Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

How to test the LPT printer port?

5 views
Skip to first unread message

TVeblen

unread,
Jul 15, 2006, 7:26:31 AM7/15/06
to
How do you test to see if the LPT1 port is functioning in hardware?
Would LPT1 fail alone or would the serial ports or other devices go with it?
Can it be repaired?

Intel D865PERL MB
HP Laserjet IIP Plus
Canon MP780
Windows XP Home SP2

My Laserjet IIP Plus printer stopped working on this computer suddenly after
many months of reliable service. When I try and print anything the printer
que icon in the system tray immediately shows a red X and a balloon
announces "This Document failed to print". Status: Error-Print.
This happens for every application, including "Print Test Page" for the
printer's properties under Printers & Faxes.
*I have connected the printer and the cable to another computer. They both
work fine.
*I have a second printer connected via USB. It prints fine from this
computer.
*I can't print to the Laserjet from a networked computer.
*Attempts to print from DOS prompt results in nothing. No action or message.
*I have deleted and restarted to reestablish the LPT1 port from device
manager.
*I have deleted the printer and reinstalled it.
*I have tried to start the spooler (NET START SPOOLER) from a DOS prompt.
*I have toggled all the port settings, one at a time, and restarted.
*I have scanned for viruses, spyware. Did a file cleanup (Temp files, etc).
*I have check BIOS settings and LPT1 is listed and set to Auto.
*I attempted a PrtScn while in CMOS setup using the Laserjet's "FormFeed"
function to print the ASCI dump. No luck.
Still no printer.

It seems I need a diagnostic to see if this is a hardware problem. Does
anyone know how to determine this?

Note: once, I simply reinstalled the drivers. Then when I tried to print the
test page the print que went into a kind of loop. Spooling - stopped -
spooling - stopped, that kind of thing, forever, until I canceled it. Never
did it again.
TIA


OhNo

unread,
Jul 15, 2006, 7:59:14 AM7/15/06
to

"TVeblen" <killth...@hal.net> wrote in message
news:CKCdneOiTqh1TSXZ...@conversent.net...

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;314085

Al Dykes

unread,
Jul 15, 2006, 8:10:42 AM7/15/06
to
In article <CKCdneOiTqh1TSXZ...@conversent.net>,

TVeblen <killth...@hal.net> wrote:
>How do you test to see if the LPT1 port is functioning in hardware?
>Would LPT1 fail alone or would the serial ports or other devices go with it?
>Can it be repaired?
>
>Intel D865PERL MB
>HP Laserjet IIP Plus
>Canon MP780
>Windows XP Home SP2
>
>My Laserjet IIP Plus printer stopped working on this computer suddenly after

There *is* such a thing as a loopback plug for parallel printer
interface. I have one, and the now-12 year old DOS diagnostic software
that it worked with. I'm not sure how good it is on a modern
mobo. Parallel ports are going away, anyway.

None of that does you any good.

The commmon problem with modern computers talking to old printer gear
is the printer port mode is much too fast.Maybe yours changed. Go
into CMOS, look at your PP setting and dumb it down to the lowest
etting.

Swap the cable.

Try the printer on another compter, etc. All the usual substitution
troubleshoshooting.

Figure out how to make your printer do a self-test. See if it works.

This site has lots of info. http://www.fixyourownprinter.com/

The IIP was a great printer, but a shiny new one might pay for itself
on lower cost-perp-age and on the electricity bill. I just bought a
Samsung 2010 for $130 that is lightyears better than the IIP any way
but bin capacity and monthly duty cycle.

Brother makes a great networked business printer for $300.

I have a IIIP and whenever I power it up I can see my electric meter
run faster.

--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m

Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001

Ken

unread,
Jul 15, 2006, 8:32:40 AM7/15/06
to

Another thing I would add is to make sure the failed print jobs cued up
have been deleted. Some OS's removed them upon shutting down, but I am
not sure about XP.

CMOS setup is a good place to start, it could even be that someone
disabled the Parallel port or changed the port to which the printer is
to print. In fact, checking the Windows Device Manager to see if it
exists might be in order, and checking it against the selected printer port.

