I have posted a similar message last week regarding my 98 Civic LX
ignition timing. I have originally replaced the distributor, but my
ignition timing was retarded by aprox 14 degrees. Thanks to the usefull
comments on this group, I have checked my timing belt alignment.
Because I wasn't sure if it was the original timing belt, I changed it
as well as the water pump. Less $100 for the next 90000 peace of mind.
When I put everything together, I've made sure that the camshaft and
everything else was properly alligned. After everything was put
together, I have checked my timing, while the service connector on the
passager side was jumpered, and it seemed to be perfect. The engine
pointer was alligned with the middle marker of the three when I first
started. I was happy, and I left the car running for about 10 minutes
because Haynes recomends to adjust the timing after the engine is warm
and the cooling fan starts. I walked away for 10 minutes with the car
running, but when I came back the timing was retarded again. It seemed
very weird especially that I've jumpered the service connector. I
thought that the timing belt jumped a tooth again. I checked the timing
belt alignment again and it seemed fine. The camshaft markers were
aligned with the cylinder head block and the crankshaft pulley was
poiting to the TDC mark (the white one). The car runs fine, without any
noticeable loss of power, but I'm a little worried about why my timing
is off. Right now the timing is.
V
||| |
Maybe I'm not jumpering the right service connector, but it is the one
that shows me emission control codes (flashing engine light). I don't
have any engine light codes though. I'm puzzled why the timing retarded
while I walked away from the car. I can't advance the distributor any
further. Is there another special disconnect for the ignition timing?
Thank you for your advice.
Little aside that could be a bit important:
Does your cooling fan really start after only ten minutes?
Even in summer-y weather, my 1991 Civic's radiator fan takes at least 35
minutes of idling before it comes on.
<snip>
> I'm a little worried about why my timing
> is off. Right now the timing is.
> V
>||| |
> Maybe I'm not jumpering the right service connector, but it is the one
> that shows me emission control codes (flashing engine light).
It's a 2-pin connector with brown and black wires. It's under the dash on
the passenger side.
> I don't
> have any engine light codes though. I'm puzzled why the timing retarded
> while I walked away from the car. I can't advance the distributor any
> further. Is there another special disconnect for the ignition timing?
>
> Thank you for your advice.
>
>
Are you sure you're connecting the timing light to the #1 plug wire? If the
light is inductive, make sure it's clipped to the plug wire as far as
possible from any other wire.
If you've been jumping the correct wire, you may be probably picking up the
signal from a different plug. (#3?)
If the above is true, your plug wires are electrically leaky and in need of
replacement (with OEM!).
--
TeGGeR®
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
>
> If you've been jumping the correct wire,
Typo: I meant to say jumping the correct under-dash CONNECTOR.
The timing connector and the Service Check connector appear to be the same
thing.
"because"??? what code are you getting?
> After further investigating, I have found the following. Immediately as
> the car starts the timing is ok. Then, the timing retards after 10-20
> seconds.
You should have the engine *fully-warm* before you attempt to adjust the
timing. Go take it for a fifteen-minute drive first, THEN adjust the
timing.
If the engine is fully-warm, and the timing light is hooked up, and you
adjust the distributor so the timing marks are correctly lined up, and you
wait 10-15 seconds, does the timing then suddenly jump to retarded?
> The service connector is jumpered because the engine light
> stays on when the car starts. I've made sure not to be around any other
> wires when testing. Right now, I'm connecting to the #1 wire close to
> the spark plug end. The wires and spark plugs were replaced with new
> ones while I was debugging the bad distributor problem. I've bought the
> wires from Autozone, are they OEM?
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They are aftermarket!!!!!!!!!!!
Go to the dealer for OEM. Although in this case it will make no difference
to what you're seeing with your timing.
> I will try to change with the old
> ones. By the way I found a good link for replacing the timing belt:
> http://www.hondatuningmagazine.com/tech/0406ht_timing/
> Tegger, please add it the website so others can use it.
Another thing to add to my list. Thanks for the link.
Jim
There were never any engine codes. After a serious rain over a weekend
the car stopped suddenly after 10 seconds after starting the following
monday. I have replaced the spark plugs, wires, distributor cap,
distributor rotor, ignition switch, map sensor, main relay and fuel
filter without any success. I was getting sparks on each wire when I
was cranking the car and the injectors were firing. Also I was hearing
the fuel pump working when the ignition was on. I didn't no what to do
so I took it to a shop for a diagnostic. They called me the next day
saying that the Kv were not consistent and offered to replace the
distributor. I refused, because it's cheaper to change it myself. When
I came to pick up my car from them, I drove it home, but they've told
me that they don't know how long it'll run. I've replaced the
distributor and now it runs even after it rains. The only issue I have
now is alligning the timing. Again, my engine light is not on unless I
jumper the service connector. That should be normal because that's how
you read the engine light flashes.
