Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Gay Cat Orangina ad in France

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Farry

unread,
Nov 1, 2010, 3:35:38 AM11/1/10
to
I don't think that this one has been mentioned in AFF, yet:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKK37G-ZWvk

It's noteworthy enough for a podcast mention by The Young Turks:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HsAaYbQ7Pw

The Saprophyte

unread,
Nov 1, 2010, 12:04:41 PM11/1/10
to

Oo! There's a bunch of new ones!

--
The Saprophyte
--

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---

Chris Sobieniak

unread,
Nov 1, 2010, 7:31:33 PM11/1/10
to
> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...@netfront.net ---

Seems like the new batch of ads made for Oringina seems to like having
the individual animals using Oringina for something else than simply a
drink. There's another one out there of a bear using it as a
deodorant.

Skytech

unread,
Nov 6, 2010, 6:05:16 PM11/6/10
to
>
> Seems like the new batch of ads made for Oringina seems to like having
> the individual animals using Oringina for something else than simply a
> drink.  There's another one out there of a bear using it as a
> deodorant
>

No one has done a douche ad yet?...

Steven F. Scharff

unread,
Nov 7, 2010, 5:07:15 PM11/7/10
to

§nühw¤£f

unread,
Nov 10, 2010, 4:20:46 PM11/10/10
to

Well theres something to look forward to. I just with they were in .flv
format instead of mp4's

--
www.skepticalscience.com|www.youtube.com/officialpeta
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\

Chris Sobieniak

unread,
Nov 11, 2010, 11:13:40 PM11/11/10
to
On Nov 10, 4:20 pm, §nühw¤£f <snuhw...@netscape.net> wrote:
> Skytech wrote:
>
> >> Seems like the new batch of ads made for Oringina seems to like
> > having
> >> the individual animals using Oringina for something else than simply
> > a
> >> drink. There's another one out there of a bear using it as a
> >> deodorant
>
> > No one has done a douche ad yet?...
>
> Well theres something to look forward to. I just with they were in .flv
> format instead of mp4's

There's some way to get them as .mp4's if you know the right add-on to
use.

я黨wぃf

unread,
Nov 12, 2010, 12:53:27 AM11/12/10
to
Chris Sobieniak <sobi...@gmail.com> pinched out a steaming pile
of<45906f34-fe28-4a01...@s11g2000prs.googlegroups.com>:

I used linux to watch em...the one with the bear in the forest with the
jock strap is pretty good.
^_^

--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COaoYqkpkUA


cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\

_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\

Nigel Ratburn

unread,
Nov 13, 2010, 10:27:35 PM11/13/10
to
On 11/10/10 3:20 PM, §nühw¤Łf wrote:
>
> Well there's something to look forward to. I just with they were in .flv
> format instead of mp4s.

I corrected your grammar.

Chance Furlong

unread,
Nov 13, 2010, 10:29:27 PM11/13/10
to
On 11/11/10 10:13 PM, Chris Sobieniak wrote:

> On Nov 10, 4:20 pm, §nühw¤Łf<snuhw...@netscape.net> wrote:
>> Skytech wrote:
>>
>>>> Seems like the new batch of ads made for Oringina seems to like
>>> having
>>>> the individual animals using Oringina for something else than simply
>>> a
>>>> drink. There's another one out there of a bear using it as a
>>>> deodorant
>>
>>> No one has done a douche ad yet?...
>>
>> Well theres something to look forward to. I just with they were in .flv
>> format instead of mp4's
>
> There's some way to get them as .mp4s if you know the right add-on to use.

Don't you mean "mp4s?"

Chris Sobieniak

unread,
Nov 14, 2010, 12:30:49 PM11/14/10
to
On Nov 13, 10:27 pm, Nigel Ratburn <ratb...@elwoodcity.com> wrote:

> On 11/10/10 3:20 PM, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>
>
>
> > Well there's something to look forward to. I just with they were in .flv
> > format instead of mp4s.
>
> I corrected your grammar.

I would say "mp4's" in this case. But if anyone here has Firefox,
here's the add-on to check out...
http://www.downloadhelper.net/

James Rau

unread,
Nov 14, 2010, 7:52:03 PM11/14/10
to
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:30:49 -0800 (PST), Chris Sobieniak
<sobi...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> I corrected your grammar.
>
>I would say "mp4's" in this case. But if anyone here has Firefox,
>here's the add-on to check out...
>http://www.downloadhelper.net/


The apostrophe (') is not necessary. What, may I ask, did the MP4s
(plural form of MP4) try to possess? :-P

James R

Lucien Drurowin

unread,
Nov 14, 2010, 9:11:05 PM11/14/10
to
On 11/14/10 5:52 PM, James Rau wrote:
>>> I corrected your grammar.
>>
>> I would say "mp4's" in this case. But if anyone here has Firefox,
>> here's the add-on to check out...
>> http://www.downloadhelper.net/
>
>
> The apostrophe (') is not necessary. What, may I ask, did the MP4s
> (plural form of MP4) try to possess? :-P
>
> James R
For me, it's a coding thing.

