Winduh 8 Piles (TM) cannot do a safe fast shutdown

[7]

Winduh 8 Piles (TM) cannot do a safe fast shutdown
--------------------------------------------------

The windiot who wrote this article doesn't know
his windopws piles (TM) issues from Linux issues:

http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Linux-and-Windows-8-Fast-Startup-puts-data-at-risk-1780640.html


In the troll's urgency to blame Linux what he forgot
to mention windopws piles (TM) will be destroyed if
you say move the disk to another windopws computer
and do the same things!!!

DOH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What UTTER FCKSWIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So the moral of the story is never ever never shut
down a windopws computer using its fast shutdown fast boot option.
Particularly if there are removable disks in the loop.

Because it has been written by amateurs
in a third rate company called Microshaft,
your disk WILL get toasted if
you had to take it to another computer
to do something with it - which most
big corporations do on a daily basis.

Banks and financial institutions are at high risk.
So are accounting departments in big
corporations.

You have been warned.

The best thing to do is kick out windopws, hire more
Linux engineers, or cross train, and start installing Linux
everywhere as the banks and stock markets already do
achieving 90% cost savings:

http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240175662/Barclays-Linux-programme-not-a-snub-to-suppliers

Knoppix Linux distro is already on the case, but its
meaningless if other windopws computers can
swiftly end up destroying a moved windopws disk.

[owl]

In comp.os.linux.advocacy 7 <email_at_www_at_en...@enemygadgets.com> wrote:
> Winduh 8 Piles (TM) cannot do a safe fast shutdown
> --------------------------------------------------

Troll.
Did the queen really grant you a trademark or are you just lying again?

[7]

Snit wrote:


> Troll.


America still the murder capital of the world
---------------------------------------------

The easiest way to get gun control is to get its owners
to go register IN PERSON their personal devices EVERY YEAR for $10.

It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.

Full ownership documents must be presented.
Full proof of ID must be presented.
No more than 2 devices can be registered per day
for personal use per person.

It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.

Devices left unregistered for more than 3 months
will need to be destroyed and can't be re-registered
unless exceptional circumstances apply.

It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.

All future guns must be manufactured to
have a 5 digit counter to indicate
how many rounds it has fired.

It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.

If the gun has been used between registrations,
an explanation must be given as to what it may
have been used for when re-registering.

It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.

If no explanations are given, or if gun
has been used one or more times, then
a fingerprint of a fired bullet is taken.

It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.

[Big Steel]

[owl]

In comp.os.linux.advocacy 7 <email_at_www_at_en...@enemygadgets.com> wrote:

> Snit wrote:
>
>
>> Troll.

>
>
> to go register IN PERSON their personal devices EVERY YEAR for $10.
>

From the mouth of one of the queen's subjects.
Damn, I'd be embarrassed to live in a monarchy in this day and age.
What the hell kind of sheep are you Brits anyway? You should revolt
and take control of your country. Oh wait... you are unarmed. Nevermind
then. :)

[The Real Doctor]

On 13/01/13 13:49, 7 wrote:
> In the troll's urgency to blame Linux what he forgot
> to mention windopws piles (TM) will be destroyed if
> you say move the disk to another windopws computer
> and do the same things!!!

(a) he doesn't blame Linux

(b) he writes "The risk exists not only when Linux is installed on disk
in parallel, it also arises with any other type of access � such as that
from the Windows-7-based Windows PE 3.0 or from recovery systems that
are booted from a CD or USB flash drive."

Ian

[Disbelief]

And you think the peopel of the land of fat and brainless have 'control' of
*YOUR* country? Listening to that interview of Alex Jones by Piers Morgan
says it all.

Oh wait, your are armed - nevernind, it the nut hoding the gun that kills,
and there's millions of nuts populating the USA, must all tha fat you eat.

BTW, we do have control of our country in a far better way than Wankyland -
now fook off.

