A SECRET WEAPON IS BEING USED AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
abe...@aol.com
Something very sinister is happening in this country. Actually, it has
been happening for more than thirty years [since 1973]. People are
being *selectively* attacked with a SECRET WEAPON that either kills
them outright or destroys their lives and the lives of their loved
ones.
People who are viewed as political or economic threats by the
oligarchs that rule the U$A are targeted for destruction. If you have
the 'wrong' beliefs [economic democracy, anti-racism, liberty and
justice for *all*, etc.] or if you know 'too much' about things that
the public is not supposed to know [who the pedophile/drug-running/
corrupt politicians,
judges, generals and admirals, CEOs and other prominent
businesspeople, etc. are] you have a good chance of being attacked.
THE WEAPON
Miniature devices [about the size of an uncooked grain of rice] were
designed in the early
1970s for the purpose of being placed *inside* of human beings in
order to ELECTRONICALLY CONTROL people.
The outside of the device was a porcelain-coated titanium capsule; it
had a porous covering so that it would bond to tissue after being
injected into a person. Inside the capsule was a tiny [nanotechnology]
programmable computer with a bi-metal power suply [battery] that could
power the device for more than one hundrd years. The circuitry for the
computer was etched onto an extremely thin silicon film, that was
rolled/folded to fit into the capsule.
This weapon serves a two main purposes-
a.) surveillance: when the implant is injected into a person, the
government is able to *permanently* track the
movements/location of the targeted person. It not only locates its
target, but it records everything that the target says, everything
that other people in the vicinity of the target say, and also records
a variety of physiological information [pulse, blood
pressure,etc.] about the target.
b.) control: the implants are injected into the *neck* of the targeted
person [usually below the ears, one on the right side and on on the
left side; they are placed in the proximity of the VAGUS NERVE for the
purpose of ELECTRICAL STIMULATION of the BRAIN (ESB)].This device
sends electrical signals to the brain that are *stronger* than any
signals that human body is capable of producing [the devices are
powered by 5 volts of direct current].
Among other features, these devices were capable of producing
*sounds*, magnetic fields, microwave radiation, and radio
frequencies.These devices can greatly disrupt the normal functioning
of the human body and cause numerous adverse health effects. The use
of these devices amounts to a form of torture -- ELECTRONIC TORTURE.
How is the government able to place these torture and control devices
in the bodies of targeted people?
It's very simple. Any federal law enforcement agency can claim that
the person that they wish to target is *suspected* of commiting a
crime [e.g. drug traficking -- it is very easy to plant drugs in
anybody's home, car,etc. ]. This allows the federal law enforcement
agency
[e.g. the DEA] to begin an 'investigation' of the targeted person;
they can go to the [surveillance] court , [usually with *fabricated*
evidence] and request a warrant to *monitor* the target. Once the
warrant is approved [they always are] the law enforcement agency will
GAS the home of the targeted person late at night while the target is
asleep. The gas is used so that the target will not awaken while the
'monitoring devices' are injected into them. The target will awaken
hours later with *no* knowledge that he or she has been implanted.
What is the source of my information about this secret weapon?
All of my information comes from a plaintiff in a series of lawsuits
against the U.S. government [and George W. Bush], named Charles A.
Schlund III.
In 1977, Charles Schlund read the CIA's files on the designing,
testing, and manufacturing of this secret weapon. His lawsuits are
*not* frivolous; one of them was appealed all the way to the United
States Supreme Court in 2001, [Charles August Schlund III and Randy D.
Lang v. United States et al. case Number 00-1603 Supreme Court of the
United States; decided on May 29, 2001]. His latest lawsuit [Schlund
v. Bush, CV-03-1590PHX VAM] is currently pending before the Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals.
Charles Schlund's affidavits from his lawsuits are available on the
internet [search for "Schlund" and "affidavit"], and provide a wealth
of information about this secret weapon.
The Secret Weapon Is Widely Used In the U.$.A. [and several other
Western countries such as U.K., Canada, Australia, etc.]
