Re: Issue 536 in zxing: Support "smtp:" URL

2 views
Skip to first unread message

zx...@googlecode.com

unread,
Sep 30, 2010, 2:58:54 AM9/30/10
to zx...@googlegroups.com
Updates:
Summary: Support "smtp:" URL
Status: Accepted
Owner: srowen
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low

Comment #7 on issue 536 by sro...@gmail.com: Support "smtp:" URL
http://code.google.com/p/zxing/issues/detail?id=536

There is no partnership beyond what you cite, and that wouldn't be relevant
to the project, no.

There is also not one standard for what goes into barcodes. Here's a
collection of de facto standard info:
http://code.google.com/p/zxing/wiki/BarcodeContents

"MATMSG" and "mailto:" are to my knowledge the standard for encoding "I
want to send an email".

But it is easy to support an "smtp:" URL. I can't find any reference for
how it's formatted. Maybe we can guess from examples. Do you have an
example of such a code, or its contents? Is it just "smtp:m...@example.org"?

zx...@googlecode.com

unread,
Sep 30, 2010, 11:02:06 AM9/30/10
to zx...@googlegroups.com

Comment #8 on issue 536 by roger0556: Support "smtp:" URL
http://code.google.com/p/zxing/issues/detail?id=536

This may help

two white papers (attached) that reference formats


you can view the plain text for email from this generator.
http://www.quickmark.com.tw/En/diy/?qmLink

Attachments:
etd-0828107-160219.pdf 1.9 MB
etd-0905108-095513.pdf 1.6 MB

zx...@googlecode.com

unread,
Sep 30, 2010, 11:52:55 AM9/30/10
to zx...@googlegroups.com
Updates:
Status: Fixed

Comment #9 on issue 536 by sro...@gmail.com: Support "smtp:" URL
http://code.google.com/p/zxing/issues/detail?id=536

OK easy enough to support. It's in SVN now.

zx...@googlecode.com

unread,
Mar 13, 2011, 5:22:02 PM3/13/11
to zx...@googlegroups.com

Comment #10 on issue 536 by wenze...@googlemail.com: Support "smtp:" URL
http://code.google.com/p/zxing/issues/detail?id=536

Hi,
I was looking for these resources of the omia org. It must have been
renamed! You can find all content data format and syntax definitions at
http://www.openmobilealliance.org/Technical/release_program/MobileCodes_v1_0.aspx

Find some interesting things in the architecture doc but definitons are in
the Mobile Codes pdf. @Roger: Thanks for posting the two files.


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages