Zugferd vs Factur-x - effect on ramID specifications

Utkarsh Mittal

unread,

Feb 6, 2025, 7:57:29 AMFeb 6

to ZUGFeRD

Hello,

Sinze Zugferd and Factur-x are two names for the same specifications, does it matter what is specified in the ramID section of the XML? Should it always be Factur-x or does it depend on the use case? If yes, which case warrants havin ramID as Zugferd vs Factur-x?

- urn:cen.eu:en16931:2017#conformant#urn:zugferd.de:2p0:extended

- urn:cen.eu:en16931:2017#conformant#urn:factur-x.eu:1p0:extended

Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,

Utkarsh

jochen...@gmail.com

unread,

Feb 13, 2025, 7:54:34 AMFeb 13

to ZUGFeRD

Hi,

it should indeed be always factur-x. The zugferd namespace is deprecated and was only specified for 2.0 (I believe no longer as of 2.1) for I guess political purposes.

kind regards

Jochen

Matthias Hanft

unread,

Feb 13, 2025, 1:41:56 PMFeb 13

to ZUGFeRD

jochen...@gmail.com wrote:
> it should indeed be always factur-x. The zugferd namespace is deprecated and was only specified for 2.0 (I believe no longer as of 2.1) for I guess political purposes.

The official documentation states that "xrechnung.xml" is also allowed
(perhaps under some additional circumstances like German mandatory
fields or so).

Best regards,
Matthias

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward