Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

70s Group Photos

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Oil Impressionist

unread,
Jan 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/4/00
to
A month or so ago, we said we might get a Post Office Box so everyone
who wants to display their photos could send us pics, and we'd put 'em
up on a web page.

So anyone who wants to, e-mail us at:
oil_impr...@my-deja.com

We'll keep a list, and when we get the box, we'll e-mail you personally
and let you know.

Also, depending on how many contribute, we might need you to send up to
a dollar along with your picture. The PO box will be $30 bucks to
start, and we're starving artists here! After all, we're trying to
save our money so we can meet you all in Vegas, right? ;-)

We do NOT want to make ANY profit AT ALL on this picture thing. Just
want to break even or put in a couple bucks of our own. No problem.

Give care,
Larry & Dawna

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
:) Shamelessly promoting our new e-novel to be released in January
http://www.azstarnet.com/~scribes/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

TrueToBrad

unread,
Jan 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/5/00
to
> Oil Impressionist writes:
>A month or so ago, we said we might get a Post Office Box so everyone
>who wants to display their photos could send us pics, and we'd put 'em
>up on a web page.
>
>So anyone who wants to, e-mail us at:
>oil_impr...@my-deja.com

Sounds great, but must ask: Are we sending pictures of us in the 70's or
current? :)


Oil Impressionist

unread,
Jan 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/5/00
to
In article <20000104203500...@ng-fm1.aol.com>,
What a FABULOUS idea!!!! How about one current pic and one from the
70s?

Dawna & Larry

Dixon Hayes

unread,
Jan 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/5/00
to
TrueToBrad wrote:

>Sounds great, but must ask: Are we sending pictures of us in the 70's or
>current? :)

I'm willing to send both, but so far I only have a current one scanned...let me
know...

Dixon

"If there's anything that upsets me it's having people say I'm sensitive!"
--Barney Fife


WLFan00

unread,
Jan 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/5/00
to
I have one of me in the 70s, but I was a baby in the early 70s. How are we
going to do this, where do I send my picture to?

Molly
Molly's Pages: http://www.angelfire.com/mn/mollyfa99/index.html (the pictures
on this site are copyrighted by me, so ask before copying)

JF02133964

unread,
Jan 19, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/19/00
to
Hi gang,
I have a picture of myself in 1972 and a picture of me today on my homepage:
http://jsf.place.cc

John F.

Sandyfour

unread,
Jan 20, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/20/00
to
I checked it out, John...what a little cutie!
You are to be commended on your work with the MDA....: )

Sandy

Oil Impressionist

unread,
Jan 20, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/20/00
to
In article <20000119192537...@ng-fr1.aol.com>,
Ditto on both counts from here!

Dawna
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
:) Shamelessly promoting our newly released e-novel
Preview Laura's Legacy at http://www.azstarnet.com/~scribes/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sandyfour

unread,
Jan 21, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/21/00
to
So...have we decided what to do about the rest of us getting our pics out
there???? Dawna......Trish??? Just let us know where and when to send
them....I'll be waiting! : )

Sandy

al...@my-deja.com

unread,
Jan 21, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/21/00
to
took the words right out of my brain on both counts for me too!! :-)

In article <8669qa$f45$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,

Oil Impressionist

unread,
Jan 22, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/22/00
to
In article <20000121114204...@ng-fa1.aol.com>,
We need about five more names to make it possible/practical.

To those who DO get in on it and send the pictures (when we can do it)
we'll e-mail the web address of the page.

Dawna & Larry

LizzieZ

unread,
Jan 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/24/00
to
>I offered to have folks mail their pics to me so I
>could scan them for you and Larry and hopefully help a bit with the work
>load. This would also save the expense/trouble of a PO box for y'all, and
>would save the expense for participants as well.

OK, this just shows how *totally* clueless I was -- here I've been thinking
everyone is already totally digital, and that the PO box you were referring to
was something web-related, and I couldn't figure out why it would cost
money....! NOW it all makes sense -- thanks Trish! Obviously if there's a way
everyone can somehow just e-mail their pix to you we're all set, right? Can't
wait to see everyone's bright shining faces. :-)

Liz
(p.s. I'll be working out of town in Washington DC all week, and probably won't
have access to my e-mail while I'm there, so if I miss any big vote on anything
about this, count me in! I'll sure miss you guys!!)

Oil Impressionist

unread,
Jan 25, 2000, 3:00:00 AM1/25/00
to
Okay, people, are we listening? :-)

We don't want to tick anyone off, but we have to say that we don't take
e-mail attachments. Not even from our parents . . . well, especially
not from our parents, cuz they don't have virus checkers AT ALL.

Maybe Larry and I are paranoid, but we don't go along with the "norm,"
in this instance. We've been e-mail bombed and even caught a computer
virus once. We hope you understand!

If anyone wants to do a photo page using e-mail, let us know, and we'll
relinquish "title" to the project. We'd be the first in line to send
our pics! :-) No problem!

To Trish: we only saw your post because Lizzie answered it. So we hope
you don't think we didn't answer you!! Deja's kind of screwy
sometimes, missing posts and skipping some.

Dawna & Larry


(snip)

We'll miss you too Liz!!

> Liz
> (p.s. I'll be working out of town in Washington DC all week, and
probably won't
> have access to my e-mail while I'm there, so if I miss any big vote
on anything
> about this, count me in! I'll sure miss you guys!!)
>

--

0 new messages