China "Doubles" COX Cox's committee announced Chinese spies had stolen secrets on seven of our most advanced thermonuclear weapons, giving them nuclear design info "on a par with our own." But the committee's report on Chinese espionage rested largely upon a document deliberately fed to us by a "walk-in" (double) Chinese agent, a spy secretly acting on the orders of China's intelligence agency. Numerous explanations by Cox and others trying to explain why China would do this, evoked much skepticism. (Washington Post 5/28/99 A3.) In shades of the recent past the Soviets ran any number of similar operations using double agents to dupe the United States via the CIA to spend billions of dollars on weapons systems to counter claimed USSR development of weapons of mass destruction that did not exist. The consequences of Cox's duping apparently will restrict the flow of scientific data between U.S. government institutions and individuals and impose possibly unnecessary restrictions on trade with other countries. Ralph McGehee http://come.to/CIABASE --------------------- COX vs China & Internet Below is a brief quote from an item in the Los Angeles Times and Denver Post 16/17 May 1999 re Chinese Espionage. (The full Times report contains the observation that Internet demands a complete re-evaluation of intelligence procedures -- an observation probably lost on our intelligence services.) Ralph McGehee http://come.to/CIABASE ----- Earlier Post: "China doesn't need to use spies anymore to obtain precise details and sketches of America's most modern thermonuclear weapons, ballistic missiles and reentry vehicles. Anyone armed with an Internet account or a library card can get some of the same military secrets that China is accused of stealing from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico." That might explain why the Chinese have tried to access a Maryland-based online service, called USNI Military Database, that offers estimates of such classified data as the explosive yield of U.S. nuclear warheads, the accuracy of the missiles that carry them and the names of the Navy warships and the locations of U.S. Air Force strategic wings responsible for the weapons. China has failed to (pay the $2,500 for a year's USNI subscription) while asking for free samples. USNI info comes from combing military journals, conference reports, arms control treaties, congressional testimony and other open sources.