Say you are reading a vim tutorial, and by following proper grammar,
you'd have something like this:
> Then, to delete a line type "dd."
When you type this in exactly as written, or dee-dee-dot, as is expected
from a tutorial, you will end up deleting 2 lines because "." means
"repeat the last command"... Not exactly what you were expecting, was
it! It would be more clearly written as:
> Then, to delete a line type "dd".

Being the coder that I am, I separate the acronym from the plural by
adding an apostrophe. It is merely for clarity. I also type the period
outside of quotes, as I did a few lines above.

For more information on this fascinating topic of breaking grammar for
clarity, try this link:
http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/writing-style.html
You will see the example I gave, as well as some more things.

If you're still reading, I also recommend ffmpeg for video and audio
conversion in the event you can't get it in mp4 format. Remember the
"-sameq" flag if you're using the most recent version from subversion
otherwise your video may become blocky.

James Rau

unread,
Nov 14, 2010, 11:51:58 PM11/14/10
to
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 19:11:05 -0700, Lucien Drurowin
<drur...@gmail.com> wrote:

>For me, it's a coding thing.

For me, it's a tech writer/tech ed thing. :-)

>Say you are reading a vim tutorial, and by following proper grammar,
>you'd have something like this:

>> Then, to delete a line type "dd."

Not necessarily proper grammar. See my comments below.

>When you type this in exactly as written, or dee-dee-dot, as is expected
>from a tutorial, you will end up deleting 2 lines because "." means
>"repeat the last command"... Not exactly what you were expecting, was
>it! It would be more clearly written as:

>> Then, to delete a line type "dd".

Which is why, if I had written the tutorial, I would have expressed it
exactly the same way as in your preceding example. I might have even
defined a convention in the tutorial/manual, explaining that anything
between " " is to be typed, while anything outside the double quotes
is to be ignored.

>Being the coder that I am, I separate the acronym from the plural by
>adding an apostrophe. It is merely for clarity. I also type the period
>outside of quotes, as I did a few lines above.

Like I said, as a TW/TE, I take a different view. Sorry, but it seems
to me that you're actually making more work for yourself by adding an
extra apostrophe when one isn't needed.

>For more information on this fascinating topic of breaking grammar for
>clarity, try this link:
>http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/writing-style.html
>You will see the example I gave, as well as some more things.

I've read the article. Filed for future reference.

>If you're still reading, I also recommend ffmpeg for video and audio
>conversion in the event you can't get it in mp4 format. Remember the
>"-sameq" flag if you're using the most recent version from subversion
>otherwise your video may become blocky.

Well of course I'm still reading. I'm a technical writer after all...

Thanks,
James R

Lucien Drurowin

unread,
Nov 15, 2010, 2:43:07 AM11/15/10
to
On 11/14/10 9:51 PM, James Rau wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 19:11:05 -0700, Lucien Drurowin
>> For me, it's a coding thing.
>
> For me, it's a tech writer/tech ed thing. :-)
Hello there, fellow geek(y furry)! ;)

>> Say you are reading a vim tutorial, and by following proper grammar,
>> you'd have something like this:
>
>>> Then, to delete a line type "dd."
>
> Not necessarily proper grammar. See my comments below.

In American English, the possibly confusing way is the correct way, for
some odd reason...

>> When you type this in exactly as written, or dee-dee-dot, as is expected
>>from a tutorial, you will end up deleting 2 lines because "." means
>> "repeat the last command"... Not exactly what you were expecting, was
>> it! It would be more clearly written as:
>
>>> Then, to delete a line type "dd".
>
> Which is why, if I had written the tutorial, I would have expressed it
> exactly the same way as in your preceding example. I might have even
> defined a convention in the tutorial/manual, explaining that anything
> between " " is to be typed, while anything outside the double quotes
> is to be ignored.

I think that typing only what is between the quotes is a standard. When
I do markup like that, depending on the location I'm posting to and the
environment that the user will be in, I use a few different (mostly
standard) conventions, like a hash for the root prompt. If I need to say
large chunks of code and can't use a system font or something (like
needing both quotes), I usually do
=====BEGIN CODE BLOCK=====
and
======END CODE BLOCK======
to mark what the user should type, which you will probably recognize as
the GPG (among others) signature data marker.

>> Being the coder that I am, I separate the acronym from the plural by
>> adding an apostrophe. It is merely for clarity. I also type the period
>> outside of quotes, as I did a few lines above.
>
> Like I said, as a TW/TE, I take a different view. Sorry, but it seems
> to me that you're actually making more work for yourself by adding an
> extra apostrophe when one isn't needed.