[Big Steel]

[owl]

This lady is in control of the situation:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5RM_I6BKjE

[Big Steel]

On 1/13/2013 10:19 AM, owl wrote:

<snipped>

It's not my problem Diaper Rash Owl on drugs. You are the one that's
going to choke on your own foot. I just gave the assist. :)

[7]

The Real Doctor wrote:

> On 13/01/13 13:49, 7 wrote:
>> In the troll's urgency to blame Linux what he forgot
>> to mention windopws piles (TM) will be destroyed if
>> you say move the disk to another windopws computer
>> and do the same things!!!
>
> (a) he doesn't blame Linux

Troll!!!

The title of the story is:

"Linux and Windows 8: Fast Startup puts data at risk"

Which part of that doesn't sound like he is trying
to scotch Linux for something the troll does not understand?

> (b) he writes "The risk exists not only when Linux is installed on disk

> in parallel, it also arises with any other type of access – such as that

> from the Windows-7-based Windows PE 3.0 or from recovery systems that
> are booted from a CD or USB flash drive."

Eh?

You are quoting a fsckwit that is a FCSKING IDIOT!!

That quote there is wrong as well!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Windopws 8 Piles (TM) cannot cope with the error either, if there
are removable drives and you start swapping drives around.

Why blame windopws 7?




So the title should have read:

"Winduh 8 Piles (TM) CANNOT do a safe fast shutdown and fast boot"


Then IT admins everywhere can sit up and take notes.

[BurfordTJustice]

"7" <email_at_www_at_en...@enemygadgets.com> wrote in message
news:fbzIs.1973$tV4...@fx28.fr7...

Wrong again Bucko..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

[BurfordTJustice]

"Big Steel" <"The One"@One.net> wrote in message
news:TZmdnSTjHMufXG_N...@earthlink.com...

[BurfordTJustice]

"Disbelief" <disbelief@diilly-daally....invalid.com> wrote in message
news:kcuhst$dv1$1...@news.albasani.net...

--

[BurfordTJustice]

"Big Steel" <"The One"@One.net> wrote in message

news:l-udnfCE7Ot-UG_N...@earthlink.com...

[BurfordTJustice]

"Big Steel" <"The One"@One.net> wrote in message

news:7a2dnWbfdaQITG_N...@earthlink.com...

[Big Steel]

On 1/13/2013 10:37 AM, BurfordTJustice wrote:

<snipped>

Meathead, I could care less about it.

[Big Steel]

[Big Steel]

On 1/13/2013 10:40 AM, BurfordTJustice wrote:

<snipped>

I could care less about it Meathead.

[The Real Doctor]

On 13/01/13 15:26, 7 wrote:

> The title of the story is:
>
> "Linux and Windows 8: Fast Startup puts data at risk"
>
> Which part of that doesn't sound like he is trying
> to scotch Linux for something the troll does not understand?

The bit where he says "and Windows 8"

> Windopws 8 Piles (TM) cannot cope with the error either, if there
> are removable drives and you start swapping drives around.
>
> Why blame windopws 7?

He doesn't. It's clearly presented as something to watch out for when
using W8.

> "Winduh 8 Piles (TM) CANNOT do a safe fast shutdown and fast boot"

Or alternatively "Windows 8 has a fast shutdown and reboot mode which is
safe to use if you do not change or access the hardware in the interim".

As a matter of interest, how well does Linux cope if you hibernate to
disk and then change significant parts of the system before attempting
to restart?

Ian

[BurfordTJustice]

"Big Steel" <"The One"@One.net> wrote in message

news:DJmdnZWQgv2FS2_N...@earthlink.com...

On 1/13/2013 10:40 AM, BurfordTJustice wrote:

<snipped>

I could care less about it Meathead.

--

What do you silly, ho? What?

---Pig Squeel 13 Jan. 2013

[BurfordTJustice]

"Big Steel" <"The One"@One.net> wrote in message

news:DJmdnZqQgv12SG_N...@earthlink.com...

On 1/13/2013 10:38 AM, BurfordTJustice wrote:

<snipped>

Meathead, I could care less about it.

