Look asshole, unless you want to lose your account I suggest that you
a) explain why exactly you are so angry
b) apologize regardless of why you are angry
And very quickly!!!
Subject: Query?
Lines: 20
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID: <UVbd8.5611$hM6.6...@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:35:02 -0000
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.1.30.63
X-Complaints-To: ab...@virgin.net
X-Trace: news6-win.server.ntlworld.com 1014319860 80.1.30.63 (Thu, 21
Feb 2002 19:31:00 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:31:00 GMT
Organization: Virgin Net Usenet Service
Xref: lust.ihug.co.nz alt.comp.virus:233140
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.3.3 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Hello,
This is the first time ive been in the group
<snipped>
And probably the last time you'll ever get an answer from anyone here.
FOAD PLONK!!!
>Daniel Barton wrote:
>
<snipped>
>
>Look asshole, unless you want to lose your account I suggest that you
>
>a) explain why exactly you are so angry
>b) apologize regardless of why you are angry
>
>And very quickly!!!
Wonder what caused his outburst of irrational instability???
Why don't you go take your medication, do your homework, and go hide
somewhere to whack off so you get in a better mood?
Grow up while you're at it, kid.
What with a rolled up copy of Health & Efficiency?
miner.-
>
> Look asshole, unless you want to lose your account I suggest that you
Freddie's threatening now? LAUGH LAUGH. I should lurk more often. This
place is always good for a chuckle.
> a) explain why exactly you are so angry
> b) apologize regardless of why you are angry
>
> And very quickly!!!
And if he doesn't comply with your demands, Oh Holy Netcop?
Regards,
Raid
If you have nothing useful to say, as in 90% of your posts, keep your
trap shut. Thank you.
> And if he doesn't comply with your demands, Oh Holy Netcop?
That's not your problem, is it?
> If you have nothing useful to say, as in 90% of your posts, keep your
> trap shut. Thank you.
90% of my posts concern technical data Frederic. I suppose that would
be beyond your level of comprehension, wouldn't it? :) Rarely do I
post with the intention of posting non-useful information. My post
which initiated your reply for example; Makes note that you
can't/don't read headers. This is indeed, useful to know. :)
> That's not your problem, is it?
I don't threaten to report people; Nor do I quote the ab...@isp.com
and insite others to do so. PS: I read headers before I make any rash
decisions, why don't you try that as well? :)
Regards,
Raid [slam]
I quoted it, because, you know, I always quote messages to which
I reply and I happened to reply to a message that mentioned the
abuse address.
I also did not incite anyone to complain.
If I can't read message headers, you obviously can't read message
bodies.
> I quoted it, because, you know, I always quote messages to which
> I reply and I happened to reply to a message that mentioned the
> abuse address.
Yes.. erm, here's your "reply":
Daniel Barton wrote:
> Dont fucking take the piss out of me you fucking sad cunt. have a
> look at yourself you cocky twat.
Look asshole, unless you want to lose your account I suggest that you
a) explain why exactly you are so angry
b) apologize regardless of why you are angry
And very quickly!!!
> If I can't read message headers, you obviously can't read message
> bodies.
Laugh. Did someone here email you that witty comeback? we know you
didn't come up with it on your own. <g>
Regards,
Raid [slam]
Okay, and where in *that* message did I quote the abuse@isp address???
I quoted it in another message. What exactly are we talking about here?
> Laugh. Did someone here email you that witty comeback? we know you
> didn't come up with it on your own. <g>
Who is "we"? You?
On 25 Feb 2002 10:35:46 -0800, raid...@yahoo.com (Raid) wrote in
post:
>Frederic Bonroy <yor...@yahoo.fr> wrote in message news:
><a5dmg0$6coc7$2...@ID-75150.news.dfncis.de>...
>>If I can't read message headers, you obviously can't read message
>>bodies.
>Laugh. Did someone here email you that witty comeback? we know you
>didn't come up with it on your own. <g>
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 19:42:13 +0100, Frederic Bonroy <yor...@yahoo.fr>
wrote in post:
>Who is "we"? You?
We = "Many of us here (who) prefer Norton Antivirus 2002"
(No wait, that's *last week's* "we"... Lemme try again...)
We = "the overwhelming majority of people in these virus groups (who)
recommend eTrust EZ Antivirus"
(Yup, much better.)
;-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Security 7.0.3
Comment: Because I *can*.
iQA/AwUBPHsm5qRseRzHUwOaEQIb4QCfeEGIk8qfTTRjwCWklq1CKYlGVckAoIaM
lgQ7MEAa2VaAaoIe0Era9rdq
=6gVs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Laura Fredericks
PGP key ID - DH/DSS 2048/1024: 0xC753039A
Remove CLOTHES to reply.
Put down your rubber knives and go to bed. That thread is getting tired.
Anyone here who just jumps off with threats is out of line, and will
probably get a bunch of viruses e-mailed to them. Though it does seem to me
that Raid is probably a good 10 or 15 years more mature.
Good night.
"Raid" <raid...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e1a0c2a2.02022...@posting.google.com...
Put down your rubber knives and go to bed. That thread is getting tired.
Anyone here who just jumps off with threats is out of line, and will
probably get a bunch of viruses e-mailed to them. Though it does seem to me
that Raid is probably a good 10 or 15 years more mature.
Good night.<<<<<
Pete/RaiD is actually a pretty nice guy when you now him personally...
rgrds Dalt