Private investigation Course
jmarchetti4
to the advanced. Subjects include: Missing persons, background checks,
credit checks and reporting, executive protection, corporate espionage,
information security and more.....
One year long course. Course materials delivered strictly through e-mail.
Affordable prices, financing approved without credit checks. All welcome.
For more details send e-mail to marchet...@hotmail.com with 'Private
Investigator' in the subject line. Or simply reply to this posting with
'Private investigator' in the subject line. Please include you return e-mail
address.
Thinblue
>
> Learn Private Investigation now! Learn everything from the basics
> to the advanced. Subjects include: Missing persons, background checks,
> credit checks and reporting, executive protection, corporate espionage,
> information security and more.....
Last week, I couldn't even spell PI. Now I are one.
--
Shannon L. Mossman, CMI
The Thin Blue Line, PI 18913
California Crime Prevention, PPO 12820
Escondido, CA (San Diego)
http://www.znet.com/~thinblue
Thinblue
>
> The last I heard, Shannon...you don't have to be a PI in order to provide
> the learning materials. And, make no mistake, just because I do not maintain
> a PI license does not in any way shape or form indicate that I don't know my
> stuff. I do know one thing...anyone that uses my materials to learn, will
> not be as shallow as you seem to be. You must not be very succesful at what
> you do.
Uh huh. I imagine it adds a certain amount of perspective to learn
brain surgery from the pool guy.
Lets see.
SUBJECT TEACHER
Law Lawyer
Medicine Doctor
Auto Repair Mechanic
Plumbing Plumber
Electric Electrician
Investigation Doesn't matter
You are right in one thing.... I'm not only a Starving Private
Investigator, I'm the president.....
BTW, your program is approved in what states? Endorsed by what
institute of learning? Satisfies the licensing requirements where????
Regards,
jmarchetti4
the learning materials. And, make no mistake, just because I do not maintain
a PI license does not in any way shape or form indicate that I don't know my
stuff. I do know one thing...anyone that uses my materials to learn, will
not be as shallow as you seem to be. You must not be very succesful at what
you do.
Thinblue <thin...@znet.com> wrote in message
news:39A994CA...@znet.com...
> jmarchetti4 wrote:
> >
> > Learn Private Investigation now! Learn everything from the basics
> > to the advanced. Subjects include: Missing persons, background checks,
> > credit checks and reporting, executive protection, corporate espionage,
> > information security and more.....
>
> Last week, I couldn't even spell PI. Now I are one.
Jason Welin
courses over the internet.
jmarchetti4 wrote in message ...
Ian Carter
> does not in any way shape or form
Hey - Dip Shit!!
Only I use those words around here!!!
Get your own life!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
PRV8EYE
>the learning materials. And, make no mistake, just because I do not maintain
>a PI license does not in any way shape or form indicate that I don't know my
>stuff
Yeah, I agree. That's why I've started the Gus Morrow Internet Truck Driving
School.
Now, I don't have a commercial truck driving license. But, make no mistake,
that doesn't mean that I don't know my stuff!
Send me your money and I'll teach you all about how to handle the big rigs.
Course includes:
Truck Stop fueling procedures
How to spot the best diners
Teenage hitch hikers and the law
Fun with the Air Horn
CB Radio procedures
First aid for Hemmoroids
Mud Flap Naked Girl Designs
Make extra cash transporting immigrants
Rest Stop safety
Women who flash truckers and why
Highway Patrol relations and MUCH more!
Gus Morrow
TOP SECRET Research & Investigations
San Diego County, CA.
Lic# PI 17173
Private Eye International < www.pi-international.com/ >
(Restricted to licensed Private Investigators)
jmarchetti4
licensed private investigation community have so much time to spend sitting
on the internet in a newsgroup just waiting to tear something apart before
having the slightest inclination to even investigate it. It is utterly
astounding to know that I must be surrounded by the cream of the crop of
investigators here. they have honed their skills to such a sharp level of
expertise that they don't even have to lok at it, all they have to do is
clairvoyantly deternmine that they had nothing to do with its origins so
therefore it must be a scam. Well, guess what? I am going to give all of you
the best tip of your life...and since you are so good that you are on here
all the time instead of making money with these profound skills you all seem
to posess, this bit of advice may not be all that hard to grasp....
Here it is...
Instead of sitting around pretending to be hotshit and wasting your brain
cells, then perhaps you should be using those brain cells for a positive
purpose and come up with something of your own to do, because I know that
your sitting here criticizing everything that comes across the board is not
making tyou money, and if you were making money, or any good at what you do,
then you would not be sitting here...because you would not have the time.
Now, for those of you that do not understand the diplomacy of my words, here
it is in plain english....
Fuck off and do something productive for yourself and don't message me
unless you have something intelligent to say.
PRV8EYE <prv...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
news:20000828203400...@ng-cg1.aol.com...
Jason Welin
Please note that the above the only the writers opinion, but he is rarely
wrong.
jmarchetti4 wrote in message ...
Todd Moss
jmarchetti4 <jmarc...@home.com> wrote in message
news:TZEq5.132844$A%3.17...@news1.rdc2.pa.home.com...
<Snip>
> Fuck off and do something productive for yourself and don't message me
> unless you have something intelligent to say.
I believe shannon had a few very valid questions, as follows.
BTW, your program is approved in what states? Endorsed by what
institute of learning? Satisfies the licensing requirements where????
I have a few follow up questions.
How much have you made in the PI field? Aprox. how many students have you
taught using this method? Can you give references? Can I really learn all I
need to know via e-mail?
These are valid intelligent questions as per your requirements posted above.
You may want to consider adding them to an FAQ that you can provide to your
potential students.
--
Todd Moss
OH PI LIC# 5396
The Background Network, Inc.
Ph# 440-816-9920
Toll Free 1-877-99CHECK
http://www.crimcheck.com
Joe Friday
So much for learning how to conduct Background Checks. I hope the Judgment
Collections section of the course is informative.
