Lured From The Hills of Nepal and Sold to a Brothel in Mumbai

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Dr. Avnish Jolly

unread,
Nov 18, 2009, 10:04:01 AM11/18/09
to AIDS Beyond Borders
Lured From The Hills of Nepal and Sold to a Brothel in Mumbai

By SOP newswire2, By Deepti Priya Mehrotra
http://thesop.org/world/2009/11/18/lured-from-the-hills-of-nepal-and-sold-to-a-brothel-in-mumbai

Lured from the hills of Nepal, Nisha found herself sold to a brothel
in Mumbai at 11. Two years later, she had contracted HIV. She had been
entertaining five to ten customers a day for those two years.

At 19, the slightly-built Rakhi is the mother of a three-year-old. She
conceived her daughter when she was sold to a brothel in Mumbai. She
also contracted HIV. Nisha and Rakhi shared their stories at the South
Asia Court of Women on the Violence of Trafficking and HIV/AIDS in
Dhaka held a few years ago. And they are among the thousands of women,
who are victims of both trafficking and HIV in the South Asian region.
It is now being increasingly realised that trafficking for sexual
exploitation is tied up with increased vulnerability to HIV/AIDS.

But why haven`t South Asians nations been able to tackle the two
together? Regional experts and representatives of the United Nations
Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM) and UNAIDS believe that the
questionable quality of interventions, poor outreach and lack of
procedures like counselling are the reasons for the proliferation of
both trafficking and HIV/AIDS.

According to Vandana Mahajan, Senior Programme Officer, UNIFEM India,
"Strong linkages exist between these issues. Trafficking for sexual
exploitation is tied up with increased vulnerability to HIV/AIDS...
and the HIV/AIDS epidemic intensifies poverty, which increases
vulnerability to trafficking. Both issues have roots in poverty and
gender inequality. Clearly, we have to devise integrated strategies,
which can make an impact on trafficking as well as on HIV/AIDS."

There is growing recognition among nations that human trafficking
needs to be tackled as a specific crime. The UN Protocol on
`Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children`, 2000, which
is implemented by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
(UNODC), offers practical help to states with drafting laws, creating
comprehensive national anti-trafficking strategies, and assisting with
resources to implement them.

Even the SAARC Secretariat has created a Regional Task Force to
implement Conventions relating to trafficking of women and children,
providing a forum for discussion and planning to integrate
trafficking, women and child welfare, and HIV/AIDS in the domestic and
foreign policies of South Asian countries. The UNIFEM has formed a
South Asia Anti-Trafficking Think Tank, that comprises governmental
representatives, NGOs, UN agencies and inter-governmental
organisations, to engage in dialogue, raise key cross-border issues
and help coordinate policy and implementation in the region.

Yet despite all these measures at a recent `Regional Consultation on
HIV/AIDS and Anti Human Trafficking` in New Delhi, Dr Munir Raza
Ahmed, Social Mobilisation Adviser, UNAIDS, Bangladesh, confessed,
"The quality of our interventions is still questionable. We have sex
worker programmes covering brothels, hotels and home-based sector, but
the outreach is poor. ...We have no comprehensive database or
monitoring system on trafficking." On the positive side Ahmed
described the services the government and NGOs are trying to provide
to MARPs (Most At Risk Populations) that aim at prevention through
measures like improving the health system, integrating gender
awareness and providing youth-friendly services. But he was quick to
add, "We have not yet situated these programmes in the context of
poverty. The demand for trafficked persons comes from affluent
sections, yet we have no behaviour change programmes targeting these
sections."

Bangladesh is not the only nation at fault. The fact is that none of
the countries have even begun tackling the problem from the demand
side: They are just beginning to realise the need to target the `MMM`
- Mobile Men with Money - who are the basic category of buyers of
trafficked women and children. Tackling the MMM will in itself have to
be a transnational campaign, since the richer countries, particularly
the US and several European countries, are typically destination
countries, while the Asian and African nations are typically the areas
of origin.

Vulnerable countries like Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, Nepal and Sri
Lanka have instituted legislation that targets trafficking - which is
vital to tackle the problem - but there is a lack of enforcement.

Nepal has a Human Trafficking (Control) Act, 2007, and Women and Child
Service Centres in over 25 police stations across the country. Yet, in
2006, the police registered only 97 cases of trafficking and 36
convictions took place. According to Sangeeta Thapa, Country Programme
Coordinator, UNIFEM Nepal, though public policy in Nepal is sensitive
to gender, not much impact has been made in challenging patriarchy and
gender inequality in the country. "The vulnerability of women to
trafficking and HIV/AIDS is not clearly understood. Female sex worker
are looked at more as vectors, than as victims. Economic
disempowerment and the lack of inheritance and land rights are not
being sufficiently addressed. We have significant seasonal migration
within Nepal, but the linkages between migration, trafficking and HIV/
AIDS are not fully understood. But we do have opportunities. A new
Constitution is being evolved with non-discrimination as one of its
central values," she said.

Besides a lack of understanding, experts at the regional consultation
also expressed logistic problems. Saghir Bukhari, Programme
Specialist, UNIFEM Pakistan, felt that due to security issues it is
difficult for organisations to reach out to approximately half of
Pakistan. Here, too, a gender scan of programmes has indicated the
need to integrate gender issues, but the way to do it is not clear.
"Women", he noted, "are mostly invisible in the programming. We have a
strategic framework, but it has yet to be translated into action.
Gender-based violence and trafficking are not being addressed at all
in the context of the national HIV/AIDS programmes..."

However, Pakistan has made some headway by passing a Prevention and
Control of Human Trafficking Ordinance (PACHTO), in 2002; its Federal
Investigation Agency registered 1,826 cases under PACHTO between 2003
and 2006. But of these cases, only 254 have been decided, with 222
sentences and 32 acquittals.

Even in India - considered a destination country for cross-border
trafficking - while 12,665 persons were arrested for trafficking,
7,075 were convicted in 20005 under the Immoral Trafficking Prevention
Act (IPTA). Some 26,000 women were sheltered in Swadhar short-stay
homes - run by NGOs and as part of the Ministry of Women and Child`s
Swadhar scheme - but these are inadequate in terms of numbers as well
as quality of services provided. Only, four states have set up Anti-
Human Trafficking Units (AHTU) - Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Goa and West
Bengal.

In the absence of comprehensive tracking, it is impossible to get
definitive statistics. But these numbers are, most likely, barely the
tip of the iceberg. Unfortunately, in countries like the Maldives,
trafficking is not even recognised as a specific offence. According to
Anna Liboro-Senga, UN Coordination Specialist, Maldives, a significant
degree of internal migration exists within the country, with reports
of trafficking, but no steps have yet been initiated in public policy.
Though Afghanistan has undertaken some policy and implementation, with
287 victims identified in 2006 and 370 persons convicted for
trafficking of persons, Sri Lanka has a law on Prevention of
Trafficking in Women and Children for Prostitution (2005) but no
arrests or convictions have been made so far. In Bhutan, where the
Penal Code identifies trafficking of a person `for any purpose` as a
crime, there has so far been no arrests or convictions.

The `Global Report on Trafficking in Persons` (UNODC February 2009)
notes that, worldwide, nations are just starting to view trafficking
as a specific crime, and public policy as well as judicial systems are
struggling to match up to the need. As UNODC`s Executive Director,
Antonio Maria Costa, put it, "The crisis we face of fragmented
knowledge and disjointed response intensifies a crime that shames us
all."

(© Women`s Feature Service)
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages