Blasphemous names
Allan Svensson
Blasphemous names
Then the angel carried me away in the Spirit into a desert. There I
saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast that was covered with
blasphemous names ... Rev.17:3. These blasphemous names are the
names of all so-called Christian churches and denominations. All
their names are blasphemous and do not correspond to their real
nature and character. Evangelical Lutheran Church is not at all
evangelical. Rather, it ought to be called the Satanic Lutheran Harlot.
The name of Baptist denomination comes of the Greek word
"baptisma", which means "immerse". The Baptist denomination
did not convey the truth of baptism, but the devil used this biblical
truth as a pretext to establish a denomination for the purpose to
confine the revival.
If the Baptist denomination would live up to its name, then the
denomination ought to inform the members about the baptism
revival in the 19th century and how the Baptist denomination came
into existence. However, during the eleven years I was a member in
a Baptist Church, they mention nothing about this revival, in their
meetings. Neither in the Pentecostal Movement I heard anything
about this revival. Not until 15 years after I had been saved, I got
any information about this revival, and that the Christians were
persecuted due to the baptism.
The church system called Pentecostal Revival is not at all any revival.
It is on the contrary. This church system has destroyed the revival,
which once burned. Many of those, who call themselves
Pentecostalists, hate the Pentecost. They are not interested in any
new Pentecost, and are not longing for renewing to be prepared for
Jesus' coming. They feel so very much at home in the spiritual
darkness of the churches, and do not like waking up. The name
Pentecostal Church, is a blasphemous name. What that is going on
there is certainly no Pentecost, but ecumenicalism, religious
fornication, faithlessness against Christ.
If the Pentecostal Movement would live up to its name, and take
God's calling seriously, then they ought to break up the whole
Pentecostal Movement, and preach the truth of the Assembly of
God, the Body of Christ. However, when I was a member in the
Pentecostal Movement, it was not even possible to get information
about what the Pentecostal Revival was. Sometimes, they told about
how powerful the meetings were when the Pentecostal Revival came.
Many were saved and baptized with the Holy Spirit.
But they could not explain why the revival became stagnant. When
I asked for more information about the revival, then I got only any
avoiding answer, and so they would not say any more. Neither in their
own papers I could find information how the Pentecostal Revival
cams, nor where it began. Not until I attended the so-called Maranata-
meetings, I got knowledge how the revival began in America about
1907. Then, 15 years after I was saved, I heard that also the Baptist
denomination had come into existence about a revival from God.
The label "Maranata" has neither produced any revival. On the
contrary. Using the word "Marana ta" as a name of a "revival
movement", was a sabotage of the devil against the revival. His
purpose was like as at earlier revivals, - that bind the revival to a
new party label and limit the revival to a certain small group of
Christians. The result became the same as with earlier revivals,
- stagnation and retrogression. The attack against the churches
and denominations came off almost entirely.
To combat the religious harlot-being it is important that use the right
names. We have no reason to acknowledge churches or denominations
as assemblies of God. For them are only religious organizations and
false copies of the Assembly of God, the Body of Christ.
Allan Svensson
If you have any questions after reading of this article
Please, visit my Web Site
http://www.algonet.se/~allan-sv/CONTENTS.HTM
The Assembly of God is no Pentecostal church
http://www.algonet.se/~allan-sv/ASSEMBLY.HTM
The most powerful revival message of the Lord
to his people in our time
http://www.algonet.se/~allan-sv/MESSAGE.HTM
Linda Lee
>
> The most powerful revival message of the Lord
> to his people in our timehttp://www.algonet.se/~allan-sv/MESSAGE.HTM
The revival is already happening; the children of God are already
coming out of the whore of Babylon. I am amazed at how many are
preaching this message (contained in the link you provided) at this
time. I am seeing it again and again.
Do you realize the false apostle Paul is the beast upon which the
'whore of babylon' rides?
TV's helping a great deal, with its so obviously evil and phony
televangelists, as is the 'information highway', the internet
(interesting its called a highway - Isa. 35:8 "And an highway shall be
there, and a way, and it shall be called The way of holiness; the
unclean shall not pass over it; but it shall be for those: the
wayfaring men, though fools, shall not err therein").
God is calling.
"Come out of her, my people".
Linda Lee
>
> The most powerful revival message of the Lord
> to his people in our time http://www.algonet.se/~allan-sv/MESSAGE.HTM
From your link at http://www.algonet.se/~allan-sv/MESSAGE.HTM
"What then is it that must be taken out of the way before the
Antichrist comes? The Antichrist is also named 'the man of
Lawlessness' and 'the Lawless one'. What is it that must be taken out
of the way before a lawless ruler can deceive and seduce the whole
world? He will awake the admiration of people so that they will
worship him. Rev. 13:4." - this "man of lawlessness" is Paul the false
apostle.
Linda Lee
>
> From your link at http://www.algonet.se/~allan-sv/MESSAGE.HTM
>
> "What then is it that must be taken out of the way before the
> Antichrist comes? The Antichrist is also named 'the man of
> Lawlessness' and 'the Lawless one'. What is it that must be taken out
> of the way before a lawless ruler can deceive and seduce the whole
> world? He will awake the admiration of people so that they will
> worship him. Rev. 13:4." - this "man of lawlessness" is Paul the false
> apostle.
See this link for further evidence of Paul's lawlessness:
http://groups.google.com/group/falseapostlepaul
The apostles and the disciples who had heard the teachings of the
Messiah were those who were learned in the Scriptures and could not be
misled by Paul's writings, but those new to the faith, the "unlearned"
and "unstable" are brought to "destruction" by Paul's teachings.
II Pet. 3:16 “As also in ALL OF HIS EPISTLES, speaking in them of
these things; in which are some things HARD TO BE UNDERSTOOD, which
they that are UNLEARNED and UNSTABLE wrest, as they do also the other
scriptures, unto their own DESTRUCTION."
The word here translated 'unstable' - Gk. 793 - is defined "unfixed,
that is, (figuratively) vacillating".
This is not talking about these being emotionally "unstable", but
those whose faith was new and therefore unstable. II Peter says those
unlearned in the Scriptures and new to the faith are misled by all of
Paul's epistles.
The true apostles, including Peter, taught the unlearned, including
the wholly ignorant Gentiles (Acts 15:7), and their preaching did not
lead anyone to confusion, not even Paul as he said he learned his
gospel from no man, so Paul admits he learned nothing from the true
apostles, neither was he taught by the Messiah.
Mat 7:12 Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do
to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
Mat 7:13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and
broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which
go in thereat:
Mat 7:14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which
leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
Mat 7:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's
clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
Mat 7:16 Ye shall know them by their FRUITS.
The Messiah said, 'by their FRUITS (the product of their preaching)
you shall know who are the false prophets'.
II Pet. 3:17 "Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things
before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the
wicked, fall from your own steadfastness".
The word here translated 'wicked' - Gk. 113 - means "lawless i.e. (by
implication) criminal".
II Peter is warning that, although Paul preached a form of Christ
according to the wisdom the apostles had given him (II Pet. 3:15), the
fruits of Paul's epistles is destruction because Paul preached
lawlessness.
EXAMPLE OF PAUL'S LAWLESSNESS (in Paul's own words in The Epistle to
the Romans written 58 A.D., long after Paul's alleged conversion):
Rom 7:18 For I know that in me (that is, in my FLESH,) dwelleth no
good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that
which is good I find not.
Rom 7:19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I
would not, that I do.
Rom 7:20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it,
but sin that dwelleth in me.
Rom 7:21 I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is
present with me.
Rom 7:22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
Rom 7:23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law
of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is
in my members.
Rom 7:24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body
of this death?
Rom 7:25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then ***with
the MIND I myself SERVE THE LAW OF GOD; BUT with the FLESH the *** LAW
OF SIN.***
Paul, apparently, is under a different law (being a 'captive' to the
"law of sin") from the believers of the Messiah. I guess Paul never
heard the Messiah came to set the captives free.
Luke 4:18-19 Yahashua` the Messiah said, "The Spirit of the Lord is
upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor;
he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance
[FREEDOM] to the CAPTIVES, and recovering of sight to the blind, to
set at liberty them that are bruised, To preach the acceptable year of
the Lord."
Paul is lying again, and his alleged 'gospel' didn't even free Paul
from sin and death, let alone anyone else. (Rom. 7:24 - "O wretched
man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?") The
answer for Paul's question was to follow the Messiah and FOLLOW THE
TEN COMMANDMENTS, which he apparently did NOT do since, according to
his own witness here, he remained captive to the "law of sin".)
Mark 7:18 Yahashua` he Messiah said, "And he saith unto them, Are ye
so without understanding also? Do ye not perceive, that whatsoever
thing from without entereth into the man, it cannot defile him;
Mar 7:19 Because it entereth NOT into his HEART, but into the BELLY
[his FLESH], and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
Mar 7:20 And he said, That which cometh out of the man, that defileth
the man.
Mar 7:21 For ***** from within, OUT OF the HEART of men, proceed EVIL
THOUGHTS,***** adulteries, fornications, murders, Mar 7:22 Thefts,
covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an
evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness:
Mar 7:23 All these evil things come from within, and defile the man.
The word translated in Mark 7:19 & v. 21 - "heart" - Gk. 2588 - "the
heart i.e. (figuratively) the THOUGHTS or feelings (MIND); also (by
analogy) the middle".
Paul says his mind is pure, but his flesh is evil; the Messiah says
evil thoughts and emotions defile the man.
There's another difference between Paul's alleged 'gospel' and the
Messiah's that can't be ignored.
Face it; Paul is kidding himself and others when he claims his mind is
pure, but his flesh is evil. Paul's MIND was evil, and he acted out
his evil THOUGHTS through his FLESH just as the Messiah taught in Mark
7:18-23 (above).
The same Greek word is used throughout the NT to mean the mind and
emotions - three examples, ALL words of the Messiah:
Matt. 6:21 "For where your treasure is, there will your HEART be
also".
Matt. 12:34 "O generation of vipers, how can ye, being EVIL, speak
good things? for out of the abundance of the HEART the MOUTH
SPEAKETH."
John 16:6-7 "But because I have said these things unto you, sorrow
hath filled your HEART. Nevertheless I tell you the truth".
Is the effect of Paul's writings creating confusion in the unlearned
'good fruit'? Creating confusion is not an admirable trait in a
prophet/apostle, and in fact, reveals them as false, as their
'fruit' (what they produce) is bad. Confusion is of the Devil, and
the author of II Peter is warning people not to be confused by Paul
because “all” of Paul's “epistles” are “hard to be understood” and may
lead to their own “destruction”.
The writings of the true apostles did not create confusion and lead to
destruction, but instead brought knowledge and led to salvation.
guardian Snow
> See this link for further evidence of Paul's lawlessness:http://groups.google.com/group/falseapostlepaul
He quotes Paul on his site. I did think his page on Marana Tha was
very telling:)
http://www.algonet.se/~allan-sv/PAGE80.HTM#Maranatha
I doubt he'd take to our message. Good luck. I think he's just angry
at his denomination. Anger is never a way to the truth.
Shalom,
*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)
I challenge you to make your life a masterpiece. I challenge you to
join the ranks of those people who live what they teach, who walk
their talk.
Tony Robbins
http://groups.google.com/group/messianicYehoshua <-- my site
http://www.isr-messianic.org/ <- download the scriptures free
2008@rocketmail.com Firefly
"Linda Lee" <lindag...@juno.com> wrote in message
news:ee5a8f95-84f4-4e7d...@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
Thank you. A friend.
Linda Lee
> On Oct 2, 7:28 pm,LindaLee<lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > See this link for further evidence of Paul's lawlessness:http://groups.google.com/group/falseapostlepaul
>
> He quotes Paul on his site. I did think his page on Marana Tha was
> very telling:)
>
> http://www.algonet.se/~allan-sv/PAGE80.HTM#Maranatha
>
> I doubt he'd take to our message. Good luck. I think he's just angry
> at his denomination. Anger is never a way to the truth.
>
> Shalom,
> *´¨)
> ¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
> (¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)
>
"our message"??? 'We' don't have an "our message". You recently
revealed you deny the Messiah was God incarnate. I think you're
ignorant, double-minded, and double-tongued since you had always
previously supported my statements affirming The Messiah was indeed
God incarnate as our Saviour.
Linda Lee
> "LindaLee" <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote in message
>
> news:ee5a8f95-84f4-4e7d...@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
Hi firefly,
You're welcome; glad you've joined the group.
guardian Snow
> "our message"??? 'We' don't have an "our message". You recently
> revealed you deny the Messiah was God incarnate. I think you're
> ignorant, double-minded, and double-tongued since you had always
> previously supported my statements affirming The Messiah was indeed
> God incarnate as our Saviour.
Linda, your to busy acting as you always do to listen to anybody and
you don't have a clue what your talking about. Just because you
failed to understand. Because you insist on keeping false names.
Num 6:27 “Thus they shall put My Name on the children of Yisra’ĕl, and
I Myself shall bless them.”
Deu 6:4 “Hear, O Yisra’ĕl: יהוה our Elohim, יהוה is one!
Deu 6:5 “And you shall love יהוה your Elohim with all your heart, and
with all your being, and with all your might.
Lev 22:32 “And do not profane My set-apart Name, and I shall be set-
apart among the children of Yisra’ĕl. I am יהוה, who sets you apart,
Shalom,
*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)
I challenge you to make your life a masterpiece. I challenge you to
Linda Lee
wrote:
> On Oct 11, 6:11 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > "our message"??? 'We' don't have an "our message". You recently
> > revealed you deny the Messiah was God incarnate. I think you're
> > ignorant, double-minded, and double-tongued since you had always
> > previously supported my statements affirming The Messiah was indeed
> > God incarnate as our Saviour.
>
> Linda, your to busy acting as you always do to listen to anybody and
> you don't have a clue what your talking about. Just because you
> failed to understand.
> Because you insist on keeping false names.
You're a liar. Why don't you take some night courses, or something, so
you can tell the difference between words and names?
>
> Num 6:27 “Thus they shall put My Name on the children of Yisra’ĕl, and
> I Myself shall bless them.”
>
> Deu 6:4 “Hear, O Yisra’ĕl: יהוה our Elohim, יהוה is one!
> Deu 6:5 “And you shall love יהוה your Elohim with all your heart, and
> with all your being, and with all your might.
>
> Lev 22:32 “And do not profane My set-apart Name, and I shall be set-
> apart among the children of Yisra’ĕl. I am יהוה, who sets you apart,
>
What happened to 'how can they impale a spirit'?
Quit trying to weasel out of it in such a cowardly way. Obviously,
you're not too sure of your new belief ...or should I say unbelief?