http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKK37G-ZWvk
It's noteworthy enough for a podcast mention by The Young Turks:
Oo! There's a bunch of new ones!
--
The Saprophyte
--
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---
Seems like the new batch of ads made for Oringina seems to like having
the individual animals using Oringina for something else than simply a
drink. There's another one out there of a bear using it as a
deodorant.
No one has done a douche ad yet?...
Right here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVYAN5OlhBc
Here's a few more...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spL77iqRl7s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHksde0yMPA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlGnYU9swjw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dAKBJYQV9U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGT3UYiCpM8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzkxDfjCmQc
And probably the one that inspired the whole thing (but for a
different product altogether)...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3SeMI47ckY
Well theres something to look forward to. I just with they were in .flv
format instead of mp4's
--
www.skepticalscience.com|www.youtube.com/officialpeta
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
There's some way to get them as .mp4's if you know the right add-on to
use.
I used linux to watch em...the one with the bear in the forest with the
jock strap is pretty good.
^_^
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COaoYqkpkUA
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
I corrected your grammar.
Don't you mean "mp4s?"
I would say "mp4's" in this case. But if anyone here has Firefox,
here's the add-on to check out...
http://www.downloadhelper.net/
>> I corrected your grammar.
>
>I would say "mp4's" in this case. But if anyone here has Firefox,
>here's the add-on to check out...
>http://www.downloadhelper.net/
The apostrophe (') is not necessary. What, may I ask, did the MP4s
(plural form of MP4) try to possess? :-P
James R
Say you are reading a vim tutorial, and by following proper grammar,
you'd have something like this:
> Then, to delete a line type "dd."
When you type this in exactly as written, or dee-dee-dot, as is expected
from a tutorial, you will end up deleting 2 lines because "." means
"repeat the last command"... Not exactly what you were expecting, was
it! It would be more clearly written as:
> Then, to delete a line type "dd".
Being the coder that I am, I separate the acronym from the plural by
adding an apostrophe. It is merely for clarity. I also type the period
outside of quotes, as I did a few lines above.
For more information on this fascinating topic of breaking grammar for
clarity, try this link:
http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/writing-style.html
You will see the example I gave, as well as some more things.
If you're still reading, I also recommend ffmpeg for video and audio
conversion in the event you can't get it in mp4 format. Remember the
"-sameq" flag if you're using the most recent version from subversion
otherwise your video may become blocky.
>For me, it's a coding thing.
For me, it's a tech writer/tech ed thing. :-)
>Say you are reading a vim tutorial, and by following proper grammar,
>you'd have something like this:
>> Then, to delete a line type "dd."
Not necessarily proper grammar. See my comments below.
>When you type this in exactly as written, or dee-dee-dot, as is expected
>from a tutorial, you will end up deleting 2 lines because "." means
>"repeat the last command"... Not exactly what you were expecting, was
>it! It would be more clearly written as:
>> Then, to delete a line type "dd".
Which is why, if I had written the tutorial, I would have expressed it
exactly the same way as in your preceding example. I might have even
defined a convention in the tutorial/manual, explaining that anything
between " " is to be typed, while anything outside the double quotes
is to be ignored.
>Being the coder that I am, I separate the acronym from the plural by
>adding an apostrophe. It is merely for clarity. I also type the period
>outside of quotes, as I did a few lines above.
Like I said, as a TW/TE, I take a different view. Sorry, but it seems
to me that you're actually making more work for yourself by adding an
extra apostrophe when one isn't needed.
>For more information on this fascinating topic of breaking grammar for
>clarity, try this link:
>http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/writing-style.html
>You will see the example I gave, as well as some more things.
I've read the article. Filed for future reference.
>If you're still reading, I also recommend ffmpeg for video and audio
>conversion in the event you can't get it in mp4 format. Remember the
>"-sameq" flag if you're using the most recent version from subversion
>otherwise your video may become blocky.
Well of course I'm still reading. I'm a technical writer after all...
Thanks,
James R
>> Say you are reading a vim tutorial, and by following proper grammar,
>> you'd have something like this:
>
>>> Then, to delete a line type "dd."
>
> Not necessarily proper grammar. See my comments below.
In American English, the possibly confusing way is the correct way, for
some odd reason...
>> When you type this in exactly as written, or dee-dee-dot, as is expected
>>from a tutorial, you will end up deleting 2 lines because "." means
>> "repeat the last command"... Not exactly what you were expecting, was
>> it! It would be more clearly written as:
>
>>> Then, to delete a line type "dd".
>
> Which is why, if I had written the tutorial, I would have expressed it
> exactly the same way as in your preceding example. I might have even
> defined a convention in the tutorial/manual, explaining that anything
> between " " is to be typed, while anything outside the double quotes
> is to be ignored.
I think that typing only what is between the quotes is a standard. When
I do markup like that, depending on the location I'm posting to and the
environment that the user will be in, I use a few different (mostly
standard) conventions, like a hash for the root prompt. If I need to say
large chunks of code and can't use a system font or something (like
needing both quotes), I usually do
=====BEGIN CODE BLOCK=====
and
======END CODE BLOCK======
to mark what the user should type, which you will probably recognize as
the GPG (among others) signature data marker.
>> Being the coder that I am, I separate the acronym from the plural by
>> adding an apostrophe. It is merely for clarity. I also type the period
>> outside of quotes, as I did a few lines above.
>
> Like I said, as a TW/TE, I take a different view. Sorry, but it seems
> to me that you're actually making more work for yourself by adding an
> extra apostrophe when one isn't needed.
I've written a program in assembly but didn't have the correct software
to load it onto the device I made it for, so I typed in the opcodes that
the compiler output directly onto the thing and it worked as expected...
that counts as making more work for yourself. (It was a TI-84.)
Ok, so it is a bit more work, but it's fairly small and doesn't hurt.
--
http://www.republicorp.us/
http://stopbeck.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org|www.youropenbook.org
Didn't seem like it was that complicated back in high school!
You obviously wernt StoNNed...
Yeah I wasn't.