[Big Steel]

On 1/13/2013 10:56 AM, BurfordTJustice wrote:

<snipped>

I really don't care ButtHead. What makes you think that I do? You had
best worry about that shit-hole Chicago you live in.

[Big Steel]

[BurfordTJustice]

"Big Steel" <"The One"@One.net> wrote in message

news:9_CdnZi0GpLXR2_N...@earthlink.com...

[BurfordTJustice]

"Big Steel" <"The One"@One.net> wrote in message

news:9_CdnZu0GpL7R2_N...@earthlink.com...

[Big Steel]

[Big Steel]

[Big Steel]

[Big Steel]

[7]

BurfordTJustice wrote:


> Wrong again Bucko..
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

Fake numbers!!!!

Wrong again troll, that includes many other items including civil war
and near civil war to intentionally bump up the numbers and divert attention
from regions where the gun violence is solely around gun ownership.

This is about gun control:

America is still the Murder capital of the whole world.

America = 14,748
compared to similar country United Kingdom = 722.
Even if you could multiply out 57 million to match
US population by say x 5.5, you still got, only
about 5000.

Murder rates are still x3 in USA than comparable country like UK.

USA is still the Murder Capital of the world!!!!



America still the murder capital of the world
---------------------------------------------

The easiest way to get gun control is to get its owners

to go register IN PERSON their personal devices EVERY YEAR for $10.

It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.

Full ownership documents must be presented.
Full proof of ID must be presented.
No more than 2 devices can be registered per day
for personal use per person.

It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.

Devices left unregistered for more than 3 months
will need to be destroyed and can't be re-registered
unless exceptional circumstances apply.

It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.

All future guns must be manufactured to
have a 5 digit counter to indicate
how many rounds it has fired.

It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.

If the gun has been used between registrations,
an explanation must be given as to what it may
have been used for when re-registering.

It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.

If no explanations are given, or if gun
has been used one or more times, then
a fingerprint of a fired bullet is taken.

It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.

[Bert]

In news:RzBIs.1140$e%.73@fx03.fr7 7

<email_at_www_at_en...@enemygadgets.com> wrote:

> The easiest way to get gun control is to get its owners
> to go register IN PERSON their personal devices EVERY YEAR for $10.
>

How do you get the criminals to show up?

--
be...@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN

[7]

Snit wrote:


> As a matter of interest, how well does Linux cope if you hibernate to
> disk and then change significant parts of the system before attempting
> to restart?

Why don't you try it?

Me?

I yank disks out and power cables out so long as its not flashing
if I'm in a hurry, though I would not recommend it as general advise and
though I never ever had a problem, I never had valuable data in those
disks either.

[BurfordTJustice]

"7" <email_at_www_at_en...@enemygadgets.com> wrote in message

news:RzBIs.1140$e%.73@fx03.fr7...

BurfordTJustice wrote:


> Wrong again Bucko..
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate


Fake numbers!!!!

--
Wikipedia is edited by a bunch of lefties like you.

So the numbers are real, you are wrong..deal with it.

[richard]

On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 14:06:02 +0000, 7 wrote:

> Snit wrote:
>
>
>> Troll.

>
>
> America still the murder capital of the world
> ---------------------------------------------
>

> The easiest way to get gun control is to get its owners
> to go register IN PERSON their personal devices EVERY YEAR for $10.
>

> It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.
>
> Full ownership documents must be presented.
> Full proof of ID must be presented.
> No more than 2 devices can be registered per day
> for personal use per person.
>
> It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.
>
> Devices left unregistered for more than 3 months
> will need to be destroyed and can't be re-registered
> unless exceptional circumstances apply.
>
> It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.

Actually it does. unless the "device" is registered, you're not allowed to
own it. That is what you are saying.

>
> All future guns must be manufactured to
> have a 5 digit counter to indicate
> how many rounds it has fired.
>
> It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.

Ain't gonna happen.

>
> If the gun has been used between registrations,
> an explanation must be given as to what it may
> have been used for when re-registering.
>
> It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.

Could lead to a violation of the 5th amendment's clause, "right to not
incriminate myself".

>
> If no explanations are given, or if gun
> has been used one or more times, then
> a fingerprint of a fired bullet is taken.
>
> It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.

yeah right. Explain how this one works mr. forensic expert.

[Big Steel]

On 1/13/2013 11:04 AM, BurfordTJustice wrote:

[7]

Snit wrote:

>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Troll.
>>
>>
>> America still the murder capital of the world
>> ---------------------------------------------
>>
>> The easiest way to get gun control is to get its owners
>> to go register IN PERSON their personal devices EVERY YEAR for $10.
>>
>> It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.
>>
>> Full ownership documents must be presented.
>> Full proof of ID must be presented.
>> No more than 2 devices can be registered per day
>> for personal use per person.
>>
>> It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.
>>
>> Devices left unregistered for more than 3 months
>> will need to be destroyed and can't be re-registered
>> unless exceptional circumstances apply.
>>
>> It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.
>
> Actually it does. unless the "device" is registered, you're not allowed to
> own it. That is what you are saying.

Actually it doesn't because nothing to stop you
using a legally registered device!

>> All future guns must be manufactured to
>> have a 5 digit counter to indicate
>> how many rounds it has fired.
>>
>> It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.
>
> Ain't gonna happen.
>
>>
>> If the gun has been used between registrations,
>> an explanation must be given as to what it may
>> have been used for when re-registering.
>>
>> It doesn't violate the right to bear arms.
>
> Could lead to a violation of the 5th amendment's clause, "right to not
> incriminate myself".

How does explaining legal use of a gun lead to incriminating
yourself? After all, when you wire money abroad, you have
to give a reason! Is that incriminating yourself?

[richard]

of course, all you have to do is just answer no and that satisfies the law.

[Phil Da Lick!]

On 13/01/2013 14:02, owl wrote:
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy 7 <email_at_www_at_en...@enemygadgets.com> wrote:

>> Winduh 8 Piles (TM) cannot do a safe fast shutdown
>> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Troll.
> Did the queen really grant you a trademark or are you just lying again?
>

Trademarks are not granted by the queen.

[Deepfriedice]

There is a skill to writing clear, comprehensible and unbiased posts.
I may be an amateur at it, but you don't have it at all.
If you are a troll, just leave this newsgroup - it already has enough
shitposters without you.
If you are not, I suggest you temper your fanboyism and Microsoft hate
with better writing skills, and critical reading of articles before you
react to them.

[Crabbit Bampot]

7 is an idiot and I don't understand why other Linux advocates
encourage his infantile behavior. He's also stupid as his posts to
sci.physics clearly show.

--
The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason.
-Benjamin Franklin

[The Real Doctor]

On 14/01/13 11:28, Crabbit Bampot wrote:
> 7 is an idiot and I don't understand why other Linux advocates
> encourage his infantile behavior. He's also stupid as his posts to
> sci.physics clearly show.

It is my general experience that those who display one considerable
talent generally display another one too. Physics and playing the
guitar, say, or mathematics and cooking, or welding and flower arranging.

In a similar way, people who are crackpots in one field are generally
crackpots in other fields too. For example, when did you ever hear
someone say "I believe in reflexology, but homeopathy is a load of
nonsense"?

Ian

[flatfish+++]

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:28:44 GMT, Crabbit Bampot wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:07:21 +1000, Deepfriedice wrote:
>
>> There is a skill to writing clear, comprehensible and unbiased
>> posts. I may be an amateur at it, but you don't have it at all.
>> If you are a troll, just leave this newsgroup - it already has
>> enough shitposters without you.
>> If you are not, I suggest you temper your fanboyism and Microsoft
>> hate with better writing skills, and critical reading of articles
>> before you react to them.
>
> 7 is an idiot and I don't understand why other Linux advocates
> encourage his infantile behavior. He's also stupid as his posts to
> sci.physics clearly show.

One of the very few accurate statements made by Roy Culley.

--
flatfish+++
PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/