Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
P2P Share files by email on Thu 04/25/2013
12 views
Skip to first unread message
Share.f...@email.con
Apr 25, 2013, 12:54:06 PM4/25/13
to
Do you think that Peer-to-Peer, FTP
IRC technologies etc...are too much complicated !?
There is a simpler technology to use, Autosend.
This software allows file-sharing by only using
your e-mail account. Autosend allows sharing files
on your computer through regular email.
It is an automatic file mailer
It completly Anonymous,secure,no spy,and nobody
can known what you do !!!!
People just make requests by sending a mail to the
server email address. The subject of the mail
is the name of the requested file or command
Autosend checks for new mails periodically in
its mailbox and replies automatically
with the requested file as attachment. Autosend
can also receive files sent by others (uploads),
answer to some commands or pick up
files for you on internet. Simple as this!
three command can be use : ?list or ?put or ?find
?list will send you a list of all files
?put will receive a files attach from you ( UPLOAD )
?find xxxx to find patern files
Send a EMAIL TO : >>>> request...@yahoo.ca
in the subject : >>>> ?list
OR search
Send a EMAIL TO : >>>> request...@yahoo.ca
in the subject : >>>> ?find XXXX
For XXXX replace by a keyword or search you want !
in the message body write nothing , leave Empty
And Send it , later in the day you will receive
a list of files available
click the file you want you email program will open ,
send the message change nothing in the message
just send it , later in the day you will receive the files
if you have a prob with you mail program just send a email
to : request...@yahoo.ca
subject : The files you want << must be Exactly like the file in the list
send it now ...
---
TO.receive.email.with.a.list.of.files.available,.replace.the.http://.with.the.line.BELOW..in.your.browser
mailto:request...@yahoo.ca?subject=!list&Body=Send.this.files.without.modification
To.message.me.,.replace.the.http://.with.the.line.BELOW..in.your.browser
mailto:request...@yahoo.ca?subject=!msg&Body=Send.this.files.with.your.message/email.below.this.line..
IRC technologies etc...are too much complicated !?
There is a simpler technology to use, Autosend.
This software allows file-sharing by only using
your e-mail account. Autosend allows sharing files
on your computer through regular email.
It is an automatic file mailer
It completly Anonymous,secure,no spy,and nobody
can known what you do !!!!
People just make requests by sending a mail to the
server email address. The subject of the mail
is the name of the requested file or command
Autosend checks for new mails periodically in
its mailbox and replies automatically
with the requested file as attachment. Autosend
can also receive files sent by others (uploads),
answer to some commands or pick up
files for you on internet. Simple as this!
three command can be use : ?list or ?put or ?find
?list will send you a list of all files
?put will receive a files attach from you ( UPLOAD )
?find xxxx to find patern files
Send a EMAIL TO : >>>> request...@yahoo.ca
in the subject : >>>> ?list
OR search
Send a EMAIL TO : >>>> request...@yahoo.ca
in the subject : >>>> ?find XXXX
For XXXX replace by a keyword or search you want !
in the message body write nothing , leave Empty
And Send it , later in the day you will receive
a list of files available
click the file you want you email program will open ,
send the message change nothing in the message
just send it , later in the day you will receive the files
if you have a prob with you mail program just send a email
to : request...@yahoo.ca
subject : The files you want << must be Exactly like the file in the list
send it now ...
---
TO.receive.email.with.a.list.of.files.available,.replace.the.http://.with.the.line.BELOW..in.your.browser
mailto:request...@yahoo.ca?subject=!list&Body=Send.this.files.without.modification
To.message.me.,.replace.the.http://.with.the.line.BELOW..in.your.browser
mailto:request...@yahoo.ca?subject=!msg&Body=Send.this.files.with.your.message/email.below.this.line..
THE COLONEL
Apr 27, 2013, 12:39:03 PM4/27/13
to
<Share.f...@email.con> wrote in message
news:01ce41cd$Blat.v3.1.1$15f0d46a$139cc6...@192.168.10.30...
> Do you think that Peer-to-Peer
BITCH SLAP!
What I know is that your are not even half a man and your penis is the size
of a pickled gherkin.
news:01ce41cd$Blat.v3.1.1$15f0d46a$139cc6...@192.168.10.30...
> Do you think that Peer-to-Peer
BITCH SLAP!
What I know is that your are not even half a man and your penis is the size
of a pickled gherkin.
Coyo the Coyote
Nov 4, 2013, 12:07:43 PM11/4/13
to
On 25 Apr 2013 10:54 AM ,Share.f...@email.con wrote:
> Autosend.
> This software allows file-sharing by only using
> your e-mail account
An interesting concept I wanted to hit you guys with, what if you published files, possibly videos, similar in concept to a vodcast or podcast, but instead of using RSS or Atom, you used usenet, and instead of linking to a web server, the link was a magnet link, letting you download via bittorrent, edonkey or advanced directconnect?
For voice and video telephony, you could use a slightly extended IRC, with DCC VOIP to setup media streams, which may be distributed with libswift, which is basically bittorrent at the transport layer.
To preserve privacy and security, a transparent high-speed VPN that uses elliptic curve cryptography could be used, such as CJDNS.
Usenet is so much better than facebook, twitter, myspace or friendster. Does anyone remember friendster? Of course not, because they suck! Facebook will go the same way, soon enough.
Usenet is an open protocol, very similar to email, easy to implement and easy to use, and even if everything is encoded base64 if it's binary, that's easy enough to get around if it's a problem.
This is what magnet links are for.
But yeah, if you combined IRC, Usenet, Gopher (for caching, searching, directory browsing and acceleration), BitTorrent (for very large files, as an alternative to multi-part RARs or 7Zs) and a VPN such s CJDNS, you could construct a P2P voice and video chat system that could easily handle hundreds of users in a single chatroom at full 1080p HD or even 4K resolution, full 8-discrete-channel FLAC audio, assuming you actually have the bandwidth. The overhead is minimal, when using a system like this.
Someone should post an RFC.
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
coyo
Apr 26, 2014, 4:14:45 PM4/26/14
to
On 25 Apr 2013 11:54 AM ,Share.f...@email.con wrote:
> Do you think that Peer-to-Peer, FTP
> IRC technologies etc...are too much complicated !?
> There is a simpler technology to use, Autosend.
> This software allows file-sharing by only using
> your e-mail account. Autosend allows sharing files
> on your computer through regular email.
> It is an automatic file mailer
>
> It completly Anonymous,secure,no spy,and nobody
> can known what you do !!!!
>
> People just make requests by sending a mail to the
> server email address. The subject of the mail
> is the name of the requested file or command
> Autosend checks for new mails periodically in
> its mailbox and replies automatically
> with the requested file as attachment. Autosend
> can also receive files sent by others (uploads),
> answer to some commands or pick up
> files for you on internet. Simple as this!
Coyo Stormcaller
Mar 7, 2016, 12:44:41 AM3/7/16
to
On 25 Apr 2013 11:54:06 -0500
There's a very fundemental problem with this.
Email attachment limits. Many email providers have strict limits to
file sizes of attachments, often much lower than 2GB.
If you want an alternative to BitTorrent, Usenet Binaries is very
traditional and established. I was very happy with Giganews while I had
the account, though I was not impressed with their VPN speeds.
When I have the means to do so, I'll put together a Fibre Channel SAN
(oldschool!) to store as much binary stuff as I'd ever want, get the
best plans from four different Usenet binaries providers, and archive a
shitload of binaries for my own personal consumption. That way, I don't
have to rely on anyone else for stuff.
I have a strong distaste for centralized repositories of anything
cultural. Anything, movies, books, music, games, elements of culture,
should not be controlled by any gatekeeper.
Culture cannot be owned. There is nothing inherently illegal about
using Usenet binaries. It is why binary newsgroup service providers can
go about their business relatively unimpeded by law enforcement.
I love the decentralization of Usenet, it makes distributing Usenet
binaries a lot easier, cause there's no single arbiter of what you can
and cannot have. Even if one service provider removes Usenet posts of a
particular NZB reference, there's absolutely no guarantee that other
Usenet service providers will, especially since the local laws of each
country are different, and filtering each individual Usenet message
traveling NNTP peering links is pretty much impossible.
Add to that the deliberate prevalence of TLS secured NNTP peering, and
trying to control the spread and exchange of culture is made pretty
much impossible, especially if maximum strength TLS is used.
The use of TLS 1.2, 512-bit AES (the strongest), client-side
certificate authentication (for server-to-server links) and certificate
pinning, making certificate forgery a lot harder, and NNTP peering can
exchange culture unimpeded.
