Unbelievers Take Special Interest in Christian Wikipedia Articles
maleb...@yahoo.com
enjoy "contributing" to Christian articles. These articles should be
informative and evenhanded, but they become misleading and poor after
these folks get their hands on them.
In the past week, atheist Dave Horn has edited the Louisiana Baptist
University over 20 times. Jason Gonella (Harvestdancer) (a witch) has
also edited it. Only a couple of months ago, agnostics RoyBoy and
KillerChihuahua edited the same article.
That was only one example of many. Another trend we find is atheists
and unbelievers nominating Christian articles for deletion. Atheist
Dave Horn has recently nominated Pacific International University for
deletion, but his nomination was soundly rejected. Jason Gonella
(Harvestdancer) has nominated Mike Randall, a Christian President of a
fully accredited Christian university and seminary for deletion. Other
atheists like Dave Horn have run to his side to agree with him.
What business do unbelievers have editing Christian articles on
Wikipedia? Does anyone think they can actually be unbiased in doing
so? All one has to do is examine the quality of their "contributions"
to see that they're always deleting important information that can be
considered positive and adding relatively unimportant negative and/or
false information.
The Wikipedian concept of "anyone can edit" may be a good one for
certain objective articles (if there can be such a thing), but
allowing people who are hostile to certain concepts to edit the very
articles that they address will never be a wise idea. Until this can
be remedied, many of the articles on Wikipedia will not be trustworthy
or reliable.
Sincerely,
Fraud Buster