ACS IN ACTION
LilMtnCbn
Sharon Stone has shocked fans by nursing a black eye - after taking a beating
from her baby. Months after recovering from a brain hemorrhage in the same year
that her husband Phil Bronstein was attacked by a komodo dragon, the couple's
bad-luck seems to be continuing. But they're laughing about actress Stone's
latest mishap - an accidental right hook from her 18-month-old son Roan. She
says, "Finally, an injury that is really funny."
Sybbis
(LilMtnCbn) writes:
<<From IMDB Celebrity News
Uh-huh. Laughing their way right into divorce court. Come now, children...
ACS notwithstanding, you do *know* that she did not get that shiner from the
kid? Puh-leeze.
GR
AdoptaDad
>From: syb...@aol.com (Sybbis)
>Date: 1/10/2002 4:17 PM Eastern Standard Time
>Message-id: <20020110161758...@mb-mb.aol.com>
Good to see you again, GR.
Dad
Sybbis
(AdoptaDad) writes:
I wrote:
>Uh-huh. Laughing their way right into divorce court. Come now, children...
>>ACS notwithstanding, you do *know* that she did not get that shiner from the
>>kid? Puh-leeze.
> Good to see you again, GR.
>
>Dad
<g> You too, Adoptadad! It was only a matter of time...
GR
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>Message-id: <20020110161758...@mb-mb.aol.com>
Welcome back, GR! Where the fuck have you been??
Ghoulagirl.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy."
- Obi-Wan Kenobi, "Star Wars".
LilMtnCbn
>Message-id: <20020110163116...@mb-mb.aol.com>
Glad to see you are safe and sound. I was wondering if everything was ok,
since we haven't seen hide nor hair of you since before 9/11.
Sybbis
(LilMtnCbn) writes:
>>> Good to see you again, GR.
>>>
>>>Dad
>>
>><g> You too, Adoptadad! It was only a matter of time...
>>
>>GR
>
>Glad to see you are safe and sound. I was wondering if everything was ok,
>since we haven't seen hide nor hair of you since before 9/11.
>
Thanks, all is well. Just my usual running around the globe like a friggin'
maniac, combined with alt.a burnout. We didn't actually lose any of our regs
in the disaster, did we? Gunga Dyne's a New Yorker, but I've seen her here
lately so The Supreme Fuckwit didn't get her. (As if she wouldn't have kicked
his bony ass if he'd tried... ha.)
GR
Sybbis
ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
I wrote:
>>Uh-huh. Laughing their way right into divorce court. Come now,
>children...
>>ACS notwithstanding, you do *know* that she did not get that shiner from
>>the kid? Puh-leeze.
>
> Welcome back, GR!
Merci. Nice to see you, Kim.
>Where the fuck have you been??
Eh - everywhere. The usual. How's tricks?
GR
p.s.
I have discovered "The Backyard/The Playground" on aol... that chat thing is
too fucking funny! I've been on there two evenings in a row and who do ya
think I ran into last night?? Mark! THE Mark. He's just chock-full of
justifications and blather... also too fucking funny. Anyway - I dutifully
(and gleefully) gave him a ration of shit. Next time, I'll send him your
*warmest* regards, Kim.
>Ghoulagirl.
>
>"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy."
p.s.s.
Love the new sig - and it's *so* appropriate.
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>Message-id: <20020110170126...@mb-mb.aol.com>
>
>In article <20020110163252...@mb-cg.aol.com>,
>ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
>
>I wrote:
>>>Uh-huh. Laughing their way right into divorce court. Come now,
>>children...
>>>ACS notwithstanding, you do *know* that she did not get that shiner from
>>>the kid? Puh-leeze.
>>
>> Welcome back, GR!
>
>Merci. Nice to see you, Kim.
Did you give up being adopted as your New Year's resolution?
>>Where the fuck have you been??
>
>Eh - everywhere. The usual. How's tricks?
Ta dah!
>GR
>p.s.
>I have discovered "The Backyard/The Playground" on aol... that chat thing
>is
>too fucking funny! I've been on there two evenings in a row and who do
>ya
>think I ran into last night?? Mark! THE Mark. He's just chock-full of
>justifications and blather... also too fucking funny.
Unbelievable that he's still at it.
Anyway - I dutifully
>(and gleefully) gave him a ration of shit. Next time, I'll send him your
>*warmest* regards, Kim.
Oh please do!
>>Ghoulagirl.
>>
>>"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy."
>
>p.s.s.
>Love the new sig - and it's *so* appropriate.
Thanks - I thought so too!
Ghoulagirl.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy."
- Obi-Wan Kenobi, "Star Wars".
Steve White
syb...@aol.com (Sybbis) wrote:
> I have discovered "The Backyard/The Playground" on aol... that chat thing is
> too fucking funny! I've been on there two evenings in a row and who do ya
> think I ran into last night?? Mark! THE Mark. He's just chock-full of
> justifications and blather... also too fucking funny. Anyway - I dutifully
> (and gleefully) gave him a ration of shit. Next time, I'll send him your
> *warmest* regards, Kim.
Please pass along mine if you would. How do you send someone a virtual
broomstick, with instructions?
steve
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>Date: Thu, Jan 10, 2002 6:02 PM
>Message-id: <stevewhite-D1F18...@uchinews.uchicago.edu>
ROR!
Steve White
syb...@aol.com (Sybbis) wrote:
> Uh-huh. Laughing their way right into divorce court. Come now, children...
> ACS notwithstanding, you do *know* that she did not get that shiner from the
> kid? Puh-leeze.
>
> GR
Welcome back. I'm trying to decide whether Ms. Stone is in the top, er,
bottom 10% of most disgusting people in Hollywood today. Any help there?
steve
Julia
Welcome home.
Julia
Sybbis
White <steve...@spammers.still.scum> writes:
>Welcome back.
Thank you.
>I'm trying to decide whether Ms. Stone is in the top, er,
>bottom 10% of most disgusting people in Hollywood today. Any help there?
Yep. Definitely at the bottom o' the heap. The good news is that her career
is pretty much over.
GR
Sybbis
ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
<snip>
> Did you give up being adopted as your New Year's resolution?
Sadly, no. Must have been the absence of your presence.
>>>Where the fuck have you been??
>>
>>Eh - everywhere. The usual. How's tricks?
>
> Ta dah!
Duly noted.
<snip>
>>THE Mark. He's just chock-full of
>>justifications and blather... also too fucking funny.
>
> Unbelievable that he's still at it.
Yep. He kept saying "I respectfully submit" and bladeeblahblah... I told him
his complete lack of personal responsibility for his actions *did* seem very
submissive... hehehe... he kinda freaked at that one.
>Anyway - I dutifully
>>(and gleefully) gave him a ration of shit. Next time, I'll send him your
>>*warmest* regards, Kim.
>
> Oh please do!
I'll include steve's broomstick. (Unless, of course, stevie meant that
broomstick for moi. If so, I've got that covered.)
GR
Sybbis
ju...@NOSPAM.dingoblue.net.au (Julia) writes:
I wrote:
>Uh-huh. Laughing their way right into divorce court. Come now, children...
>>ACS notwithstanding, you do *know* that she did not get that shiner from
>>the kid? Puh-leeze.
>Welcome home.
>
>Julia
Mucho thanks.
GR
Kathy
>Date: 1/10/02 1:17 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <20020110161758...@mb-mb.aol.com>
Gentle Reader, lol, ......where have YOU been? Welcome back, *hon*. ;)-
Are you still an adoptee/nmom? Or did you give it up for New Years?
>GR
>
Kathy
"To err is human; to forgive, divine."
J.
>Subject: Re: ACS IN ACTION
>From: syb...@aol.com (Sybbis)
>Date: 10 Jan 2002 21:17:58 GMT
She's bad, she's back and she's got the inside story.
J.
Reply to jmhjmdATaolDOTcom
helicon
"Sybbis" <syb...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20020110161758...@mb-mb.aol.com...
Heheheheh. She's hooooooooooooome!
Helen
>
> GR
Steve White
syb...@aol.com (Sybbis) wrote:
> Yep. Definitely at the bottom o' the heap. The good news is that her
> career is pretty much over.
You mean Michael Douglas doesn't want to make another flic with her? I
can't believe it!
Perhaps there's a sit-com out there for her.
steve
Steve White
> I'll include steve's broomstick. (Unless, of course, stevie meant that
> broomstick for moi. If so, I've got that covered.)
No, no, that was for Mark. You and I are ok.
Unless you start up about 13 year old mothers again ;-)
steve
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>Message-id: <20020110192254...@mb-mb.aol.com>
>
>In article <20020110174813...@mb-ba.aol.com>,
>ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
>
><snip>
>
>> Did you give up being adopted as your New Year's resolution?
>
>Sadly, no. Must have been the absence of your presence.
Too bad. Now you'll have to wait another year!
>>>>Where the fuck have you been??
>>>
>>>Eh - everywhere. The usual. How's tricks?
>>
>> Ta dah!
>
>Duly noted.
And for my next trick...
><snip>
>
>>>THE Mark. He's just chock-full of
>>>justifications and blather... also too fucking funny.
>>
>> Unbelievable that he's still at it.
>
>Yep. He kept saying "I respectfully submit" and bladeeblahblah... I told
>him
>his complete lack of personal responsibility for his actions *did* seem
>very
>submissive... hehehe... he kinda freaked at that one.
He's a total ass.
>>Anyway - I dutifully
>>>(and gleefully) gave him a ration of shit. Next time, I'll send him your
>>>*warmest* regards, Kim.
>>
>> Oh please do!
>
>I'll include steve's broomstick. (Unless, of course, stevie meant that
>broomstick for moi. If so, I've got that covered.)
ROR!
Sybbis
<steven...@spammers.are.awful.com> writes:
> I'll include steve's broomstick. (Unless, of course, stevie meant that
>> broomstick for moi. If so, I've got that covered.)
>
>
>No, no, that was for Mark. You and I are ok.
Well, he got it... but I don't think he liked it. hehehe...
>Unless you start up about 13 year old mothers again ;-)
You first, hon. Oh wait... you already have! I'm not in the mood, stevie.
Try again later.
GR
Sybbis
<hel...@eircom.net> writes:
>> Uh-huh. Laughing their way right into divorce court. Come now,
>children...
>> ACS notwithstanding, you do *know* that she did not get that shiner from
>the kid? Puh-leeze.
>
>Heheheheh. She's hooooooooooooome!
Yep. Having skimmed the past couple of weeks worth of posts... You were
correct, madam, I am not the fine and fabulous "whoever" though I'm deeply
flattered by the comparison. So, Helen, what's my consistent spelling mistake?
Inquiring minds want to know! (And moi, a former spelling-bee champion for
fuck's sake - this is *terrible*!)
GR
Sybbis
meag...@aol.comsthesun (Kathy) writes:
GR:
>>Uh-huh. Laughing their way right into divorce court. Come now,
>children...
>>ACS notwithstanding, you do *know* that she did not get that shiner from the
>>kid? Puh-leeze.
>
>Gentle Reader, lol, ......where have YOU been?
As you well know, Kathy, I've been... ahem... around.
>Welcome back, *hon*. ;)-
Thanks, hon. (Is that supposed to be a cleft chin or one of those annying
little facial-hair tufts at the bottom of your smiley face? Inquiring minds!)
>Are you still an adoptee/nmom? Or did you give it up for New Years?
Without Kim's benevolent influence, I am - regrettably - still a two-fer.
I hear you've gone through some rather startling changes, Kathy. How ya doing?
GR
Sybbis
writes:
GR:
>>Uh-huh. Laughing their way right into divorce court. Come now,
>children...
>>ACS notwithstanding, you do *know* that she did not get that shiner from the
kid? Puh-leeze.
>>
>She's bad, she's back and she's got the inside story.
ROR... But of course!
And you guys know better than to believe this spin, too. Thanks to your Auntie
Winchell, you are in the loop. I told you all about Sharon, ages ago. Ms.
Stone plays grown-up games with grown-up peeps. Nothing wrong with that in my
book. Blaming her trophy-adoptosprog for her recent grown-up injury is just
plain disgusting.
I'm enjoying her trip down the ladder of success far more than I enjoyed her
trip up it, but I'm just a bitch sometimes. (The other times are called
"sleep")
GR
Sybbis
<steven...@spammers.are.awful.com> writes:
GR:
>> Yep. Definitely at the bottom o' the heap. The good news is that her
>> career is pretty much over.
>
>
>You mean Michael Douglas doesn't want to make another flic with her? I
>can't believe it!
She's waaaaay too old.. Though CZJ ain't no 30-something. Anyway, Stone's
box-office is ice-fucking-cold. No more primo parts are coming her way.
>Perhaps there's a sit-com out there for her.
Oh nononono! She's far too impressed with her alleged IQ. (Oddly enough, no
one has ever actually seen her at a Mensa meeting... nor is she in the
membership roster...how can this be?!? She must be going incognito.) I'd look
for her to try an "inspirational" book and possibly a talk show. Of course,
she's gonna run through the tv/cable movies first. They're still sending her
scripts for that kinda thing, just not the really hot ones. She's a joke in
the biz. Stone was such a backstabbing, lying sack, crew-abusing,
casting-couch-using beeyotch *all* those years - everyone hates her. I am
happy to report that she'll be ho'wood histoire really soon.
And blaming that adopted kid for her black eye... a new low.
GR
Sybbis
ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
<snip>
I wrote:
>>Yep. He kept saying "I respectfully submit" and bladeeblahblah... I told
>>him
>>his complete lack of personal responsibility for his actions *did* seem
>>very
>>submissive... hehehe... he kinda freaked at that one.
>
> He's a total ass.
Well! That's an understatement, for sure. After three days of experiencing
"chat" I have now been been TOS'd - by Marky-Mark. Evidently, his fragile
little mind couldn't take someone typing the word "fuck" and he became
unhinged... He was strangely focused on how often Lisa-Gee and I washed our
panties, the little freak. I think from now on his name will alternate between
Marky-Mark, Panty-Sniffing-Mark and Mark G-for Girly-man. Kim, I am in awe of
your power to instantly evaporate the putrid little punk, but... you missed
out. He came back, after he was *sure* you were gone, and many wacky hijinks
ensued. This guy's gotta be, what... 5'1" in heels?
How fucking funny is that chatroom stuff? Nannies are apparently breeding like
rabbits. Oh well, TOS away... I'll try (valiantly!) to carry on. I think what
actually bugged him was that all his little pals were getting an eyeful of
Panty-Sniffing-Mark's adoption history. As far as I can tell, many find it
quite ugly. I don't think he's ever truly *shared* the particulars with his
friends. Quelle shock. <smirk>
>>>Anyway - I dutifully
>>>>(and gleefully) gave him a ration of shit. Next time, I'll send him your
>>>>*warmest* regards, Kim.
>>>
>>> Oh please do!
>>
>>I'll include steve's broomstick. (Unless, of course, stevie meant that
>>broomstick for moi. If so, I've got that covered.)
>
> ROR!
Merci. Mark G-for-Girly-man is truly bizarro. And I did, btw, tell him you
said hi and that steve sent him a broomstick. Given his subsequent behavior,
I'm not sure he appreciated your warmth and kindness.
GR
Kathy
>Message-id: <20020111161411...@mb-fy.aol.com>
>
>In article <20020110193937...@mb-cu.aol.com>,
>meag...@aol.comsthesun (Kathy) writes:
>
>GR:
>>>Uh-huh. Laughing their way right into divorce court. Come now,
>>children...
>>>ACS notwithstanding, you do *know* that she did not get that shiner from
>the
>>>kid? Puh-leeze.
>>
>>Gentle Reader, lol, ......where have YOU been?
>
>As you well know, Kathy, I've been... ahem... around.
Actually I didn't 'well know' but while we're discussing where you've been, I
might as well ask why you never answered my question via email when you claimed
you were most willing to divulge to nmoms who the redh...@hotmail.com was.
>>Welcome back, *hon*. ;)-
>
>Thanks, hon. (Is that supposed to be a cleft chin or one of those annying
>little facial-hair tufts at the bottom of your smiley face? Inquiring
>minds!)
Well it will probably remain a puzzle to you until you answer my questions
directly above your inquiry.
>>Are you still an adoptee/nmom? Or did you give it up for New Years?
>
>Without Kim's benevolent influence, I am - regrettably - still a two-fer.
Oh well, there's always the upcoming season of Lent....
>I hear you've gone through some rather startling changes, Kathy.
Oh yeah, who'd you hear that from?