I've written a program in assembly but didn't have the correct software
to load it onto the device I made it for, so I typed in the opcodes that
the compiler output directly onto the thing and it worked as expected...
that counts as making more work for yourself. (It was a TI-84.)

Ok, so it is a bit more work, but it's fairly small and doesn't hurt.

§nühw¤£f

unread,
Nov 15, 2010, 10:41:38 AM11/15/10
to
In message <MaWdnVoeVqy6ykLR...@giganews.com>, Nigel Ratburn
pondered the following:
Uh huh. Reading the rest of this thread made me want to smash my face into the
keyboard.

--
http://www.republicorp.us/
http://stopbeck.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org|www.youropenbook.org

Chris Sobieniak

unread,
Nov 15, 2010, 10:24:46 PM11/15/10
to
On Nov 15, 10:41 am, §nühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In message <MaWdnVoeVqy6ykLRnZ2dnUVZ_tWdn...@giganews.com>, Nigel Ratburn

> pondered the following:> On 11/10/10 3:20 PM, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>
> > > Well there's something to look forward to. I just with they were in .flv
> > > format instead of mp4s.
>
> > I corrected your grammar.
>
> Uh huh. Reading the rest of this thread made me want to smash my face into the
> keyboard.
>
> --http://www.republicorp.us/http://stopbeck.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org|www.youropenbook.org

Didn't seem like it was that complicated back in high school!

§nühw¤£f

unread,
Nov 16, 2010, 10:53:01 AM11/16/10
to
In message <5c396883-129b-46e4...@t13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
Chris Sobieniak pondered the following:

> On Nov 15, 10:41 am, §nühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > In message <MaWdnVoeVqy6ykLRnZ2dnUVZ_tWdn...@giganews.com>, Nigel Ratburn
> > pondered the following:> On 11/10/10 3:20 PM, §nühw¤£f wrote:
> >
> > > > Well there's something to look forward to. I just with they were in .=

> flv
> > > > format instead of mp4s.
> >
> > > I corrected your grammar.
> >
> > Uh huh. Reading the rest of this thread made me want to smash my face int=
> o the
> > keyboard.
> >
> > --http://www.republicorp.us/http://stopbeck.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.e=

> yeonpalin.org|www.youropenbook.org
>
> Didn't seem like it was that complicated back in high school!

You obviously wernt StoNNed...

Chris Sobieniak

unread,
Nov 16, 2010, 12:40:07 PM11/16/10
to
On Nov 16, 10:53 am, §nühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In message <5c396883-129b-46e4-bbb8-5b3db9478...@t13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,

> Chris Sobieniak pondered the following:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 15, 10:41 am, §nühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > In message <MaWdnVoeVqy6ykLRnZ2dnUVZ_tWdn...@giganews.com>, Nigel Ratburn
> > > pondered the following:> On 11/10/10 3:20 PM, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>
> > > > > Well there's something to look forward to. I just with they were in .=
> > flv
> > > > > format instead of mp4s.
>
> > > > I corrected your grammar.
>
> > > Uh huh. Reading the rest of this thread made me want to smash my face int=
> > o the
> > > keyboard.
>
> > > --http://www.republicorp.us/http://stopbeck.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.e=
> > yeonpalin.org|www.youropenbook.org
>
> > Didn't seem like it was that complicated back in high school!
>
> You obviously wernt StoNNed...

Yeah I wasn't.

§nühw¤£f

unread,
Nov 17, 2010, 10:52:07 AM11/17/10
to
In message <2b79818d-c7a4-414c...@o2g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>,

Chris Sobieniak pondered the following:
> On Nov 16, 10:53 am, §nühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > In message <5c396883-129b-46e4-bbb8-5b3db9478...@t13g2000yqm.googlegroups=
> ..com>,

> > Chris Sobieniak pondered the following:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Nov 15, 10:41 am, §nühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > In message <MaWdnVoeVqy6ykLRnZ2dnUVZ_tWdn...@giganews.com>, Nigel Rat=

> burn
> > > > pondered the following:> On 11/10/10 3:20 PM, §nühw¤£f wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Well there's something to look forward to. I just with they were =

> in .=
> > > flv
> > > > > > format instead of mp4s.
> >
> > > > > I corrected your grammar.
> >
> > > > Uh huh. Reading the rest of this thread made me want to smash my face=
> int=
> > > o the
> > > > keyboard.
> >
> > > > --http://www.republicorp.us/http://stopbeck.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|w=

> ww.e=
> > > yeonpalin.org|www.youropenbook.org
> >
> > > Didn't seem like it was that complicated back in high school!
> >
> > You obviously wernt StoNNed...
>
> Yeah I wasn't.
>
Gee ya missed out on all the fun then.
0 new messages