Have you ever wondered why there are so many news stories about
'mentally ill' people who believe that they have been implanted?
Whenever you see news articles like these, READ BETWEEN THE LINES.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Houston Chronicle - - 3 STAR EDITION
May 8, 2007 Tuesday
SECTION: B; Pg. 3
LENGTH: 436 words
HEADLINE: Knife-wielding woman left odd phone message; Recording was
made day
before she was killed at HPD, attorney says
BYLINE: MIKE GLENN, Staff
Before police fatally shot her inside Houston police headquarters,
explaining that she'd lunged at an officer with a knife early Sunday,
Marnell Robertson Villarreal left a cryptic telephone message with an
attorney who had represented her more than a decade ago.
The message is mostly unintelligible, but the 42-year-old Villarreal
could be heard saying she was afraid of being kidnapped by mysterious
forces who "won't stop what they're doing."
"These people are definitely getting more out of control," she said.
Attorney Clyde Miller believes Villarreal called his office sometime
on Saturday. The tone was similar in a lengthy letter she faxed to him
in March.
"I didn't really act on (the letter) because a lot of it is really
bizarre," Miller said.
In the rambling, 13-page letter, Villarreal claimed law enforcement
officials poisoned her with arsenic and implanted electronic tracking
devices inside her during a stay at the Harris County Jail.
"I can feel some sort of energy wave in my body that wasn't there
before going to jail," Villarreal wrote.
Miller helped Villarreal in a civil housing issue about 14 years ago.
That was his last contact with her until late March, when she called
and asked if he still remembered her.
"She sent me some papers about ongoing harassment by law enforcement
officials," Miller said. "I didn't really see that she had a civil or
legal matter I could do anything about."
After reading the letter, it was clear that Villarreal wasn't stable,
Miller said.
About 10 percent of officer-involved shootings can be linked to an
apparent suicide attempt, said Rick Parent, a Vancouver, British
Columbia-area police officer who analyzed 400 cases in the United
States and Canada.
Villarreal was shot about 2 a.m. Sunday after police said she rushed
past the metal detector at Houston Police Department headquarters,
while clutching a knife in her fist.
Officers E.D. Smith and A.B. Clay were manning the security desk in
the lobby and told her to drop the weapon. Smith then fired a Taser,
but HPD officials weren't sure if the electrically charged darts hit
Villarreal.
Calling out for the officers to kill her, Villarreal got within a few
feet of them when Clay fired a single shot from his service revolver,
police said.
HPD officials on Monday declined to comment on the fatal shooting,
citing the ongoing investigation. On Sunday, however, they said the
officers showed "great restraint" by attempting to use less than
lethal force as their first option.
The officers will undergo mandatory counseling during their
administrative leave.
A family member at Villarreal's home declined comment.
NOTES: mike....@chron.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=
The Associated Press State & Local Wire
August 31, 2004, Tuesday, BC cycle
SECTION: State and Regional
LENGTH: 265 words
HEADLINE: Victim's family sues suspected killer
DATELINE: NEW HAVEN, Conn.
The family of a woman who was killed in her West Haven home in April
has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against her husband, who has been
charged with murdering her.
The family of Vonda Bennings has sued Addison Bennings on behalf of
the couple's 6-year-old daughter.
Attorney Vincent R. Falcone said the intent of the lawsuit is to
ensure that Addison Bennings does not inherit Vonda Bennings'
"substantial" assets.
"What we're concerned with now is that all of the assets of Vonda,
essentially, her estate with Addison, her insurance and other pension
plans fall into the right hands," Falcone said.
The Superior Court lawsuit claims that Addison Bennings and his twin
brother, Antonio Bennings, conspired to kill Vonda for personal gain.
The lawsuit also says that Addison failed to address his own mental
illness and homicidal thoughts and failed to warn his wife of his
brother's homicidal thoughts and impulses.
The brothers, 41, are both charged with murdering Vonda Bennings on
April 26. Antonio Bennings has been declared incompetent to stand
trial and is undergoing treatment to restore competency.