How ya
>doing?
You asking them, or me?
LilMtnCbn
>Message-id: <20020111161415...@mb-fy.aol.com>
>
>In article <20020110231211...@mb-fi.aol.com>,
>ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
>
><snip>
>
>I wrote:
>>>Yep. He kept saying "I respectfully submit" and bladeeblahblah... I told
>>>him
>>>his complete lack of personal responsibility for his actions *did* seem
>>>very
>>>submissive... hehehe... he kinda freaked at that one.
>>
>> He's a total ass.
>
>Well! That's an understatement, for sure. After three days of experiencing
>"chat" I have now been been TOS'd - by Marky-Mark. Evidently, his fragile
>little mind couldn't take someone typing the word "fuck" and he became
>unhinged... He was strangely focused on how often Lisa-Gee and I washed our
>panties, the little freak. I think from now on his name will alternate
>between
>Marky-Mark, Panty-Sniffing-Mark and Mark G-for Girly-man. Kim, I am in awe
>of
>your power to instantly evaporate the putrid little punk, but... you missed
>out. He came back, after he was *sure* you were gone, and many wacky hijinks
>ensued. This guy's gotta be, what... 5'1" in heels?
Guess I left too early. LOL
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>Message-id: <20020111161413...@mb-fy.aol.com>
>
>In article <stevenrwhite1-99B...@netnews.attbi.com>, Steve
>White
><steven...@spammers.are.awful.com> writes:
>
>> I'll include steve's broomstick. (Unless, of course, stevie meant that
>>> broomstick for moi. If so, I've got that covered.)
>>
>>
>>No, no, that was for Mark. You and I are ok.
>
>Well, he got it... but I don't think he liked it. hehehe...
I'm so sorry I chased him away from the Playground last night - though it WAS
sort of funny that he fled the moment I entered the chat room. What a huge
coward! I've decided that the "G" In "MarkG" stands for "Girly Man"!
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>From: syb...@aol.com (Sybbis)
>Date: Fri, Jan 11, 2002 4:14 PM
>Message-id: <20020111161413...@mb-fy.aol.com>
>
>White
><steven...@spammers.are.awful.com> writes:
>
>GR:
>>> Yep. Definitely at the bottom o' the heap. The good news is that her
>>> career is pretty much over.
>>
>>
>>You mean Michael Douglas doesn't want to make another flic with her? I
>
>>can't believe it!
>
>She's waaaaay too old.. Though CZJ ain't no 30-something. Anyway, Stone's
>box-office is ice-fucking-cold. No more primo parts are coming her way.
>
>>Perhaps there's a sit-com out there for her.
>
>Oh nononono! She's far too impressed with her alleged IQ. (Oddly enough,
>no
>one has ever actually seen her at a Mensa meeting... nor is she in the
>membership roster...how can this be?!?
Is Sharon Stone her real name? If not, maybe she joined under that so she
wouldn't be hassled.
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>
>In article <20020110231211...@mb-fi.aol.com>,
>ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
>
><snip>
>
>I wrote:
>>>Yep. He kept saying "I respectfully submit" and bladeeblahblah... I told
>>>him
>>>his complete lack of personal responsibility for his actions *did* seem
>>>very
>>>submissive... hehehe... he kinda freaked at that one.
>>
>> He's a total ass.
>
>Well! That's an understatement, for sure. After three days of experiencing
>"chat" I have now been been TOS'd - by Marky-Mark. Evidently, his fragile
>little mind couldn't take someone typing the word "fuck" and he became
>unhinged...
Wow, who'd have thunk that a super duper lawyer type like him would get so
upset by the word "fuck"?
He was strangely focused on how often Lisa-Gee and I washed
>our
>panties, the little freak.
Is he sniffing glue?
I think from now on his name will alternate
>between
>Marky-Mark, Panty-Sniffing-Mark and Mark G-for Girly-man.
ROR! I get to take credit for "Girly-Man"!
Kim, I am in
>awe of
>your power to instantly evaporate the putrid little punk,
Why thank you!
but... you missed
>out. He came back, after he was *sure* you were gone, and many wacky hijinks
>ensued.
Damn! I am soooo bummed! Maybe we should all go back at the same time
tonight and see if he's there (if my modem allows me to stay online for more
than five mintues, that is).
>This guy's gotta be, what... 5'1" in heels?
What a mental picture! Maybe you should ask him how often he washes his
panties!
>How fucking funny is that chatroom stuff?
Pretty fucking funny, I've got to say!
Nannies are apparently breeding
>like
>rabbits. Oh well, TOS away... I'll try (valiantly!) to carry on.
I know it will be tough, since you were totally devastated by being TOS'd the
first time.
I think
>what
>actually bugged him was that all his little pals were getting an eyeful
>of
>Panty-Sniffing-Mark's adoption history.
Yeah, I'm sure that had to hurt.
As far as I can tell, many find
>it
>quite ugly. I don't think he's ever truly *shared* the particulars with
>his
>friends. Quelle shock. <smirk>
Supplies!
>>>I'll include steve's broomstick. (Unless, of course, stevie meant that
>>>broomstick for moi. If so, I've got that covered.)
>>
>> ROR!
>
>Merci. Mark G-for-Girly-man is truly bizarro.
Ya think? I wonder if Steve knows if there's a clinical term for guys who
speculate about how often women in chat rooms wash their underwear.
And I did, btw, tell him
>you
>said hi and that steve sent him a broomstick. Given his subsequent behavior,
>I'm not sure he appreciated your warmth and kindness.
Gosh, I feel awful about that.
Palms2pines
>WAS
>sort of funny that he fled the moment I entered the chat room. What a huge
>coward! I've decided that the "G" In "MarkG" stands for "Girly Man"!
>
>
>Ghoulagirl.
Are you talking about The Backyard??
P2P
Steve White
syb...@aol.com (Sybbis) wrote:
> Merci. Mark G-for-Girly-man is truly bizarro. And I did, btw, tell him you
> said hi and that steve sent him a broomstick. Given his subsequent behavior,
> I'm not sure he appreciated your warmth and kindness.
You got TOS'd for my broomstick? I'm honored, I think.
Before you get banned completely, how 'bout one more post over there
laying out everything Mark did -- all the sanctimony and hypocrisy.
After all, you're not going to get in more trouble.
steve
Steve White
syb...@aol.com (Sybbis) wrote:
> Oh nononono! She's far too impressed with her alleged IQ. (Oddly enough, no
> one has ever actually seen her at a Mensa meeting... nor is she in the
> membership roster...how can this be?!? She must be going incognito.)
Of course she's going incognito. She's blonde!!!
> And blaming that adopted kid for her black eye... a new low.
One does wonder at the force of the punch of a 3 year old.
steve
Steve White
> Oh wait... you already have! I'm not in the mood, stevie.
> Try again later.
Not a chance. That horse is dead.
steve
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>Date: Fri, Jan 11, 2002 4:50 PM
>Message-id: <20020111165017...@mb-ma.aol.com>
No, this place was called "The Playground".
Eldie
Kathy: <<Oh yeah, who'd you hear that from?>>
GR: <<How ya
doing?>>
Kathy: <<You asking them, or me? >>
I'm sure she would like to hear from all of your personalities, Kathy, not just
the one. ;-)
eldie
helicon
LOL - it's admittedly a rare occurrence to catch *you* out.
I know it is barely conceivable that you might ever have forgotten it, but I
will remind you of that little mnemonic 'i' before 'e' except after 'c'! :-)
Helen
Helen
>
> GR
>
Palms2pines
>no
>> one has ever actually seen her at a Mensa meeting... nor is she in the
>> membership roster...how can this be?!? She must be going incognito.)
>
>
>Of course she's going incognito. She's blonde!!!
>
>
>> And blaming that adopted kid for her black eye... a new low.
>
>
>One does wonder at the force of the punch of a 3 year old.
>
>
>
>
>
>steve
Is the kid three? I thought he was only 18 months. Even if a kid swung his
little plastic baseball bat (or favorite Elmo doll) as hard as be possibly
could and had expert aim, doubtful he could cause a black eye.
:::::bzzzzzttttt:::::
Try again, Sharon.
P2P
Jrobnett1
(Eldie) writes:
>
>I'm sure she would like to hear from all of your personalities, Kathy, not
>just
>the one. ;-)
>
>eldie
ROR!