--
____________________________________________________
FROM:
Christopher J. Froeschl
Due Process Investigations (VaDCJS #11-2640)
Roanoke, Virginia
(540) 342-0300 Fax: (617) 507-6206
WWW: www.URserved.com
ICQ: 83775853
-----------------------------------------------------
Your Source for Child Care Technology
Ace Camera - www.AceCamera.com
>>Al Gore is a Risky Scheme<<<
"jmarchetti4" <jmarc...@home.com> wrote in message
news:kS9q5.129445$A%3.16...@news1.rdc2.pa.home.com...
: Learn Private Investigation now! Learn everything from the basics
: to the advanced. Subjects include: Missing persons, background checks,
: credit checks and reporting, executive protection, corporate espionage,
: information security and more.....
: One year long course. Course materials delivered strictly through e-mail.
:
:
:
:
:
Joe Friday
--
____________________________________________________
FROM:
Christopher J. Froeschl
Due Process Investigations (VaDCJS #11-2640)
Roanoke, Virginia
(540) 342-0300 Fax: (617) 507-6206
WWW: www.URserved.com
ICQ: 83775853
-----------------------------------------------------
Your Source for Child Care Technology
Ace Camera - www.AceCamera.com
>>Al Gore is a Risky Scheme<<<
"PRV8EYE" <prv...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
news:20000828203400...@ng-cg1.aol.com...
: >The last I heard, Shannon...you don't have to be a PI in order to provide
:
Joe Friday
email address so he uses a Hotmail Address, claiming he is a "member of our
licensed private investigation community".
--
____________________________________________________
FROM:
Christopher J. Froeschl
Due Process Investigations (VaDCJS #11-2640)
Roanoke, Virginia
(540) 342-0300 Fax: (617) 507-6206
WWW: www.URserved.com
ICQ: 83775853
-----------------------------------------------------
Your Source for Child Care Technology
Ace Camera - www.AceCamera.com
>>Al Gore is a Risky Scheme<<<
"jmarchetti4" <jmarc...@home.com> wrote in message
news:TZEq5.132844$A%3.17...@news1.rdc2.pa.home.com...
: You know what really amazes me? That so many highly esteemed members of
:
:
:
piwa...@my-deja.com
"Joe Friday" <news...@urserved.com> wrote:
> This is down right funny!!!! An Unlicensed freak, a who can't afford
a real
> email address so he uses a Hotmail Address, claiming he is a "member
> licensed private investigation community".
Helloooooo assholes!!!
The Marchetti HOTMAIL traces back to JOHN GROGAN and HIS school scam.
He sure does loves those Hotmail addresses
Jason Welin
hotmail address.
piwa...@my-deja.com wrote in message <8ogfem$7mr$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>In article <tNOq5.4644$p5.1...@newsread03.prod.itd.earthlink.net>,
> "Joe Friday" <news...@urserved.com> wrote:
>> This is down right funny!!!! An Unlicensed freak, a who can't afford
>a real
>> email address so he uses a Hotmail Address, claiming he is a "member
>of our
jmarchetti4
First and foremost I would like to adress Todd Moss, who seems to be the
most intelligent of those who have commented simply because he asked the
questions before he made his comments. My answer is that had anybody taken
the time to ask the questions and request the information, it would have
been given, but they didn't.
Second, I seem to see a lot of people jumping on the band wagon and making
comments that were not part of the original crew that did say something.
Well, it has always been my experience that those that jumped on the
bandwagon tended to fall when the others fell.
Which leads to my last comment....and what a beautiful thought it is. I came
on here trying to practition a legitimate business, however whether it be
through depraved indifference, malicious intent, or just plain stupidity,
this group of trained professionals have sought to tear apart a business
that had unlimited potential. DUH! I am so happy all of you are so well
trained to remember your lessons on defamation and related lawsuits. All I
think I need is one person to tell me that they have not ordered my service
because of your misaligned, negative comments and I will have every one of
you in court. And, the reason I say I 'think' I need that is because the
more you talk the less difference it will make if I have someone there or
not, all I would need to show is that no reasonable person after reading
your PUBLIC postings would believe me credible and order my service and that
would put you in the legal hotseat. I would suggest that you talk to some of
the lawyers that you work with, if you are working because I will certainly
be consulting mine.
Have a nice day.
Joe Friday <news...@urserved.com> wrote in message
news:zGOq5.4621$p5.1...@newsread03.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> >>> , financing approved without credit checks. All welcome. <<<
>
> So much for learning how to conduct Background Checks. I hope the
Judgment
> Collections section of the course is informative.
>
> --
> ____________________________________________________
> FROM:
> Christopher J. Froeschl
> Due Process Investigations (VaDCJS #11-2640)
> Roanoke, Virginia
> (540) 342-0300 Fax: (617) 507-6206
> WWW: www.URserved.com
> ICQ: 83775853
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Your Source for Child Care Technology
> Ace Camera - www.AceCamera.com
>
> >>Al Gore is a Risky Scheme<<<
>
> "jmarchetti4" <jmarc...@home.com> wrote in message
JACI101
>most intelligent
he usually is the most intelligent one here!
:o)
Jan
Jason Welin
jmarchetti4 wrote in message ...
>
>
PRV8EYE
>licensed private investigation community have so much time to spend sitting
>on the internet in a newsgroup just waiting to tear something apart
You know what amazes me?
That anonymous posters keep expecting to receive respect.
No man that cowers behind a screen name is respected .
The seller of any LEGITIMATE course would have the courage and professionalism
and DESIRE to post his name and contact information.
Do you understand that nobody gives a diddley SQUAT what you say or think when
you don't even have the balls to identify yourself???
Dale Pleasant
Jan, that really hurt my feelings. Say you're sorry and I'll forgive you.
Dale Pleasant
Select Investigations, Inc.
Charlotte, NC
704-986-4422
Todd Moss
BTW Thanks Jan you made my day!
Todd
Dale Pleasant <sele...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
news:20000830065107...@ng-fv1.aol.com...
> >he usually is the most intelligent one here!
>
Dale Pleasant
>Jan
OK., all is forgiven just as long as you don't ever say Gus is better looking.
