On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:10:46 +0000, This account has been banned because
it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use wrote:
> A<SLAP>
> Nadegda <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks<SPANK>
>
> Defeated,<SLAP!>
Your willful pollution of irrelevant newsgroups with your feud with a
nonexistent person is noted, kook.
>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:17:25 +0000, This account has been banned
>> because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use wrote:
>>
>>> kensi <kensi_ke...@zoonoses.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/08/2012 4:26 PM, Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:46:28 -0400, kensi Derbyshire
>>>>> <kensi_ke...@zoonoses.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/08/2012 3:28 PM, Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:14:24 -0400, kensi Derbyshire
>>>>>>> <kensi_ke...@zoonoses.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Been busy making more video fanfic of your owners and superiors,
>>>>>>>> have you? Good, good...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Been busy morphing to avoid killfile's,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been posting as kensi <kensi_ke...@zoonoses.invalid>
>>>>>> steadily for weeks (before that,
zoonoses.de), with two exceptions
>>>>>> under extraordinary circumstances: one to make sure Sweetness saw
>>>>>> the depths of outerfilthing depravity to which Morphy had sunk
>>>
>>> What a load of Derbyshite.
>>
>> Your failure to address kensi<SPANK>
>
> Why do you speak about yourself in the th<SLAP!!>
Your continued failure to address kensi's point is noted, kook.
>>>>> You morphed to avoid Sweetness's killfile.
>>>>
>>>> Once, for a very singular occasion.
>>>
>>> Liar.
>>
>> Then you won't mind posting MIDs of kensi<SPANK?
>
> Why do you speak about yourself in the t<SLAP!!!>
Your refusal to post two MIDs that would prove your assertion has been
noted, kook.
>>>> That's not "busy morphing to avoid
>>>> killfiles", which implies frequent morphing and multiple killfiles,
>>>> you idiot.
>>>
>>> You do frequently morph to evade killfiles, Paula.
>>
>> P<SPANK>
>
> Why do you sp<SLAP!!!!>
Your refusal to prove Ferd's and your retarded assertion has been noted,
kook.
>>> Then you reset your Sympatico DSL connection to renew the DHCP lease
>>> and obtain a new IP address
>>
>> Proof? Actually, this sounds like you admitting that the posts that
>> you claim are kensi socks have different NNTP-Posting-Hosts from
>> kensi's posts, i.e. that you're just making a leap of faith that they
>> are kensi socks and not separate people.
>
> Why do you sp<SLAP!!!!!>
Your admission that you indeed cannot prove your klame has been noted,
kook.
>>> - which would otherwise not change for many days.
>
>> Proof? A similar topic came up a week or two again and as I recall it
>> turned out that DHCP IPs typically change every few *hours*, not days.
>
> Where is the proof "DHCP IPs typically change every few *hours*, not
> days", P<SLAP!!!!!!>
<jvdh3i$vlv$
6...@dont-email.me>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134482679200
Embarrassingly for you, it seems that I already showed you the proof on a
previous occasion and you completely forgot about it, allowing me to
prove what an idiot you are, in public, on the same issue *a second time*.
>> Of course, if someone<SPANK>
>
> If someone is a kook who has been spanked for using sockpuppets - like
> Paul G. Derbyshite has, for example - he'll reset his modem before
> changing socks.
That's called "forcing the facts to fit the theory", kooky.
Hypothesis: A and B are socks.
Data: A and B consistently have different NNTP-Posting-Host headers when
they post at close to the same time.
Reasonable conclusion: A and B are not socks; the hypothesis was wrong.
Conspiracy kook conclusion: The puppetmaster must keep resetting her
modem -- yeah, that's the ticket!
Same sort of rationalization of data that supports the null hypothesis as
somehow supporting the conspiracy theory that you get from 9/11 truthers,
UFO nuts, and other species of raving loon.
> Which is what you've done. Isn't that right P<SLAP!!!!!!!>
Conspiracy kook behavior: right after admitting that you can't actually
prove your assertion, repeat it again anyway as if it was true and hope
nobody notices.