Jeannette, Bmom
The more that you read, the more things you will know.
The more that you learn, the more places you'll go.
Dr. Seuss, I Can Read With My Eyes Shut
Becky Young
while he was taking a bottle. He was messing around like babies do - he
clocked me with that full bottle, right on the nose, and blacked BOTH my eyes.
But admittedly, he wasn't adopted.
In article <20020111184905...@mb-fk.aol.com>,
palms...@aol.comh8spam (Palms2pines) writes:
>
>Is the kid three? I thought he was only 18 months. Even if a kid swung his
>little plastic baseball bat (or favorite Elmo doll) as hard as be possibly
>could and had expert aim, doubtful he could cause a black eye.
>
>:::::bzzzzzttttt:::::
>
Becky Young
....Though nothing can bring back the hour of splendour in the grass, of glory
in the flower, We will grieve not; rather find strength in what remains behind
-- William Wordsworth
Kathy
>Date: 1/11/02 3:00 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <20020111180045...@mb-mj.aol.com>
;-) yourself, and fuck right off !
>eldie
Kathy
>Date: 1/11/02 6:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <20020111214545...@mb-fg.aol.com>
>
>Well I gotta tell you. I was lying on the bed with my friend's 8-month-old
>while he was taking a bottle. He was messing around like babies do - he
>clocked me with that full bottle, right on the nose, and blacked BOTH my
>eyes.
>But admittedly, he wasn't adopted.
LOL.
Fwiw, speaking from experience, one of my sons at 12 months was 27 pounds and
wore a size 4 and a half quad E, (lethal weapons them there footies).
>
>In article <20020111184905...@mb-fk.aol.com>,
>palms...@aol.comh8spam (Palms2pines) writes:
>
>>
>>Is the kid three? I thought he was only 18 months. Even if a kid swung his
>>little plastic baseball bat (or favorite Elmo doll) as hard as be possibly
>>could and had expert aim, doubtful he could cause a black eye.
>>
>>:::::bzzzzzttttt:::::
>>
>
>
>Becky Young
>
>....Though nothing can bring back the hour of splendour in the grass, of
>glory
>in the flower, We will grieve not; rather find strength in what remains
>behind
>-- William Wordsworth
Kathy
Palms2pines
toddler son bruised her up!
>Well I gotta tell you. I was lying on the bed with my friend's 8-month-old
>while he was taking a bottle. He was messing around like babies do - he
>clocked me with that full bottle, right on the nose, and blacked BOTH my
>eyes.
>But admittedly, he wasn't adopted.
>
P2P
Becky Young
else thought DH did it and I was covering for him, poor thing. I swear, I found
the meaning of "seeing stars" because I really did!
In article <20020111220614...@mb-fk.aol.com>,
palms...@aol.comh8spam (Palms2pines) writes:
>
>Becky, not funny, but LOL!! So, I guess it is possible that Sharon Stone's
>toddler son bruised her up!
Becky Young
Were you among those of us who thought your child would never be able to
ambulate unless he was in those hard-soled white shoes as a baby? Those things
HURT!
In article <20020111215903...@mb-cu.aol.com>,
meag...@aol.comsthesun (Kathy) writes:
>
>LOL.
>Fwiw, speaking from experience, one of my sons at 12 months was 27 pounds
>and
>wore a size 4 and a half quad E, (lethal weapons them there footies).
>
Sybbis
ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
>I'm so sorry I chased him away from the Playground last night - though it WAS
>sort of funny that he fled the moment I entered the chat room. What a huge
>coward! I've decided that the "G" In "MarkG" stands for "Girly Man"!
>
Yep, that one was yours. A big ol' hunk o' girly-man, for sure.
GR
Sybbis
ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
<snip>
I wrote:
>Oh nononono! She's far too impressed with her alleged IQ. (Oddly enough,
>>no one has ever actually seen her at a Mensa meeting... nor is she in the
>>membership roster...how can this be?!?
>
> Is Sharon Stone her real name?
I don't think so, no.
> If not, maybe she joined under that so she
>wouldn't be hassled.
Er... Kim, sweetie, Sharon Stone is no more eligible for membership in Mensa
than Tori Spelling. Well, okay, she's smarter than Tori. BoBo the Wonder Dog
is smarter than Tori, but Stone's not Stephen Fucking Hawking-smart, ya know?
She's an average-to-bright chick whose publicist put out that genius crap years
ago. Unfortunately, the characterization of Stone as some kind of wunder-bra..
er.. wunderkind, managed to stick to the wall and it's been trotted out,
periodically, ever since.
Did you know that Stephen Hawking gets lots of chicks? Reportedly, he's quite
the babe-magnet. That is my favorite gossip of 2002, thus far. (yeah.. I
know.. it's tres early, but what a fun tidbit!)
GR
Sybbis
White <steve...@spammers.still.scum> writes:
>> Merci. Mark G-for-Girly-man is truly bizarro. And I did, btw, tell him
>you said hi and that steve sent him a broomstick. Given his subsequent
>behavior, I'm not sure he appreciated your warmth and kindness.
>
>
>You got TOS'd for my broomstick? I'm honored, I think.
Dunno if it was for the broomstick. In theory, it was for typing the word
"fuck".
>Before you get banned completely, how 'bout one more post over there
>laying out everything Mark did -- all the sanctimony and hypocrisy.
>After all, you're not going to get in more trouble.
I'd be happy to, but I may not be the person most appropriate for that job. I
wasn't lurking/posting during Panty-Sniffing-Mark's tenure here on
alt.adoption. I've heard the stories and I asked him outright the first time I
saw him in "The Playground". As for posting something there, the only "place"
I've ever run across Marky-Mark is in that chatroom. I think they do have aol
message boards, but I've never read them. My understanding is that politeness
is required, or they'll kill your post. There has to be someone better suited
than I for that particular task.
Question to aol'ers: Thus far, I have recieved no indication from aol that
Mark G-for-Girly-Man's complaints have been fruitful. Does this take time? Do
they sometimes just ignore it? Is it a Three-TOS-You're-Out deal? Inquiring
minds!
GR
Sybbis
meag...@aol.comsthesun (Kathy) writes:
I wrote:
>>As you well know, Kathy, I've been... ahem... around.
>
>Actually I didn't 'well know'
Hmm... So, would one of these personality changes involve the complete removal
of any sense of humor? How tragic!
>but while we're discussing where you've been, I
>might as well ask why you never answered my question via email when you
>claimed
>you were most willing to divulge to nmoms who the redh...@hotmail.com was.
Hmm... was I? Oh well, too much time and too many Cosmos under the bridge to
even vaguely remember that exchange. Sorry, sweetie, I have absolutely no clue
what you're talking about. (redh...@hotmail.com - who the fuck, what the
fuck, etc.?!?)
>>>Welcome back, *hon*. ;)-
>>
>>Thanks, hon. (Is that supposed to be a cleft chin or one of those annying
>>little facial-hair tufts at the bottom of your smiley face? Inquiring
>>minds!)
>
>Well it will probably remain a puzzle to you until you answer my questions
>directly above your inquiry.
Is that right? Umm... okay, Kathy, I'll see if I can manage to live with the
disappoinment.
>>>Are you still an adoptee/nmom? Or did you give it up for New Years?
>>
>>Without Kim's benevolent influence, I am - regrettably - still a two-fer.
>
>Oh well, there's always the upcoming season of Lent....
Lent? I don't think it's an option at Lent. Maybe one can take it out for a
test-run at Lent. I'll check with Kim.
>>I hear you've gone through some rather startling changes, Kathy.
>
>Oh yeah, who'd you hear that from?
Just about everyone to whom I posed the question, "So, what's new in alt.a
while I've been gone?"
>> How ya doing?
>
>You asking them, or me?
You. So, how ya doing?
GR
Sybbis
ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
I wrote:
>>Well! That's an understatement, for sure. After three days of experiencing
>>"chat" I have now been been TOS'd - by Marky-Mark. Evidently, his fragile
>>little mind couldn't take someone typing the word "fuck" and he became
>>unhinged...
>
> Wow, who'd have thunk that a super duper lawyer type like him would get so
>upset by the word "fuck"?
He actually said that the use of the word wasn't the problem. I think I just
pissed him off so he went running for his nanny. (Quelle shock!) As for his
practice, he admitted that it was confined to ambulance-chasing. (Quelle
surprise.)
>He was strangely focused on how often Lisa-Gee and I washed
>>our panties, the little freak.
>
> Is he sniffing glue?
Evidently, he's sniffing unwashed panties.
>I think from now on his name will alternate
>>between
>>Marky-Mark, Panty-Sniffing-Mark and Mark G-for Girly-man.
>
> ROR! I get to take credit for "Girly-Man"!
Absolutely.
> Kim, I am in awe of
>>your power to instantly evaporate the putrid little punk,
>
> Why thank you!
Certainly. It was a very impressive display.
>
>but... you missed
>>out. He came back, after he was *sure* you were gone, and many wacky
>hijinks ensued.
>
> Damn! I am soooo bummed! Maybe we should all go back at the same time
>tonight and see if he's there (if my modem allows me to stay online for more
>than five mintues, that is).
Hmm... I may give it a whirl this evening. Maybe then I'll get the "You can't
play with us anymore" notice from aol.
>>This guy's gotta be, what... 5'1" in heels?
>
> What a mental picture! Maybe you should ask him how often he washes his
>panties!
Nononono. My kinks don't bend in that direction.
>>How fucking funny is that chatroom stuff?
>
> Pretty fucking funny, I've got to say!
Ain't the truth!
>>Nannies are apparently breeding
>>like rabbits. Oh well, TOS away... I'll try (valiantly!) to carry on.
>
> I know it will be tough, since you were totally devastated by being TOS'd
>the first time.
Yes, I think total devastation strikes just the right note. Well... it's
either that, or my stomach hurts from laughing in derision. Sometimes it's
impossible to differentiate between the two.
> I think what
>>actually bugged him was that all his little pals were getting an eyeful
>>of Panty-Sniffing-Mark's adoption history.
>
> Yeah, I'm sure that had to hurt.
Upon further consideration it only bothered some, others were right in there
with him. Kinda funny how that crowd of clowns makes even those alt.a-ers with
whom I strongly disagree look pretty fucking decent.
>As far as I can tell, many find it
>>quite ugly. I don't think he's ever truly *shared* the particulars with
>>his friends. Quelle shock. <smirk>
>
> Supplies!
>
>>>>I'll include steve's broomstick. (Unless, of course, stevie meant that
>>>>broomstick for moi. If so, I've got that covered.)
>>>
>>> ROR!
>>
>>Merci. Mark G-for-Girly-man is truly bizarro.
>
> Ya think? I wonder if Steve knows if there's a clinical term for guys who
>speculate about how often women in chat rooms wash their underwear.
Oh, there must be one by now. Isn't there a clinical term for everything?
>And I did, btw, tell him you
>>said hi and that steve sent him a broomstick. Given his subsequent
>behavior, I'm not sure he appreciated your warmth and kindness.
>
> Gosh, I feel awful about that.
I knew that you would.
GR
Sybbis
<hel...@eircom.net> writes:
<snip>
>I will remind you of that little mnemonic 'i' before 'e' except after 'c'! :-)
That's it? Yeah, I fuck that one up any number of times a day. Geeez... and
here I thought it was going to be something really bad! You know, like having
misspelled "cluster-fuck" each and every friggin' time I used it.
GR
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>Date: Fri, Jan 11, 2002 10:57 PM
>Message-id: <20020111225722...@mb-mg.aol.com>
Now THAT would have been a REAL faux pas!
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>
>In article <20020111164128...@mb-ch.aol.com>,
>ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
>
><snip>
>
>I wrote:
>>Oh nononono! She's far too impressed with her alleged IQ. (Oddly enough,
>>>no one has ever actually seen her at a Mensa meeting... nor is she in
>the
>>>membership roster...how can this be?!?
>>
>> Is Sharon Stone her real name?
>
>I don't think so, no.
>
>> If not, maybe she joined under that so she
>>wouldn't be hassled.
>
>Er... Kim, sweetie, Sharon Stone is no more eligible for membership in Mensa
>than Tori Spelling. Well, okay, she's smarter than Tori. BoBo the Wonder
>Dog
>is smarter than Tori, but Stone's not Stephen Fucking Hawking-smart, ya
>know?
>She's an average-to-bright chick whose publicist put out that genius crap
>years
>ago. Unfortunately, the characterization of Stone as some kind of
wunder-bra..
>er.. wunderkind, managed to stick to the wall and it's been trotted out,
>periodically, ever since.
I had no real opinion about her IQ either way, actually. I was just offering
an alternate explanation.
>Did you know that Stephen Hawking gets lots of chicks? Reportedly, he's
>quite
>the babe-magnet. That is my favorite gossip of 2002, thus far. (yeah..
>I
>know.. it's tres early, but what a fun tidbit!)
Yeah - good for him, I say!
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>I wrote:
snip
>>>Without Kim's benevolent influence, I am - regrettably - still a two-fer.
>
>>
>>Oh well, there's always the upcoming season of Lent....
>
>Lent? I don't think it's an option at Lent. Maybe one can take it out
>for a
>test-run at Lent. I'll check with Kim.
Oh absolutely! I seem to remember encouraging others to try it out for Lent
last year, but I don't think I had any takers. If you try it out and like it,
you can make it your resolution next year.
Jmmbear
ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
>
>>
>>Are you talking about The Backyard??
>
> No, this place was called "The Playground".
>
>Ghoulagirl.
>
The 'backyard playground' and 'the playground' were created for people to spill
over to, while the Backyard had its scheduled chats. We all kept interupting
the scheduled chats to just chat, so they finally gave us two more rooms to
chat in.
Jeanne aka the Nutbar lunatic bmom
Jmmbear
their first shoes. White lace up shoes that weighed a ton. You are right, they
hurt. LOL
In article <20020111224018...@mb-fg.aol.com>,
blup...@aol.combadstuff (Becky Young) writes:
>Subject: Re: ACS IN ACTION
>From: blup...@aol.combadstuff (Becky Young)
>Date: 12 Jan 2002 03:40:18 GMT
>
>
>Were you among those of us who thought your child would never be able to
>ambulate unless he was in those hard-soled white shoes as a baby? Those
>things
>HURT!
>
>
>In article <20020111215903...@mb-cu.aol.com>,
>meag...@aol.comsthesun (Kathy) writes:
>
>>
>>LOL.
>>Fwiw, speaking from experience, one of my sons at 12 months was 27 pounds
>>and
>>wore a size 4 and a half quad E, (lethal weapons them there footies).
>>
>
>
>Becky Young
>
Jmmbear
(Sybbis) writes:
>
>Question to aol'ers: Thus far, I have recieved no indication from aol that
>Mark G-for-Girly-Man's complaints have been fruitful. Does this take time?
>Do
>they sometimes just ignore it? Is it a Three-TOS-You're-Out deal? Inquiring
>minds!
>
>GR
>
GR they notify you by email that you have been reported. And from last I heard
after 3 notifications you lose the account. AOL closes it.
Jmmbear
ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
>
>>Did you know that Stephen Hawking gets lots of chicks? Reportedly, he's
>>quite
>>the babe-magnet. That is my favorite gossip of 2002, thus far. (yeah..
>>I
>>know.. it's tres early, but what a fun tidbit!)
>
Click here: Latest News - The Stephen Hawking Pages
http://www.psyclops.com/hawking/news/
Steve White
syb...@aol.com (Sybbis) wrote:
> Question to aol'ers: Thus far, I have recieved no indication from aol that
> Mark G-for-Girly-Man's complaints have been fruitful. Does this take time?
> Do they sometimes just ignore it? Is it a Three-TOS-You're-Out deal?
> Inquiring minds!
I'm not an aol'er [1], however, it's my experience that most ISPs won't
toss someone for using the fuck word. The most that will happen is that
you'll get an e-mail from some drone at AOL telling you to be nice.
And of course you'll listen :-)
steve
[1] And careful how you spell that!
Steve White
> I think I just pissed him off so he went running for his nanny.
No, he went running for his child's nanny. I wonder if he'd get TOS'd by
his wife for that?
steve
Ron Morgan
> In article <stevenrwhite1-B0B...@netnews.attbi.com>, Steve
White
> <steven...@spammers.are.awful.com> writes:
>
> And blaming that adopted kid for her black eye... a new low.
>
> GR
Phil's got quite a rep for brawling. He once leapt over his desk at the
Chron to have at political hack Clint Reilly...
Ron
>
>
Lainie Petersen
Anyone want to clue me in?
Lainie
Sybbis
blup...@aol.combadstuff (Becky Young) writes:
>Well I gotta tell you. I was lying on the bed with my friend's 8-month-old
>while he was taking a bottle. He was messing around like babies do - he
>clocked me with that full bottle, right on the nose, and blacked BOTH my
>eyes.
>But admittedly, he wasn't adopted.
Duly noted, these things do sometimes happen. In Stone's case, nothing of the
kind has ever taken place. No stray punch, no bottle, no shoe, no elbow, no
toy. Nothing involving any minor gave her that black eye.
Let's sing it together now: It Was Not The Kid. Tra-la!
Good job.
GR
helicon
God forbid that you'd ever get THAT one wrong! <bg>
Helen
>
> GR
AdoptaDad
>Date: 1/11/02 10:57 PM Eastern Standard Time
>Message-id: <20020111225721...@mb-mg.aol.com>
< snip >
>Question to aol'ers: Thus far, I have recieved no indication
>from aol that Mark G-for-Girly-Man's complaints have been fruitful.
>Does this take time? Do they sometimes just ignore it? Is it a
>Three-TOS-You're-Out deal? Inquiring minds!
>
>GR
I got TOS'd four or five times over the span of a couple years, mostly from
participating in the Back Yard or on the Adoptive Parents board. I vaguely
recall a "three strikes and yer out" threat somewhere (within a certain time
frame), but nothing came of them.
When AOL emails your little TOS certificate, they also cc: every other screen
name on your account - which royally pissed me off. My wife, who sweats out
the remaining time on street parking meters, was not very pleased at my little
misbehaviors.
If you don't intercept the emailed TOS certificate, your wife and those
kidlets with email addresses all know that Daddy's been a bad little boy.
Dad
LilMtnCbn
>Date: 1/11/02 7:45 PM Mountain Standard Time
>Message-id: <20020111214545...@mb-fg.aol.com>
>
>Well I gotta tell you. I was lying on the bed with my friend's 8-month-old
>while he was taking a bottle. He was messing around like babies do - he
>clocked me with that full bottle, right on the nose, and blacked BOTH my
>eyes.
>But admittedly, he wasn't adopted.
Me too! My oldest whacked me on the nose with a bottle. No black eyes, but
hard enough to make me cry. LOL
Little Rabbit Foo Foo
Hey, welcome back!
>I'd be happy to, but I may not be the person most appropriate for that job. I
wasn't lurking/posting during panty-Sniffing-Mark's tenure here on
alt.adoption.>
That's too bad. You missed some prime entitled-PAP stuff.
>Question to aol'ers: Thus far, I have recieved no indication from aol that
Mark G-for-Girly-Man's complaints have been fruitful. Does this take time?
Do they sometimes just ignore it? Is it a Three-TOS-You're-Out deal?
Inquiring
minds!>
Well, there's TOSing and then there's TOSing. From what I understand, actions
range from being warned by email that someone's complained, to actually having
your account yanked. The former happens all the time, the latter is quite
rare.
Knifchick
Con te patiro
su navi per mari
che io lo so
no, no, non esistono piu
con te io li vivro
J.
>Question to aol'ers: Thus far, I have recieved no indication from aol that
>Mark G-for-Girly-Man's complaints have been fruitful. Does this take time?
>Do
>they sometimes just ignore it? Is it a Three-TOS-You're-Out deal? Inquiring
>minds!
>
>GR
>
I can't imagine ever being TOS'd, so I can't help you with this one.
J.
Reply to jmhjmdATaolDOTcom
J.
(Sybbis) writes:
>Er... Kim, sweetie, Sharon Stone is no more eligible for membership in Mensa
>than Tori Spelling. Well, okay, she's smarter than Tori. BoBo the Wonder
>Dog
>is smarter than Tori, but Stone's not Stephen Fucking Hawking-smart, ya know?
>
>She's an average-to-bright chick whose publicist put out that genius crap
>years
>ago. Unfortunately, the characterization of Stone as some kind of
>wunder-bra..
>er.. wunderkind, managed to stick to the wall and it's been trotted out,
>periodically, ever since.
>
>Did you know that Stephen Hawking gets lots of chicks? Reportedly, he's
>quite
>the babe-magnet. That is my favorite gossip of 2002, thus far. (yeah.. I
>know.. it's tres early, but what a fun tidbit!)
>
>GR
Not bad for a 60 year old. Hmmm, maybe that's why he ran into a wall the other
day while trying to catch his wife.
J.
Reply to jmhjmdATaolDOTcom
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>
>In article <20020111164843...@mb-ch.aol.com>,
>ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
snip
>> Wow, who'd have thunk that a super duper lawyer type like him would get
>so
>>upset by the word "fuck"?
>
>He actually said that the use of the word wasn't the problem.
So what was the problem?
I think I
>just
>pissed him off so he went running for his nanny. (Quelle shock!)
What did you expect from a little Girly-Man?
As for
>his
>practice, he admitted that it was confined to ambulance-chasing. (Quelle
>surprise.)
You could knock me over with a feather!
>>He was strangely focused on how often Lisa-Gee and I washed
>>>our panties, the little freak.
>>
>> Is he sniffing glue?
>
>Evidently, he's sniffing unwashed panties.
Does that get a person high?
>>I think from now on his name will alternate
>>>between
>>>Marky-Mark, Panty-Sniffing-Mark and Mark G-for Girly-man.
>>
>> ROR! I get to take credit for "Girly-Man"!
>
>Absolutely.
Thanks.
>> Kim, I am in awe of
>>>your power to instantly evaporate the putrid little punk,
>>
>> Why thank you!
>
>Certainly. It was a very impressive display.
Wasn't it, though?
>>but... you missed
>>>out. He came back, after he was *sure* you were gone, and many wacky
>>hijinks ensued.
>>
>> Damn! I am soooo bummed! Maybe we should all go back at the same time
>>tonight and see if he's there (if my modem allows me to stay online for
>more
>>than five mintues, that is).
>
>Hmm... I may give it a whirl this evening.
Whoops. I ended up watching "Law and Order SVU" and then going to bed.
Maybe then I'll get the "You
>can't
>play with us anymore" notice from aol.
Doubtful. TOS is a joke.
>>>This guy's gotta be, what... 5'1" in heels?
>>
>> What a mental picture! Maybe you should ask him how often he washes
>his
>>panties!
>
>Nononono. My kinks don't bend in that direction.
I'm sure he'd be happy to tell you even if you DON'T ask!
snip how funny chatrooms can be
>>>Nannies are apparently breeding
>>>like rabbits. Oh well, TOS away... I'll try (valiantly!) to carry on.
>>
>> I know it will be tough, since you were totally devastated by being TOS'd
>>the first time.
>
>Yes, I think total devastation strikes just the right note.
I thought as much.
Well... it's
>either that, or my stomach hurts from laughing in derision. Sometimes it's
>impossible to differentiate between the two.
I hate when that happens.
>> I think what
>>>actually bugged him was that all his little pals were getting an eyeful
>>>of Panty-Sniffing-Mark's adoption history.
>>
>> Yeah, I'm sure that had to hurt.
>
>Upon further consideration it only bothered some, others were right in there
>with him.
Oh dear.
Kinda funny how that crowd of clowns makes even those alt.a-ers
>with
>whom I strongly disagree look pretty fucking decent.
Wow. Now that's saying something.
snip
>>>Merci. Mark G-for-Girly-man is truly bizarro.
>>
>> Ya think? I wonder if Steve knows if there's a clinical term for guys
>who
>>speculate about how often women in chat rooms wash their underwear.
>
>Oh, there must be one by now. Isn't there a clinical term for everything?
Probably. I wonder if Mark made the DSM.
>
>>And I did, btw, tell him you
>>>said hi and that steve sent him a broomstick. Given his subsequent
>>behavior, I'm not sure he appreciated your warmth and kindness.
>>
>> Gosh, I feel awful about that.
>
>I knew that you would.
Am I THAT predictable??
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>Date: Sat, Jan 12, 2002 12:32 AM
>Message-id: <8hiv3ukvjtn978u7m...@4ax.com>
>
>On 12 Jan 2002 04:39:49 GMT, ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful
>All-Knowing One) wrote:
>
>>>Subject: Re: ACS IN ACTION
>>>From: syb...@aol.com (Sybbis)
>>>Date: Fri, Jan 11, 2002 10:57 PM
>>>
>>>In article <20020111162820...@mb-dh.aol.com>,
>>>meag...@aol.comsthesun (Kathy) writes:
>>
>>>I wrote:
>>
>>snip
>>
>>>>>Without Kim's benevolent influence, I am - regrettably - still a two-fer.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Oh well, there's always the upcoming season of Lent....
>>>
>>>Lent? I don't think it's an option at Lent. Maybe one can take it out
>>>for a
>>>test-run at Lent. I'll check with Kim.
>>
>> Oh absolutely! I seem to remember encouraging others to try it out for
>Lent
>>last year, but I don't think I had any takers. If you try it out and like
>it,
>>you can make it your resolution next year.
>
>prefer being special and chosen.
Yeah, but don't you hate it when your Primal Wound oozes pus all over your
new outfit?
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>Date: Sat, Jan 12, 2002 12:20 AM
>Message-id: <20020112002004...@mb-cu.aol.com>
Thanks! I didn't know the history there. I don't spend very much time in
chatrooms.
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>Date: Sat, Jan 12, 2002 7:31 AM
>Message-id: <20020112073139...@mb-mp.aol.com>
snip
> If you don't intercept the emailed TOS certificate, your wife and those
>kidlets with email addresses all know that Daddy's been a bad little boy.
ROR!
Kathy
>Date: 1/11/02 7:40 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <20020111224018...@mb-fg.aol.com>
>
>
>Were you among those of us who thought your child would never be able to
>ambulate unless he was in those hard-soled white shoes as a baby? Those
>things
>HURT!
Oh yes, lol. One more *E* added onto his width and we would have had to have
them factory made by Strideright, (sp.?).
>
>In article <20020111215903...@mb-cu.aol.com>,
>meag...@aol.comsthesun (Kathy) writes:
>
>>
>>LOL.
>>Fwiw, speaking from experience, one of my sons at 12 months was 27 pounds
>>and
>>wore a size 4 and a half quad E, (lethal weapons them there footies).
>>
>
>Becky Young
>
>....Though nothing can bring back the hour of splendour in the grass, of
>glory
>in the flower, We will grieve not; rather find strength in what remains
>behind
>-- William Wordsworth
Kathy
"To err is human; to forgive, divine."
Kathy
>Date: 1/12/02 8:26 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <20020112112617...@mb-dh.aol.com>
Omg, give some warning. It's early Sat. morn. in Ca., and there goes my
appetite!
You naughty adopted child.
>Ghoulagirl.
>
>"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy."
>
Kathy
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>Date: Sat, Jan 12, 2002 12:05 PM
>Message-id: <20020112120506...@mb-fi.aol.com>
Just think of it as the ACS Diet Plan!
>You naughty adopted child.
Not anymore - I gave it up, remember?
Ghoulagirl.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy."
- Obi-Wan Kenobi, "Star Wars".
Jackie C
>In article <ioK%7.25850$8s4.1...@news.indigo.ie>, "helicon"
><hel...@eircom.net> writes:
>
><snip>
>
>>I will remind you of that little mnemonic 'i' before 'e' except after 'c'! :-)
>
>That's it? Yeah, I fuck that one up any number of times a day. Geeez... and
>here I thought it was going to be something really bad! You know, like having
>misspelled "cluster-fuck" each and every friggin' time I used it.
>
>GR
friggin is now friken.. in my world..
I just finished listening.. Titus Groan.. Mervyn Peake
The guy loves, or loved to, make up words.. a man after my own heart..
One of his characters says.. "The English language is so boring.. why
would one not make up words that are more suitable"..
Jackie
Jackie C
<steve...@spammers.still.scum> wrote:
>Before you get banned completely, how 'bout one more post over there
>laying out everything Mark did -- all the sanctimony and hypocrisy.
>After all, you're not going to get in more trouble.
Also, how about saying that our Kim thinks it okay that Mark took that
baby from the hospital the day it was born.
It is his hypocrisy.. that she dislikes..
Hmmmm.. and this from a hypocrite.. IMO
The rape thingee.. remember Kim.. and the WTS.. woops.. the WTC...
Jackie
LilMtnCbn
>Date: 1/12/02 12:07 PM Mountain Standard Time
>Message-id: <s3214ug9paapq9erq...@4ax.com>
What about Kim and the WTC?
Sybbis
(Jmmbear) writes:
<snip - TOS>
>GR they notify you by email that you have been reported. And from last I
>heard after 3 notifications you lose the account. AOL closes it.
>Jeanne aka the Nutbar lunatic bmom
Hmm... okay, thanks. Nothing so far...
GR
Sybbis
ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
Kim:
>I've decided that the "G" In "MarkG" stands for "Girly Man"!
>>>
GR:
>>Yep, that one was yours. A big ol' hunk o' girly-man, for sure.
>
> We should chip in and buy him a frilly dress.
ROR!
And some patent leather maryjanes.
GR
Sybbis
ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
<snip: i/e>
I wrote:
>>That's it? Yeah, I fuck that one up any number of times a day. Geeez...
>>and here I thought it was going to be something really bad! You know, like
>having misspelled "cluster-fuck" each and every friggin' time I used it.
>
> Now THAT would have been a REAL faux pas!
Ed Zachary!
GR
Sybbis
<steven...@spammers.are.awful.com> writes:
<snip - TOS?>
>I'm not an aol'er [1], however, it's my experience that most ISPs won't
>toss someone for using the fuck word.
The *only* place I've ever heard of anything like this crap is AOL.
>The most that will happen is that
>you'll get an e-mail from some drone at AOL telling you to be nice.
>
>And of course you'll listen :-)
Oh yeah. I'm turning up my hearing aid to 11.
>steve
>
>
>[1] And careful how you spell that!
Hey... would I take a cheap shot like that? Ahem.
Sybbis
(Jmmbear) writes:
I wrote:
>>Did you know that Stephen Hawking gets lots of chicks? Reportedly, he's
>>>quite the babe-magnet. That is my favorite gossip of 2002, thus far.
(yeah..
>>>I know.. it's tres early, but what a fun tidbit!)
>>
>
> Click here: Latest News - The Stephen Hawking Pages
>http://www.psyclops.com/hawking/news/
>Jeanne aka the Nutbar lunatic bmom
Thanks Jeanne, but there's absolutely nothing about chicks on that page! <g>
GR
Palms2pines
<snip>
>Also, how about saying that our Kim thinks it okay that Mark took that
>baby from the hospital the day it was born.
>
<snip>
For clarification, since I was not here when the infamous Markg was posting
here, are you saying, Jackie, he is "guilty" of "taking" a newborn home from
the hospital *after* lobbying against such an action or denouncing such an
action on the part of an adoptive parent? Or, is he just guilty (IYO) because
he and his wife adopted a newborn that was released from the hospital directly
into their custody? We have twice adopted newborns and both times they were
released directly from the hospital into our custody, per the wishes of their
birthmothers. Use of the word "took" in you sentence would suggest a form of
aggression or force in the 'taking" of a baby from the hospital. Most adoptive
parents who adopt newborns do "take" the baby from the hospital because the
birthmother/parents wish it to be so.
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>Date: Sat, Jan 12, 2002 2:16 PM
>Message-id: <lm214uoe9ie7km8vv...@4ax.com>
>
>On 12 Jan 2002 16:26:17 GMT, ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful
>All-Knowing One) wrote:
>
>>>
>>>I did! However, I decided to pass on the resolution--I found I still
>>>prefer being special and chosen.
>>
>> Yeah, but don't you hate it when your Primal Wound oozes pus all over
>your
>>new outfit?
>
>always have all over myself. Besides, the small animals I torture
>just don't seem to care how I'm dressed.
Good point... besides, I'm sure you can always steal more clothes.
Palms2pines
>new outfit?
>
>Ghoulagirl.
LOL! Aren't you glad you gave it all up, Ghoulagirl? I'll bet you've saved
gazillions on dry cleaning bills.
P2P
Palms2pines
>always have all over myself. Besides, the small animals I torture
>just don't seem to care how I'm dressed.
OMG. And I thought Kim's remarks were bad.
:::::spew:::::
P2P
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>Date: Sat, Jan 12, 2002 3:28 PM
>Message-id: <20020112152812...@mb-bh.aol.com>
And a great big lollipop!
The All-Powerful All-Knowing One
>Date: Sat, Jan 12, 2002 4:20 PM
>Message-id: <20020112162030...@mb-de.aol.com>
Yeah - and my cats no longer live in fear!
Sybbis
<jda...@newsguy.com> writes:
>friggin is now friken.. in my world..
>
Hmm... well, I do prefer friggin', but fricken/friken works! <ggg>
GR
Sybbis
writes:
>I can't imagine ever being TOS'd, so I can't help you with this one.
>
>J.
Obviously, you aren't typing the word "fuck" anywhere *near* often enough. You
simply must work on that, counselor.
GR
Sybbis
writes:
<snip>
I wrote:
>>Did you know that Stephen Hawking gets lots of chicks? Reportedly, he's
>>quite
>>the babe-magnet. That is my favorite gossip of 2002, thus far. (yeah.. I
>>know.. it's tres early, but what a fun tidbit!)
>>
>>GR
>
>
>Not bad for a 60 year old. Hmmm, maybe that's why he ran into a wall the
>other day while trying to catch his wife.
ROR! (no.. I'm not really laughing at Hawking's unfortunate accident... ahem)
Gotta love this guy, for sure.
GR
Sybbis
knif...@aol.comprplknif (Little Rabbit Foo Foo) writes:
>Hey, welcome back!
Merci, sweetie! Nice to see ya.
>>I'd be happy to, but I may not be the person most appropriate for that job.
>I wasn't lurking/posting during panty-Sniffing-Mark's tenure here on
>alt.adoption.>
>
>That's too bad. You missed some prime entitled-PAP stuff.
My personal fave! I may have caught bits and pieces of it, but nothing solid.
I've always come and gone, at will, from alt.adoption. It's just that when I
lurked - nobody noticed - some still don't, I'm sure. <g> Still, haven't we
had enough entitled-pap bullshit to make up for what I missed? I think so...
>>Question to aol'ers: Thus far, I have recieved no indication from aol that
>Mark G-for-Girly-Man's complaints have been fruitful. Does this take time?
>Do they sometimes just ignore it? Is it a Three-TOS-You're-Out deal?
>Inquiring
>minds!>
>
>Well, there's TOSing and then there's TOSing. From what I understand,
>actions
>range from being warned by email that someone's complained, to actually
>having
>your account yanked. The former happens all the time, the latter is quite
>rare.
Eh. Whatever. Fucking weenies. If I *wanted* to hang with children, I'd have
a few around the house.
Anyway, still lovely to see *you* and how are things? Cooked up that lobster
yet? Mmm, mmm... tasty!
GR
Sybbis
(AdoptaDad) writes:
>>Question to aol'ers: Thus far, I have recieved no indication
>>from aol that Mark G-for-Girly-Man's complaints have been fruitful.
>>Does this take time? Do they sometimes just ignore it? Is it a
>>Three-TOS-You're-Out deal? Inquiring minds!
>>
>>GR
>
>
> I got TOS'd four or five times over the span of a couple years, mostly from
>participating in the Back Yard or on the Adoptive Parents board. I vaguely
>recall a "three strikes and yer out" threat somewhere (within a certain time
>frame), but nothing came of them.
Adoptadad... I am *shocked* at your obviously outrageous behavior!! ROR... too
funny.
> When AOL emails your little TOS certificate, they also cc: every other
>screen name on your account - which royally pissed me off. My wife,
> who sweats out the remaining time on street parking meters, was not
>very pleased at my little misbehaviors.
>
> If you don't intercept the emailed TOS certificate, your wife and those
>kidlets with email addresses all know that Daddy's been a bad little boy.
Hmm... well, thank heavens my friend is the coolest chick around. I'll give
her a heads-up on this. She's one of my infamous pals who has read my/others
stuff from this group, and she knows me well. She'll probably get a perverse
kick out of it and razz me for weeks.
Funny to think of *you* getting busted!! hee hee hee...
GR
Sybbis
ghoul...@aol.com.net (The All-Powerful All-Knowing One) writes:
<snip>
I wrote:
>>He actually said that the use of the word wasn't the problem.
>
> So what was the problem?
I pissed him off, and he wasn't winning the argument. You *know* how hard it
is to actually win an argument with me. It pisses a lot of peeps off. Plus,
LisaGee was there and a few others - he wasn't winning any arguments with them,
either.
>I think I just
>>pissed him off so he went running for his nanny. (Quelle shock!)
>
> What did you expect from a little Girly-Man?
Umm... not TOS'ing, actually. I thought that was for teenagers when grown-ups
came around and dicked with them. Shows what I know.. not too friggin' much.
Apparently there's nothing too low for MGirlyman.
>As for his
>>practice, he admitted that it was confined to ambulance-chasing. (Quelle
>>surprise.)
>
> You could knock me over with a feather!
I hear ya.
>>>He was strangely focused on how often Lisa-Gee and I washed
>>>>our panties, the little freak.
>>>
>>> Is he sniffing glue?
>>
>>Evidently, he's sniffing unwashed panties.
>
> Does that get a person high?
Hmm... I wouldn't think so, but then I'm not the right person to ask about that
particular drug of choice.
<snip>
>>Certainly. It was a very impressive display.
>
> Wasn't it, though?
Yes, but it made the whole thing an incomplete experience. I really wanted to
see you two.. umm.. together.
<snip>
>>Hmm... I may give it a whirl this evening.
>
> Whoops. I ended up watching "Law and Order SVU" and then going to bed.
I didn't stay long. Though I have heard/seen, through the mysterious
grapevine, that the exchange among Lisa, MGirlyman, myself, and others (and my
reportage of same here in alt.a) has been a continuing cause for discussion
over there. Evidently, me laughing my ass off has been interpreted as me
claiming to have "kicked butt" - a term I don't believe I've used in reference
to the whole sordid mess. Its entertainment value is fading fast. I'm not sure
that chatting is the best venue for my peculiarly twisted sense of humor.
Besides, it's hard to get a really good smackdown-of-an-idiot going in
three-line bites.
>Maybe then I'll get the "You
>>can't play with us anymore" notice from aol.
>
> Doubtful. TOS is a joke.
It doesn't matter. Adults who can't handle someone using the word "fuck" or
being challenged on their adoption beliefs/practices are probably not for moi.
I don't think chat is really intended for discussion, and I can only type "Hi
___" and "Bye ___" so many times before I sink into a coma.
>>>>This guy's gotta be, what... 5'1" in heels?
>>>
>>> What a mental picture! Maybe you should ask him how often he washes
>>his panties!
>>
>>Nononono. My kinks don't bend in that direction.
>
> I'm sure he'd be happy to tell you even if you DON'T ask!
ROR! Doubtless he would be, but I'm still not gonna go looking for that info
from the little perv. TMI - for sure.
<snip>
>>> I think what
>>>>actually bugged him was that all his little pals were getting an eyeful
>>>>of Panty-Sniffing-Mark's adoption history.
>>>
>>> Yeah, I'm sure that had to hurt.
>>
>>Upon further consideration it only bothered some, others were right in there
>>with him.
>
> Oh dear.
Well - it's kinda strange. I've run across that mentality before, of course,
but at least here one can actually *talk* about it. (Yes, we joke, flame and
bitch - but ideas come through from time to time and they *are* discussed)
>Kinda funny how that crowd of clowns makes even those alt.a-ers
>>with whom I strongly disagree look pretty fucking decent.
>
> Wow. Now that's saying something.
Indeed. I'm sure that there are many decent sorts over there, too. (beyond the
alt.a regs I've enjoyed running into) It's just that the format/prevailing
attitude doesn't promote dissent of any kind. Too much "Everyone MUST be nice
to everyone else at all times... or we'll give you lots of shit and TOS ya!!"
for moi. I find it odd and shallow, but I guess it must be serving them in
some way in which it would never serve me.
<snip>
> Probably. I wonder if Mark made the DSM.
Hmm... ya think they have a panty-sniffing-girlyman sub-section? It's gotta be
a hell of a read!
>>>And I did, btw, tell him you
>>>>said hi and that steve sent him a broomstick. Given his subsequent
>>>behavior, I'm not sure he appreciated your warmth and kindness.
>>>
>>> Gosh, I feel awful about that.
>>
>>I knew that you would.
>
> Am I THAT predictable??
Yes. (That's the truncated version.) <g>
GR