The increasing adoption of TLS by the Usenet community means that the
decentralized and unregulated nature of Usenet is preserved in a global
climate of increasingly oppressive state surveillance and persecution.
Edward Snowden is a good example of a citizen doing what he has to do
to preserve the liberties and freedoms of his people. We need more
people like him.
The protocol headers for HTTP as used for HTTP Strict Transport
Security and HTTP Public Key Pinning can be ported to NNTP headers,
since NNTP resembles SMTP in many ways.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_Strict_Transport_Security
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_Public_Key_Pinning
See also: https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4642.pdf
Bottom line, When properly secured, NNTP is by and far the most
established method of sharing very large files with the general public
in a very difficult-to-impede manner, especially in the methods
generally used against BitTorrent.
There's also RetroShare, for those who want to try something new.
I DO recommend that if you decide on investing in a Usenet binaries
service plan that you take advantage of the OpenVPN or PPTP privacy VPN
that is made available to you, and use TLS whenever possible on top of
that. Why? Ask Edward Snowden, Bruce Schneider and Alexander Shulgin.
Share.f...@email.con wrote:
> three command can be use : ?list or ?put or ?find
> ?list will send you a list of all files
> ?put will receive a files attach from you ( UPLOAD )
> ?find xxxx to find patern files
Sounds like the email version of IRC XDCC.
> three command can be use : ?list or ?put or ?find
> ?list will send you a list of all files
> ?put will receive a files attach from you ( UPLOAD )
> ?find xxxx to find patern files
There's a very fundemental problem with this.
Email attachment limits. Many email providers have strict limits to
file sizes of attachments, often much lower than 2GB.
If you want an alternative to BitTorrent, Usenet Binaries is very
traditional and established. I was very happy with Giganews while I had
the account, though I was not impressed with their VPN speeds.
When I have the means to do so, I'll put together a Fibre Channel SAN
(oldschool!) to store as much binary stuff as I'd ever want, get the
best plans from four different Usenet binaries providers, and archive a
shitload of binaries for my own personal consumption. That way, I don't
have to rely on anyone else for stuff.
I have a strong distaste for centralized repositories of anything
cultural. Anything, movies, books, music, games, elements of culture,
should not be controlled by any gatekeeper.
Culture cannot be owned. There is nothing inherently illegal about
using Usenet binaries. It is why binary newsgroup service providers can
go about their business relatively unimpeded by law enforcement.
I love the decentralization of Usenet, it makes distributing Usenet
binaries a lot easier, cause there's no single arbiter of what you can
and cannot have. Even if one service provider removes Usenet posts of a
particular NZB reference, there's absolutely no guarantee that other
Usenet service providers will, especially since the local laws of each
country are different, and filtering each individual Usenet message
traveling NNTP peering links is pretty much impossible.
Add to that the deliberate prevalence of TLS secured NNTP peering, and
trying to control the spread and exchange of culture is made pretty
much impossible, especially if maximum strength TLS is used.
The use of TLS 1.2, 512-bit AES (the strongest), client-side
certificate authentication (for server-to-server links) and certificate
pinning, making certificate forgery a lot harder, and NNTP peering can
exchange culture unimpeded.
The increasing adoption of TLS by the Usenet community means that the
decentralized and unregulated nature of Usenet is preserved in a global
climate of increasingly oppressive state surveillance and persecution.
Edward Snowden is a good example of a citizen doing what he has to do
to preserve the liberties and freedoms of his people. We need more
people like him.
The protocol headers for HTTP as used for HTTP Strict Transport
Security and HTTP Public Key Pinning can be ported to NNTP headers,
since NNTP resembles SMTP in many ways.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_Strict_Transport_Security
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_Public_Key_Pinning
See also: https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4642.pdf
Bottom line, When properly secured, NNTP is by and far the most
established method of sharing very large files with the general public
in a very difficult-to-impede manner, especially in the methods
generally used against BitTorrent.
There's also RetroShare, for those who want to try something new.
I DO recommend that if you decide on investing in a Usenet binaries
service plan that you take advantage of the OpenVPN or PPTP privacy VPN
that is made available to you, and use TLS whenever possible on top of
that. Why? Ask Edward Snowden, Bruce Schneider and Alexander Shulgin.
0 new messages