The auctioning of India
shashwat pandey
Below is an interesting article on present UPA Govt.
This govt. is trying hard to shake our roots, HRD
minister is re-writing Indian history so that next gen
India does not have any clue about what they are and
what are their capabilities, one must get very
cautious about India’s present govt. moves which are
focused to change very social structure of India which
has over seen foreign invasion's since last 1000 yrs,
this is an attempt to dismantle India and create a
bunch of people without any feeling of belonging-ness
to our motherland.
Regards
Shashwat Pandey
http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/modules.php?name==Content&pa==showpage&pid= 4&
page=
The auctioning of India
By M.D. Nalapat
That the UPA regime passively accepted the
transmission of upto a thousand
of tons of toxic asbestos into the lungs and livers of
thousands of Indian
workers is a symbol of the reality that the
country’s interests are being
auctioned off by the Sonia-led government. The
constituents of the UPA shout their
support for the “rights of the worker” every other
day, yet they are silent
when floating death—in the form of the poisonous
hulk of a French aircraft
carrier—is steaming towards India without a murmur
of protest by even the “
proletarian” parties. In effect, what the Sonia-led
administration is decreeing
is that the UPA prefers that those who will be killed
by the asbestos are
Indian rather than French.
The welcoming of toxic waste from France is just one
of the numerous ways in
which the interests of the people of India are being
auctioned by the UPA.
Another is the way members of the Hurriyat Conference
in Kashmir, who have
been supporting terrorism in the state since it was
formed by Pakistan-friendly
groups, have been given effective authority to
negotiate with their backers
in Islamabad over ways that would delink Kashmir from
the rest of India. The
fawning manner in which the higher levels of UPA
officialdom interact with the
Hurriyat and other anti-India forces has helped
demoralise those in the
state who stand for a united India. These neglected
patriots are aware that
individuals such as Farook Kathwari and Ejaz Mansur
who seek to detach Kashmir
from India have regular contact with Sonia favourites,
and that the two sides
may be conducting an auction of Indian interests. One
of Sonia’s favourites is
Wajahat Habibullah, who lashed out at this columnist
some years ago when he
had the temerity to point out that several temples had
been destroyed in
Kashmir without any protest by supposedly democratic
politicians. “The Kashmiris
don’t need lessons in secularism from you”, was
Habibullah’s retort. True.
Who in the UPA cares if temples get destroyed? Who in
Sonia Raj cares if senior
officials commit themselves in writing to concepts
that would end Indian
control over Kashmir, that too in think-tanks known to
favour the jehad in
Kashmir.
Is it in any way surprising that Palaniappan
Chidambaram has imposed
restriction after restriction on Indian companies, so
that they will be unable to
compete with the foreign entities that are thus
helped by the UPA? Is it in any
way surprising that the policies of the UPA are
helping Chinese and other
companies to wipe out Indian competitors, and to
prevent India from challenging
China as a platform for manufactures? Manmohan Singh,
like China’s Deng
Xiaoping, is brilliant in economic policy. But he has
handed over charge of this
to the Sonia brigade. And incomprehensibly for many
who know and respect him,
the “Prime Minister” has been engaged in
destroying India’s nuclear
defenses by seeking to conclude a deal with
India-negative elements in Washington
that would cripple our defenses against a nuclear
attack. One after the other,
crucial Indian interests are being auctioned away.
Who in the UPA cares if temples get destroyed? Who in
Sonia Raj cares if
senior officials commit themselves in writing to
concepts that would end Indian
control over Kashmir, that too in think-tanks known to
favour the jehad in
Kashmir.
Surprisingly for those who take press freedom
seriously, Sonia Gandhi has
thus far received an excellent press, especially in
the western world. Because
she belongs to one of the European tribes, western
mediapersons have fawned
over Sonia Gandhi as much as their (far more
constrained) Indian counterparts.
Although it would have been a simple task for the
well-funded news bureaus
of western publications to investigate the lifestyles
of Sonia Gandhi’s
sisters and mother, and trace the mismatch between
discernible sources of income
and these, this has not even been attempted. Neither
has an examination of the
scholastic record of the three children of Stefano
Maino, nor his activities
and known income sources before Ottavio
Quattrochi—a true Santa Claus—wedged
his way into their lives in the 1980s. Nor has even
the most meagre of
efforts been made to trace the activities of Sonia
Gandhi in the vicinity of
Cambridge during the period before she won the heart
of Rajiv Gandhi. Of course,
neither has any Indian publication, though these at
least have the excuse of
not being capable of standing up to the retribution
that would surely follow
any expose.
However, the fact that Sonia Gandhi was born in Italy
should not be used as
a point against her. There are thousands of cases of
women from other
societies marrying Indians and settling down in this
country in a way respectful of
the land’s traditions and chemistry. In particular,
several individuals from
the western world have understood and internalised
the ethos of India in a
way few who were born here could achieve. These
individuals come from the UK,
the US, Germany, Italy and other countries. They have
learnt to love this
land, even though it is admittedly much less ordered
and developed than that
which they left behind. They have, through their love
for this land, its culture
and its people have become part of India. Is Sonia
Gandhi one of them, or
does she belong to the group who inherently dislikes
this country and resents
the fact that their husbands returned here rather
than remained abroad? Those
who oppose Sonia Gandhi in politics do so not because
she was born in Italy—a
country with a rich history where family loyalties
paralell that found in
India—but because of their conviction that Sonia
Gandhi has very little
understanding of India, and even less regard for its
culture.
According to Sonia, Rajiv wanted her to be in active
politics. This is
something unknown to many who were close to the shy
pilot who took over India’s
destiny on October 31, 1984. The reality is that
Italian—and not Hindi—was the
language used in communication between the family
members. The reality is
that every Sunday there was a “brunch” in the
Prime Minister’s House to which
very few Indians got invited. The reality is that
Sonia Gandhi is still ill
at ease among ordinary Indians. Indeed, so pervasive
is her conviction that
Indians are biased that she is even hesitant to openly
acknowledge that she is
Catholic, refusing to kiss the Pope’s ring in
public. And this in a country
that has willingly accepted a Sikh Prime Minister, a
Catholic UPA Chairperson
and a Muslim President. Indeed, both President Kalam
and Prime Minister Singh
embody the pluralistic ethos of India, blending
seamlessly into the land’s
syncretic traditions, proud to acknowledge publicly
their faiths.
Rajiv Gandhi gave two precious gifts to Sonia, and
these are his two
children. Priyanka has charm and chemistry, and is
clearly a winner in politics.
Rahul has a sensible head on young shoulders, and the
few comments that he has
been allowed to make have been suffused with a wisdom
in excess of his years.
It is time for Sonia Gandhi to give Manmohan Singh
his freedom by making him
AICC President as well, and hand over the UPA
Chairmanship to an alliance
partner. She should simultaneously encourage those
two treasures, Priyanka and
Rahul. This would be the best way to begin to reverse
a course that is
compromising not simply the future of India, but also
that of the Congress Party.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
harsha
their children to inherit their legacy whether they fit or not for the
job. There could be better people who can manage inherited business
than you could, but as at one time you are telling, where is the
chance? This is not limited to congress alone, probably to any
politician irrespective of party line.
Believe it or not, being politician is the most competent and toughest
job in India. One has to rise to stand such competition. If some
inherit it and is incomepetent, he will feather out eventually just
like if he is an incompetent businessman. No charisma works.