On Aug 19, 8:01 am, KY Hooligan <
Swiftboat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> HOWEVER, LF, have you read anything in the media about Obama, at
> Saddleback, lying in his reply about his Abortion stance in Chicago
> (and I won't count it being above his pay grade)? It was an outright
> lie.
>
>
http://tinyurl.com/56gwed
>
> Do you think the wife of a Candidate ignoring children she never grew
> up with, nor has any responsibility for, is worse than an actual
> Candidate lying?
>
> Which should have the headlines? You know had it been McCain it would
> have been major headlines and the lead story on network news. But
> your wonderful media isn't biased, right?
____
KH, I haven't read your posted url yet. I put up the article about
Cindy McCain's sister simply because I thought it interesting.
If you want to nit pick though, I'll play along.
On the one hand, family values candidate John McCain and wife Cindy
have close blood family they don't know or claim, but McCain claims as
a confidant John Lewis, a black congressman and civil rights hero,
whom he doesn't even really know.
At Saddleback he was one of McCain's named "three wisest people" he
would "rely heavily on". They've been in congress together 22 years
now, but according to Lewis, McCain's never consulted with him so far.
Kind of ironic.
http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/08/9293_john_mccain_john_lewis_wise_man.html
___
John McCain says he plans to consult with Democratic Rep. John Lewis
when he's president. That's news to Lewis.
During Saturday's presidential forum at Rick Warren's California
megachurch, John McCain was asked to name the "three wisest people" he
would "rely heavily on" if elected president. He didn't cite close
confidantes Phil Gramm and Randy Scheunemann, possibly because they
have gotten McCain into trouble politically. Instead McCain chose Gen.
David Petraeus; former eBay CEO Meg Whitman, one of his economic
advisers; and Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), a leading figure in the civil
rights movement.
This is not the first time McCain has invoked Lewis' name on the
campaign trail. Earlier this year, in Selma, Alabama, he told the
story of civil rights marchers trying to cross the Edmund Pettus
Bridge in a 1965 march from Selma to the state capital of Montgomery.
Waiting at the crest of the bridge were a brigade of police and state
troopers who meted out an attacks so violent that the day is known
today as Bloody Sunday.
Central in McCain's telling was John Lewis, a man of just 25 who was
at the front of the march and absorbed the first blow. Millions of
Americans, McCain noted, "watched brave John Lewis fall."
But even though McCain has now repeatedly cited Lewis as a role model
and potential adviser, McCain has not established a relationship with
the Georgia Democrat in the 22 years they have served in Congress
together. At the time of McCain's Selma speech, a Lewis associate told
my colleague David Corn that McCain has never been close to Lewis.
Lewis was not told about McCain's speech in Selma in advance, nor was
he invited to attend.
In response to McCain's latest invocation of his name, Rep. Lewis said
in a statement requested by Mother Jones, "I cannot stop one human
being, even a presidential candidate, from admiring the courage and
sacrifice of peaceful protesters on the Edmund Pettus Bridge or making
comments about it." But, he added, "Sen. McCain and I are colleagues
in the US Congress, not confidantes. He does not consult me. And I do
not consult him."
It took McCain years to fully embrace the goals that Lewis was
fighting for on Bloody Sunday. In 1983, McCain voted against making
Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday a national holiday, in opposition to
most members of Congress, including many of his Republican colleagues.
In 1987, the governor of Arizona repealed the state's recognition of
King; McCain supported the move. It was only in 1990, 25 years after
Lewis marched in Alabama, when Arizona reversed its decision that
McCain changed his own stance on the issue.
And there are, of course, the fundamental differences between John
McCain's political philosophy and the goals of Lewis and his fellow
marchers. Lewis hoped that the federal government would use its
influence to protect the rights of disenfranchised individuals; he
sought an expanded role for government because of what he believed was
government's power to do good. It explains, in part, why Lewis is a
Democrat today and supports Barack Obama for president. McCain, on the
other hand, is a fanatical enemy of government spending and has said,
"I've found over time that less government involvement is better."
It's a philosophy that would have left Lewis and his cohorts out in
the cold.
So why does John McCain promise to consult a man who he is not close
to and has never consulted before? I put the question to the McCain
campaign. If and when they respond, I'll update the post.