. Ron Hubbard: "The hardest task one can have is to
continue to love his fellows despite all reasons he should not. And the
true sign of sanity and greatness is to so continue. For the one who
can archive this, there is abundant hope." -- L.Ron Hubbard (From What
is Greatness? Certainty Vol. 13 No. 3, March 1966)
"It takes truth to live with a swiftly changing world. Nothing less
than truth can survive." -- L. Ron Hubbard
Huh? Strange sentence. You could write the book about Wikipiggi.
Wikipiggi articles are just as confused.
Bozo, the destructive anti-religious poop clown could assist you for
the really really dirty parts. That guy just has toilets in his mind.
You rarely find a posting in which he doesn't mention anything from the
toilet. Perhaps he was delivered in a toilet bowl?
Anyway, no these postings are not the same. Compare word by word.
Such are trying to face reality?
>> The only question will be, which section of the bookstore will we find
>> it in? Comedy? Humor? Loonytoon psychopaths with computer access?
>
> If you wouldn't lie so much, Barbzzzz Babbles Graham, you could write
> it. But as you can't stick to the truth, you should not enter
> non-fiction. Stick to your usually anti-religious horror.
In other words, as with everything else you come up with, there is such a
small amount of research that the thought of doing actual work as
frightened you off...
Good catch. I missed the letter "r" from "your"
> You could write the book about Wikipiggi.
> Wikipiggi articles are just as confused.
Yes. I can write fiction and have several pieces published. However, why I'd
waste my time on wikipedia is one for philosophers
> Bozo, the destructive anti-religious poop clown could assist you for
> the really really dirty parts.
You mean Crozo? Right.
> That guy just has toilets in his mind.
He mentioned it once. Obviously that is enough for them to be his/her mind.
> You rarely find a posting in which he doesn't mention anything from the
> toilet. Perhaps he was delivered in a toilet bowl?
Nah, he's just heard enough shit from you.
> Anyway, no these postings are not the same. Compare word by word.
This one had one less spelling mistake. So technically, you're right.
Since you seem to be the expert on the subject I would encourage you to
create the
manuscript and shop it around to publishers.
I think about it RW. As more and more people, including schools and
universities warn of this disinformation "enyclopedia", somebody has to
put it back where it belongs. Not in the top of the search engines but
back in the in the sandbox, for little kids to pay around with.
r
I don't believe that you are not on drugs, Roger.