c'mon chaps....pour some more crud from the filthy fossil fuel industry into the river....no. 43
abelard
coal? why not...
oil? fine...
gas? why not....
but please no clean safe nuclear power
good job it's not a gallon of low level nuclear waste...
roll up roll up...poor your arsenic and mercury into our river....
a million gallons of crud a day should be great....
good job the filthy fossil fuel industry gives obarmy 'donations'
25 nov 2009...
http://www.southernstudies.org/2009/11/tva-gets-ok-to-dump-more-toxic-coal-waste-into-ash-polluted-river.html
Last month the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation
(TDEC) granted TVA a permit under the Clean Water Act that will allow
the federal corporation to discharge wastewater polluted with toxic
arsenic, mercury and selenium into the river from the plant in Roane
County. The discharge will come from from a pond that will hold liquid
waste collected from a new air pollution scrubber.
That permit is being challenged by three environmental advocacy groups
-- Earthjustice, the Environmental Integrity Project and the Sierra
Club.
"The Clean Water Act requires TDEC to eliminate toxic discharges from
the Kingston plant," says EIP Attorney Lisa Widawsky. "Instead,
incredibly, TDEC is authorizing new discharges of toxic heavy metals
-- to the tune of one million gallons a day -- into the same river
devastated by the Kingston coal ash spill."
...
china's latest coal mine disaster kills 108
3 nov 2009
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5g4UPWd3x4z2btiEx4MYfl-BBA0Lw
"Monitoring the clean-up of a huge oil spill in pristine Australian
waters could take as long as seven years, an official said Wednesday
as environmentalists urged a wide-ranging inquiry into the disaster."
canada deelighted with one of the filthiest fossil fuel site on the
planet
http://www.canada.com/business/fp/Alberta+deficit+shrinks+billion/2272166/story.html
"Stronger investment income, oil royalties and corporate income tax
revenues have buoyed the Alberta government�s economic picture,
reducing the province�s projected deficit to $4.3-billion.
In its fiscal update in August, the government forecast the 2009-10
shortfall to rise to $6.9-billion from its initial budget projection
of a $4.7-billion deficit."
gas??
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gBj6FQpRXrxsKovHU6JL9I0MUveQD9C5F1F80
"A fourth victim has died from injuries suffered in a natural gas
explosion that tore through a North Carolina Slim Jim plant five
months ago, a hospital spokesman said Monday.
Curtis Ray Poppe, 55, died Thursday at the North Carolina Jaycee Burn
Center in Chapel Hill, spokesman Tom Hughes said. An obituary posted
by a Hickory funeral home said Poppe's family greeted friends there
Sunday.
Four critically burned victims were among the 71 who required hospital
treatment after the June blast at the ConAgra Foods Inc. plant in
Garner, said U.S. Chemical Safety Board lead investigator Don
Holmstrom."
...
world wide deaths from nuclear plants in the last ten years...
probably zero....
but be very scared of those rays!!
regards
--
web site at www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc over 1 million document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
abelard
<last...@LyingLeftistsare.invalid> wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:19:06 +0100, abelard <abel...@abelard.org>
>wrote:
>And just who are the biggest opponents of clean nuclear energy?
>Why the left wing environmental movement of course.
yeah, the watermelons
why am i interested in the uninformed 'opinions' of idiots
>http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x102714
>
>http://wapedia.mobi/en/Anti-nuclear
>
>http://climateprogress.org/2009/11/07/david-frum-conservatives-heart-nuke-power/
i've no idea why you post those links...i've had a very quick
look at them
>Interesting that you are on the same side of the issue as Rush
>Limbaugh and other conservatives.
why is that 'surprising'?
in what manner 'on the same side'?
abelard
<last...@LyingLeftistsare.invalid> wrote:
>On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:00:49 +0100, abelard <abel...@abelard.org>
>wrote:
>>i've no idea why you post those links...i've had a very quick
>> look at them
>
>Just a few examples of who some of the more vocal opponents are. You,
>of all people, should know that on USENET it's always a good idea to
>post cites supporting any statements one makes.
i'm not objecting...i was asking
>>>Interesting that you are on the same side of the issue as Rush
>>>Limbaugh and other conservatives.
>>
>>why is that 'surprising'?
>>
>>in what manner 'on the same side'?
>
>Before "global warming" became fashionable Limbaugh and others have
>been proponents of clean nuclear energy for years.
ok
>Way back when the issue was mere air pollution in general Limbaugh was
>preaching that the Europeans were leaving the US in the dust when it
>came to clean electrical power via Nuclear power plants and how the US
>needed to build more if we really wanted to cut down on the use of
>coal fired power plants.
ok
>That pretty much places you on the same side of the issue as Limbaugh
>and a large portion of conservatives in regards to nuclear power.
ok...no problem with any of that...
the problems with filthy fossil fuels go well being the hoohaa
over agw...
fff cause ginormous damage and they have been at the
centre of wars for a century...
they're not helping balance of payments...
we're running out of them...
the fff industry is dying....people just don't get it yet