Greed from an eternal perspective. That is something interesting to
think about. Here is my understanding for what it is worth.
The Law of Consecration operates on the premise that all things belong
to God. The earth and everything on it are His and He asks us to be
stewards over it. This means we own nothing and can own nothing we are
only caretakers for Him. We are given this property to care for and
take care of ourselves and others. Once a person has everything they
need and want, within reason, keeping anything beyond that would be
considered greedy. Under this order working to get gain over another
or more of something than another would be considered greed.
This definition is fairly good though somewhat flawed. It brings into
play a persons intention for what they are doing.
“Greed is; when one's lust for material gain or power surpasses a
> point where their intentions, actions, and interactions are peaceful,
> honest, and responsible.”
”By this definition, the mere -- normal -- desire to succeed, excel,
> and acquire is not “greed” no matter how wealthy or accomplished one
> may be. And, of course, one can be “poor” and exhibit these very
> traits as well. “
This part of the definition, however, makes me wonder. If "most
business people are not greedy," why do they work to get more money,
more goods, more property when they have sufficient for their needs
coming in from their business? When do they allow for someone to fill
in a need they can no longer adequately supply, thereby giving others
the ability to also take care of themselves?
”Most business people are not “greedy,” but most politicians surely
> are. In the end, the pathological and morally corrupt attributes
> defined above as greed are standard behavior amongst those who seek to
> impose their will through compulsion and thus increase their power and
> authority over the lives of others.”
The "free enterprise captialist system" is a telestial system and
operates under that law.