Addison Bennings' competency is under evaluation.
Shortly before the killing, the two brothers sued the FBI in U.S.
District Court. The brothers claimed wireless electronic devices were
implanted in their bodies to control their minds.
The federal lawsuit filing also said that Addison Bennings believed
his wife was aiding federal agents who were seeking to drive him
insane.
-=-=-=-=-
INTELLIGENCER JOURNAL (LANCASTER, PA.)
February 4, 2004, Wednesday
SECTION: NEWS, Pg. A-1
LENGTH: 938 words
HEADLINE: Convicted killer says he's conspiracy victim; Judge hears
testimony on Zook's mental state
BYLINE: Thomas L. Flannery
Convicted killer Robert P. Zook Jr. took the stand Tuesday during the
second day of a hearing to determine if he is mentally capable of
helping his attorney's efforts to get him off death row.
Zook was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder in 1986 and
sentenced to death for killing 55-year-old typewriter repairman Paul
Conard and the repairman's 19-year-old girlfriend, Sandra Wiker,
during a botched robbery at Conard's North Queen Street shop.
On Tuesday, under questioning by his attorney, James Moreno of the
Defender Association of Philadelphia, Zook told Farina he is an
innocent man.
Zook said his attorneys are trying to have him executed as part of a
conspiracy concocted by former District Attorney Joseph Madenspacher,
now a county judge, and retired Lancaster Bureau of Police Chief
Michael Landis, now a county detective.
Zook claims the two men plotted with the "radio community" and had
transmitters implanted in his head and abdomen.
The transmitters, Zook said, have been used to monitor his every move
and record his thoughts and his speech. He said the recordings are
listened to by a bevy of "outlaw radio stars" that populate the
county.
Zook, a hulking man who weighs about 300 pounds and is fully tattooed,
told Moreno he has no idea who killed Conard and Wiker, his distant
cousin.
"Did the "radio community' set you up?" Moreno asked.
"Yes sir," Zook said.
Zook was polite, calm and deliberate as he talked about a conspiracy
that extended to his entire family and included Moreno.
Zook told Farina he knows about the implants because of the images he
sees from behind his eyelids, and voices that speak to him from the
implants.
On Tuesday, Philadelphia psychiatrist Dr. Robert Sodoff testified that
Zook's mental status has deteriorated to a point where Zook is so
delusional and distrustful of Moreno that he cannot assist in his own
defense.
Sodoff told Farina that Zook believes he has a computer chip implanted
in his head and a two-way transmitter in his abdomen so authorities
can monitor his every move and communicate with him, all part of an
elaborate plot Moreno helped concoct in 1979.
In 1979, Moreno was a college freshman.
Sodoff also said it is highly unlikely Zook has been faking his
delusions for more than five years, when they first surfaced. A
psychiatrist called by the defense Tuesday agreed with Sodoff's
assessment.
However, Dr. Timothy Michaels, a forensic psychiatrist called by
Deputy Attorney General Jonelle Eshbach, who is prosecuting Zook at
the appellate level, said Zook, despite the alleged delusions, can
cooperate and help his attorneys -- if he so chooses.
Michaels said Zook does not "want to be crazy." He said Zook "can
effectively think, reason, understand and cooperate with his
attorneys."
Under questioning by Moreno, Michaels said he was the only physician
to ever examine Zook who did not conclude Zook was psychotic.
"His delusional progression is not consistent with mental illness,"
Michaels said. If Zook is psychotic, Michaels said, the psychosis he
allegedly suffers related to the implanted chip and transmitter does
not impair his ability to aid in his own defense.
This week's hearing was ordered by the state Supreme Court, which is
considering an appeal filed by Zook of a November 1999 ruling by
county Judge Louis Farina. At that time, Farina dismissed an appeal
Zook had filed seeking relief under the state's Post Conviction Relief
Act. Zook asked Farina to overturn the death sentence and resentence
him to life in prison.
Zook claimed he was not properly represented during his two separate
murder trials held here in the 1980s.