Thinblue
> I need is one person to tell me that they have not ordered my service
> because of your misaligned, negative comments and I will have every one of
> you in court. And, the reason I say I 'think' I need that is because the
> more you talk the less difference it will make if I have someone there or
> not, all I would need to show is that no reasonable person after reading
> your PUBLIC postings would believe me credible and order my service and that
> would put you in the legal hotseat. I would suggest that you talk to some of
> the lawyers that you work with, if you are working because I will certainly
> be consulting mine.
Let me guess. Your lawyer learned his profession from a bus driver.....
Don't forget to tell him I told you to go live in Ace's ass.
Regards,
JACI101
Ok Dale,
I am sorry, you and a few others are also, I did not mean to hurt your
feelings, so, ok your intelligent too.
Forgive me please!
Jan
<;o)
HANDAPEYE
>those weakfish my son and I caught on Saturday were just a figment of my
>imagination
Damn, MJ, you need to leave thos poor little weakfish alone, you big bully you.
I have caught smallfish, but not necessarily weak ones.
Barry G. Higginbotham
Higginbotham & Associates
Longview, Texas
(903) 758-4919
(903) 753-2661 (fax)
hand...@aol.com
jmarchetti4
see what is right in front of your face!
PRV8EYE <prv...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
> >You know what really amazes me? That so many highly esteemed members of
our
> >licensed private investigation community have so much time to spend
sitting
> >on the internet in a newsgroup just waiting to tear something apart
>
> That anonymous posters keep expecting to receive respect.
> No man that cowers behind a screen name is respected .
> The seller of any LEGITIMATE course would have the courage and
professionalism
> and DESIRE to post his name and contact information.
> Do you understand that nobody gives a diddley SQUAT what you say or think
when
> you don't even have the balls to identify yourself???
>
>
SHADOW
> My name is right in my e-mail address. Some investigator...you can't even
> see what is right in front of your face!
He's been at this P.I. stuff only six years!
PRV8EYE
>He's been at this P.I. stuff only six years!
LOL! And a cop for only 12 years before that. Yeah, I'm just a rookie.
I don't remember ever claiming to be an expert on anything other than my
opinion.
At LEAST I've got the balls and common courtesy to identify myself and put my
real name to my words. I don't hide behind a screen name like a coward.
PRV8EYE
>see what is right in front of your face!
Oh, I see. You're name is jmarchetti4?
Thanks Jay Marchetti or John Marchetti or Joe Marchetti or Jane Marchetti or
Jean Marchetti or Jack Marchetti or Jennifer Marchetti or June Marchetti or
Jesus Marchetti or Jacob Marchetti or Julio Marchetti or is it just Jackass?
Instead of just posting your name and business info like any real legitimate
businessman would you prefer to be a smart ass.
Now THAT will incourage people to send you their money! Sheesh!
PRV8EYE
>> because of your misaligned, negative comments and I will have every one of
>> you in court.
LOL! Oooo, I'm a scaaaared!
I can hear it now "Your honor, this guy gave his personal opinion that no one
should deal with an anonymous poster on a public newsgroup". "You can see that
my name is right in my e-mail address"
ROFLMAO!!!
CD
>the lawyers that you work with, if you are working because I will certainly
>be consulting mine.
>
Mr./Mrs. "jmarchetti4"
I will start this out by stating that I am a licensed attorney in the state
of Ohio. I've been in the legal field for over a decade and even I think
that your program is probably bullshit. If any attorney tells you that you
have a viable case based on opinions expressed in this thread, then they are
simply blowing smoke out of their ass. If you do find an attorney who tells
you that he will take this case, ask him if he will take it on a contingency
fee basis and see what his answer is.
Chris
P.S. Gus has already given me the lashings for using a hotmail account
before, but I still use it out of convenience.
Thinblue
> You luzers keep throwing that around like it mattered to anyone but
> you.
>
> H-E-L-L-O ! This is a public unmoderated alt. newsgroup. If you
> shmucks would look around you'd notice that _nobody_ uses RL
> information UNLESS they are absolute newbies or they're trolling for
> business (hint, hint).
Look again. The only people NOT using real life information are newbees
and "luzers"
--
Thinblue
>
> >I would suggest that you talk to some of
> >the lawyers that you work with, if you are working because I will certainly
> >be consulting mine.
> >
>
> Mr./Mrs. "jmarchetti4"
>
> I will start this out by stating that I am a licensed attorney in the state
> of Ohio. I've been in the legal field for over a decade and even I think
> that your program is probably bullshit. If any attorney tells you that you
> have a viable case based on opinions expressed in this thread, then they are
> simply blowing smoke out of their ass. If you do find an attorney who tells
> you that he will take this case, ask him if he will take it on a contingency
> fee basis and see what his answer is.
Jeez. Somebody left the door open and let a lawyer in... Oh well, I
guess it's ok. It's Ohio law, not REAL law.... :)
PRV8EYE
>before, but I still use it out of convenience.
Yeah, but you're still cool.<G>
Gus
MJ
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
We'll call them that strange name some people 'down south' use for them Sea
Trout.
"HANDAPEYE" <hand...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
news:20000830221452...@ng-bh1.aol.com...
PRV8EYE
>posters to alt. newsgroups _don't_ reveal RL IDs out of hand.
Because there exists hundreds of newsgroups your statement is technically
correct.
But a visit to newsgroups of specific hobbies or occupations reveals that very
FEW contributors hide behind a screen name as if they were on a CB radio.
People who do that are ignorant of the original intent of newsgroups and
confuse newsgroups with a chat room.
>You
>and your buddies do because it allows you the illusion of
>exclusivness and you hope to scrape up some easy work.
Great, another college kid who's taken psych 101.
I've known most of the regulars on this group for years and have met many of
them, at seminars, in person.
NONE of them arrogantly attempt any illusion of "exclusiveness". They are easy
going, fun, people but have the professionalism and courage to stand up for
what they believe. They don't hide.