>>>>> "You're not supposed to "get rid of me". You're supposed to pay
>>>>> attention to FNVW business. If you don't, what are you doing in
>>>>> alt.usenet.kooks anyway?"
>>>>
>>>> It's a valid question.
>>>
>>> Bull shit, Paula.
>>
>> Then you won't mind describing to us a valid reason for someone to be
>> heavily active in alt.usenet.kooks that isn't seriously impeded by
>> killfiling FNVWs<SPANK>
>
> P<SLAP!!!!!!!!!>
Your failure to describe a valid reason for someone to be heavily active
in auk while ignoring posts from the FNVWs is noted, kook.
> Chalk up another epic fail for you, Paula - like when you pretended to
> be the moderator of
rec.arts.tv.
Please post the MID where someone named Paula claimed to be the moderator
of
rec.arts.tv.
MID: ______________________
Fetch, boy!
<snicker>
>>>> Since the "YesFlashIsAStalker" special case, I have posted only as
>>>> kensi <kensi_ke...@zoonoses.invalid> except for just two posts
>>>> in one thread when testing what Scatboi's bot was responding to.
>>>
>>> More Derbyshite lies.
>>
>> "Proof"<SPANK>
>
> Your sockpuppets all smell of Derbyshite, P<SLAP!!!!!!!!!!>
Your failure to provide the required proof is noted, kook.
>>>> And most
>>>> likely Sweetness (and most other people) had killfiled the whole
>>>> thread -- it was a Scatboi-infested thread.
>>>>
>>>> If you are claiming otherwise, you will need to prove that claim.
>>>> (But you won't be able to.)
>>>
>>> Ya think?
>>
>> The claim of Ferd's that you are defending is that kensi morphs every
>> single day. So, your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to
>> prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a kensi
>> <kensi_ke...@zoonoses.invalid> post made on Wednesday, August 8,
>> 2012 and any post made on Wednesday, August 8, 2012 with a different
>> From: are from the same person.
>>
>> Of course, should you or any of your k00ksqu4d t33m be captured or
>> killed, the FNVWs will disavow all knowledge of your actions.
>>
>> This message won't self-destruct in six days on Google because I,
>> unlike you, am not an XNA-using coward.
>>
>> Now fetch, boy!
>
> Why do you speak ab<SLAP!!!!!!!!!!!>
Your failure to complete your mission has been noted, kook. As has your
failure to address the topic of your cowardice.
>>>>>> If a coward wants to plonk me, he'll see very little of me from
>>>>>> then on, if anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> How is it cowardly to plonk a poster?
>>>>
>>>> As a way of running from an argument you're being bested at it is
>>>> quite cowardly.
>>>
>>> You'd know, Paula - since all you do when you've been spanked is deny,
>>> morph, and lie.
>>
>> Morphy<SPANK>
>
> Obsess<SLAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!>
Your failure to address the substance of my post has been noted, kook.
>> Kensi<SPANK>
>
> Why do you sp<SLAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!>
Your failure to address, substantially, even *one single point* in my
post has been noted, kook.
>>>> Now it's your turn to answer a question: why do you keep crossposting
>>>> your drivel into a UFO-cult newsgroup that has nothing to do with any
>>>> of this?
>>>
>>> aioe.news.helpdesk is a UFO cult?
>>
>> I'm fairly sure kensi was referring to Ferd's repeatedly adding
>> alt.fan.art-bell to the distribution when replying, kooky. Art Bell is
>> a kook in his own right, a UFO nut with a radio show and a series of
>> books about guess what. In other words, just the sort of fellow Ferd
>> would be a fan of.
>
> Why do you sp<SLAP-AP-AP-AP-AP-AP-AP-AP-AP-AP-AP-AP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!>
Wow, that one echoed. :)
Your tacit admission that you screwed up by claiming that kensi was
referring to aioe.news.helpdesk rather than alt.fan.art-bell has been
noted, kook.