In 1989, the state Supreme Court ruled Zook's first trial was flawed
and overturned the conviction, ordering a second trial.
The U.S. Supreme Court denied the county's appeal of the state Supreme
Court's ruling.
On Jan. 12, 1990, Zook was convicted a second time of two counts of
first-degree murder and again was sentenced to death.
Zook's defense team took an automatic appeal to the state Supreme
Court, but the state's top court upheld the verdict and sentence.
On March 24, 1995, Moreno filed Zook's filed first PCRA appeal in
state court.
The hearing on the 1995 PCRA filing hearing was set to begin in May
1998, but was delayed until January 1999.
During the 1999 hearing before Farina, Moreno argued that Zook was not
adequately represented by attorney James P. Cullen during his first
trial, nor by attorney Vincent Quinn during his second trial.
Cullen currently is a Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas judge.
Quinn, now in private practice, was the chief counsel for the state's
Judicial Conduct Board.
According to the motion for a new trial Farina denied in 1999, Zook
claimed both Cullen and Quinn failed to introduce medical evidence
about his alleged mental illness during the penalty phase of the 1986
and 1990 trials that may have led the jury to impose a life sentence
instead of the death penalty.
The malady, Moreno said in 1999, was caused by brain damage Zook
allegedly suffered during a prison scuffle prior to the murders, the
abuse he suffered at the hands of his parents and Zook's history of
heavy methamphetamine, marijuana, alcohol and crack cocaine use.
After the testimony concluded Tuesday afternoon, Farina did not rule
on the matter. The Supreme Court requires a written opinion.
Zook also is serving a separate 25-to-50-year sentence for beating an
elderly man during a robbery at a Manheim Township bowling alley.
GRAPHIC: PHOTO, Robert Zook;
1985 photo
-=-=-=-=-=-
The Associated Press State & Local Wire
October 8, 2004, Friday, BC cycle
SECTION: State and Regional
LENGTH: 191 words
HEADLINE: Memphis man to be evaluated after bomb threats
DATELINE: MEMPHIS, Tenn.
A Memphis man will face a mental evaluation after he was accused of
sending bomb threats and envelopes filled with white powder to
Florida, a federal judge said.
Federal Magistrate Tu Pham put a detention hearing for Dane Swindell,
46, on hold Thursday until Swindell is tested.
Both Swindell's federal public defender, Steve Shankman, and Assistant
U.S. Attorney Fred Godwin agreed to the testing.
Swindell is accused of mailing at least eight bomb threats to schools
in Broward County. One letter, written entirely in capital letters,
said: "There is a bomb in your building!!! No election polls here!!!"
FBI agents interviewed Swindell last week and found a list of agencies
Swindell had mailed. Authorities said Swindell told them he'd sent as
many as 25 letters.
"He's sick, physically and mentally," said Novella Smith-Arnold, his
chaplain at Calvary Episcopal Church.
Smith-Arnold said Swindell told friends the government implanted
devices to track him.
"He's too intelligent to think somebody put implants in his head," she
said.
(Information from: The Commercial Appeal, http://www.thecommercialappeal.com)
-=-=-=-=-
The Tampa Tribune (Tampa, FL), Jan 17, 2000 p2
A strange tale that could be true. (NATION/WORLD)(Column)
Full Text:
COPYRIGHT 2000 The Tribune Company
Has it even remotely occurred to anyone that Anthony Diveley may be
onto something?
You'll recall it was the 38-year-old Diveley who caused a pinch of a
commotion in downtown Tampa last week when he allegedly drove a
stolen, massive Mack truck through a parking lot, running over,
sideswiping and otherwise smashing up 20 cars.
Sure, it's tough to find a parking space on occasion, but this is
ridiculous.
After the truck came to rest, witnesses reported seeing Diveley
scamper atop the vehicle's hood and begin a rant about a government
conspiracy to plant a chip in his stomach to monitor his whereabouts
with satellite beams, although at the moment he had done a pretty good
job of alerting the authorities of his position all on his own.