You can twist it, spin it, put a lable on it or psychobabble it any way you
want but the truth is that any man who hides is a coward. He gets some childish
kick out of anonymously being "naughty" or rude.
There is no REASON for any professional to hide behind a screen name.
A person who hides is simply afraid of what others might think, afraid of
confrontation or afraid he might make a mistake which would cause him to wither
and blow away. Gutless.
>Throwing up
>the anonymity issue is a cheap and easy way for you (and others) to
>devalue divergent viewpoints.
You're absolutely RIGHT. But you're missing the point that we don't give a
rat's ASS about anybody's "divergent viewpoint" who doesn't have the balls to
stand behind them. These people need to find a newsgroup called alt.Imawhimp.
We can't "devalue" something which has no value in the first place.
>Anonymity, real and imagined, is the
>norm on Usenet
It is NOT the "norm" on every individual newsgroup. That's simply not true.
Check out alt.rec.bicycle.recumbent, as an example, and see how many people
don't post with their name.
>and this newsgroup isn't an island.
Yes it is. This is PI (private island).<G>
It was started by PIs as a forum for PIs.
While it's true we can't stop anybody from visiting, and don't WANT to stop
most, we are NOT required to treat anyone who is rude with respect.
We have the SAME freedom of speech that people with your lack of courage
espouse.
>You are part of a
>larger community, whether you like it or not.
But this is our neighborhood and it's not a good one for cowardly or rude
people.
You want some cheese with that whine?
Semper Fi,
jmarchetti4
computer operation too, if that is the problem. Here is a freebee ...see the
little bar on the right hand side of the message? Well, that is called a
scroll bar. Now you can click on the arrows to move up or down depending on
which arrow you click on. I will explain the drag and pull theory in the
next lesson. If you had scrolled down to the bottom of my origianl message,
then you would have seen the address I was talking about it goes something
like this:
marchet...@hotmail.com
I think that qualifies for explicit enough.
PRV8EYE <prv...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
news:20000831115656...@ng-ch1.aol.com...
jmarchetti4
my course is a scam and that it is not worth anything without investigating
it. That's enough for defamation. As far as my name being in my origianl
e-mail well, refer to the answer I just posted above.
PRV8EYE <prv...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
jmarchetti4
and you ran around badmouthing its integrity telling people not to join, it
would certainly amount to defamation, would it not? Especially, if you were
an instructor with a masters in education. And, you could scream it was only
an opinion all day and night but, your comments impacted someone's ability
to do business, or caused them damage in other ways...defamation. So, are
the rules different because you are on the Internet? I think not. No matter
how you slice it, these are licensed professionals making these comments,
just as you are counselor. They should know better and so should you.
CD <cdrob...@hotmail.comnospam> wrote in message
news:8omgnq$9m4$1...@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net...
Sati...@webtv.net
>>Don't forget to tell him I told you to go live in Ace's ass.
Now wait a damn minute! Just how many of us does he think he's gonna
squeeze into this fudge hole anyway!?
Might wanna remind him to bring plenty of Renuzit air freshener. PLUG
IT IN ! PLUG IT IN !
And NO SMOKING either. ACE eats lotsa Mexican.
MJ
You better go back and review that part of your course. You need a
refresher.
"jmarchetti4" <jmarc...@home.com> wrote in message
news:F0Fr5.4008$AW2....@news1.rdc2.pa.home.com...
JACI101
oops !!
JACI101
JACI101
oops.....
maybe YOU, blah blah blah....
not your....
Islander
wrote:
>[blah blah snip] That's enough for defamation. [/snip]
Wrongo, squid squeezer.
CD is right on this one.
CD
>where do the rules change? If I opened a school right next to your office
>and you ran around badmouthing its integrity telling people not to join, it
>would certainly amount to defamation, would it not?
Not necessarily.
>Especially, if you were an instructor with a masters in education.
What has this got to do with anything? My father received his Masters in
Education in the late 1960s. Does that mean he is qualified to teach a
course in investigations? I doubt it. It also does not imply that you are
either.
>And, you could scream it was only an opinion all day and night but, your
comments impacted someone's >ability to do business, or caused them damage
in other ways...defamation.
Defamation refers to dematory statements of FACT, not opinion.
>So, are the rules different because you are on the Internet? I think not.
No matter how you slice it, these are >licensed professionals making these
comments, just as you are counselor.
Several points...
The rules may actually be different on the internet. If you haven't figured
it out yet, the internet is unlike any other medium the world has ever seen.
There is no governing body for the internet, and deception on the internet
is easy and rampant. If you want credibility, set up an internet site for
people to visit. Don't ask people to request information on the course from
a Hotmail account. For all we know, you could be scanning the US Academy or
DTI courses into the computer and e-mailing those of to the people on your
list. You have to look at everything from the other side and see how you
would approach the situation.
One of the defenses to defamation is truth. Some of the things that people
have pointed out in response to your initial post appear to be true. At
least I do not recall you denying them.
Have you found an attorney willing to do this on a contingency fee yet?
At this point, I will say that I am interest in obtaining information
regarding your course. Please send me some information at
cdrob...@hotmail.com. I will also send my request for information in the
manner you have stated in your initial post.
Joe Friday
I have an email address of news...@urserved.com and another as
king_stephen@......
I don't claim to be named newsgroup or Stephen King. What would make me
care (or better believe) that an ass hole like you has changed his name to
reflect what his Hotmail Screen Name is.
--
____________________________________________________
FROM:
Christopher J. Froeschl
Due Process Investigations (VaDCJS #11-2640)
Roanoke, Virginia
(540) 342-0300 Fax: (617) 507-6206
WWW: www.URserved.com
ICQ: 83775853
-----------------------------------------------------
Your Source for Child Care Technology
Ace Camera - www.AceCamera.com
>>Al Gore is a Risky Scheme<<<
"jmarchetti4" <jmarc...@home.com> wrote in message
news:F0Fr5.4008$AW2....@news1.rdc2.pa.home.com...
: Okay smart ass, just how many cases have you closed? I have a lesson on
:
:
Jason Welin
jmarchetti4 wrote in message ...