TVeblen

unread,
Jul 15, 2006, 9:22:24 AM7/15/06
to

"Al Dykes" <ady...@panix.com> wrote in message
news:e9am02$9vj$1...@panix5.panix.com...

I checked all those usual suspects. The printer works, the cable is good.
All the setting "look" normal. I have it narrowed down to the box.
Thanks.
(And the IIp is freakin noisy too!)


TVeblen

unread,
Jul 15, 2006, 9:26:34 AM7/15/06
to

"Ken" <us...@domain.invalid> wrote in message
news:If5ug.392124$Fs1.2...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

No, XP just makes the que longer and longer. I must cancel every failed
print test. Sometimes they come back after restart (clue?).
CMOS setting are OK. And I tried changing "Auto" to "Enabled" too.
The LPT1 Port exists, has been reinstalled, and the printer is set to the
correct port.
Thanks


Al Dykes

unread,
Jul 15, 2006, 9:39:11 AM7/15/06
to
In article <S-mdnXFdodSWcCXZ...@conversent.net>,

Loopback cable info: It may give you a clue for more googling,

http://www.lammertbies.nl/comm/cable/parallel.html


If you have no other excuse to replace your system, a cheap laser
printer will connect via USB and do an end-run of your broken parallel
port.

A slightly better printer ($250, Brother 5250DN) ) will get you a
printer with an ethernet interface. If you don't have a home LAN, a
crossover cable will connect the printer to your PC directly.

If you have a network at home you can hook the LJII to another PC and
share it in the network.

John Holmes

unread,
Jul 15, 2006, 2:05:34 PM7/15/06
to
Al Dykes "contributed" in alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:

Have you been drinking again, Al?

--
Your mother was a brainless minor celebrity who flirted outrageously
amongst cavemen in a time loop.

Rod Speed

unread,
Jul 15, 2006, 2:23:19 PM7/15/06
to
TVeblen <killth...@hal.net> wrote

> How do you test to see if the LPT1 port is functioning in hardware?

There are various diagnostics around that use a loopback plug.
Those can be a problem if you cant solder one up.

The other approach is to boot something like a Bart PE CD or
knoppix CD and see if you can print from that. That eliminates
the XP config being screwed up etc.

> Would LPT1 fail alone

Yes, that does certainly happen.

> or would the serial ports or other devices go with it?

Not usually.

> Can it be repaired?

Nope, but it isnt hard to add a parallel port on a
card if you have a free PCI slot. May make more
sense to use a USB/printer port adapter tho.

TVeblen

unread,
Jul 15, 2006, 3:50:42 PM7/15/06
to

"Rod Speed" <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4hsq4pF...@individual.net...

> TVeblen <killth...@hal.net> wrote
>
>> How do you test to see if the LPT1 port is functioning in hardware?
>
> There are various diagnostics around that use a loopback plug.
> Those can be a problem if you cant solder one up.
>
> The other approach is to boot something like a Bart PE CD or
> knoppix CD and see if you can print from that. That eliminates
> the XP config being screwed up etc.
>
>> Would LPT1 fail alone
>
> Yes, that does certainly happen.
>
>> or would the serial ports or other devices go with it?
>
> Not usually.
>
>> Can it be repaired?
>
> Nope, but it isnt hard to add a parallel port on a
> card if you have a free PCI slot. May make more
> sense to use a USB/printer port adapter tho.

I'll check Newegg for one of those.


Rod Speed

unread,
Jul 15, 2006, 4:24:39 PM7/15/06
to

I wouldnt unless you cant print from the knoppix CD.

And I'd also check that the port config hasnt changed in the bios too.


TVeblen

unread,
Jul 15, 2006, 7:58:35 PM7/15/06
to

"Rod Speed" <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ht189F...@individual.net...
The port config in BIOS is "Auto". It was unchanged. But I did try changing
it to "Enabled", which just engages legay IRQ7. No change. So I changed iot
back to default. There are no other LPT1 settings in my BIOS (other than
"Disable").
Where does one find a knoppix CD?


Unknown

unread,
Jul 15, 2006, 7:47:02 PM7/15/06
to
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 07:26:31 -0400, "TVeblen" <killth...@hal.net>
wrote:

I ran thoiugh the same routine , finally installed a parall PCI card
for the printer and the problem was gone. I believe the cable that
plugs into the motherboard parallel port caused a lot of strain on the
connector and broke something on the motherboard.

Rod Speed

unread,
Jul 15, 2006, 10:24:26 PM7/15/06
to

TVeblen

unread,
Jul 16, 2006, 7:06:13 AM7/16/06
to

<billplatz> wrote in message
news:3cvib2p3eu0u8chao...@4ax.com...

That's what I am thinking. I have a Rosewill card on it's way from Newegg as
I type.
It seems rather obvious at this point. And $14 beats a couple hundred any
day!


johns

unread,
Jul 17, 2006, 3:34:07 PM7/17/06
to

I've repaired dozens of LJ2Ps. Every single one of them
failed at the input circuit on the printer itself. It is a
small pc board just inside the printer, and it fails.
Time for new printer.

johns

Rod Speed

unread,
Jul 17, 2006, 3:41:11 PM7/17/06
to
johns <john...@moscow.com> wrote:

Pity his printer works fine on a different system.


TVeblen

unread,
Jul 17, 2006, 4:29:10 PM7/17/06
to

"Rod Speed" <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4i27epF...@individual.net...
The Laserjet IIp plus will never die!!


TVeblen

unread,
Jul 20, 2006, 7:27:44 AM7/20/06
to

"TVeblen" <killth...@hal.net> wrote in message
news:CKCdneOiTqh1TSXZ...@conversent.net...


I installed a Rosewill RC-302 PCI to Parallel port adapter card and
everything is working fine again - on LPT3.
That would probably prove that LPT1, the printer port on the main board is
dead. Meaning: no signal is being sent through the connection.
Can you test and repair a connection like that, or is it not worth the
effort?
If anyone here has any experience testing and/or repairing these things I'd
love to hear your thoughts.


Palindr☻me

unread,
Jul 20, 2006, 7:50:58 AM7/20/06
to
TVeblen wrote:
<snip>

>
> I installed a Rosewill RC-302 PCI to Parallel port adapter card and
> everything is working fine again - on LPT3.
> That would probably prove that LPT1, the printer port on the main board is
> dead. Meaning: no signal is being sent through the connection.
> Can you test and repair a connection like that, or is it not worth the
> effort?
> If anyone here has any experience testing and/or repairing these things I'd
> love to hear your thoughts.
>
>

It's a set of I/O ports. Some are output ports, some input and some
bidirectional.

http://www.logix4u.net/parallelport1.htm

What you can do is to send a byte to an output port and see if the
hardware lines on the connector change state. More usually, you use a
loopback connector that takes these lines and connects them to input
port lines. Then you send a byte to the output port and see if it is
reflected in a change of state of the input port.

You can get diagnostic software that does all this for you and comes
with loopback connectors for the parallel (and serial) port.

Or, if you still have old DOS floppies, you can write a GWBasic program
in a few minutes that tests for free. Delphi, with the appropriate
libraries, will do the same job under XP, although it may take a little
longer to get to grips with.

Repairing the hardware used to be a doddle in the days of discrete
chips. The chip concerned then cost maybe 20p. These days, you either
replace the mobo or live with it ... and a PCI card.

--
Sue

Rod Speed

unread,
Jul 20, 2006, 2:41:59 PM7/20/06
to

Depends on how its failed. If its just a dry joint on the connector
itself its pretty easy to test and repair if you can solder.

If you have managed to kill the ic driving it with static etc,
its not really feasible to repair and not worth the hassle.

> or is it not worth the effort?

Really depends on your capability soldering wise.

> If anyone here has any experience testing and/or repairing these things I'd love to hear
> your thoughts.

I'm quite capable of doing it, but generally dont bother.


0 new messages