To the uninitiated, the idea of someone claiming to have a government
issued homing device implanted in their tummy while being bombarded by
satellite rays from outer space might seem to be just a tad specious.
Indeed some naysayers might even go far enough to suggest Anthony
Diveley is a bit wacko.
Tut-tut.
But for those of us in the scribbling racket, Diveley's insistence
that he's been turned into a human transmitter hardly raised an
eyebrow of surprise.
There is nary a reporter who has spent at least 15 minutes in this
business who hasn't gotten the phone call from some beleaguered soul
who is absolutely convinced the FBI, CIA, National Security Council,
Secret Service and the ghost of Rod Serling has them under intense
surveillance.
This scrutiny can take various forms, from the ever popular hovering
black helicopter in a stationary position over the roof, to the more
sublime gamma ray assault, to the rather elegant implanting of the
computer chip in one's teeth, brain, shoulder or - in the case of
Anthony Diveley - the stomach.
Over the course of my own hen-scratching career I've probably heard
from maybe 15 or 20 folks who have been hied away to a secret
government installation to have a monitoring chip inserted in some
body part.
And in a random, unscientific survey of several co-workers, each one
of them had had similar experiences dealing with walking antennas.
This means two things: A) the government is very busy and/or B) we've
all talked to the same people.
The best part about this job is when you can confirm to the caller
that their fears are - true.
If you multiply the number of newspapers around the country with the
tally of folks claiming to have surveillance chips sown into their
gall bladders by the KGB, the A-Team and the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police, one can only conclude there are a terrifying number of Zelda
Fitzgerald types out there, or the dark side of Washington is awfully
nosy.
Although the chip-in-the-spleen scenario is a staple of such things as
"The X-Files" this sort of stuff is generally perpetrated by alien
life forms instead of the federal government. You know how sneaky
those alien life forms can be.
Still, you have to believe if so many people honestly suspect the U.S
Postal Service of injecting a tracking device into their tush, maybe
there is something to all this paranoia.
Wouldn't the sheer force of statistical probability suggest that if
thousands of people insist they are walking around with an electronic
bug in their navel, planted there by the Federal Tea Board (which we
all know is merely a front for the White House), maybe, just maybe at
least one of them is telling the truth?
But why?
With all due respect to Anthony Diveley, one has to wonder even if the
U.S. Department of Internal Snoopiness had the wherewithal to run
around sticking homing chips in the intestinal tracts of people, uh,
why him?
It isn't as if Diveley is a threat to national security, although one
might argue he can wreak havoc on car insurance rates.
Perhaps that's it.
Could it be that Diveley does in fact have a tracking chip in his
stomach? But the government didn't put it there.
AAA did.
Very eerie.
-=-=-=-=-
The Associated Press State & Local Wire
June 17, 1999, Thursday, BC cycle
SECTION: State and Regional
LENGTH: 646 words
HEADLINE: Supreme Court upholds medication of mentally ill man
BYLINE: By CHET BROKAW, Associated Press Writer
DATELINE: PIERRE, S.D.
A man who believes he is getting and sending messages through a
computer chip implanted in his brain has lost his bid to stop the
state mental hospital from giving him psychotropic drugs.
The South Dakota Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a circuit judge's
order granting the hospital authority to administer psychotropic
medication to Bernard Rigney against his will.
The court order did not violate Rigney's constitutional rights, and
the hospital met the legal requirements for showing that the
medication was necessary, the Supreme Court said in a 4-1 ruling.
But in a dissent, Justice Richard Sabers said the majority opinion
could lead to a weakening of requirements for some kinds of testimony
in criminal cases.
"If that happens, GOOD-BYE CONSTITUTION, HELLO HITLER," Sabers wrote
in a footnote attached to his dissent.
Rigney, who has been diagnosed as chronic paranoid schizophrenic, has
been treated in Veterans Administration hospitals over the years.
In May 1997, he was involuntarily committed for the second time to the
George S. Mickelson Center for Neurosciences in Yankton, also known as
the Human Services Center. In February 1998, the center sought a court
order for authority to give Rigney psychotropic medicine.
After a hearing, Circuit Judge Kathleen Caldwell authorized the center
to administer such drugs to Rigney for up to a year, to conduct any
needed assessments and to review the need for the medicine every 30
days.
The psychiatrist treating Rigney said Rigney believed he had a
computer chip implanted in his brain, that Minnehaha County
authorities and the hospital were stealing his money, and that he had
been injected with the AIDS virus.
Rigney argued that the court order violated his constitutional rights
because it was too broad. He said the order was flawed because it did
not specify which medicine he was to get, it allowed tests and it
failed to require a court order for any changes in medication.
The Supreme Court said the court order must provide guidance to the
center, but it does not have to name the precise medication or
prescribe a treatment plan.
"Medication determinations and treatment plans are best left to the
appropriate professionals, not the court," Chief Justice Robert A.
Miller wrote for the court majority.
The center met the requirements set in state law for showing that
Rigney should receive medication against his will, the high court
said.
The psychiatrist testified that Rigney was not competent to make his
own decision about medication. He also testified that Rigney could be
a danger to himself or others and that Rigney's condition would
deteriorate without medication.
Rigney argued that state law requires testimony from two people on the
need for psychotropic drugs. The law at the time said a facility could
seek a court order authorizing such drugs if the facility's director
or administrator or attending psychiatrist and treating physician
agreed drugs were necessary.
The majority opinion says the law requires only that two people agree
on the need for drugs, but it does not require that two people testify
in court.
In his dissent Sabers said the plain meaning of the law is that two
people must not only agree on the need for psychotropic drugs, but
also must testify in court.
The forcible injection of medication against a person's will is a
substantial interference with personal liberty, so courts much protect
that person's rights in such cases, Sabers said.
Sabers said the majority's opinion could set a bad precedent that
harms people's rights in criminal cases.
The state's criminal laws set out the key elements that define certain
crimes, but they do not specifically require testimony on the subject,
Sabers said. The majority's decision could mean the state would no
longer have to provide testimony to prove the key elements of crimes,
he said.
John Black
abe...@aol.com says...
DAMN! We've been exposed!!! Its over... Unless... I think there is a
way to salvage the program but I cannot reveal any more details...
John Black
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
JJ
http://www.intervoiceonline.org/
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/voice-hearers/
deadhead
--
_____________________________________________________________________________
http://www.jamfestexpress.com/
"John Black" <jbl...@texas.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.20ccb3afd...@free.teranews.com...
cablehead
"deadhead" <atar...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:78M8i.13343$296...@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
Gregory (Bear) Casad
"cablehead" <tra...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:rsa9i.166663$mJ1....@newsfe22.lga...
Akneigh Wombuster
>
> read more ยป
---------- OH, EH, RIGHT ! ----------
"People who are viewed as political or economic threats by the
oligarchs that rule the U$A are targeted for destruction."
AND EXAMPLES OF THESE SPECIFIC TYPES THAT HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED INCLUDE
_________________________ , ________________________
_____________________________, __________________________________,
_________________________________, and
____________________________ .
MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE
>> A SECRET WEAPON IS BEING USED AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
>>
>> Something very sinister is happening in this country.
>
> ---------- OH, EH, RIGHT ! ----------
>
> "People who are viewed as political or economic threats by the
> oligarchs that rule the U$A are targeted for destruction."
>
> AND EXAMPLES OF THESE SPECIFIC TYPES THAT HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED INCLUDE
> _________________________ , ________________________
> _____________________________, __________________________________,
> _________________________________, and
> ____________________________ .
A: Who is at risk?
ANYONE or ANYTHING that stands in the way of EITHER Clinton.
Ask Ron Brown.
Ask Vince Foster
Ask Adm. Boorda
Ask Bill Colby about his canoe cruise.
Imagine Evil Triumphant. HILLARY.
Obscured
"cablehead" <tra...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:rsa9i.166663$mJ1....@newsfe22.lga...
boobs
Hasn't this god-damned fuckin' shit been posted dozens of times?