Joe Friday
Of course the curriculum was written by someone who failed the State Bar.
--
____________________________________________________
FROM:
Christopher J. Froeschl
Due Process Investigations (VaDCJS #11-2640)
Roanoke, Virginia
(540) 342-0300 Fax: (617) 507-6206
WWW: www.URserved.com
ICQ: 83775853
-----------------------------------------------------
Your Source for Child Care Technology
Ace Camera - www.AceCamera.com
>>Al Gore is a Risky Scheme<<<
"Thinblue" <thin...@znet.com> wrote in message
news:39AD8E00...@znet.com...
: jmarchetti4 wrote:
: > I need is one person to tell me that they have not ordered my service
: > because of your misaligned, negative comments and I will have every one
of
: > you in court. And, the reason I say I 'think' I need that is because the
: > more you talk the less difference it will make if I have someone there
or
: > not, all I would need to show is that no reasonable person after reading
: > your PUBLIC postings would believe me credible and order my service and
that
: > would put you in the legal hotseat. I would suggest that you talk to
some of
: > the lawyers that you work with, if you are working because I will
certainly
: > be consulting mine.
:
: Let me guess. Your lawyer learned his profession from a bus driver.....
:
: Don't forget to tell him I told you to go live in Ace's ass.
:
: Regards,
:
: Shannon L. Mossman, CMI
:
Thinblue
>
> where do the rules change? If I opened a school right next to your office
> and you ran around badmouthing its integrity telling people not to join, it
> would certainly amount to defamation, would it not? Especially, if you were
> an instructor with a masters in education. And, you could scream it was only
> an opinion all day and night but, your comments impacted someone's ability
> to do business, or caused them damage in other ways...defamation. So, are
> the rules different because you are on the Internet? I think not. No matter
> how you slice it, these are licensed professionals making these comments,
> just as you are counselor. They should know better and so should you.
Idiot.
--
Joe Friday
: and you ran around badmouthing its integrity telling people not to join,
it
: would certainly amount to defamation, would it not?
Actually, it would not. You as the Plaintiff, would actually have to prove
that your program doesn't actually SUCK. And how would you do that?....
You would have to have Licensed Professionals, who have taken your course
testify that the program Don't Suck. I don't see that happening. Besides,
it is also a Civil Case were the Preponderance of Evidence would apply.
This means that if we have more Licensed Professionals testifying that your
program does, in fact, SUCK..... You still come out a loser.
Oh, and by the way, we don't even have to take your course, we will simply
request it during Discovery. This way we get it for free and get to
evaluate it the best that Licensed Professionals know how.
--
____________________________________________________
FROM:
Christopher J. Froeschl
Due Process Investigations (VaDCJS #11-2640)
Roanoke, Virginia
(540) 342-0300 Fax: (617) 507-6206
WWW: www.URserved.com
ICQ: 83775853
-----------------------------------------------------
Your Source for Child Care Technology
Ace Camera - www.AceCamera.com
>>Al Gore is a Risky Scheme<<<
"jmarchetti4" <jmarc...@home.com> wrote in message
news:8mFr5.4022$AW2....@news1.rdc2.pa.home.com...
: where do the rules change? If I opened a school right next to your office
: >
: >
:
:
:
Thinblue
> Oh, and by the way, we don't even have to take your course, we will simply
> request it during Discovery. This way we get it for free and get to
> evaluate it the best that Licensed Professionals know how.
So. We've established that:
1. The course was written (if it even exists) by a non professional.
2. It's quite possible that this "course" material is stolen from
another training provider since the author has no experience to have
written it himself.
3. The course is not endorsed by any institute of learning.
4. The course fulfills no licensing requirements in any state.
5. The "author" is spamming a news group in violation of Cox TOS.
6. He's a twit and an idiot.
Another case closed. I'll expect a check from each of you or I'll sue
you. I'm not kidding. I can do it. I took a lawyer course from the
Acme Garage Door Manufacturing Company and Skool of Law and Shit.
PRV8EYE
>and you ran around badmouthing its integrity telling people not to join, it
>would certainly amount to defamation, would it not?
If you opened a school right next to my office you wouldn't BE anonymous, now
would you?
You'd need a business license with your complete, real, name on it.
Then I wouldn't have a problem with you even if your course did suck.
My POINT is that anyone would have to be a fool to take a course from an
ANONYMOUS offer over the Internet.
I never bad mouthed your course. I bad mouthed you for being too cowardly and
unprofessional to identify yourself.
If you're going to SPAM this newsgroup at least have the balls to put your name
on your SPAM.
As far as I'm concerned, anonymous posters are the Rodney Dangerfield of the
Internet. They get no respect.
PRV8EYE
>my course is a scam and that it is not worth anything without investigating
>it.
I never made any such claim.
I don't know anything about your course.
What I said is that YOU are a coward and unprofessional.
Though, if you're this easily confused, I have to wonder how good any course of
yours could possibly be.
PRV8EYE
>next lesson.
ROFL!!!
>then you would have seen the address I was talking about it goes something
>like this:
>marchet...@hotmail.com
LOL! It goes "something" like that?
A Hotmail address? Well, I apologize. If you use a Hotmail address you MUST be
a pro. ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!! Excuse me, I have to go practice my drag and pull.
(And people say this forum ain't fun anymore<G>)
Thinblue
> Excuse me, I have to go practice my drag and pull.
> (And people say this forum ain't fun anymore<G>)
That explains the glasses and the hairy palms.
PRV8EYE
>> (And people say this forum ain't fun anymore<G>)
>
>That explains the glasses and the hairy palms.
>
Oh, yeah, I WISH I had to drag it!
jmarchetti4
think about the action ... it could even be grab and pull...why don't you go
try it
MJ <Paulx...@monmouth.com> wrote in message
news:8on960$6u4$1...@news.monmouth.com...
jmarchetti4
I think you give me entirely too much credit. You must be so bored that you
are dying to catch a scam...maybe you should look to yourself for that
scam...after all, you are the one with the name 'newsgroup'. I am not going
to say it again about making a professional opinion that I am a scam without
looking into your facts...you are putting yourself in a world of trouble.
