True.Origins offers intellectually honest reponses to the claims of evolutionisms's proponents

[paolojoejingy]

The TrueOrigin Archive offers intellectually honest responses to the
claims of evolutionism's proponents, including-but not limited
to-the "Talk.Origins" newsgroup and the "Talk.Origins
Archive" website. Advocates of evolutionism largely subscribe to
certain philosophical presuppositions such as naturalism and humanism.
Consequently, they tend to arbitrarily apply certain predispositions to
their perspective and (therefore) their interpretation of the available
empirical data. This fact (which they zealously deny) severely erodes
evolutionists' credibility, effectively disqualifying them from any
claim to objectivity in matters concerning origins and science. Much
of the material published by evolutionists embodies precisely such a
pseudo-scientific bias, often articulated under the pretense that it is
the product only of purely objective and unprejudiced study.
The contributions posted at this site give some expression to the
"other side"-dispelling the two most popular myths perpetuated by
most advocates of evolutionism, namely:

1. The myth that the NeoDarwinian Macroevolution belief system-as
heavily popularized by today's self-appointed "science experts,"
the popular media, academia, and certain government agencies-finds
"overwhelming" or even merely unequivocal support in the data of
empirical science
2. The myth that the alternative-biblical creation-somehow fails
to find any compelling, corroborative support in the same data

The question of origins is plainly a matter of science history-not
the domain of applied science. Contrary to the unilateral denials of
many evolutionists, one's worldview does indeed play heavily on
one's interpretation of scientific data, a phenomenon that is
magnified in matters concerning origins, where neither repeatability,
nor observation, nor measurement-the three immutable elements of the
scientific method-may be employed. Many proponents of evolutionism
nevertheless persist in claiming exclusive "scientific" status for
their popularized beliefs, while curtly dismissing (if not angrily
deriding) all doubters, and spurning the very advice of Darwin himself.

This site is one answer to such unreasonable-and
unscientific-practices...

[dfnj2006]

Thanks for taking the time to report this abuse!
Continue with Google Groups.