Re: Links for the Navy Chaplain
formerlyfooled
Beckyboo wrote:
> Ok, we have the attention of the Navy Chaplain....they want
> links...regarding the disputed 75% success rate of Narconon.
>
> Can someone help me out?
>
> I know there are a ton here and there but what would be the best to
> send the Chaplain?
>
> Jerald? Tigger? Anyone else?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
>
> Becky <
Source documents Critical Evaluations
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Narconon/sources/critical.htm
http://www.xenu.net/archive/techniques/hj170889b.html
http://www.xenu.net/archive/narconon/
http://www.xenu.net/archive/oca/narconon/sources.html
http://www.xenu.net/archive/oca/narconon/success.html
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/06/09/MNGL2736S31.DTL
d
news:1158590286.2...@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Beckyboo wrote:
>> Ok, we have the attention of the Navy Chaplain....they want
>> links...regarding the disputed 75% success rate of Narconon.
>>
>> Can someone help me out?
>>
>> I know there are a ton here and there but what would be the best to
>> send the Chaplain?
>>
>> Jerald? Tigger? Anyone else?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>>
>> Becky <
> Source documents Critical Evaluations
> http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Narconon/sources/critical.htm
>
> http://www.xenu.net/archive/techniques/hj170889b.html
> http://www.xenu.net/archive/narconon/
> http://www.xenu.net/archive/oca/narconon/sources.html
This is the one that directly challenges the 75% success rate claim:
> http://www.xenu.net/archive/oca/narconon/success.html
Surely it's up to Narconon to prove their 75% claim to the chaplain, and not
our job to disprove it. :)
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/06/09/MNGL2736S31.DTL
>
banchukita
Good call, formerlyfooled, -- also don't forget to show them where the
claim is made by narconon stonehawk, without any supporting
documentation whatsoever:
http://www.narcononstonehawk.com/landing_sr.php
-maggie, human being
d
news:1158594106....@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Here is their results page:
http://www.narcononstonehawk.com/rehab-results.php
And here's a nice page with a picture of LRH on it:
http://www.narcononstonehawk.com/founders.php
> -maggie, human being
dave
Paul F. Johnson
> Ok, we have the attention of the Navy Chaplain....they want
> links...regarding the disputed 75% success rate of Narconon.
>
> Can someone help me out?
http://www.xenu.net/archive/oca/narconon/do201291.html
You can't get much better than that. It really describes Narconon for what
it is - the same as all of $cn - a big fucking con
--
"Der einzige Weg, Leute zu kontrollieren ist sie anzulügen" - L. Ron "Ich
kann kein Science-Fiction schreiben" Hubbard; Lügner, Betrüger, Fixer und
Wohltäter zu niemandem
jerald
caught my eye. They are the ones claiming independent studies have
been done.
jerald
jerald
You may want to ask about this site also. It claims a 90 % success
rate.
http://www.narconongulfcoast.com/
jerald
jerald
" Dear Editor,
I am very conserned about something I read on the Navy's web site. On
the page they use to decribe Scientology they also write of the drug
program called Narconon.
The claims made on this page are as follows.....
" Independent studies have showed that about 75% of Narconon graduates
have remained off drugs when they were checked two years after
completing the program."
>From what I understand there has never been one independent study of
this kind. As this program is unproven no insurance will pay for it.
Thus the vet or his family must pay the 20 to 25 thousand dollars it
costs out of pocket.
I am very worried our vets will read this page and think Narconon has
been proven and has the approval of the U.S. Navy. Our vet's deserve
the very best and not to lose their lifes savings on a unproven and
untested rehab program."
I hope it peaks their intrest.
jerald