|
|
New report proves cost-competitiveness of Material Recovery and Biological Treatment-based approaches for mixed waste treatment
EMBARGOED UNTIL 13 APRIL 2023 00:01 CEST - PLEASE CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY
FULL REPORT TO BE UPLOADED ON THE PROVIDED LINK ON 13 APRIL 2023
A new report by Zero Waste Europe (ZWE) demonstrates how Material Recovery and Biological Treatment (MRBT) systems are a cost-effective approach to treat (leftover) mixed waste.
This study modelled MRBT systems at two scales: 100 thousand tonnes (100kt), and 200 thousand tonnes (200kt). These were further modelled in two scenarios: lower cost EU Member States and higher cost EU Member States.
The study found that MRBT costs are lower than costs for incineration, with MRBT becoming even more compelling once incinerators are included in the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS):
- The costs for the MRBT facilities are in the range of €97-€123 per tonne for the 100kt system, and €76-€96 per tonne for the 200kt system (1).
- MRBT systems require relatively little capital commitment. These vary between €296-€377 per tonne/year for the 100kt facility and 242-304 for the 200kt facility. These are well under half what would be expected for an incineration facility (2).
The study also demonstrated the benefits of MRBT for extracting plastics for recycling from mixed waste:
- When comparing the costs of extracting plastics from mixed waste with those paid under extended producer responsibility schemes (EPR), the former is very competitive at the 100kt scale (226- 550 €/tonne) and becomes one of the lower-cost means of accessing plastics for recycling at 200kt scale (32-210€/tonne).
Janek Vähk, ZWE’s Climate, Energy, and Air Pollution Programme Coordinator, states: “We have a climate crisis and EU funds should be used to implement MRBT across Europe. These systems must be considered by all EU countries to comply with their circular economy commitments. This report shows that MRBT works, it’s cost-effective, and it brings us closer to our zero emissions target - it’s effectively a proof of concept, so let’s make sure we use it everywhere to address the climate emergency.”
Dominic Hogg, Director at Equanimator, adds: “The relevance of MRBT systems at a global level is potentially enormous both in terms of energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) saving associated with materials recycling but also because of its potential of zero methane landfilling. We really should be doing it everywhere”.
The key results of the report were previewed at the “Mixed Waste Sorting: The next frontier for the circular economy” conference on 21 March 2023.
ENDS
Notes to the editor:
As specified in a previous ZWE report, MRBT brings about relevant benefits in terms of minimisation of GHGs from the management of leftover mixed waste, it secures compliance with the obligation to pretreat waste before landfilling, and at the same time avoids any lock-in and keeps operational flexibility in the system, to keep working on reduction, reuse and recycling.
MRBT has the potential to manage mixed waste in a responsible manner and at an acceptable cost. It offers a flexible system to extract additional materials for recycling while eliminating methane from landfills and avoiding CO2 from incineration of fossil-based materials, such as plastics and synthetic textiles.
Press Contacts:
Collateral materials:
(1) The cost of MRBT systems
(2) The capital cost of MRBT
About Zero Waste Europe
Zero Waste Europe is the European network of communities, local leaders, experts, and change agents working towards the elimination of waste in our society. We advocate for sustainable systems and the redesign of our relationship with resources, to accelerate a just transition towards zero waste for the benefit of people and the planet. www.zerowasteeurope.eu
|
|
Zero Waste Europe gratefully acknowledges financial assistance from the European Union: Commission Directorate General (DG) Environment. The sole responsibility for the content of this press release lies with Zero Waste Europe. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the funder mentioned above. The funder cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|