Karvette38 <karve...@aol.com> wrote in article
<199804081505...@ladder01.news.aol.com>...
When I went to the hospital last June hemorrhaging out of my nose after
sinus surgery and removal of nodules and a septoplasty I needed to have a
"plug" put it. Well this plug is about 6 inches long and it's shaped like a
tongue depressor. My nose felt like raw meat as the surgery had only been
two days before. This Osteopath who was on duty at ER told me that I didn't
need any pain medications, that he doesn't give pain medications and he was
a thorough jerk. I ended up in Mpls. for a week bed bound in the hospital
and given two Percocet and a Demerol shot every four hours as deemed fit by
my ENT specialist to treat the pain that this condition caused. I don't
like osteopaths and had been afraid he would be the doc on duty in ER when
I arrived there, he is my worst nightmare.
Vicki PS: There is an article about osteopaths on the Skeptic's page. I put
the url on the ng about a week ago.
In the past they were taught some kind of spine manipulation, but they
don't use it anymore. They treat you like md's, that is they don't touch
you or look at you. My experience with most drs is they take your BP and
grab the rx pad and push you out the door. They don't even touch, you
let alone manipulate you. I believe it's a very individual thing. md and
do are synonomous now. Dot
Oh how wrong you can be----An Osteopath recieves virtually the same training as
an MD with the addition ofmanual manipulation. Not all continue to use
manipulation in the future. At least in San Antonio we have some excellent
ones-The allergist- Bruce Martin and anesthesiologistRobbins are excellent and
I see Wm. Thomas Crow for manipulative treatments every other week-he's the
best diagnostician I,ve come across.Each of these drs take time to talk about
whats going on in my life that might effect my health,my fears and concerns as
well as what's wrong. Dr. Crow will treat you using conventionally,or more
natural remedies or a mixture of both. All 3 seem to be very up on
FM-especially Crow.That's My experience.
judy
Vicki http://www.quackwatch.com/04ConsumerEducation/QA/osteo.html
and........
>Personally I would suggest a rheumatologist before an osteopath. Personally
>an osteopath would be the last doctor I would go to for anything. In fact I
>wouldn't let one examine my psychotic poodle either.
Although I cant help ya w/ your poodle, let me clarify what a DO is:
A D.O.(Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine) is equivalently trained to an M.D.
Both are 4 yr medical degrees. DOs take the same courses, same board exams,
do the same residencies, do the same specialties, and practice in the same
hospitals alongside their M.D. colleagues. The ONLY difference is that DOs
take an additonal course in manual medicine in their first 2 yrs. Only about
15% of DOs continue to use these techniques in their practices.
There are 40,000 DOs, and 700,000 MDs in the USA. There are 144 medical
colleges in the USA, 20 of them being Osteopathic College of Medicine.
Also, the term *osteopath* went out in the early 60s...no longer used.
Osteopathic medical doctor, osteopathic physician, or just 'hey you' is the
contemporary moniker.
I am sorry that you had an unhappy experience w/ an ER doc. Turns out he was
a DO. More likely statistically he would have been a MD or Foreign MD. But
he/she was a DO and rubbed you the wrong way. Unfortunate. I assure you it
had nothing to do w/ his medical training. And I guarantee that you will hear
more from people whose favorite doctors are DOs, than those have had bad
encounters w/ a DO.
I hope this has shed a little light on what a DO is, and is not. It's always
good to look into things for yourself, and not base your healthcare decisions
on hearsay or an individuals anecdotal experiences.
Bryan Maxwell, MSc
MS2, The Univ. of Health Sciences-Kansas City
Osteopathic College of Medicine
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
Just a note about that QuackWatch info: It is glaringly inaccurate regarding
the osteopathic profession. My background is as a research scientist, trained
in an MD-college, now a DO medical student, so I do not have a particular axe
to grind. I have played both sides of the fence. I am also generally a fan of
QuackWatch. That said, there are many inaccuracies and misstatements in
Steve's article on osteopathic medicine. His data is 20 yrs off the mark
where it is even accurate. Remember, there are 40,000 DOs and 700,000 MDs.
Chances are you will find many more MDs carrying out questionable medical
practices than DOs, just by sheer numbers. And I would argur that the %'s
would be no different. As far as manipulation, it is great for low back pain
(as Steve points out). I feel few DOs do it b/c of fears of misperceptions by
the lay public. The quackwatch site unfortunately adds further confusion to
the mix. Cranial manipulation is a fringe element that is considered so by
BOTH the osteopathic *AND* allopathic communities. So is chelation, etc.
Please judge the individual practitioner by his bedside manner, reputation,
and individual competency, NOT by the letters after his name.
(BTW, the QuackWatch authors wife is also an MD...and her partners are DOs!)
Cheers,
Bryan
I think you should form your own opinion about the Drs. in your area as
far as FM.
Laurie
But that was in 1940. The leg is fine on that line, but awful with
tingling, numbness, and pain from FM. So, I have never been fond of them!
Yours in 'Christ, Emily
VSteen <blue...@runestone.net> wrote in article
<6gg979$d3o$1...@news3.mr.net>...
> Personally I would suggest a rheumatologist before an osteopath.
Personally
> an osteopath would be the last doctor I would go to for anything. In fact
I
> wouldn't let one examine my psychotic poodle either.
>
Good luck sorry good not be of more help
Dave
Again, that was one maine osteopath in 1940!! did they even have x-ray and
aspirin in 1940?? ;-) Just kidding.
Let's not all pile on this one. How 'bout a few stories about crappy MDs.
Anyone have any stories in that regard...............
When your different you sure stick out, and everything you do is measured.
Peace,
Missed that one, Dot. But I'm glad to stink as equally as the MDs...no more
or less, just equally! ;-)
Listen, you give me a few more years(I get my degree in May 2000)and then
look me up. I'll take the best care of you I can. I'll listen..and I'll ACT
like I'm listen also!
I wish I could do more for you all now. Take care.
I'm also rather sorry the old breed of D.O. who practiced medicine on the whole
person inclucing spinal manipulation is decreasing.
I have a graduate degree in the Health Care profession and introduced a segment
of "What it Means to be a DO" to the College of Public Health in my community.
I'm very sorry you had a bad experience with an ER doc. There is a time warp
where many physicians who were doing ER medicine were doctors who had problems
with a practice or other things elsewhere. I'm happy to say in the last 10
years, the quality of the ER physician to be found in the average hospital,
whether an M.D. or a D.O. has risen substantially.
Also one last thought, there are D.O. Rheumatology Docs.