regarding codes, afaik, obdcII cars don't flash codes through the check
engine light - you need a diagnostic scanner that connects into the
obdcII plug in the driver's foot well. if you did read for codes with
the scanner and got nothing, great. but if you were having random
misfire problems, this is unlikely. check that next time before
replacing stuff!
regarding the new distributor timing, i return to the timing belt. the
ecu gets its firing signal from a sensor in the distributor, which is
connected to the cam, which is connected to the crank. afaik, there is
no way for the distributor to be just this little bit off without it
being a timing belt issue. iirc, there's 40 teeth in the cam pulley.
that's 9 degrees per tooth. one or two of those and you have your
timing difference. especially as you replaced the timing belt at the
same time as the problem appeared. sorry, but you have to take that
cover off again and sets the belts right. make sure you /ONLY/ turn the
crank anti-clockwise and set the belt tension correctly. per the honda
manual, "rotate the crankshaft counterclockwise 3 teeth on the camshaft
to create tension on the timing belt" before tightening the tension
pulley. if it's not tight enough, it'll jump.
once that's resolved and the timing's fixed again, notch the distributor
housing and cylinder head relative to each other. that way, if you ever
take the distributor off again, you'll be able to replace it in the
correct position. any variance subsequent to that will not be a
distributor problem!
for future reference, the "inconsistent kV" was almost certainly a
failing coil. that's a $70 fix that does not require distributor removal.
> aci...@lycos.com wrote:
>> jim beam wrote:
>>
<snip>
>
> regarding codes, afaik, obdcII cars don't flash codes through the
> check engine light - you need a diagnostic scanner that connects into
> the obdcII plug in the driver's foot well.
Honda retained the flashing-light method at least up to the 2000 model
year. It's even in the factory manual.
> if you did read for codes
> with the scanner and got nothing, great. but if you were having
> random misfire problems, this is unlikely. check that next time
> before replacing stuff!
>
> regarding the new distributor timing, i return to the timing belt.
> the ecu gets its firing signal from a sensor in the distributor, which
> is connected to the cam, which is connected to the crank. afaik,
> there is no way for the distributor to be just this little bit off
> without it being a timing belt issue. iirc, there's 40 teeth in the
> cam pulley. that's 9 degrees per tooth. one or two of those and you
> have your timing difference. especially as you replaced the timing
> belt at the same time as the problem appeared. sorry, but you have to
> take that cover off again and sets the belts right. make sure you
> /ONLY/ turn the crank anti-clockwise and set the belt tension
> correctly. per the honda manual, "rotate the crankshaft
> counterclockwise 3 teeth on the camshaft to create tension on the
> timing belt" before tightening the tension pulley. if it's not tight
> enough, it'll jump.
Given the OP's report of a "sudden" change in timing, and given that he's
made sure he's not picking up the signal from an adjacent HT wire, I'd
agree it's got to be a timing belt tension issue.
Thanks for all your support.
that's because the timing's not set right!!! when it is set correctly,
the crank and cam are perfectly aligned with their timing marks when the
belt is fully tensioned.
> If the belt is
> installed, when I turn the crankshaft the camshaft will also turn.
???
> I
> don't see how you'd only turn one without the other and still be on the
> marks specified (cylinder block alignment for the camshaft and arrow
> alignment for the crankshaft).
see first comment above!!!
> It seems to me that the tensioner only
> tightens the section between the crankshaft and water pump. What I mean
> is that once it reaches a point, it can't tighten the region between
> the water pump and camshaft.
no. as far as a running engine is concerned, the cam is free to turn
and the crank is free to turn. in this situation, tension in any one
part of the belt is idential with any other part of the belt.
> It would need to jump a tooth to tighten
> it more. The region between water pump and camshaft seems a little
> loose, but not enough to get one tooth out and give it to the tensioner
> side. What are the specs for belt tensioning? Could I measure tension
> myself with common tools?
no. the tensioner pulley is spring loaded. if you follow the
tensioning procedure correctly, the spring loads the belt with exactly
the correct tension.
> I have looked at the timing belt again. It is lined up on both the
> camshaft and crankshaft. I noticed that it was a little loose between
> the camshaft and crankshaft. I took jim's advice and I have loosened
> the tensioner, spinned the crankshaft counterclockwise (about 3 teeth
> on the camshaft) and tightened the tensioner. It seemed tighter then.
> After I have put everything together, I'm having the same problem. Jim
> said to only turn the crankspaft counterclockwise, but that would throw
> off the alignment with the arrow on the engine block.
I think we may have a failure to convey a concept here. Let me try again:
(Sorry for the capitals here; I'm not shouting, just highlighting certain
keywords).
To start off with, you MUST have the belt on with ALL the pulleys lining up
with their respective zero marks. That is Step One, which out which NOTHING
else will work.
At this point, it doesn't matter if the belt is tight or slack. Slack is
better, actually.
Since the belt is cogged, the pulleys cannot slip out of time with each
other unless the belt jumps a tooth, which is highly unlikely with it just
sitting there.
