I think a feature like filtering should be included on TiddlyWiki.com
if it is a feature that has been included in the core. It would best
belong with content on lists. To my mind it would naturally belong on
under the content section of the features Tiddler[1]
I think it would be better for TW users to be able to use the simple
built in core macros at first, then use a plugin if it didn't meet
their needs. But if they don't know about it they are going to ask the
group then use the excellently documented filtering plugins.
The TW community has no control over TiddlyWiki.com, and can only make
suggestions. Also a user who is learning about computer coding and
finds it difficult to understand documentation. It gets difficult when
the documentation has quotes and there is no way of understanding what
the text in the documentation means. This is not the person to write
the documentation.
The role a non-technical user *is* able to perform is a tester and
questioner, and in his own way help to improve the whole project,
making it easier for new visitors. On TW.org, some of my confusion was
caused by how the information is presented - the meaning the
characters "<+|->" in "[filter[<+|->value]]" .I read it as the
acceptable characters are "less than", "Plus", "Or", "Minus" ,
"greater than" a particular value.
My trial and errors and Erics documentation for his enhancement did
not help much. It seems to me "-" does not work in sorting that it
doesn't work and i get errors. I spent an hour of so messing with it
and could easiliy spend a couple more and still get nowhere on this
decoding of documentation through trying to see what works. That there
is a possibility that it doesn't work contributes to the decision to
use a plugin - probably fET. But there is a risk. What if fET stops
working? Udo has not written many plugins recently and there is no
reason to expect that an updated version would be available. Sunk
costs [1] in learning how to do something are something that I am
becoming aware of as I walk the non-linear TW path to enlightenment.
The radical proposal would of course be to include Erics core in the
core, and to use his documentation. It seems to me that an hour
playing with the built in filter, you would want the functions that
Eric has provided anyway, OR and AND for example.
Alex
[1]
http://tiddlywiki.com/#Features
[2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunk_cost
2009/6/29 FND <
FN...@gmx.net>:
--
http://www.multiurl.com/g/64