Zugferd vs Factur-x - effect on ramID specifications

[Utkarsh Mittal]

Hello,

Sinze Zugferd and Factur-x are two names for the same specifications, does it matter what is specified in the ramID section of the XML? Should it always be Factur-x or does it depend on the use case? If yes, which case warrants havin ramID as Zugferd vs Factur-x?

- urn:cen.eu:en16931:2017#conformant#urn:zugferd.de:2p0:extended

- urn:cen.eu:en16931:2017#conformant#urn:factur-x.eu:1p0:extended

Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,

Utkarsh

[jochen...@gmail.com]

Hi,

it should indeed be always factur-x. The zugferd namespace is deprecated and was only specified for 2.0 (I believe no longer as of 2.1) for I guess political purposes.

kind regards

Jochen

[Matthias Hanft]

jochen...@gmail.com wrote:
> it should indeed be always factur-x. The zugferd namespace is deprecated and was only specified for 2.0 (I believe no longer as of 2.1) for I guess political purposes.

The official documentation states that "xrechnung.xml" is also allowed
(perhaps under some additional circumstances like German mandatory
fields or so).

Best regards,
Matthias

[JEMS EBERHARD HORBEL]

  DIRECT SENDER IS HERE LETS DEAL.

JEMS EBERHARD HORBEL




MT103/202 DIRECT WIRE TRANSFER
PAYPAL TRANSFER
CASHAPP TRANSFER
ZELLE TRANSFER
TRANSFER WISE
WESTERN UNION TRANSFER
BITCOIN FLASHING
BANK ACCOUNT LOADING/FLASHING
IBAN TO IBAN TRANSFER
MONEYGRAM TRANSFER
SLBC PROVIDER
CREDIT CARD TOP UP
SEPA TRANSFER
WIRE TRANSFER
GLOBALPAY INC US


Thanks.



NOTE; ONLY SERIOUS / RELIABLE RECEIVERS CAN CONTACT.

DM ME ON WHATSAPP FOR A SERIOUS DEAL.

+447756961978