Now, the WHOLE POINT of the "three tooth" rotation is to place ALL THE
SLACK on the TENSIONER/WATER PUMP side of the crankshaft pulley. You want
it TIGHT between the CAM and CRANK, and LOOSE at the TENSIONER. The "three
tooth" rotation does this for you. And you need the slack to STAY on the
tensioner side, which you do by NOT LETTING GO OF THE WRENCH once you turn
three teeth.
Turning the crankshaft WILL move the cam too, but you ALREADY LINED THEM UP
before you put the belt on. So long as you turn COUNTERclockwise only THREE
TEETH, the risk of the belt jumping a tooth is non-existent, and the timing
will REMAIN AS YOU SET IT.
HOLDING the crank at the "three-tooth" rotation point, NOW you loosen the
tensioner. You need to hold the crank from springing back in order to make
sure ALL the slack STAYS on the TENSIONER side. If you turn it three teeth
then LET GO again, the slack will redistribute itself and you will still
have a loose belt. Use your foot or knee to hold the wrench if you need
your hands somewhere else.
If you've done this right, you will hear the tensioner give a little ZING
noise as its spring pulls it up. Retighten tensioner, let go of crank
wrench, check timing again.
THE END.
P.S.: There is another retensioning technique that involves pulling the
tensioner back down again, but we won't get into that just now.
Thanks
<snip>
> Align the marks on the camshaft and crankshaft
> Keep the tensioner screw tight
> Rotate the crankshaft 3 teeth counterclockwise
> Without letting go of the wrench loosen the tensioner screw
> Tighten the tensioner screw
> Let go of the ratchet
> Is this the suggested sequence of events?
Yes. And the tensioner bolt is ABOVE the crank pulley, set into the timing
belt cover.
You'd hold the crank pulley still from below, and do the tensioner from
above. I really have no idea why you're finding the crank interfering with
the tensioner....unless...your PS is in the way...
This site addresses the PS issue:
http://timingbelt.soben.com/
> When I installed the belt previously I let go of the wrench. I think
> that was what I did wrong. I will try it today again, but in the past I
> was using the crankshaft pulley(the one that spins the drive belts)
> using the 54mm hex to turn the crankshaft 3 teeth for tension.
Why are you using that bulky thing?
Just use a normal 3/8" drive 19mm socket and extensions on the pulley bolt
to turn it. Might buy you more wiggle room.
Don't worry, the bolt won't come loose if you've torqued it properly.
I have tried the method you've suggested and no success. I'm getting
better and better at getting to the timing belt after about 5 attempts
so far, but I still have the same issue. The timing belt is tight
between the camshaft and crankshaft. It seems that when the engine
first starts cold the timing is close, but not exact, to the TDC
marker. Once the engine slows down to idle speed,after a few minutes,
that's when the timing retards and it will just stay retarded. It
coincides with the engine speed. I've read somewhere that timing should
be adjusted at 750RPM +- 50. The only time I get that high, without
touching the acceleration, is when the car first starts. The idle speed
RPMs are below 500. I always look at timing only after the cooling fan
comes on, and I did it a few times after more than 45 minutes of
driving (when I came from work). I'm running out of options. The
markings are always alligned, I've made sure of it. Would the drive
belts tension have anything to do with it? I loose a bit of power when
I drive with the AC on. When I do my timing monitoring all utilities
are off per Hayes manual. Although the service jumper is connected, my
timing still changes when I look at it when I start cold. Once the
engine is hot it doesn't fluctuate, but it is retarded. Do you have any
more ideas I could try? What are the consequences for driving like this?
correct tension is vital, but it doesn't mean squat regarding timing.
what matters is the tooth count between the timing marks. to confirm
this is correct, do both timing marks align /exactly/ for the cam and
the crank when the belt is tensioned?
> It seems that when the engine
> first starts cold the timing is close, but not exact, to the TDC
> marker. Once the engine slows down to idle speed,after a few minutes,
> that's when the timing retards and it will just stay retarded. It
> coincides with the engine speed. I've read somewhere that timing should
> be adjusted at 750RPM +- 50. The only time I get that high, without
> touching the acceleration, is when the car first starts. The idle speed
> RPMs are below 500. I always look at timing only after the cooling fan
> comes on, and I did it a few times after more than 45 minutes of
> driving (when I came from work). I'm running out of options. The
> markings are always alligned, I've made sure of it. Would the drive
> belts tension have anything to do with it? I loose a bit of power when
> I drive with the AC on. When I do my timing monitoring all utilities
> are off per Hayes manual.
haynes is notoriously CRAP. either get the online stuff from tegger's
site or buy the proper workshop manual from helm.
> Although the service jumper is connected, my
> timing still changes when I look at it when I start cold. Once the
> engine is hot it doesn't fluctuate, but it is retarded. Do you have any
> more ideas I could try? What are the consequences for driving like this?
>
take it to a shop. no disrespect, but all we have to work on at this
end is your version of events. if you live close to san francisco, i
could look at it for you, but way things are right now, it's impossible
to get closer to the problem without physical inspection.