Joe Friday <news...@urserved.com> wrote in message
news:KmQr5.14868$p5.3...@newsread03.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
jmarchetti4
for a woman's tit. Gee, it is always nice to regress to my childhood.
Jason Welin <jjw...@telusplanet.net> wrote in message
news:htQr5.159$7F3.1...@news0.telusplanet.net...
jmarchetti4
Islander <isla...@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:m69vqsciqtbgd1jma...@4ax.com...
Thinblue
>
> such an impressive display of vocabulary ... 'twit' ...fourth grade slang
> for a woman's tit. Gee, it is always nice to regress to my childhood.
Not much of a trip, was it?
You get your drivers license yet?
Thinblue
>
> Not as far as my attorneys have advised
Who is your attorney?
jmarchetti4
used that example to show that when a licensed professional makes a
statement it is not regarded as an 'opinion', it is regarded as a
'professional opinion' which makes a very big difference. A mere opinion by
any layperson is rarely damaging whereas a professional opinion can be havoc
wreaking. Even though they have not said 'it is my professional opinion'
before they made there statements, if became a professional opinion as soon
as they signed their name with qualifications at the bottom, or when they
stated that they were a licensed PI. As for the answer is truth: First off,
it would be pretty embarrassing for them to have to sit on the stand and be
asked how much investigation did they put into this course beforestating as
a professional that it was a scam? And, did they do enough investigation to
find that it had been co-authored by any professionals such as themselves.
And then, after being handed the full twelve month course to in a court room
(the truth remember) and then being asked to point out where exactly the
fraud is.
I will take this time to say that I have been turning down requests for
information since shortly after posting on here. The reason that I have been
turning down those requests is because I was contacted by an accredited
educational facility that has asked if we could negotiate the sale of rights
for this course. They are working with a PI firm apparently, although I
would like them to sponsor the course and let me continue to distribute it,
from a marketing perspective iit may be more viable just to let them buy the
course outright and do whatever they want with it. If you are still
interested in the information, I will send it to you once the negotiations
have ended, provided I am still the owner of the material.
And, I didn't have to look for a lawyer to take the case on a contingency
basis. I have some very good lawyers whom are also very good friends of
mine, and although we have discussed what has been going on, and the offer
for formal representation has been made, I have not pushed the issue or
questioned whether it would be contingency based or fee based. Quite
frankly, if I pushed it certainly contingency would be absolutley grand, but
it isn't like I don't have the money to pay an attorney either. And, you of
all people should know how attorneys are...They like to forge new ground
that has not been broken yet..i.e., the internet, they also like anything
that is going to pay them money....and there is always an attorney that will
get you what you want. At least I am fortunate enough to have long time
frineds that are attorneys.
CD <cdrob...@hotmail.comnospam> wrote in message
news:8oohu9$t6m$1...@slb7.atl.mindspring.net...
jmarchetti4
you said it yourself...the way I would prove that it 'don't suck' as you put
it...is I would have the professionals that had been consulted during its
writing testify, and maybe between me and my attorney we could muster up a
few college professionals with credentials out their ass from nice ivy
league schools in say the criminal justice field to reveiw the course
thoroughly and testify about it afterwards. As far as your review of the
course ... the point wouldn't be your review of it during dicovery...it
would be your proclamation that it was a 'scam' before even asking for the
basic information. You could say it sucked all you wanted to after reviewing
it, but the point would be that ther ewas a course provided so therefore it
could not be a scam as alleged.news:XEQr5.14910$p5.3...@newsread03.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
jmarchetti4
defamation case? And what factual basis were your conclusions derived from?
I hope not just a lack of response, because everybody knows that there are
several ways to answer questions
1.(oh I can count too) with actions, usually not the best method.
2. with direct answers, which if you have someone that wants to argue will
usually prolong the arguement, and if they are thick headed will never
resolve itself because they won't see past the nose on their face, as we
have seen with the name thing, or...
3. say absolutly nothing at all, the recommended advice of most legal
professionals especially when the comments are so ludicrous that to answer
them would be lowing your own stands or just feeding someone elses
preconceived ideations so they can argue further.news:39AFE724...@znet.com...
jmarchetti4
the e-mail. I did not mask the origination of the e-mail, I only said to
respond to another e-mail bank which is not uncommon for businesses. Hell, I
even have an e-mail site for the sweepsatkes I enter because the spam is
notorious for them. I specified to use the hotmail account so ther is less
risk of virus infection, and so all the spam from other companies selling
stuff goes there, however I did not mask the e-mail that I posted from so if
anyone replied to that posting I would receive it in my regular account
anyway. And I did receive some to my regular account.
Additionally, maybe I am a little naive in this area but isn't a newsgroup
for posting news and information? I did not send anything directly to your
mailbox when you hadn't requested it. I put it on a public board for anyone
that wanted to view it, to do so. And it was not posted as any response to
something that was already here. It was posted as a message in itself, so
you had the choice about whether to look. If I came on yelling 'hey, I need
a PI' I guarantee you that every one of you would have been screaming to get
my business, but under your definition wouldn't that have been spamming,
just the mere fact that I came on and said hey I have to hire a PI. Or is
spamming only when you let people know that you have a service to offer,
like including your business name and PI licencse number at the bottom of
your chatroom like postings.
PRV8EYE <prv...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
news:20000901143152...@ng-cg1.aol.com...
jmarchetti4
course as I am unable to provide it at this time. I have entered into
business negotions with a party that wants to purchase the complete rights
to the course. During the negotiations I can not continue to offer this
information to the public as I may not own it at the conclusion of the
negotions.
I thank you for your interest and hope you remain interested in futher
education.
Yours Truly,
John Marchetti
jmarchetti4 <jmarc...@home.com> wrote in message
news:kS9q5.129445$A%3.16...@news1.rdc2.pa.home.com...
> Learn Private Investigation now! Learn everything from the basics
> to the advanced. Subjects include: Missing persons, background checks,
> credit checks and reporting, executive protection, corporate espionage,
> information security and more.....
> One year long course. Course materials delivered strictly through e-mail.
> Affordable prices, financing approved without credit checks. All welcome.
>
> For more details send e-mail to marchet...@hotmail.com with 'Private
> Investigator' in the subject line. Or simply reply to this posting with
> 'Private investigator' in the subject line. Please include you return
e-mail
> address.
>
>
>
>
MJ
Perhaps you need that chapter of your computer lessons re-written? A mistake
every now and then is one thing but you just keep them flowing.
I'll even help you out on this one. You are using Outlook Express. Go to
Tools / Options / Spelling and click on the little white boxes in front of
the 2 items in Settings. The first is to have the spell checker always
review your spelling and the second is for the spell checker to recommend
alternative spellings for misspelled words.
To show what a sport I am I'll even let you use my directions when you
correct that section of your lessons.
Damn, I'm such a nice guy!
"jmarchetti4" <jmarc...@home.com> wrote in message
news:hV_r5.4733$AW2....@news1.rdc2.pa.home.com...
Thinblue
>
> To all who may read this, please hold off on requesting information on this
> course as I am unable to provide it at this time. I have entered into
> business negotions with a party that wants to purchase the complete rights
> to the course. During the negotiations I can not continue to offer this
> information to the public as I may not own it at the conclusion of the
> negotions.
>
> I thank you for your interest and hope you remain interested in futher
> education.
It is my professional and expert opinion that you are full of shit.
Islander
wrote:
> I'm not kidding. I can do it. I took a lawyer course from the
>Acme Garage Door Manufacturing Company and Skool of Law and Shit.
Dammit, Mossman -- you're going to put us out of business.
jmarchetti4
I haven't found anyone worth wasting time on...:)news:8opvqe$aat$1...@news.monmouth.com...
PRV8EYE
>course as I am unable to provide it at this time.
LOL! HOLD BACK EVERYBODY!
TRY TO HOLD BACK! <G>
Thinblue
>
> >To all who may read this, please hold off on requesting information on this
> >course as I am unable to provide it at this time.
>
> LOL! HOLD BACK EVERYBODY!
> TRY TO HOLD BACK! <G>
I guess I'll be getting a copy of the course.
One of you graduates of the Ingram School of Internet Spook Stuff can
practice on this piece of unsolicited mail I received.
------------------------------------
Return-Path: <jmarc...@home.com>
Received: from mx1.znet.com (mx1.znet.com [207.167.64.1])
by sd.znet.com (8.11.0/8.11.0/jjb-sd) with ESMTP id e82Dg7010565
for <thin...@sd.znet.com>; Sat, 2 Sep 2000 06:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from femail2.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail2.sdc1.sfba.home.com
[24.0.95.82])
by mx1.znet.com (8.11.0/8.11.0/jjb-mx1) with ESMTP id e82Dg7i03093
for <thin...@znet.com>; Sat, 2 Sep 2000 06:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-From: jmarc...@home.com
X-Envelope-To: <thin...@znet.com>
Received: from cn322927a ([24.180.154.85]) by femail2.sdc1.sfba.home.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP
id
<20000902134158.NGCM27630.femail2.sdc1.sfba.home.com@cn322927a>
for <thin...@znet.com>; Sat, 2 Sep 2000 06:41:58 -0700
Message-ID: <002301c014e3$6647ff20$559a...@wall1.pa.home.com>
From: "jmarchetti4" <jmarc...@home.com>
To: "Thinblue" <thin...@znet.com>
References: <kS9q5.129445$A%3.16...@news1.rdc2.pa.home.com>
<hV_r5.4733$AW2....@news1.rdc2.pa.home.com>
<39B081BE...@znet.com>
Subject: Re: Private investigation Course
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 09:40:46 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-PMFLAGS: 34078848 0 1 P02C60.CNM
That is all I needed to hear. I am 90% sure I will be seeing you in
court.
--------------------------------------------
MJ
writing to this group because no one here is worth the trouble. That kind of
shoots his whole argument that he has been defamed to hell, doesn't it? If
he thought he had a potential customer base here he certainly hasn't done
himself any favors by his lack of attention to detail.
ACEBALDWIN 2
i thought you were J. Marc Hetti the 4th.
*
*
***********
ACE<BR>
DISCLAIMER: All above in post is my opinion!<BR>
<A HREF="http://www.scottsplace.com/faq.html">Alt Pi FAQ Page</A> <BR>
***********
Jason Welin
-----Original Message-----
From: jmarchetti4 [mailto:jmarc...@home.com]
Sent: 05 September 2000 19:55
To: Jason Welin
Subject: Re: Private investigation Course
You know what? You are real tough behind a computer. You use such big words
like 'twit' and 'idiot'...Oh my ... lets see what you really got tough guy?
My response:
You are laughable. You email me, and accuse me of being an internet tough
guy, then spout off some pitiful crap like "lets see what you really got
tough guy?" You truly are a twit.
Jason Welin wrote in message ...
>No, it's slang for idiot, which you are.
Doug Debus
Doug Debus, LPI
Debus & Associates
19186 Fort St., Suite 242
Riverview, MI 48192
Offices also in Flint, MI
313-381-9188
313-381-6471 (Fax)
888-996-6700 (Toll Free)
Mich. PD Lic #4124 & PD-4124 A
Visa, Master Card & American Express Accepted
newsp...@my-deja.com
Dewey, Cheatem and Howe.
I've heard of them. They represent some of the biggest
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Tony Smith
Your command of the English language is suspect. You used the wrong vowel in
"twit".
Tony Smith
Liverpool
UK
Jason Welin
Tony Smith wrote in message <39B748BD...@cableinet.co.uk>...
jmarchetti4
were looking for by calling someone names on the internet...yep...internet
tough guy...nothing more. That is sad.news:lijt5.322$VF5.1...@news0.telusplanet.net...
jmarchetti4
license number or his address and telephone number, so no I have established
1. very limited vocabulary (probably due to lack of intelligence). 2. That
he is actually a nothing looking for attention..i.e. posting private
messages in a public forum to get a response. and 3. THAT HE HAS NO BALLS!
hmmmm...do I smell pussy?
At least I give everyone else credit for saying something and making sure I
knew where to reach them. haha.
Jason Welin <jjw...@telusplanet.net> wrote in message
news:lijt5.322$VF5.1...@news0.telusplanet.net...
Thinblue
> hmmmm...do I smell pussy?
>
Your boyfriend must have met a girl.....
jmarchetti4
gender mixed up.news:39B8447C...@znet.com...
Todd Moss
the lawyers not quite working out or did they recommend that you come back
to the group and stir the shit soup a little more? By the way can you tell
me when that company is buying your course? I am looking forward to
purchasing it. All of this hoopla you have caused has been a great publicity
tool, you sly dog.
--
Todd Moss
OH PI LIC# 5396
The Background Network, Inc.
Ph# 440-816-9920
Toll Free 1-877-99CHECK
http://www.crimcheck.com
jmarchetti4 <jmarc...@home.com> wrote in message
news:rKXt5.15140$AW2.1...@news1.rdc2.pa.home.com...
CD
much different than some of the things that were said about you.
jmarchetti4 wrote in message ...
Todd Moss
Newsgroups: alt.private.investigator
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: Private investigation Course
> Would these be defamatory statements or just your opinion? Doesn't seem
> much different than some of the things that were said about you.
Roberts, I don't know who you are but I'm sick and tired of you ATTACKING
the
legitimate business of Marchetti. I have look over his course and find it
quite good.
YOU have no balls! After all, you are JUST ANOTHER LOW-LIFE HIDING BEHIND
ANOTHER HOTMAIL ACCOUNT. YOU are the joke.
Todd Moss
>
>
> jmarchetti4 wrote in message ...
> >hmmm...that is odd..... Mr. Nobody, Jason Welin, does not list his PI
> >license number or his address and telephone number, so no I have
> established
> >1. very limited vocabulary (probably due to lack of intelligence). 2.
That
> >he is actually a nothing looking for attention..i.e. posting private
> >messages in a public forum to get a response. and 3. THAT HE HAS NO
BALLS!
> >hmmmm...do I smell pussy?
No, just the smelly balls of CD Roberts who the hell that is!
> >At least I give everyone else credit for saying something and making sure
I
> >knew where to reach them. haha.
"CD" <cdrob...@hotmail.comnospam> wrote in message
news:8oohu9$t6m$1...@slb7.atl.mindspring.net...
>
> >where do the rules change? If I opened a school right next to your office
> >and you ran around badmouthing its integrity telling people not to join,
it
> >would certainly amount to defamation, would it not?
>
> Not necessarily.
>
> >Especially, if you were an instructor with a masters in education.
>
> What has this got to do with anything? My father received his Masters in
> Education in the late 1960s. Does that mean he is qualified to teach a
> course in investigations? I doubt it. It also does not imply that you
are
> either.
>
> >And, you could scream it was only an opinion all day and night but, your
> comments impacted someone's >ability to do business, or caused them damage
> in other ways...defamation.
>
> Defamation refers to dematory statements of FACT, not opinion.
>
> >So, are the rules different because you are on the Internet? I think not.
> No matter how you slice it, these are >licensed professionals making these
> comments, just as you are counselor.
>
Todd Moss
bestiality.
--
Todd Moss
OH PI LIC# 5396
The Background Network, Inc.
Ph# 440-816-9920
Toll Free 1-877-99CHECK
http://www.crimcheck.com
Todd Moss <inversti...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:qt6u5.5299$%S5.2...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
PRV8EYE
>me when that company is buying your course?
The Patricia Langley Publishing Company.
jmarchetti4
want you trying to make trouble for them as you did try with me...:)
Besides, I think you would meet your match with them anyway.
PRV8EYE <prv...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
jmarchetti4
did not impact his ability to do business with the public. Where are the
damages?
CD <cdrob...@hotmail.comnospam> wrote in message
Thinblue
ehehehehee!
Thinblue
>
> I am not a licensed professional; I am not criticizing his profession and I
> did not impact his ability to do business with the public. Where are the
> damages?
You make me ill. You talked bad about my mama inferring that your
boyfriend had sex with her. I am unable to work because of the mental
anguish and stress you have created. Since your actions have made it
impossible for me to care for my family and myself, I intend to seek
damages.
See how stupid that shit sounds you cretin? (<----- professional, august
and most expert opinion)
jmarchetti4
look at you when you were born and said 'yep, he will be a flaming
crossdressing homo so lets make it easy on him and give him a girl's name...
shannon'. Little did they know the impact of their actions. Such a
shame...parents should really think before they act. And it was my female
fiance that had sex with your mother. Just because you are a flaming fag
doesn't mean everybody likes men.
Oh, and document your proof of damages with phsychiatrists that will testify
and proof of your inability to work and the fact that absolutely nobody will
hire you because of my comments and then you might have a case. Til
then...go suck another dick...Shannon.
Thinblue <thin...@znet.com> wrote in message
news:39B98007...@znet.com...
Jbbulldog1
fiance that had sex with your mother. >>
"One fucking Langley can't never be right."
RLan538885
>"One fucking Langley can't never be right."
Bulldog, (hehehe)
That's positively stupid. Don't you have some doggie rectums to snif or some
territory to mark with your urine?
"100,000 lemmings can't be wrong"
CD
>I am not a licensed professional; I am not criticizing his profession and I
>did not impact his ability to do business with the public.
None of which are necessary for defamation.
jmarchetti4
hell are you anyway...just some asshole who just decided to open his mouth
so he can get some attention? Crawl back under the rock you came from and
find someone else to pick your fights with, I have enough assholes to deal
with without others joining in.
geez...what is this place? Assholitus ... everywhere you turn around there
is another one?
Jbbulldog1 <jbbul...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20000909163329...@ng-fy1.aol.com...